<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://jhr.pensoft.net/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">6</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:DE333E49-E4EE-5693-9BEF-D446E6301C98</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:55528528-5C97-4D79-A718-8B3D153B37CC</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Journal of Hymenoptera Research</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">JHR</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1070-9428</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1314-2607</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Pensoft Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/jhr.99.202665</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">202665</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Encyrtidae</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>General ecology</subject>
          <subject>Systematics</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>China</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Integrative species delimitation and preliminary study of host specificity of encyrtid parasitoids associated with psyllids in China</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Zou</surname>
            <given-names>Boyu</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5022-8669</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Chesters</surname>
            <given-names>Douglas</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-5770</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Yu</surname>
            <given-names>Runze</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1318-260X</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Liu</surname>
            <given-names>Huanji</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3128-5684</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Li</surname>
            <given-names>Hongliang</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2187-8536</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Xiao</surname>
            <given-names>Hui</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8979-3793</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Zhu</surname>
            <given-names>Chaodong</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-3178</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
            <given-names>Yanzhou</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">zhangyz@ioz.ac.cn</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9713-5352</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">State Key Laboratory of Animal Biodiversity Conservation and Integrated Pest Management, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China</addr-line>
        <institution>State Key Laboratory of Animal Biodiversity Conservation and Integrated Pest Management, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Beijing</addr-line>
        <country>China</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/034t30j35</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">College of Biological Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China</addr-line>
        <institution>College of Biological Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Beijing</addr-line>
        <country>China</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/05qbk4x57</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830017, China</addr-line>
        <institution>College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Urumqi</addr-line>
        <country>China</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/059gw8r13</uri>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding author: Yanzhou Zhang (<email xlink:type="simple">zhangyz@ioz.ac.cn</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: Zachary Lahey</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>25</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>99</volume>
      <fpage>1045</fpage>
      <lpage>1067</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/33EAF9C2-4CC0-5FE2-B59F-483990C54743">33EAF9C2-4CC0-5FE2-B59F-483990C54743</uri>
      <uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:href="https://zoobank.org/4D2D59F9-CAF2-44AE-B41D-8DCF184FDFBC">4D2D59F9-CAF2-44AE-B41D-8DCF184FDFBC</uri>
      <uri content-type="zenodo_dep_id" xlink:href="https://zenodo.org/record/22990692">22990692</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>04</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>27</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Boyu Zou, Douglas Chesters, Runze Yu, Huanji Liu, Hongliang Li, Hui Xiao, Chaodong Zhu, Yanzhou Zhang</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:type="simple">https://zoobank.org/4D2D59F9-CAF2-44AE-B41D-8DCF184FDFBC</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>In the family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Encyrtidae">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Hymenoptera">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily" reg="Chalcidoidea">Chalcidoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), many species attack psyllids (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Hemiptera">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily" reg="Psylloidea">Psylloidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and, thus, are instrumental in controlling populations of those hosts. However, successful biological control requires accurate identification of encyrtid parasitoids and a clear picture of specificity in host-parasitoid interactions. Taxonomic classification, species delimitation and host affiliation remain challenging for researchers due to their the small size of parasitoid wasps, morphological complexity, and the prevalence of cryptic species in the family. In the present paper, we conducted a DNA barcoding study of encyrtid parasitoids of psyllids collected from many provinces throughout China over the past two decades. We analyzed host specificity within an integrative taxonomic framework that combined both morphological data and DNA barcodes. Multiple species-delimitation analyses (ABGD, ASAP, GMYC and bPTP) were used, with a range of 32 to 47 Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (<abbrev xlink:title="Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units">MOTUs</abbrev>) returned, indicating cryptic diversity among morphological forms. By integrating morphological evidence with molecular species-delimitation results, we recognized 32 species in our samples. Host specificity analysis indicated more than 80% of parasitoid species were strictly monophagous, each parasitizing no more than a single psyllid species. This study provides a preliminary clarification of the species status of Chinese encyrtids parasitoids of psyllids and establishes a DNA barcode database covering their diversity.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily" reg="Psylloidea">Psylloidea</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>
          <tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Encyrtidae">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part>
          </tp:taxon-name>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>Integrative taxonomy</kwd>
        <kwd>Host affiliation</kwd>
        <kwd>Parasitoid</kwd>
        <kwd>Biological control</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
    <notes>
      <sec sec-type="Citation" id="sec1">
        <title>Citation</title>
        <p>Zou B, Chesters D, Yu R, Liu H, Li H, Xiao H, Zhu C, Zhang Y (2026) Integrative species delimitation and preliminary study of host specificity of encyrtid parasitoids associated with psyllids in China. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 99: 1045–1067. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.3897/jhr.99.202665">https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.99.202665</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
    </notes>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Psyllids (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Hemiptera">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily" reg="Psylloidea">Psylloidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), constitute a globally distributed group of sap-sucking insects of over 4,000 described species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Burckhardt et al. 2021</xref>). They exhibit a high degree of host plant specificity and primarily associate with trees and shrubs of various families, including <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Rutaceae">Rutaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Rosaceae">Rosaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Fabaceae">Fabaceae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Hodkinson 1974</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">1980</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Burckhardt and Ouvrard 2012</xref>). Many psyllids are economically important pests and pose a continuous threat to fruit and other horticultural industries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Hodkinson 1974</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Li 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Mauck et al. 2024</xref>). The family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Encyrtidae">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> represents one of the predominant natural enemies of psyllids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Noyes and Hayat 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Noyes and Hanson 1996</xref>). According to the Universal <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily" reg="Chalcidoidea">Chalcidoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Database (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">UCD Community (2023)</xref>, <ext-link xlink:href="https://ucd.chalcid.org" ext-link-type="uri">https://ucd.chalcid.org</ext-link>), around 19 genera are found to be associated with psyllids. Encyrtid parasitoids of psyllids are predominantly specialist endoparasitoids of psyllid nymphs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Noyes and Hanson 1996</xref>). Many encyrtid parasitoids of psyllid species have been employed in biological control programs worldwide. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pilosus">pilosus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Noyes, 1988 from Australia was introduced and released in California and European countries to control <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenarytaina">Ctenarytaina</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="eucalypti">eucalypti</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Maskell, 1890 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Dahlsten et al. 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chauzat et al. 2002</xref>). <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="bliteus">bliteus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Riek, 1962 was introduced and released in California to control <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Glycaspis">Glycaspis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="brimblecombei">brimblecombei</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Moore, 1964 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Daane et al. 2005</xref>). <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Diaphorencyrtus">Diaphorencyrtus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="aligarhensis">aligarhensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Shafee, Alam &amp; Agarwal, 1975 was introduced and released in California to control <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Diaphorina">Diaphorina</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="citri">citri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Kuwayama, 1908 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bistline-East et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Milosavljević et al. 2022</xref>).</p>
      <p>Accurate species identification is a prerequisite for biocontrol research and application (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Gordh and Beardsley 1999</xref>). Due to the small body size of encyrtid parasitoids associated with psyllids (usually 0.5–2.0 mm), high-quality slide- and card-mounted specimens, high resolution images, informative keys and thorough taxonomic descriptions are essential for species identification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Noyes 1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Wang et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">McClelland et al. 2023</xref>). Challenge in species discrimination is compounded by the prevalence of cryptic species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Smith et al. 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chesters et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Qin et al. 2018</xref>). Over the past two decades, DNA barcoding has become a powerful, objective and widely used method for species delimitation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Hebert et al. 2003</xref>). In hymenopteran parasitoids, DNA barcoding has been frequently applied to identify species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Smith et al. 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Stahlhut et al. 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">Zhou et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Fernandez-Triana et al. 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Xu et al. 2023</xref>) and, in the family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Encyrtidae">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, DNA barcoding has been similarly applied in many genera associated with scale insect hosts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chesters et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Qin et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Rudoy et al. 2022</xref>). However, molecular taxonomic studies of encyrtid parasitoids of psyllids is rare except that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fromont et al. (2017)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Hall et al. (2017)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">McClelland et al. (2023)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">McClelland et al. (2025)</xref>.</p>
      <p>Host specificity is key to the habits and distribution of parasitoids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Poulin and Keeney 2008</xref>) because it reflects the range of host species that a parasitoid can successfully exploit. The distributions of highly specialized parasitoids may therefore be more closely constrained by the availability of suitable hosts, whereas parasitoids with broader host ranges may occur across a wider range of host communities and habitats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Godfray 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Hawkins 1994</xref>). Host specificity has attracted considerable interest from ecologists and evolutionary biologists (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Godfray 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Dyer et al. 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Guilhaumon et al. 2012</xref>). Many studies have determined that a single, generalist morpho-species might actually comprise multiple host specific species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Heraty et al. 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Smith et al. 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Li et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Nicholls et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Hrček and Godfray 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Qin et al. 2018</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Noyes and Hanson (1996)</xref> indicated that some species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Ashmead appear to be host specific. Field observations suggest that other species exhibit narrow host ranges, such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Diaphorencyrtus">D.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="aligarhensis">aligarhensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Qureshi et al. 2009</xref>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trechnites">Trechnites</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="insidiosus">insidiosus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Tougeron et al. 2021</xref>). A DNA-based food-web analysis of eight <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eucalyptus">Eucalyptus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>-feeding psyllid species revealed high host specificity among parasitoid lineages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Hall et al. 2017</xref>). To date, specific host specificity of encyrtid parasitoids associated with psyllids remains poorly understood.</p>
      <p>In the present study, we present a preliminary DNA barcoding analysis of encyrtid parasitoids of psyllids collected across China and subsequently analyze patterns of host specificity using an integrative taxonomic approach that combines detailed morphological examination with molecular data. This study aims to: (1) delineate species of Chinese encyrtid parasitoids associated with psyllids using an integrative taxonomic approach (morphology, molecules and host records); (2) establish a reliable and publicly accessible DNA barcode reference library for this group in China; and (3) provide a preliminary assessment of host specificity patterns via a host–parasitoid interaction network.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec3">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Specimen sampling" id="sec4">
        <title>Specimen sampling</title>
        <p>We examined more than 2,000 parasitoid wasps associated with psyllids sourced from both historical museum collections and extensive fieldwork that covered 22 provincial-level administrative divisions of China. To rear parasitoids, plant materials (twigs, leaves, and bark) infested with late-stage nymphs of psyllids were collected and maintained in glass vials or fine-mesh nylon bags. These rearing efforts yielded approximately 1,000 encyrtid wasps from 400 psyllid-rearing batches. Of all specimens examined, 263 representative individuals were selected for sequencing (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>). When multiple psyllid species infested the same host plant, each species was isolated and reared separately for at least two months to ensure complete parasitoid emergence. The identified host psyllids included gall-forming and non-galling, foliage-dwelling taxa representing four families–<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Aphalaridae">Aphalaridae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Carsidaridae">Carsidaridae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Psyllidae">Psyllidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, and <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Triozidae">Triozidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>; detailed host identities and feeding habits are provided in Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>. Upon emergence, parasitoids were preserved in 95% ethanol for molecular analysis.</p>
        <p>For morphological identification of species, we used the following keys: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Trjapitzin (1989)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Noyes and Hanson (1996)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Hayat (2006)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Zhang and Huang (2004)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">Zou et al. (2023)</xref>. All specimens used for molecular analyses and listed in Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref> are deposited in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing" id="sec5">
        <title>DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing</title>
        <p>Approximately 67% of the encyrtid parasitoids examined were used in DNA barcoding study. Total genomic DNA was extracted from each individual using the DNeasy Blood &amp; Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The COI gene was amplified and sequenced using the universal DNA barcoding primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Folmer et al. 1994</xref>). For specimens that proved difficult to amplify, the primer pair FWPTF (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Li et al. 2010</xref>) and LepR1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Hebert et al. 2004</xref>) was used. Sequences of the 28S-D2 region (D2 expansion segment of 28S rDNA) were generated using the primer pairs D2-3549 and D2-4068 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Campbell et al. 1993</xref>), or D2-3566 and D2-4057 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Gillespie et al. 2005</xref>). Reactions (30 μl) consisted of 3.3 μl of template DNA (not quantified), 9 μl of reaction buffer, 4 μl of dNTP mixture (2.5 mM each), 0.5 μM of each primer and 1.25 units of ExTaq polymerase. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Deng et al. (2012)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Zhang et al. (2011)</xref>, amplification comprised an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 52 °C for 50 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. All of the sequences were queried in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (<abbrev xlink:title="National Center for Biotechnology Information">NCBI</abbrev>) nucleotide database (<ext-link xlink:href="http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi" ext-link-type="uri">http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi</ext-link>) with default parameters.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Barcoding analysis" id="sec6">
        <title>Barcoding analysis</title>
        <p>DNA sequences were checked and assembled with BioEdit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Hall 1999</xref>). In MEGA X (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Kumar et al. 2018</xref>), consensus sequences were translated with the mitochondrial invertebrate genetic code to check for stop codons, and genetic interspecific and intraspecific distances were calculated with the Kimura two-parameter (<abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev>) model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Kimura 1980</xref>). Both distance-based (ASAP and ABGD) and tree-based (GMYC and bPTP) methods were used to evaluate barcoding success rates in the COI data set.</p>
        <sec sec-type="Distance based methods" id="sec7">
          <title>Distance based methods</title>
          <p>The ABGD analysis was performed online (<ext-link xlink:href="https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/abgd/" ext-link-type="uri">https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/abgd/</ext-link>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Puillandre et al. 2012</xref>) under Jukes-Cantor (JC69; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Jukes and Cantor 1969</xref>), Kimura 2-parameter (<abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev>), and uncorrected distance p-distance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Nei and Kumar 2000</xref>), with relative gap width (X = 1.0). The range of prior intraspecific divergence from 0.001 to 0.1 was recorded with 20 steps. ASAP was implemented using the same three models (Simple, <abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev>, JC69). Threshold genetic distances were dynamically selected, and the optimal partition was determined by minimizing the ASAP score, which balances over-splitting and under-splitting errors. The number of proposed species groups was evaluated across varying thresholds. The aligned sequences were submitted online (<ext-link xlink:href="https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap/" ext-link-type="uri">https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap/</ext-link>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Puillandre et al. 2021</xref>).</p>
        </sec>
        <sec sec-type="Tree based methods" id="sec8">
          <title>Tree based methods</title>
          <p>For creation of the Bayesian time-calibrated tree, a partitioned relaxed molecular clock model was implemented in BEAST2. Substitution models for each partition were selected using jModelTest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Posada 2008</xref>) (COI: GTR+I+G). A Yule speciation prior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">Yule 1925</xref>) and an uncorrelated lognormal clock model were applied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Drummond et al. 2006</xref>). Two independent MCMC chains were run for 50 million generations, sampling every 5,000 steps. Convergence and effective sample sizes (<abbrev xlink:title="effective sample sizes">ESS</abbrev> &gt; 200) were verified in Tracer v1.7.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Rambaut et al. 2018</xref>). Maximum clade credibility trees were summarized in TreeAnnotator v2.6.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Helfrich et al. 2018</xref>) after discarding the first 10% as burn-in. NJ trees based on <abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev> distance model were built in MEGA X using 500 bootstrap replicates.</p>
          <p>GMYC analyses were performed in the R package splits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Ezard et al. 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Fujisawa and Barraclough 2013</xref>). Single- and multiple-threshold models were fitted to the ultrametric chronograms generated in BEAST (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Pons et al. 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Monaghan et al. 2009</xref>). Likelihood ratio tests (<abbrev xlink:title="Likelihood ratio tests">LRTs</abbrev>) compared the fit of coalescent vs. speciation models. Threshold transitions and 95% confidence intervals were estimated via parametric bootstrapping (1,000 replicates).</p>
          <p>For the bPTP analysis we first constructed a Bayesian tree in PhyloSuite v1.1.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">Zhang et al. 2020</xref>), then imported it into the online URL of bPTP (<ext-link xlink:href="https://species.h-its.org/ptp/" ext-link-type="uri">https://species.h-its.org/ptp/</ext-link>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Zhang et al. 2013</xref>) and set the number of MCMC iterations to 5,000,000. The first 25% was discarded as burn-in and the other parameters were default for the analysis.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Host specificity analysis" id="sec9">
        <title>Host specificity analysis</title>
        <p>To accurately assess host utilization by parasitoids, the food web was reconstructed using species delimitation results combining the morphological and DNA barcoding analyses. Network-level metrics, including connectance and the specialization index H2' (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Blüthgen et al. 2006</xref>), were calculated using the bipartite package (v2.18) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Dormann et al. 2009</xref>) in R (v4.4.2). Species-level specialization indices were also calculated: d’ (degree of host monopolization; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Blüthgen et al. 2006</xref>) and Paired Difference Index (<abbrev xlink:title="Paired Difference Index">PDI</abbrev>; reliance on primary host; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Poisot et al. 2010</xref>), and Species Specificity Index (<abbrev xlink:title="Species Specificity Index">SSI</abbrev>; evenness of interaction frequencies across hosts; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Julliard et al. 2006</xref>). All analyses were performed using the bipartite (v2.18) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Dormann et al. 2009</xref>) and ESM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Poisot et al. 2012</xref>) packages in R (v4.4.2).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec10">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Sample collection and morphological diversity" id="sec11">
        <title>Sample collection and morphological diversity</title>
        <p>Morphological examination placed these specimens within 4 genera: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Diaphorencyrtus">Diaphorencyrtus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Hayat, 1981, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Ashmead, 1900 (the most abundant genus, more than 85% of specimens), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trechnites">Trechnites</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Thomson 1876</xref>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Prionomitus">Prionomitus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Mayr, 1876. Preliminary sorting resulted in the recognition of 29 distinct morphospecies, of which <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> contributed 24 species, while the remaining four were distributed among <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Prionomitus">Prionomitus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (2 species), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trechnites">Trechnites</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (2 species), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Diaphorencyrtus">Diaphorencyrtus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (1 species).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Sequence variation" id="sec12">
        <title>Sequence variation</title>
        <p>A total of 212 COI sequences representing 28 morphospecies in 3 genera were used for barcode analysis, with 209 newly generated from collected individual psyllids and three downloaded from <abbrev xlink:title="National Center for Biotechnology Information">NCBI</abbrev> (GenBank: <ext-link xlink:href="MZ438311" ext-link-type="gen">MZ438311</ext-link>, <ext-link xlink:href="MZ436006" ext-link-type="gen">MZ436006</ext-link> and <ext-link xlink:href="OP787025" ext-link-type="gen">OP787025</ext-link>). We were not able to obtain COI sequences from <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="calligonicola">calligonicola</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> or <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Diaphorencyrtus">Diaphorencyrtus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="aligarhensis">aligarhensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. The length of all sequenced fragments was 540 bp after edge trimming, with 288 conserved sites, 246 variable sites, and 250 parsimony-informative sites. No insertions, deletions, or stop codons were noted in the sequences. All COI sequences had a bias toward low GC content (A = 26.3%, T = 45.6%, C = 13.5%, and G = 14.7%).</p>
        <p>The mean intraspecific divergence was 0.012 (ranging from 0.00 to 0.0879), the mean interspecific divergence was 0.1492 (ranging from 0.0537 to 0.2276). The interspecies divergence within genera varied from 4.88% to 13.58%: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trechnites">Trechnites</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (mean = 7.55%), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Prionomitus">Prionomitus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (mean = 4.88%) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (mean = 13.58%) (detailed values of each genus are provided in Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S2">2</xref>). For intraspecific differentiation, 1) the lowest divergence occurred between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Prionomitus">Prionomitus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tiliaris">tiliaris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trechnites">Trechnites</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp 1, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="femoralis">femoralis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp 2, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp 4 (0.00) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="obliquus">obliquus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (0.0004); 2) the highest diversity was observed in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="caillardiae">caillardiae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (0.0879), followed by <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="arenarius">arenarius</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (0.0471), suggesting higher population-level variability; 3) most groups (e.g., <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="nartshukae">nartshukae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="colposceniae">colposceniae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) exhibited moderate divergence (0.0012–0.0318). For interspecific differentiation, 1) the lowest divergence occurred between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp 2 and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp 3 (0.0537), indicating potential close relatedness; 2) the highest divergence was observed between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp 2 and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trechnites">Trechnites</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp 1 (0.2276), supporting their distinct species status (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref> and Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S2">2</xref>). The length of the 255 nuclear 28S sequences ranged from 519 bp in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="stenopsyllae">stenopsyllae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> to 481 bp in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Prionomitus">Prionomitus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tiliaris">tiliaris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. The mean inter- and intraspecific divergences were 4.44% and 0.406%, respectively.</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jhr.99.202665.figure1</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="zenodo_dep_id">22990895</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">6023D661-6D53-5523-B46F-65BF73768D96</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Maximum intraspecific Kimura two-parameter (<abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev>) distances among 212 COI sequences representing 28 morphospecies of encyrtid parasitoids associated with psyllids in China. Red points indicate divergence &gt; 4%, blue points indicate divergence ≤ 4%, and the dashed line marks the 4% reference threshold.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="journal_of_hymenoptera_research-99-1045_article-202665__-g001.jpg" id="oo_1789482.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1789482</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Molecular species delimitation" id="sec13">
        <title>Molecular species delimitation</title>
        <p>In the ABGD analysis, <abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev> and JC69 models yielded identical results: initial partitioning suggested 32 groups at P = 0.02976, while recursive partitioning increased group numbers to 33–45 at intermediate P values, stabilizing at 71 groups for P ≤ 0.002069. The simple distance model produced fewer groups initially (32–40) but stabilized at 17 groups under recursive partitioning for P ≤ 0.00336. At a priori genetic distance thresholds of 0.02967 and 0.04833, ABGD strongly supported the presence of 32 genetically distinct partitions in the COI data set (see Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: table S4-1). The number of partitions produced by ABGD was in accord with morphological identifications. ABGD strongly supported the presence of 32 genetically distinct partitions in the COI data set. Among these morphological species, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="colposceniae">colposceniae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="chinensis">chinensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="caillardiae">caillardiae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="arenarius">arenarius</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were each distinguished into two groups (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). The ASAP analysis produced 30 <abbrev xlink:title="Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units">MOTUs</abbrev> under JC69, the simple models (ASAP scores 6.00, 6.50) and <abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev> model (ASAP score 7.00) (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S4">4</xref>: table S4-2). In contrast to the ABGD analysis, the ASAP analysis with the <abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev> model revealed more <abbrev xlink:title="Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units">MOTUs</abbrev> within three morphospecies, splitting <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="colposceniae">colposceniae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> into three and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="longiventris">longiventris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> into two. Additionally, the JC69 and simple models grouped <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="desertus">desertus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="caillardiae">caillardiae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (from Changji, Xinjiang) as a single MOTU (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jhr.99.202665.figure2</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="zenodo_dep_id">22990897</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">5519FD59-FF08-5165-B5D8-03D4FADCE5D5</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Neighbor Joining (NJ) tree of 216 COI sequences, including morphological analysis and results of four different species delimitation methods (Color bars indicate the results of ABGD, ASAP, GMYC, bPTP).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="journal_of_hymenoptera_research-99-1045_article-202665__-g002.jpg" id="oo_1789483.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1789483</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>A total of 113 COI haplotypes and 81 nuclear 28S haplotypes were used to construct the NJ trees. Based on tree topology and branch support, the COI haplotypes were resolved into 32 distinct clades corresponding to the 32 consensus <abbrev xlink:title="Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units">MOTUs</abbrev>, whereas the 28S haplotypes were resolved into 34 clades (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S5">5</xref>, 6).</p>
        <p>The GMYC single-threshold analysis identified 38 species (95% CI: 32–43) and 39 entities (95% CI: 33–44). The likelihood ratio test was highly significant (LR = 77.67, P &lt; 0.001), rejecting the null coalescent model. Threshold time was -0.0092 relative to tree root. Consistent with distance-based methods, GMYC supported delimitation of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="chinensis">chinensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="arenarius">arenarius</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="colposceniae">colposceniae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="caillardiae">caillardiae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> as distinct <abbrev xlink:title="Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units">MOTUs</abbrev>, while further splitting <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="desertus">desertus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="densiciliatus">densiciliatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="stenopsyllae">stenopsyllae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). The bPTP analysis showed an acceptance rate of 34.7%, with 249,749 merge events and 250,251 split events. The estimated number of species ranged broadly between 42 and 68, with a mean of 53.6.</p>
        <p>Maximum Likelihood analyses of our dataset distinguished 49 <abbrev xlink:title="Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units">MOTUs</abbrev>; and Bayesian analyses distinguished 47 MOTU (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). Although the tree-based bPTP method yielded a significantly higher count of <abbrev xlink:title="Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units">MOTUs</abbrev> (47–49), likely due to over-splitting of intraspecific population structure, the distance-based ABGD and tree-based GMYC analyses showed strong congruence in revealing cryptic diversity. Both methods consistently supported the splitting of four morphospecies (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="colposceniae">colposceniae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="chinensis">chinensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="caillardiae">caillardiae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="arenarius">arenarius</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) into distinct lineages. Consequently, adopting a conservative consensus approach across multiple delimitation methods, we recognized a total of 32 <abbrev xlink:title="Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units">MOTUs</abbrev> from the 29 initial morphospecies in this study (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Host specificity of encyrtid parasitoids of psyllids in China" id="sec14">
        <title>Host specificity of encyrtid parasitoids of psyllids in China</title>
        <p>To assess host use pattern, a tanglegram showing host–parasitoid interactions was established for those species with host records (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). The network comprised 21 host species and 23 parasitoid species. Nine of the 32 <abbrev xlink:title="Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units">MOTUs</abbrev> were excluded from the network because host records were unavailable. The resulting bipartite network was sparse but highly structured, with 19 parasitoid species utilizing only a single host species; two parasitoid species utilizing two host species, and two parasitoid species utilizing three host species. At the network level, connectance was low (0.06) and the specialization index was exceptionally high (H2’ = 0.9205), indicating strong overall specialization. Species-level metrics reinforced this finding: over half of the parasitoid species showed extreme host specificity (d’ = 1.0). The few apparent generalists—<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="stenopsyllae">stenopsyllae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="guangxiensis">guangxiensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>—each attacked three host species and had relatively low <abbrev xlink:title="Species Specificity Index">SSI</abbrev> values (&lt;0.6). However, their high <abbrev xlink:title="Paired Difference Index">PDI</abbrev> values (&gt;0.9) revealed that even these species strongly preferred a single primary host. Additionally, we found seven psyllid species were parasitized by two or three parasitoid species.</p>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jhr.99.202665.figure3</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="zenodo_dep_id">22990901</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">FB5F97AA-0CD2-53E1-8168-6D382EBE5EE7</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Encyrtid-Psyllid interaction networks based on MOTU.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="journal_of_hymenoptera_research-99-1045_article-202665__-g003.jpg" id="oo_1789484.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1789484</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Measuring host specificity using molecular species-level indices in parasitoid–host network.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Parasitoids</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>d’</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <abbrev xlink:title="Species Specificity Index">SSI</abbrev>
                  </bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <abbrev xlink:title="Paired Difference Index">PDI</abbrev>
                  </bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trechnites">Trechnites</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp 1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Trechnites">Trechnites</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="flavipes">flavipes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tokgaevi">tokgaevi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.8847472</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Prionomitus">Prionomitus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tiliaris">tiliaris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tangae">tangae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="stenopsyllae">stenopsyllae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.693163</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.5608773</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.93</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="populi">populi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="ogazae">ogazae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.5925446</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.814862</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.9875</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="obliquus">obliquus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="longiventris">longiventris</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.7102146</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="linzhiensis">linzhiensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="guangxiensis">guangxiensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.6931138</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.5477226</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.9</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="femoralis">femoralis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.746215</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="desertus">desertus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.7660403</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="chinensis">chinensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.7091957</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.96875</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="colposceniae">colposceniae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.6609728</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="caillardiae">caillardiae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="belanensis">belanensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="arenarius">arenarius</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="arenarius">arenarius</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> nr1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="caillardiae">caillardiae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> nr1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.5316736</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="colposceniae">colposceniae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> nr1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.5103994</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="chinensis">chinensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> nr1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec15">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <sec sec-type="Efficacy of DNA barcoding for species identification" id="sec16">
        <title>Efficacy of DNA barcoding for species identification</title>
        <p>DNA barcoding analyses demonstrated that COI sequences effectively discriminate all encyrtid morphospecies. The presence of a clear barcoding gap and high bootstrap support for species-level clades in phylogenetic trees (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S5">5</xref>) indicate that COI possesses sufficient variation to distinguish most species in this group. These findings are consistent with successful COI barcoding applications in other encyrtid parasitoid wasps (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Zhang et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chesters et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Wang et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Qin et al. 2018</xref>) and parasitoid wasp families more broadly (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Smith et al. 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Xu et al. 2023</xref>). Notably, even between closely related species (e.g., <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp 2 and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sp 3), COI exhibited an average interspecific genetic distance of 5.37%, comparable to values reported for the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Encyrtus">Encyrtus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="sasakii">sasakii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> complex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chesters et al. 2012</xref>).</p>
        <p>In the present study, the minimum interspecific threshold observed for COI (approximately 5.37%) may be attributable to its slower evolutionary rate compared to other mitochondrial markers. This interpretation is supported by recent mitogenomic analyses of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Encyrtidae">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, which revealed that COI exhibits the lowest substitution rate among all 13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Zhang et al. 2024</xref>). Using mitochondrial Cytochrome b (Cytb), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Hall et al. (2017)</xref> found the three <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> morphospecies reared from eight <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Eucalyptus">Eucalyptus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>-feeding psyllid species might contain nine putative cryptic species, suggesting that Cytb, with its relatively higher interspecific genetic distance threshold (approximately 8.4%), may resolve additional cryptic species. The available evidence suggests that COI may evolve relatively slowly in encyrtid parasitoids associated with psyllids, although comparisons with a broader range of mitochondrial genes are needed to confirm this inference.</p>
        <p>Although the 28S-D2 region is known to be more evolutionarily conserved than COI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Heraty et al. 2004</xref>), it remains a valuable complementary tool for species confirmation in <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Encyrtidae">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Zhang et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Wang et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Qin et al. 2018</xref>). Our results support the utility of this marker for distinguishing encyrtid parasitoid species associated with psyllids, as it exhibited a clear barcode gap in interspecific genetic distances (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S3">3</xref>: table S3-1, S3-2). Notably, 28S-D2 distinguished between closely related species (e.g., <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="chinensis">chinensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="obliquus">obliquus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) based on fixed diagnostic nucleotide substitutions, demonstrating that even a conserved nuclear marker can provide reliable species-level resolution when diagnostic sites are present. The presence of such diagnostic characters enhances the reliability of molecular identification and provides a stable reference for future taxonomic and biological control studies.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Cryptic species diversity" id="sec17">
        <title>Cryptic species diversity</title>
        <p>The advent of molecular taxonomy has greatly facilitated the discovery of cryptic diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bickford et al. 2007</xref>). Numerous studies have demonstrated that cryptic species are prevalent in parasitoid wasps (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Heraty et al. 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Smith et al. 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Nicholls et al. 2010</xref>), with some morphospecies in <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Encyrtidae">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> comprising multiple <abbrev xlink:title="Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units">MOTUs</abbrev> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Wang et al. 2016</xref>). However, the extent of cryptic diversity and the contribution of molecular approaches vary among taxonomic groups. Evidence from large-scale taxonomic surveys increasingly supports high concordance between morphology-based and molecular-based species delimitation in lineages with unambiguous diagnostic characters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Jablonski and Finarelli 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Pentinsaari et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Toro-Delgado et al. 2022</xref>). In such morphologically challenging groups associated with psyllids, we found some characters, such as the shape of the oblique portion of clava and the coloration of coxae, provide complementary evidence to molecular data, helping to resolve species boundaries and improve taxonomic resolution.</p>
        <p>Among Chinese encyrtid parasitoids associated with psyllids, we observed a high degree of concordance between morphological and molecular boundaries, with cryptic lineages detected in only several morphospecies (e.g. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="chinensis">chinensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="arenarius">arenarius</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). The congruence between molecular delimitations and morphological classifications demonstrates that morphological characters provide reliable and practical means for species identification in this group, reducing the likelihood that morphologically cryptic lineages have been overlooked.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Host specificity of encyrtid parasitoids associated with psyllids" id="sec18">
        <title>Host specificity of encyrtid parasitoids associated with psyllids</title>
        <p>The degree of host specificity of encyrtid parasitoids of psyllids is not known with any certainty, but it appears that host specificity is presumed to be high (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Noyes and Hanson 1996</xref>); however, this critical biological trait has been rigorously tested in only a few cases. By integrating molecular delimitation with extensive geographic sampling and network analysis, we provide a framework for host specificity of these parasitoids. Our result revealed that 19 species with known host records are restricted to a single host species, and two species are associated with three host species. Our findings indicated a high level host specificity exists in encyrtid parasitoids associated with psyllids. Even a few species expand beyond a single host species, but in these cases the hosts are usually closely related species. This result is consistent with other studies of encyrtid parasitoids associated with scale insects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Zhang et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chesters et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Wang et al. 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Qin et al. 2018</xref>). As endoparasitoids, they must overcome specific host defenses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Salt 1968</xref>), whereby many physical and chemical factors may become increasingly refined in the interactions with the hosts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Vinson 1976</xref>).</p>
        <p>The introduction of molecular data has refined the understanding of parasitoid host specialization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Smith et al. 2006</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Kaartinen et al. 2010</xref>). Patterns of host use in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> often reveal high specificity, even within species that exploit multiple host species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fromont et al. 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Hall et al. 2017</xref>). Our findings for these parasitoids align with this trend: while monophagy is the predominant pattern (H2'=0.9205), several species, such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="stenopsyllae">stenopsyllae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">P.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="guangxiensis">guangxiensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, were found to utilize multiple hosts. However, the high Paired Difference Index (<abbrev xlink:title="Paired Difference Index">PDI</abbrev> ≥ 0.9) for these species indicates a strong reliance on a single primary host. This outcome is consistent with patterns observed in encyrtid parasitoids of scale insects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Zhang et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Qin et al. 2018</xref>).</p>
        <p>Collectively, these insights suggest that host-parasitoid associations may be tighter than morphological assessments imply. This has significant implications for biological control: while high specialization minimizes non-target risks, it necessitates precise host-parasitoid matching to avoid control failure in dynamic environments.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conclusion" id="sec19">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>By combining morphological examination with COI and 28S rDNA sequence analysis, we successfully delimited 32 <abbrev xlink:title="Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units">MOTUs</abbrev> from 29 initial morphospecies, uncovering cryptic diversity within four species. Barcodes combined with morphology-based taxonomy can accelerate the identiﬁcation of morphologically cryptic species within species complexes. The host-parasitoid network analysis revealed an exceptional degree of specialization (H2'=0.9205), with over 80% of the species exhibiting monophagy. This high host specificity level likely reflects evolutionary constraints imposed by the narrow host ranges of psyllids themselves. However, our current sampling is insufficient to robustly assess how different molecular species-delimitation methods affect the results. We will continue sampling in future studies to investigate this question more thoroughly. Together, the DNA barcode reference library and assessment of parasitoid host specialization provide a foundation for the accurate identification and selection of effective, host-specific natural enemies, thereby improving the efficacy and reducing the non-target risks of future psyllid biocontrol programs in China.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We would like to thank Dr. Hong-Ying Hu (Xinjiang University), for providing valuable specimens and information, and to Mr. Shu-Li Zhang in field collection. We thank Dr. Alana McClelland (The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia) and another anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Ashmead WH (1900) On the Genera of Chalcid-Flies Belonging to the Subfamily <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Encyrtinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Proceedings of the United States National Museum.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PK, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram KK, Das I (2007) Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22(3): 148–155. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.004" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.004</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Burckhardt D, Ouvrard D (2012) A revised classification of the jumping plant-lice (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Psylloidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Zootaxa 3509(1): 1–34. <ext-link xlink:href="10.11646/zootaxa.3509.1.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3509.1.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Burckhardt D, Ouvrard D, Percy DM (2021) An updated classification of the jumping plant-lice (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Psylloidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) integrating molecular and morphological evidence. European Journal of Taxonomy 736: 137–182. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5852/ejt.2021.736.1257" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.736.1257</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Bistline-East A, Pandey R, Keçeci M, Hoddle MS (2015) Host range testing of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Diaphorencyrtus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">aligarhensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) for use in classical biological control of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Diaphorina</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">citri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Liviidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in California. Journal of Economic Entomology 108: 940–950. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/jee/tov020" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov020</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Blüthgen N, Menzel F, Blüthgen N (2006) Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecology 6(1): 1–9. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/1472-6785-6-9" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-6-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Campbell BC, Steffen-Campbell JD, Werren JH (1993) Phylogeny of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Nasonia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species complex (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Pteromalidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) inferred from an internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) and 28S rDNA sequences. Insect Molecular Biology 2: 225–237. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2583.1994.tb00142.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2583.1994.tb00142.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Chauzat MP, Purvis G, Dunne R (2002) Release and establishment of a biological control agent, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pilosus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, for eucalyptus psyllid (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenarytaina</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">eucalypti</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) in Ireland. Annals of Applied Biology 141(3): 293–304. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1744-7348.2002.tb00221.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2002.tb00221.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Chesters D, Wang Y, Yu F, Bai M, Zhang T-X, Hu H-Y, Zhu C-D, Li C-D, Zhang Y-Z (2012) The integrative taxonomic approach reveals host specific species in an encyrtid parasitoid species complex. PLOS ONE 7: e37655. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0037655" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037655</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Chen J, Li Q, Kong L, Yu H (2011) How DNA barcodes complement taxonomy and explore species diversity: the case study of a poorly understood marine fauna. PLOS ONE 6(6): e21326. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0021326" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021326</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Dahlsten DL, Hansen EP, Zuparko RL, Norgaard RB (1998) Biological control of the blue gum psyllid proves economically beneficial. California Agriculture 52(1): 35–40. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3733/ca.v052n01p35" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v052n01p35</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Daane KM, Sime KR, Dahlsten DL, Andrews JW, Zuparko RL (2005) The biology of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">bliteus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Riek (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), a parasitoid of the red gum lerp psyllid (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Psylloidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Biological Control 32(2): 228–235. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.09.015" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.09.015</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Deng JUN, Yu F, Zhang TX, Hu HY, Zhu CD, Wu SA, Zhang YZ (2012) DNA barcoding of six <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ceroplastes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Coccoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Coccidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from China. Molecular Ecology Resources 12(5): 791–796. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03152.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03152.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Dormann CF, Fründ J, Blüthgen N, Gruber B (2009) Indices, graphs and null models: Analyzing bipartite ecological networks. The Open Ecology Journal 2(1): 7–24. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2174/1874213000902010007" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2174/1874213000902010007</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A (2006) Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLOS Biology 4: e88</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Dyer LA, Singer MS, Lill JT, Stireman JO, Gentry GL, Marquis RJ, Ricklefs RE, Greeney HF, Wagner DL, Morais HC, Diniz IR, Kursar TA, Coley PD (2007) Host specificity of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Lepidoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> in tropical and temperate forests. Nature 448(7154): 696–699. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/nature05884" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05884</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Ezard THG, Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG (2009) SPLITS: SPecies’ LImits by Threshold Statistics. R package.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Fernandez-Triana JL, Shimbori EM, Whitfield JB, Penteado-Dias AM, Shaw SR, Boudreault C, Sones J, Perez K, Brown A, Manjunath R, Burns JM, Hebert PDN, Smith MA, Hallwachs W, Janzen DH (2023) A revision of the parasitoid wasp genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Alphomelon</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Mason with the description of 30 new species (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Braconidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Zookeys 1175: 5–162. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/zookeys.1175.105068" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1175.105068</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294–299.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Fromont C, DeGabriel JL, Riegler M, Cook JM (2017) Diversity and specificity of sap-feeding herbivores and their parasitoids on Australian fig trees. Insect Conservation and Diversity 10: 107–119. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/icad.12202" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12202</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG (2013) Delimiting species using single-locus data and the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent approach. Systematic Biology 62(5): 707–724. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/sysbio/syt033" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt033</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Gillespie JJ, Munro JB, Heraty JM, Yoder MJ, Owen AK, Carmichael AE (2005) A secondary structural model of the 28S rRNA expansion segments D2 and D3 for chalcidoid wasps (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Chalcidoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Molecular Biology and Evolution 22(7): 1593–1608. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/molbev/msi152" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msi152</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Godfray HCJ (1994) Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Gordh G, Beardsley JW (1999) Taxonomy and biological control. Handbook of Biological Control. Academic Press, 45–55.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Guilhaumon F, Krasnov BR, Poulin R, Shenbrot GI, Mouillot D (2012) Latitudinal mismatches between the components of mammal–flea interaction networks. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21(7): 725–731. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00714.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00714.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editorand analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Hall AAG, Steinbauer MJ, Taylor GS, Johnson SN, Cook JM, Riegler M (2017) Unravelling mummies: Cryptic diversity, host specificity, trophic and coevolutionary interactions in psyllid–parasitoid food webs. BMC Evolutionary Biology 17(1): e127. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/s12862-017-0959-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0959-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Hawkins BA (1994) Pattern and Process in Host–Parasitoid Interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 298 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Hayat M (1981) Taxonomic notes on Indian <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (Hym.: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Chalcidoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). II. Journal of Natural History 15(1): 17–29. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00222938100770021a" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938100770021a</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Hayat M (2006) Indian <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Chalcidoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, India, 496 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270(1512): 313–321. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1098/rspb.2002.2218" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Astraptes</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">fulgerator</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(41): 14812–14817. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1073/pnas.0406166101" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406166101</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Helfrich P, Rieb E, Abrami G, Lücking A, Mehler A (2018) TreeAnnotator: Versatile visual annotation of hierarchical text relations. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018).</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Heraty J, Hawks D, Kostecki JS, Carmichael A (2004) Phylogeny and behaviour of the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Gollumiellinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, a new subfamily of the ant‐parasitic <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Eucharitidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Chalcidoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Systematic Entomology 29(4): 544–559. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.0307-6970.2004.00267.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6970.2004.00267.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Heraty JM, Woolley JB, Hopper KR, Hawks DL, Kim J-W, Buffington M (2007) Molecular phylogenetics and reproductive incompatibility in a complex of cryptic species of aphid parasitoids. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45(2): 480–493. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ympev.2007.06.021" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.06.021</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Hodkinson ID (1974) The biology of the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Psylloidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Homoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>): A review. Bulletin of Entomological Research 64: 325–339. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1017/S0007485300031217" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300031217</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Hodkinson ID (1980) Present-day distribution patterns of the holarctic <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Psylloidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Homoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Insecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) with particular reference to the origin of the Nearctic fauna. Journal of Biogeography 7: 127–146. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2307/2844706" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2307/2844706</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Hrček J, Godfray HCJ (2015) What do molecular methods bring to host–parasitoid food webs? Trends in Parasitology 31(1): 30–35. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.pt.2014.10.008" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2014.10.008</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Li Y, Zhou X, Feng G, Hu H, Niu L, Hebert PDN, Huang D (2010) COI and ITS2 sequences delimit species, reveal cryptic taxa and host specificity of fig‐associated <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Sycophila</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Eurytomidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Molecular Ecology Resources 10(1): 31–40. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02671.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02671.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Li FS (2011) Psyllidomorpha of China (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Insecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Science Press, Beijing, 1976 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Jablonski D, Finarelli JA (2009) Congruence of morphologically-defined genera with molecular phylogenies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(20): 8262–8266. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1073/pnas.0902973106" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0902973106</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (Ed.) Mammalian Protein Metabolism (Vol. III). Academic Press, New York, 21–132.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Julliard R, Clavel J, Devictor V, Jiguet F, Couvet D (2006) Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecology Letters 9(11): 1237–1244. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00977.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00977.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16(2): 111–120. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/BF01731581" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(6): 1547–1549. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/molbev/msy096" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Kaartinen R, Stone GN, Hearn J, Lohse K, Roslin T (2010) Revealing secret liaisons: DNA barcoding changes our view on parasitoid host specificity. Ecological Entomology 35(5): 623–635. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01224.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01224.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Kuwayama S (1908) Die Psylliden Japans. I. Transactions of the Sapporo Natural History Society 2: 149–189.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Maskell WM (1890) On some species of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Psyllidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> in New Zealand. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute 22: 157–170.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <mixed-citation>Mauck KE, Gebiola M, Percy DM (2024) The hidden secrets of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Psylloidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: Biology, behavior, symbionts, and ecology. Annual Review of Entomology 69(1): 277–302. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1146/annurev-ento-120120-114738" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120120-114738</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <mixed-citation>Mayr G (1876) Die europäischen Encyrtiden. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 25: 675–778.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <mixed-citation>McClelland A, Austin AD, Rodriguez J, Cooper SJB, Fagan-Jeffries EP (2023) Integrative and accelerated taxonomy recognises a new species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), parasitic on <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Lasiopsylla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">striata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Psyllidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from Australia. Australian Journal of Taxonomy 17: 1–12. <ext-link xlink:href="10.54102/ajt.szjz2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.54102/ajt.szjz2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <mixed-citation>McClelland AR, Moore MR, Bremer JS, Talamas EJ, Halbert SE, Singarayan VT, Brown BT, Purcell MF, Brookes DR, Hentz MG (2025) You can run, but you will never escape: A new species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Ashmead (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), parasitoid of the classical biological control agent <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Boreioglycaspis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">melaleucae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Moore)(<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Aphalaridae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in Florida, USA. Journal of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Research 98: 95–116.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <mixed-citation>Milosavljević I, Vankosky MA, Morgan DJW, Hoddle CD, Massie RE, Hoddle MS (2022) Post-Release Evaluation of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Diaphorencyrtus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">aligarhensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Tamarixia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">radiata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Eulophidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) for Biological Control of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Diaphorina</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">citri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Liviidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in Urban California, USA. Agronomy 12(3): e583. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/agronomy12030583" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030583</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <mixed-citation>Monaghan MT, Wild R, Elliot M, Fujisawa T, Balke M, Inward DJ, Lees DC, Ranaivosolo R, Eggleton P, Barraclough TG, Vogler AP (2009) Accelerated species inventory on Madagascar using coalescent-based models of species delineation. Systematic Biology 58(3): 298–311. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/sysbio/syp027" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syp027</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <mixed-citation>Moore KM (1964) Observations on some Australian forest insects. 18. Four new species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Glycaspis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Homoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Psyllidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from Queensland. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 89: 163–166.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56">
        <mixed-citation>Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57">
        <mixed-citation>Nicholls JA, Preuss S, Hayward A, Melika G, Csóka G, Nieves-Aldrey J-L, Askew RR, Tavakoli M, Schönrogge K, Stone GN (2010) Concordant phylogeography and cryptic speciation in two Western Palaearctic oak gall parasitoid species complexes. Molecular Ecology 19(3): 592–609. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04499.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04499.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B58">
        <mixed-citation>Noyes JS (1982) Collecting and preserving chalcid wasps (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Chalcidoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Journal of Natural History 16(3): 315–334. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/00222938200770261" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938200770261</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B59">
        <mixed-citation>Noyes JS, Hayat M (1984) A review of the genera of Indo-Pacific <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Chalcidoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Entomology) 48(3): 131–395.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B60">
        <mixed-citation>Noyes JS (1988) <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Insecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Fauna of New Zealand 13: 1–188.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B61">
        <mixed-citation>Noyes JS, Hanson P (1996) <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Chalcidoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) of Costa Rica: the genera and species associated with jumping plant-lice (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Homoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Psylloidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum (Entomology Series) 65(2): 105–164.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B62">
        <mixed-citation>Pentinsaari M, Hebert PD, Mutanen M (2014) Barcoding beetles: a regional survey of 1872 species reveals high identification success and unusually deep interspecific divergences. PLOS ONE 9(9): e108651. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0108651" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108651</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B63">
        <mixed-citation>Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, Hazell S, Kamoun S, Sumlin WD, Vogler AP (2006) Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Systematic Biology 55: 595–609. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/10635150600852011" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600852011</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B64">
        <mixed-citation>Posada D (2008) jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25(7): 1253–1256. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/molbev/msn083" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn083</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B65">
        <mixed-citation>Poulin R, Keeney DB (2008) Host specificity under molecular and experimental scrutiny. Trends in Parasitology 24(1): 24–28. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.pt.2007.10.002" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2007.10.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B66">
        <mixed-citation>Poisot T, Lepennetier G, Martinez E, Ramsayer J, Hochberg ME (2010) Resource availability affects the structure of a natural bacteria–bacteriophage community. Biology Letters 7(2): 201–204. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1098/rsbl.2010.0774" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0774</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B67">
        <mixed-citation>Poisot T, Canard E, Mouillot D, Mouquet N, Gravel D (2012) The dissimilarity of species interaction networks. Ecology Letters 15(12): 1353–1361. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00174.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00174.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B68">
        <mixed-citation>Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G (2012) ABGD, automatic barcode gap discovery for primary species delimitation. Molecular Ecology 21: 1864–1877. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05239.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05239.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B69">
        <mixed-citation>Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, Achaz G (2021) ASAP: Assemble species by automatic partitioning. Molecular Ecology Resources 21(2): 609–620. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1755-0998.13281" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13281</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B70">
        <mixed-citation>Qin Y, Zhou Q, Yu F, Wang X, Wei J, Zhu C, Zhang Y, Vogler AP (2018) Host specificity of parasitoids (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) toward armored scale insects (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Diaspididae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>): Untangling the effect of cryptic species on quantitative food webs. Ecology and Evolution 8(16): 7879–7893. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ece3.4344" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4344</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B71">
        <mixed-citation>Qureshi JA, Rogers ME, Hall DG, Stansly PA (2009) Incidence of invasive <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Diaphorina</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">citri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hemiptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Psyllidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and its introduced parasitoid <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Tamarixia</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">radiata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Eulophidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in Florida citrus. Journal of Economic Entomology 102(1): 247–256.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B72">
        <mixed-citation>Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/sysbio/syy032" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B73">
        <mixed-citation>Riek EF (1962) The Australian species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), parasites of psyllids (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Homoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Australian Journal of Zoology 10: 684–757.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B74">
        <mixed-citation>Rudoy A, Zhu CD, Ferrari RR, Zhang YZ (2022) Integrative taxonomy based on morphometric and molecular data supports recognition of the three cryptic species within the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Encyrtus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">sasakii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> complex (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Journal of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Research 90: 129–152.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B75">
        <mixed-citation>Salt G (1968) The resistance of insect parasitoids to the defence reactions of their hosts. Biological Reviews 43(2): 200–232.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B76">
        <mixed-citation>Shafee SA, Alam SM, Agarwal MM (1975) Taxonomic survey of encyrtid parasites (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in India. Aligarh Muslim University Publications (Zoological Series) on Indian Insect Types 10: 1–125.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B77">
        <mixed-citation>Stahlhut JK, Fernández-Triana J, Adamowicz SJ, Buck M, Goulet H, Hebert PD, Huber JT, Merilo MT, Sheffield CS, Woodcock T, Smith MA (2013) DNA barcoding reveals diversity of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> and the dominance of parasitoids in a sub-arctic environment. BMC Ecology 13(1): 1–2. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/1472-6785-13-2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-13-2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B78">
        <mixed-citation>Smith MA, Woodley NE, Janzen DH, Hebert PDN (2006) DNA barcoding reveals cryptic host-specificity of specialist parasitoid flies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(10): 3657–3662. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1073/pnas.0511318103" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0511318103</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B79">
        <mixed-citation>Smith MA, Rodriguez JJ, Whitfield JB, Deans AR, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2008) Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology, and collections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(34): 12359–12364. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1073/pnas.0805319105" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805319105</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B80">
        <mixed-citation>Smith MA, Fernández‐Triana JL, Eveleigh E, Gómez J, Guclu C, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN, Hrcek J, Huber JT, Janzen D, Mason PG, Miller S, Quicke DLJ, Rodriguez JJ, Rougerie R, Shaw MR, Várkonyi G, Ward DF, Whitfield JB, Zaldívar‐Riverón A (2013) DNA barcoding and the taxonomy of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Microgastrinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> wasps (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Braconidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>): impacts after 8 years and nearly 20000 sequences. Molecular Ecology Resources 13: 168–176. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1755-0998.12038" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12038</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B81">
        <mixed-citation>Thomson CG (1876) <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Scandinaviae. Tomus IV. Pteromalus (Svederus). Lund: H. Ohlsson, 259 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B82">
        <mixed-citation>Toro-Delgado E, Hernández-Roldán J, Dincă V, Vicente JC, Shaw MR, Quicke DL, Vodă R, Albrecht M, Fernández-Triana J, Vidiella B, Valverde S, Dapporto L, Hebert PDN, Talavera G, Vila R (2022) Butterfly–parasitoid–hostplant interactions in Western Palaearctic <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Hesperiidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: a DNA barcoding reference library. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 196(2): 757–774. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac052" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac052</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B83">
        <mixed-citation>Tougeron K, Iltis C, Renoz F, Albittar L, Hance T, Demeter S, Le Goff GJ (2021) Ecology and biology of the parasitoid <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Trechnites</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">insidiosus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and its potential for biological control of pear psyllids. Pest Management Science 77(11): 4836–4847. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s00442-016-3770-7" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3770-7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B84">
        <mixed-citation>Trjapitzin VA (1989) Parasitic <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> of the Fam. <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> of Palaearctics. Opredeliteli po Faune SSSR, 489 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B85">
        <mixed-citation>UCD Community (2023) Universal <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Chalcidoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Database (UCD) curated in TaxonWorks. <ext-link xlink:href="https://sfg.taxonworks.org/api/v1/" ext-link-type="uri">https://sfg.taxonworks.org/api/v1/</ext-link> [Accessed March 2026]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B86">
        <mixed-citation>Vinson SB (1976) Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 21(1): 109–133.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B87">
        <mixed-citation>Wang Y, Zhou QS, Qiao HJ, Zhang AB, Yu F, Wang XB, Zhu CD, Zhang YZ (2016) Formal nomenclature and description of cryptic species of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Encyrtus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">sasakii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> complex (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Scientific Reports 6: e34372. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/srep34372" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34372</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B88">
        <mixed-citation>Xu X, Hoffmann AA, Umina PA, Ward SE, Coquilleau MP, Malipatil MB, Ridland PM (2023) Molecular identification of hymenopteran parasitoids and their endosymbionts from agromyzids. Bulletin of Entomological Research 113: 481–496. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1017/S0007485323000160" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485323000160</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B89">
        <mixed-citation>Yule GU (1925) A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis, F.R.S. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 213: 21–87.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B90">
        <mixed-citation>Zhang YZ, Huang DW (2004) A review and an illustrated key to genera of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="superfamily">Chalcidoidea</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from China. Science Press, Beijing, 166 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B91">
        <mixed-citation>Zhang YZ, Si S, Zheng JT, Li HL, Fang Y, Zhu CD, Vogler AP (2011) DNA barcoding of endoparasitoid wasps in the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Anicetus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> reveals high levels of host specificity (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Biological Control 58: 182–191. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.05.006" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.05.006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B92">
        <mixed-citation>Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A (2013) A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics 29(22): 2869–2876. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1093/bioinformatics/btt499" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt499</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B93">
        <mixed-citation>Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT (2020) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20: 348–355. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1755-0998.13096" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13096</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B94">
        <mixed-citation>Zhang CH, Wang HY, Wang Y, Chi ZH, Liu YS, Zu GH (2024) The first two complete mitochondrial genomes for the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Anagyrus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) and their phylogenetic implications. ZooKeys 1206: 81. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/zookeys.1206.121923" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1206.121923</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B95">
        <mixed-citation>Zhou Q, Xi Y, Yu F, Zhang X, Li X, Liu C, Niu Z, Zhu C, Qiao G, Zhang Y (2014) Application of DNA barcoding to the identification of <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> parasitoids from the soybean aphid (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Aphis</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">glycines</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) in China. Insect Science 21(3): 363–373. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1744-7917.12095" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12095</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B96">
        <mixed-citation>Zou B, Hu H, Zhang L, Zhang Y (2023) A taxonomic study of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Ashmead (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Hymenoptera</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Encyrtidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from China. ZooKeys 1184: 327–359. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/zookeys.1184.109476" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1184.109476</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="Additional information" id="sec20">
      <title>Additional information</title>
      <sec sec-type="Conflict of interest" id="sec21">
        <title>Conflict of interest</title>
        <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ethical statement" id="sec22">
        <title>Ethical statement</title>
        <p>No ethical statement was reported.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Artificial Intelligence (AI) use" id="sec23">
        <title>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</title>
        <p>The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.</p>
        <p>No AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Funding" id="sec24">
        <title>Funding</title>
        <p>This project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant No. 32170431), the National Key R &amp; D Program of China (Grant No. 2023YFC2605200) and the State Key Laboratory of Animal Biodiversity Conservation and Integrated Pest Management (SKLA2501).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author contributions" id="sec25">
        <title>Author contributions</title>
        <p>BYZ: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. DC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and Editing, Supervision. RZY: Methodology, Data curation, Writing – review and Editing, Investigation. HJL: Writing – review and Editing, Data curation, Methodology. HLL: Writing – review and Editing, Data curation, Investigation. HX: Writing – review and Editing. CDZ: Writing – review and Editing, Supervision. ZYZ: Conceptualization, Writing – review and Editing, Funding acquisition.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author ORCIDs" id="sec26">
        <title>Author ORCIDs</title>
        <p>B. Zou <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5022-8669" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5022-8669</ext-link></p>
        <p>D. Chesters <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-5770" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-5770</ext-link></p>
        <p>R. Yu <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1318-260X" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1318-260X</ext-link></p>
        <p>H. Liu <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3128-5684" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3128-5684</ext-link></p>
        <p>H. Li <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2187-8536" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2187-8536</ext-link></p>
        <p>H. Xiao <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8979-3793" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8979-3793</ext-link></p>
        <p>C. Zhu <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-3178" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-3178</ext-link></p>
        <p>Y. Zhang <ext-link xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9713-5352" ext-link-type="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9713-5352</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data availability" id="sec27">
        <title>Data availability</title>
        <p>The newly generated COI sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers <ext-link xlink:href="PZ778155" ext-link-type="gen">PZ778155</ext-link>–<ext-link xlink:href="PZ778363" ext-link-type="gen">PZ778363</ext-link> and will be released publicly upon publication of this article or on 1 January 2027, whichever occurs first. Voucher specimens examined in this study are deposited in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. Collection, voucher, host-association, BOLD Process ID, and GenBank accession data are provided in Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jhr.99.202665.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="zenodo_dep_id">22990971</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">39A5161D-5C9C-5686-8123-F2A66CF8B369</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Specimen information of encyrtid parasitoids of psyllids. (&gt; means male)</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>xlsx</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="journal_of_hymenoptera_research-99-1045_article-202665__-s001.xlsx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1789485.xlsx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1789485</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Boyu Zou, Douglas Chesters, Runze Yu, Huanji Liu, Hongliang Li, Hui Xiao, Chaodong Zhu, Yanzhou Zhang</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S2" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jhr.99.202665.suppl2</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="zenodo_dep_id">22990977</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">9EC5AF91-28C8-5F5A-A919-02E03610AFB9</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 2</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Detailed values of genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Psyllaephagus">Psyllaephagus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic></p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>docx</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p><bold>table S2-1</bold>. Interspecific distance based on <abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev> model between 212 COI sequences. <bold>table S2-2</bold>. Intraspecific divergence based on <abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev> model between 212 COI sequences.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="journal_of_hymenoptera_research-99-1045_article-202665__-s002.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1789486.docx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1789486</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Boyu Zou, Douglas Chesters, Runze Yu, Huanji Liu, Hongliang Li, Hui Xiao, Chaodong Zhu, Yanzhou Zhang</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S3" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jhr.99.202665.suppl3</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="zenodo_dep_id">22990979</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">93A234D6-F54A-5D52-991C-8C0D7AE7267C</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 3</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Interspecific genetic distances</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>docx</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p><bold>table S3-1</bold>. Interspecific distance based on <abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev> model between 263 28S-D2 sequences. <bold>table S3-2</bold>. Intraspecific divergence based on <abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev> model between 263 28S-D2 sequences.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="journal_of_hymenoptera_research-99-1045_article-202665__-s003.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1789487.docx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1789487</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Boyu Zou, Douglas Chesters, Runze Yu, Huanji Liu, Hongliang Li, Hui Xiao, Chaodong Zhu, Yanzhou Zhang</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S4" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jhr.99.202665.suppl4</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="zenodo_dep_id">22990983</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">3E446248-12C9-5F83-B57E-239FB33384A5</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 4</label>
        <caption>
          <p>ASAP analysis</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>docx</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p><bold>table S4-1</bold>. Settings and results of Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) analysis Kimura 2-parameter model (<abbrev xlink:title="Kimura two-parameter">K2P</abbrev>),Jukes-Cantor substitution model (JC69), and Simple distance (p-distance) model. <bold>table S4-2</bold>. Results of Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP) analysis.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="journal_of_hymenoptera_research-99-1045_article-202665__-s004.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1789488.docx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1789488</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Boyu Zou, Douglas Chesters, Runze Yu, Huanji Liu, Hongliang Li, Hui Xiao, Chaodong Zhu, Yanzhou Zhang</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S5" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jhr.99.202665.suppl5</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="zenodo_dep_id">22990985</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">094FF09E-2A19-5410-85F5-638D65887E57</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 5</label>
        <caption>
          <p>The NJ trees of 113 COI haplotypes</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>pdf</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="journal_of_hymenoptera_research-99-1045_article-202665__-s005.pdf" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="pdf" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1789489.pdf">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1789489</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Boyu Zou, Douglas Chesters, Runze Yu, Huanji Liu, Hongliang Li, Hui Xiao, Chaodong Zhu, Yanzhou Zhang</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S6" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/jhr.99.202665.suppl6</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="zenodo_dep_id">22990989</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">8ACD4702-10C2-5F86-A8F3-43CD5B915076</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 6</label>
        <caption>
          <p>The NJ tree of 81 28S-D2 rDNA haplotypes</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>pdf</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="journal_of_hymenoptera_research-99-1045_article-202665__-s006.pdf" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="pdf" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1789490.pdf">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1789490</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Boyu Zou, Douglas Chesters, Runze Yu, Huanji Liu, Hongliang Li, Hui Xiao, Chaodong Zhu, Yanzhou Zhang</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
