Research Article |
Corresponding author: Natapot Warrit ( ich108@hotmail.com ) Academic editor: Jack Neff
© 2014 Watcharapong Hongjamrassilp, Natapot Warrit.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Hongjamrassilp W, Warrit N (2014) Nesting biology of an Oriental carpenter bee, Xylocopa (Biluna) nasalis Westwood, 1838, in Thailand (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Xylocopinae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 41: 75-94. https://doi.org/10.3897/JHR.41.7869
|
The biological study of wild non-Apis bees can provide useful information that may help with the pollination of food crops and native plants in areas where the keeping of honey bee colonies is restricted or affected by CCD. Here, we describe the nesting biology of the Oriental large carpenter bee, Xylocopa (Biluna) nasalis Westwood, 1838. An aggregation of more than 80+ bamboo nests of X. nasalis was discovered in Suan Pheung district, Ratch Buri province, Thailand on the 25th of May 2012. We collected 27 nests from the site to dissect, measure the external and internal nest architecture, and analyze the pollen composition of the pollen masses. X. nasalis constructs linear unbranched nests with nest entrance mostly located at the open-end of the bamboo culms. The nest length and the branch diameter of the nest entrance (excluding nesting edge) are 25.40 ± 6.95 cm and 17.94 ± 6.00 mm, and the maximum number of provisioned cells is 8. A biased sex ratio of 8♀: 1♂ is reported, with up to 7 adults inhabiting in a single nest. 29 pollen types were identified from 14 pollen masses using an acetolysis method and visualization under both light microscope and scanning electron microscope. 13 pollen types were considered as major pollen sources (contribute ≥ 1% in total pollen volume); however, only 10 can be identified to family and generic levels. The dominant pollen sources are of the families Elaeagnaceae (Elaeagnus cf. latifolia), Euphorbiaceae (Croton), Fabaceae (Senna siamea and Cassia), Fagaceae (Lithocarpus and Castanopsis), and Lythraceae (Trapa) which are mostly native to the region of Southeast Asia. The nesting architectural details should prove to be beneficial to beekeepers and researchers who are interested in trapping and studying X. nasalis, and the polylectic behavior of X. nasalis can be highly valuable for future crop pollination strategies, particularly for plants that require sonication of their poricidal anthers.
Carpenter bee, nesting biology, Thailand, bamboo, pollen
Because of the declining honey bee population worldwide resulting from the condition known as Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD;
The large carpenter bees of the genus Xylocopa Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera; Apoidea) have recently received attention due to their pollination capabilities. The use of large carpenter bees to assist with pollination of greenhouse tomatoes and honeydew melons in Australia and Israel has been reported (
Carpenter bees can be found throughout the tropical and subtropical parts of the world (
One subgenus of Oriental Xylocopa, Biluna Maa, 1938, comprises five to nine species (
We discovered a nesting aggregation of Xylocopa nasalis in a makeshift roof structure (Figure
Nesting habitat of X. nasalis; A nesting habitat of X. nasalis on a makeshift roof of a restaurant in Suan Pheung district, Ratch Buri province, Thailand. The red arrows indicate locations where the bamboo culms were arranged ca. 2.50 m above the ground (1a and 1b). At the nest entrance, the female of X. nasalis was dehydrating the nectar previously foraged (1c).
Nesting architecture of X. nasalis; Dissected nests of X. nasalis revealing the nest structure inside the bamboo culm and its residents. Measurements of the nest parameters are shown in Table
Nesting structure measurements of X. nasalis; Summary of the measurements of nesting architecture of X. nasalis (n = 27) from Suan Pheung district, Ratch Buri province, Thailand (13°33' 32.4138"N and 99°21'32.3202"E).
Nest Characters | Ranges | Max. | Min. |
---|---|---|---|
(Mean ± S.D.) | |||
Vestibulum length (cm) | 12.95 ± 67.80 | 31.00 | 5.04 |
Nest length (cm) | 25.40 ± 6.95 | 36.25 | 10.00 |
Number of cells / nest | 2.83 ± 2.55 | 8 | 0 |
Inner most cell length* (mm) | 32.75 ± 11.06 | 55.30 | 15.00 |
Individual cell length (except *) (mm) | 23.25 ± 3.88 | 41.00 | 17.00 |
Branch diameter at nest entrance (mm) | 17.94 ± 6.00 | 30.70 | 11.00 |
Nest thickness (mm; measured at the entrance) | 4.66 ± 0.79 | 6.80 | 3.30 |
Partition thickness (mm) | 0.88 ± 0.27 | 1.60 | 0.50 |
Pollen weight / cell (g) (n = 3) | 1.37 ± 0.13 | 1.52 | 1.20 |
Feces’ weight / cells (g) (n = 6) | 0.24 ± 0.23 | 0.86 | 0.01 |
Number of adult individuals | 3.24 ± 1.90 | 7 | 1 |
Number of female adults | 3.19 ± 2.04 | 7 | 1 |
Number of male adults | 0.40 ± 0.70 | 2 | 0 |
Number of pupa and post-defecating larva | 1.15 ± 2.41 | 7 | 0 |
Number of larva | 0.69 ± 1.38 | 5 | 0 |
Number of eggs | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 3 | 0 |
For pollen analysis, we employed the acetolysis method (
Before counting the pollen grains, we mixed the vial containing pollen grains submerged in silicone oil to obtain a homogenous pollen suspension. Ten drops of the pollen suspension were removed and placed on microscopic slides and each aliquot was spread to an area of ca. 30 × 30 mm. Three slides per pollen mass were used for the examination. We counted 300 pollen grains for each slide, which provide a total pollen count of 900 grains from a single pollen mass. Since there is no published exhaustive key for the pollens endemic to western Thailand, we were limited in resources to accurately identify most pollens to the specific level. We followed the pollen identification guides from various authors whose works were on the melittopalynology of the Asian Tropics, i.e.,
Since pollens are diverse in their shapes and sizes, to accurately identify which pollen type contributes the most to the bee diets, one should not depend only on the most number of grain counts alone.
We also observed some behaviors exhibited by the bees on the day before we collected the bamboo nests. These behaviors were related to their nesting habits and are briefly discussed in the next section.
Nests of Xylocopa nasalis nest are strictly unbranched. The provisioned cells are separated by partitions made from bamboo particles excavated by the founding female. All of the nest entrances are located at the end of the bamboo culms, except for a couple of nests that the bees excavated from the undersides. A summary of nest architectural details is provided in Table
A total of 29 pollen types were identified from the 14 pollen masses. We were able to identify pollen grains from 13 families, including 12 identifiable genera (Table
Pollen grains collected by X. nasalis; Some representations of pollens collected from pollen masses of X. nasalis. The “major” pollen sources: Fagaceae, Castanopsis sp. (3a); Elaeagnaceae, Elaeagnus cf. latifolia (3b); Fabaceae, Cassia sp. (3c and 3d), Senna siamea (3e and 3f); Acanthaceae, Thunbergia (3g and 3h).
Pollen type amount and volume foraged by X. nasalis; Percentage pollen grain count and percentage pollen volume frequently encountered from 14 pollen masses collected by X. nasalis from 6 nests. For each pollen mass, 900 pollens were counted (total of 12,600 pollen grains).
Family | Grains counted | Approximate geometric figure of pollen | p | e | v | Percentage of pollen grains |
Total pollen volume by taxon |
Percentage of total pollen volume |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus/Species | ||||||||
FAGACEAE | ||||||||
Lithocarpus | 3 310 | Elliptic | 17.13 | 23.02 | 4.71 | 26.43 | 155.57 | 7.65 |
Castanopsis | 1 724 | Elliptic | 15.05 | 22.01 | 3.8 | 13.77 | 65.51 | 3.22 |
FABACEAE | ||||||||
Senna siamea | 1 045 | Elliptic | 30.09 | 40.11 | 25.12 | 8.35 | 262.5 | 12.91 |
Cassia | 751 | Elliptic | 32.53 | 44.09 | 32.93 | 6 | 247.3 | 12.17 |
ELAEAGNACEAE | ||||||||
Elaeagnus cf. latifolia | 1 857 | Elliptic | 22.14 | 34.9 | 14.1 | 14.83 | 261.84 | 12.88 |
LYTHRACEAE | ||||||||
Trapa | 655 | Elliptic | 33.04 | 49.1 | 41.47 | 5.23 | 271.63 | 13.36 |
THEACEAE | ||||||||
Schima | 576 | Elliptic | 30.17 | 37.98 | 22.67 | 4.6 | 130.58 | 6.42 |
ANACARDIACEAE | 369 | Elliptic | 34.93 | 37.57 | 25.76 | 2.95 | 95.05 | 4.68 |
EUPHORBIACEAE | ||||||||
Croton | 349 | Sphere | 55.01 | NA | 87.07 | 2.8 | 303.87 | 14.95 |
JUNGLANDACEAE | ||||||||
Engelhardtia | 111 | Elliptic | 20.87 | 19.23 | 3.97 | 0.87 | 4.41 | 0.22 |
ARACEAE | 63 | Elliptic | 27.44 | 42.56 | 25.99 | 0.5 | 16.37 | 0.81 |
RHAMNACEAE | ||||||||
Ziziphus | 60 | Sphere | 27.51 | 25.02 | 4.19 | 0.48 | 2.51 | 0.12 |
ACANTHACEAE | ||||||||
Thunbergia | 48 | Sphere | 57.5 | NA | 99.5 | 0.38 | 47.76 | 2.35 |
CAPRIFOLIACEAE | ||||||||
Sambucus | 37 | Elliptic | 19.98 | 30.03 | 9.42 | 0.3 | 3.49 | 0.17 |
CYPERACEAE | 13 | Half sphere | 25.00 | NA | 4.09 | 0.1 | 0.53 | 0.03 |
UNKNOWNS | ||||||||
Triangular, tripolate | 595 | Elliptic | 27.44 | 25.08 | 8.99 | 4.75 | 53.49 | 2.63 |
Irregular shape, inaperture | 368 | Half sphere | 20.1 | NA | 2.09 | 2.94 | 7.69 | 0.38 |
Monolete | 226 | Elliptic | 24.98 | 42.57 | 23.63 | 1.8 | 53.4 | 2.63 |
Three furrows, triangular, tricofig | 185 | Elliptic | 20.03 | 22.51 | 4.71 | 1.48 | 8.71 | 0.43 |
Three furrows, tricofig | 180 | Sphere | 35.02 | NA | 22.44 | 1.44 | 40.39 | 1.99 |
Oblate, two pores fused, monolete | 78 | |||||||
Inaperture | ||||||||
Triangular, inaperture | ||||||||
Triporate | ||||||||
Triangular, tripolate | ||||||||
Fenestrated | ||||||||
Inaperture | ||||||||
Oblate, triangular, fenestrated | ||||||||
Three bladders, vesiculate | ||||||||
12 600 | 100 | 2032.6 | 100 |
For the 13 pollen types classified as major pollen sources, we were able to identify 10 pollen types to their generic level and 2 of these to species (Elaeagnus cf. latifolia Linnaeus and Senna siamea (Lam.) Irwin et Bradley). These include the family Acanthaceae (Thunbergia; 2.35%), Anacardiaceae (genus unknown; 4.68%), Elaeagnaceae (E. cf. latifolia; 12.88%), Euphorbiaceae (Croton; 14.95%), Fabaceae (Cassia; 12.17% and S. siamea; 12.91%), Fagaceae (Lithocarpus; 7.65% and Castanopsis; 3.22%), Lythraceae (Trapa; 13.36%), and Theaceae (Schima; 6.42%). Three pollen types (all are < 3% of total pollen volume) remain unidentified at any level (under “Unknowns” in Table
The dominant pollen types based on both the highest percentage pollen type amount and total percentage of pollen volumes for each of the 14 pollen masses is displayed in Table
Dominant pollens foraged by X. nasalis; Dominant pollen types from 14 pollen masses determined by the highest percentage pollen grain count and percentage of pollen volume (sequential order starting from the pollen mass number in the inner most cell (#1) proceeding to the nest entrance).
Nest Number/ Pollen Mass number | Family: Genus/Species | Percentage of pollen grains | Percentage of pollen volume |
---|---|---|---|
1/1 | FAGACEAE: Lithocarpus | 83.3 | 52.6 |
1/2 | FAGACEAE: Lithocarpus | 70.1 | 54.5 |
1/3 | FAGACEAE: Castanopsis | 55.5 | 15.7 |
FABACEAE: S. siamea | 22.1 | 41.5 | |
1/4 | ELAEAGNACEAE: E. cf. latifolia | 56.4 | 87.7 |
1/5 | ELAEAGNACEAE: E. cf. latifolia | 76.5 | 65.1 |
2/1 | ANACARDIACEAE | 33.6 | 49.9 |
3/1 | ELAEAGNACEAE: E. cf. latifolia | 31.1 | 50 |
3/2 | FAGACEAE: Lithocarpus | 63.8 | 54.9 |
4/1 | FABACEAE: S. siamea | 47.0 | 73.8 |
4/2 | ARACEAE | 11.3 | 23.5 |
4/3 | EUPHORBIACEAE: Croton | 18.2 | 63.6 |
5/1 | LYTHRACEAE: Trapa | 49.6 | 74.8 |
5/2 | FAGACEAE: Lithocarpus | 45.5 | 37.3 |
THEACEAE: Schima | 14.1 | 55.7 | |
6/1 | FAGACEAE: Lithocarpus | 45.2 | 12.2 |
EUPHORBIACEAE: Croton | 8.4 | 42.1 |
Not only does Xylocopa nasalis display polylecty as indicated by results of the pollen analyses in its foraging behavior, but each female also exhibited a broad host plant range when foraging for pollen. Table
We also observed some notable nest-entrance behaviors by the bees. Competition for nests seemed to be very high at the nest site despite the abundance of available bamboo culms. Two defending posture tactics were observed. The most common defense posture is that of a female blocking the entrance with her head (Figure
Nest defending postures of X. nasalis; Defending posture tactics performed by females X. nasalis to repel other conspecifics in the aggregated nesting site. The bee blocking the entrance via protruding her head out from the nest entrance (4a). Guarding the entrance by using the dorsal side of her metasoma to block the invaders (4b).
Pollen composition from a single nest of X. nasalis; Pollen composition from a single nest (nest #1; Table
Family: | Cell 1 | Cell 2 | Cell 3 | Cell 4 | Cell 5 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genus/Species | P | V | P | V | P | V | P | V | P | V |
FAGACEAE | ||||||||||
Castanopsis | 5.3 | 2.7 | 17.8 | 11.1 | 55.5 | 15.7 | 29.3 | 11.5 | 12.9 | 2.9 |
Lithocarpus | 83.3 | 52.6 | 70.1 | 54.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
FABACEAE | ||||||||||
Cassia | 9.8 | 42.6 | - | - | 14.2 | 34.4 | - | - | - | - |
S. siamea | - | - | - | - | 22.1 | 41.5 | - | - | - | - |
ELAEAGNACEAE | ||||||||||
E. cf. latifolia | - | - | - | - | - | - | 56.4 | 87.7 | 76.5 | 65.1 |
CAPRIFOLIACEAE | ||||||||||
Sambucus | 1.6 | 2.1 | - | - | 2.5 | 1.7 | - | - | - | - |
THEACEAE | ||||||||||
Schima | - | - | 5.3 | 19.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
ACANTHACEAE | ||||||||||
Thunbergia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5.4 | 31.2 |
TRAPACEAE | ||||||||||
Trapa | - | - | 2.1 | 14 | 2 | 6.1 | - | - | - | - |
UNKNOWNS | ||||||||||
Triangular and tripolate | - | - | 2.6 | 0.5 | 1.0 | <0.1 | - | - | - | - |
Triangular and inaperture | - | - | 2.1 | 0.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Three furrows triangular and tricofig | - | - | - | - | 1.2 | <0.1 | 7.6 | 0.5 | - | - |
Three furrows and tricofig | - | - | - | - | 2.5 | 0.5 | 6.7 | 0.3 | - | - |
Irregular and inaperture | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5.2 | 0.8 |
Xylocopa nasalis is polylectic with a diverse group of pollens collected. This is consistent with the described foraging behaviors of other carpenter bee species (
Another group of large trees that also benefit from Xylocopa nasalis visitation is Senna siamea (Fabaceae), and other related but unidentified species in the genus Cassia. Senna siamea is an indigenous evergreen tree found throughout Thailand and other neighboring countries in South and Southeast Asia; locals use its leaves mainly for consumption; it is seldom used as fodder for animals and intercropping. The flowering period of this species is documented to be during March to September or otherwise year round, if the hot and humid weather permitted (
From the analyses of the pollen volume, we found that Croton (Euphorbiaceae) contributes the highest volume (14.95%). It is important to note that though this genus was found for only 2.80% of the total pollen count (Table
One genus of an annual floating-leaved aquatic plant is also frequently visited by Xylocopa nasalis. The pollens of water chestnut of the genus Trapa (Lythraceae) contribute 13.36% of the total pollen volume in the bee diets.
Lastly, the main shrub species that X. nasalis visits for pollen is Elaeagnus cf. latifolia (Elaeagnaceae), a prominent shrub that has a native range in northern Thailand, although it can be found throughout the country due to its high adaptability to various soil conditions and habitats (
Our observations of nest-defending by resident females are consistent with the nest defending postures reported in Xylocopa sulcatipes and X. pubescens in Israel (
In summary, our observations and dissections of Xylocopa nasalis nests agree with known reports of other Xylocopa species (
We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the editor: Dr. Jack Neff, Drs Deborah Smith, and Charles Michener for helping us to improve the manuscript. This research cannot be completed without the assistances of undergraduate and graduate students of the Department of Biology, Chulalongkorn University: Pattarawit Engkananuwat, Suttimon Narongchaisarid, Thanawan Duangmanee, Narin Chomphuphung, Nantikarn Thongcharon, Wassamon Suwannarat and Chatphagorn Rangsri. Pollen identification was guided by Dr Chumpol Khunwasi, Department of Botany, Chulalongkorn University, and Ms. Nungruthai Wichaikul. Dr Ajcharaporn Piumsomboon graciously contacted the SEM facility at the Center of Nano-imaging, Mahidol University, for us to produce the pictures of the pollen grains. We are grateful to the assistance of Dr Orawan Duangphakdee and Mr. Preecha Rod-im of King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi for their hospitality and for providing an opportunity to the authors to study the carpenter bees in Ratch Buri province. This research is partially funded by the Thailand Research Fund (TRF#MRG5380139) and Grants for the Development of New Faculty Staff, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand, to NW.