Research Article
Print
Research Article
Ant-plants as oases: Colonies of Cladomyrma sirindhornae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) thrive in their host plants Sphenodesme pentandra in both the wet and dry seasons
expand article infoSalinee Khachonpisitsak, Weeyawat Jaitrong§, Tadsanai Jeenthong§, Chinnakit Wongkunanusorn, Kumron Laedprathom|, Thotsapol Chaianunporn, Adam Khalife#, Sunittra Aupanun¤, Fuminori Ito#
‡ Burapha University, Chon Buri, Thailand
§ Office of Natural Science Research, National Science Museum, Pathum Thani, Thailand
| The Royal Forest Department of Thailand, Forest Management Bureau No.9, Chonburi, Thailand
¶ Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
# Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
¤ Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
Open Access

Abstract

Seasonal changes affect the distribution and behavior of animals. Ant societies are strongly affected by the dry season: they suffer from high temperatures and desiccation, but also from the lower availability of insect prey. However, some species of ants are involved in mutualistic relationships with myrmecophytic plants that provide a moist nesting space and nutrition. The effects of seasonal changes on such ant-plant symbioses are poorly understood. In this study, we report the nesting habits, colony composition and reproductive status of a plant-ant species, Cladomyrma sirindhornae Jaitrong, Laedprathom & Yamane, 2013 in the wet and dry seasons in Thailand. C. sirindhornae nested inside vines of Sphenodesme pentandra Jack, a pioneer species found in secondary dry evergreen forests and at forest edges which provides naturally hollowed stems for ant colonies. Among the 243 observed vines in this study, 223 vines (92%) were inhabited by C. sirindhornae while only 11 (4.5%) were occupied by other ant species, suggesting a high specialization of the ant-plant mutualism. C. sirindhornae nested within the cavities of the host plant, extending throughout the stems and branches from the base to the canopy. A comparison of ten colonies collected in the dry season and ten in the wet season showed no effects of seasonality on colony size and proportion of larvae, worker pupae and scale insects. However, sexual pupae and adults were more abundant in the wet season than in the dry season. Our results suggest that myrmecophytes buffer seasonal variations, allowing plant-ant colonies to grow year-round, while reproductives are produced only when conditions outside are favorable for colony founding.

Keywords

Cladomyrma, Formicinae, myrmecophyte, nesting habitat, phragmosis, plant-ants, seasonality

Introduction

Seasonal climatic factors, such as variations in temperature, humidity, and precipitation, influence insect diversity in tropical and temperate ecosystems by affecting the availability of resources and the ecological conditions (Wolda 1988). In ecosystems with marked seasonality, the abundance of most insect orders decreases in the dry season (e.g. Janzen 1973; Pinheiro et al. 2002; Vasconcellos et al. 2010). Ant activity is influenced by environmental conditions. Kaspari and Weiser (2000) report that foraging ants avoid desiccation: in that study, ant activity increased by 200 percent along habitat moisture gradient, 25 percent from dry to wet seasons and 15 percent from day to night. This pattern indicates that the ants forage less during the dry season (Kaspari and Weiser 2000; Chantarasawat et al. 2013). However, Moses et al (2023) report region-specific responses to seasonality, with higher ant activity during the dry season in Papua New Guinea and Tanzania, but not in Ecuador. The foraging activity of ant workers is influenced by the resource abundance, brood production, physiological adaptation to ambient temperature, humidity and luminosity (Hölldobler and Wilson 1990). Importantly, ant larvae need proteins (amino acids) for their development (Abbott 1978, Stradling 1978). Therefore, ant colonies also suffer from the common decrease of insects during the dry season, in particular predatory and scavenger species that exclusively feed on other arthropods. For example, ground-dwelling Cerapachys sulcinodis rarely forage and pause reproduction as a response to low arthropod density during the dry season in Thailand (Mizuno et al. 2019). The impact of seasonality on colony composition in tropics has been studied in a few other ant species e.g. Solenopsis geminata (Helms and Vinson 2008) and Pheidole ceres (Judd 2005), but overall, such reports remain scarce.

Among the various examples of mutualism between ants and plants, ant-myrmecophyte (or ant-plant) symbioses are remarkable. Myrmecophytes provide hollow nesting spaces called domatia to host plant-ants (Fiala and Maschwitz 1992; Davidson and McKey 1993). Some host plants can also attract ants by providing nutrition through nutrient-rich food bodies, extrafloral nectar, or honeydew through sap-feeding insects (Huxley and Cutler 1991; Standler and Dixon 2008). Sphenodesme pentandra Jack, the only known host of Cladomyrma sirindhornae ants (Jaitrong et al. 2013), is a climbing plant of the family Verbenaceae. Note that Jaitrong et al. (2013) initially misidentified the host plant of C. sirindhornae as Sphenodesme involucrata (C. Presl) B. L. Rob. This pioneer plant species is distributed in India, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Malaysia and Burma (Chuakul et al. 2002; Wiart 2006), typically inhabiting secondary dry evergreen forests and forest edges. Some plants in the family Verbenaceae are known to provide nectar and/or food bodies to ants (Blüthgen and Reifenrath 2003). For example, Clerodendrum fistulosum (Verbenaceae) is one of the earliest documented myrmecophytes, characterized by the presence of domatia inhabited by ants (Beccari 1884). In Sarawak, it forms an obligate association with Camponotus (Colobopsis) clerodendri Emery. The lower surface of C. fistulosum young leaves is dotted with numerous nectaries, which appear as green spots on a reddish background and secrete glucose-rich nectar, although it does not produce specialized food bodies (Maschwitz, Fiala, and Linsenmair 1994). Similar information on domatia structure and presence of extrafloral nectar (ENF) and/or food bodies is, however, lacking for Sphenodesme pentandra.

Cladomyrma (Formicinae: Plagiolepini, Boudinot 2015) is a genus of plant-ants comprising thirteen species endemics to the Oriental tropics. These ants are known to nest inside the living shoots, stems, and branches of various myrmecophyte species and tend scale insects for honeydew (Moog 2009). While some species are found in humid tropics with no marked seasonality like C. maschwitzi in West Malaysia (Moog et al. 1998), others are confronted to a strong dry season like C. sirindhornae in eastern Thailand with temperature at 35.0–39.9 degrees Celsius and humidity at 71–74% (Jaitrong et al. 2013; Thai Meteorological Department 2025).

To understand the consequences of the dry season on an ant-myrmecophyte mutualism, we investigated the nesting habits, colony composition and reproductive status of C. sirindhornae in Thailand during wet and dry seasons in Sphenodesme pentandra host plants. We hypothesized that the colonies will be smaller and less reproductively active in the dry than the wet season.

Methods

Nesting habits and colony collection

We investigated the nesting habits of C. sirindhornae by sampling of S. pentandra Jack plants from various habitats, including secondary forests, forest edges, and forest paths in central and eastern Thailand. A total of 243 S. pentandra vines were randomly collected from 243 separate host trees to examine the existing ant species in the cavities. Each vine was collected from the host tree spaced at least 10 meters apart to ensure that vines from the same ant colony were not sampled more than once (i.e., each nest chamber represented a different colony). The vines were put in plastic bags and transported to the laboratory. In the laboratory, the vines were cut open to identify the ant species nesting within the cavities. These vines were collected from four sites: Nong Pla Subdistrict, Mueang District, Saraburi Province (14.440535°N, 100.95984°E); Mueang District, Nakhon Nayok Province (14.324434°N, 101.308769°E); Tok Prom Subdistrict, Khlung District, Chanthaburi Province (12.631996°N, 102.322258°E); and Tha Mai District, Chanthaburi Province (13°02'54"N, 101°10'59"E).

Colony composition

From the above 243 vines, we collected twenty colonies of C. sirindhornae and brought them to the laboratory for dissection to investigate the colony composition by counting the number of alate queens, males, workers, and brood (worker pupae, sexual pupae, and larvae separately counted). The colony condition (queenright or queenless) was also scored accordingly (the dealate queen present or not). Six out of the 20 colonies were collected from Tok Prom Subdistrict, Khlung District (colony code: WJT110214-1, WJT110214-2, WJT120214-1, WJT030214-1, WJT030214-2, WJT040214-1), Chanthaburi Province, and fourteen colonies were collected at Tha Mai District, Chanthaburi Province (colony code: C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9, C10, C11, C12, C13, C14). The collection was carried out in February 2014 and March 2018 for the dry season, and in August 2014 and June 2018 for the wet season. We cut the entire plant, from the bottom of stem to the top of branches, to make sure that the whole colonies of C. sirindhornae were collected. We ensured that each plant was separate by 10 meters to avoid collecting ants from the same colony. Additionally, the length of each host plant collected from Tha Mai District, Chanthaburi Province (colony code: C1–C14) were measured and the number and diameter of nest entrances were recorded.

Ovary dissection and head width measurement

The reproductive condition of dealate queens from 13 out of 20 colonies (queenright colonies) were dissected under a stereo microscope immediately after collection and compared between the two seasons. We recorded the number of ovarioles and developing oocytes in each dealate queen. Furthermore, the head widths of 18 alate queens and 121 workers (61 major workers and 60 minor workers) from one colony were measured using an ocular micrometer on a stereo microscope to assess worker morphology in relation to nest entrance sizes.

Statistics

The relative abundance of sexual adults, sexual pupae, worker pupae, larvae and scale insects was computed for all the host plants as the ratio between the number of individuals divided by the total number of workers in the colony and compared between the wet and dry season by using the Mann–Whitney U test. The head width of alate queens, major workers, and minor workers were compared between castes within one nest using the Kruskal–Wallis test. The Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) with a Poisson distribution and a log-link function was utilized to examine the effects of seasonality and plants length on colony size (i.e., for plants C1–C14 only where length data measured), including the number of reproductive, number of major and minor workers. The seasonality and plants length were selected as fixed variables and colony identity was selected as a random variable to account for colony-specific variation in colony size. The model was fitted using the “glmer” function from the “lme4” package in R (Bates et al. 2015). We plotted individual data points to show how colony size varied with plant length and season. The smooth curves were added using geom_smooth, which plots the predicted values based on the fitted Poisson GLMM. All statistical analyses were performed using R Studio, version 4.3.2.

Results

Nesting habits

We identified Sphenodesme pentandra Jack as a host plant of Cladomyrma sirindhornae. Out of 243 observed S. pentandra vines, C. sirindhornae nested inside the cavity of 223 vines (91.8%). Of the remaining vines, 11 (4.5%) were occupied by other ant species (e.g. Cataulacus granulatus, Crematogaster sp., Pheidole sp., Pseudolasius sp., Tapinoma sp., and Tetramorium sp.) and 9 (3.7%) vines were not used by any ants. Cladomyrma sirindhornae nested in domatia throughout the stems and branches of the host plant from the base to the canopy. The ant workers did not excavate tunnels inside the host plant by themselves. Instead, the host plant naturally forms cavities along its branches. These cavities continue until they reach the tip of the branch, which becomes narrow and prevents further cavity formation. As a result, ants are not found inhabiting these areas (Fig. 1). Furthermore, we found numerous food bodies resembling soft, light orange gel within the domatia (Fig. 1). These food bodies were abundantly distributed throughout the domatia, and worker ants actively transport them (personal observation). Nevertheless, we did not find any extrafloral nectaries in S. pentandra.

Figure 1. 

Nest structure of Cladomyrma sirindhornae on Sphenodesme pentandra Jack. The ants use cavities throughout the stem and branches of the host plant from the base to the canopy. The food bodies resembling soft, light orange, gel-like masses were found distributed throughout the domatia.

The average length of the S. pentandra vines was 16.9 ± 3.4 m (mean ± SD), ranging from 11.8 to 21.3 m. Along the stems of the host plant, 97 ± 18 small elliptical nest entrances were found. Entrance holes had a diameter of 0.72 ± 0.21 cm and were located 1.5 ± 0.2 cm under a branch or leaf and 15.7 ± 2.6 cm apart from each other (Fig. 1). Major workers often blocked these holes with their heads (phragmosis, Fig. 2C). Dealate queens were found at swollen parts of the stem, 3 to 12 meters away from the vine base. Adults and brood of C. sirindhornae were observed throughout the cavities of the host plant from the base to the canopy. Similarly, scale insects of the family Pseudococcidae were found throughout the host plant domatia, cohabiting with C. sirindhornae (Fig. 2D).

Figure 2. 

Nesting habit of C. sirindhornae A C. sirindhornae nesting inside a hollow branch of S. pentandra (photo by Sunittra Aupanun) B workers grooming the dealate physogastic queen (photo by Krittanun Tantraporn) C major worker blocking an entrance hole with its head (photo by Krittanun Tantraporn) D scale insects were found in all colonies of C. sirindhornae (photo by Krittanun Tantraporn).

Caste polymorphism

Thirteen dealate queens were dissected immediately after being collected from the field. These dealate queens had 32 ± 4 ovarioles per individual (mean ± SD) in both the dry and wet seasons, characterized by dense yellow bodies and oocytes. The number of developing oocytes in the dry season (244 ± 44, N = 7) was not different from that in the wet season (300 ± 112, N = 6) (Welch two sample t-test, t = -1.15, df = 6.36, p = 0.29). The spermatheca was large and ellipsoidal (Fig. 3). Both major (N = 17) and minor (N = 18) workers had two ovarioles (1:1), with a few developing mature oocytes.

Figure 3. 

Ovaries of a dealate queen of C. sirindhornae (photo by Sunittra Aupanun) A whole ovary (photo by Sunittra Aupanun) and B spermatheca and basal oocytes (photo by Sunittra Aupanun).

The head width of alate queens ranged from 0.93 to 1.00 mm (Fig. 4). Major workers exhibited a similar head width range (0.91 to 1.00 mm), while minor workers had a significantly smaller head (0.60 to 0.70 mm) (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001). Minor workers were often observed using small nest entrances to go in and out that major workers sealed with their head (phragmosis). The head width of minor workers (0.64 ± 0.03 mm) was smaller than the diameter of most entrance holes (0.89 ± 0.19 mm, ranging from 0.50 to 1.10 mm). In contrast, major workers and queens, in virtue of their large head, likely used only the largest holes to exit.

Figure 4. 

Head width distribution of C. sirindhornae alate queens and workers.

Colony composition

The colony composition of all twenty colonies of C. sirindhornae is displayed in Table 1. Thirteen were queenright with a single dealate queen, while seven were queenless. All dealate queens were highly physogastric (Fig. 2B). All but one colony contained males and/or alate queens. The average number of alate queens in the dry and wet seasons was 30 ± 44 and 97 ± 108, respectively, while that of males in the dry and wet seasons was 25 ± 58 and 99 ± 128, respectively. The average number of major and minor workers in the dry season was 1310 ± 1019 and 3973 ± 2728 respectively, while that in the wet season was 1660 ± 1660 and 3504 ± 2751, respectively. The average number of scale insects in the dry and wet seasons was 150 ± 95 and 174 ± 190, respectively. Regarding colony size, the number of workers in queenright colonies (7160 ± 3986) did not significantly differ from that of queenless colonies (3635 ± 3293) (Mann-Whitney U test, U = 67, p = 0.09).

Table 1.

Colony composition of Cladomyrma sirindhornae. RE: reproductives (alate queens and males).

Colony code Date Dealate queen Alate queens Males Workers (Major) Workers (Minor) Pupae (worker) Pupae (RE) Larvae Scale insects Plant length (m.)
Dry season
WJT110214-1 11 Feb. 2014 1 26 17 449 1810 159 74 96 48 -
WJT110214-2 11 Feb. 2014 1 144 5 572 2537 139 163 298 43 -
WJT120214-1 12 Feb. 2014 1 47 0 280 2998 33 39 254 82 -
C1 16 March 2018 1 0 9 1285 2657 472 6 211 229 10.24
C2 16 March 2018 0 0 0 887 2074 448 3 256 174 7.75
C3 16 March 2018 1 1 9 1139 2003 457 4 331 141 10.71
C4 17 March 2018 1 50 2 3217 8533 1740 27 1555 46 14.12
C5 17 March 2018 0 10 190 476 2268 386 206 692 317 15.54
C6 17 March 2018 0 17 11 2176 8554 1580 13 1139 243 8.5
C7 17 March 2018 1 1 6 2623 6291 1217 8 2192 179 8.72
Mean 29.6 24.9 1310.4 3972.5 663.1 54.3 702.4 150.2 10.8
± SD ± 44.41 ± 58.25 ± 1019.90 ± 2727.83 ± 617.80 ± 72.68 ± 702.98 ± 95.20 ± 2.96
Wet season
WJT030214-1 3 Aug. 2014 1 221 71 651 4288 109 366 506 73 -
WJT030214-2 3 Aug. 2014 1 274 105 874 2957 122 427 537 29 -
WJT040214-1 4 Aug. 2014 0 139 0 383 1146 7 200 130 53 -
C8 2 June 2018 1 8 2 4532 7321 395 4 467 518 13.14
C9 2 June 2018 1 227 3 2847 8117 1614 227 1359 505 9.39
C10 2 June 2018 0 0 68 416 526 131 123 194 60 10.3
C11 2 June 2018 0 25 90 804 1567 300 234 435 101 13.13
C12 2 June 2018 1 1 120 150 795 7 95 177 43 9.8
C13 2 June 2018 1 28 441 4360 5734 987 608 1595 294 7.87
C14 2 June 2018 0 44 86 1582 2588 420 434 826 118 7.73
Mean 96.7 98.6 1659.9 3503.9 409.2 271.8 622.6 179.4 10.2
± SD ± 107.84 ± 128.18 ± 1659.33 ± 2750.64 ± 513.29 ± 184.39 ±498.27 ± 190.47 ± 2.22

The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was utilized to estimate the effect of season, plant length (fixed effect) and colony identity (random effect) on the colony size (N = 7 for each season; AIC = 278.5; Table 3). The intercept represents the expected log count of colony size in the dry season. Although the colony size was slightly lower in the wet season, the effect of season on colony size was not statistically significant (p = 0.493). Similarly, plant length did not also significantly affect the colony size (p = 0.795). The variance of the random effect (σ² = 0.6756) indicates substantial variation at the colony level suggesting that colony identity also influenced colony size (Fig. 5).

Figure 5. 

Effect of season and plant length on the colony size of C. sirindhornae. The lines show the predicted values based on the fitted Poisson GLMM.

The number of major workers in queenright (1768 ± 1555) did not significantly differ from that of queenless colonies (961 ± 678) (Mann-Whitney U test, U = 57, p = 0.393). In addition, the number of minor workers in queenright (4311 ± 2593) was not significantly different from that of queenless colonies (2675 ± 2686) (Mann-Whitney U test, U = 66, p = 0.115). Scale insects were found in all colonies, with an average number of 165 ± 147. A significant linear correlation was observed between the colony size of C. sirindhornae and the number of scale insects (r2 = 0.39, p = 0.003).

Reproductives and workers were produced in colonies of both the wet and dry seasons. The total number of major and minor workers was not different between seasons (wet season 5164 ± 4245; dry season 5283 ± 3663) (Welch two sample t-test, t = 0.067, df = 18, p = 0.9472; Fig. 6). The number of alate queens and males was not different between the two seasons (Mann-Whitney U test; alate queens, U = 34, p = 0.24; males, U = 29, p = 0.12) (Fig. 7); however, when considering alate queens and males combined, the number of reproductives was significantly higher in the wet season (Mann-Whitney U test, U = 17, p = 0.012). Consistently, the relative number of reproductive pupae in the wet season was significantly larger than that in the dry season (Mann-Whitney U test, U = 15, p = 0.0068) (Fig. 7). In contrast, the relative abundance of worker pupae was lower in the wet season than the dry season, even though marginally insignificant (Mann-Whitney U test, U = 75, p = 0.063) (Fig. 7). The relative abundance of larvae and scale insects did not differ between seasons (Mann-Whitney U test; larvae, U = 37, p = 0.35; scale insects, U = 44, p = 0.68) (Fig. 7).

Figure 6. 

The box plots show the effect of seasons on A major worker numbers and B minor worker numbers of C. sirindhornae.

Figure 7. 

The box plots show the relative comparisons of each colony component, expressed as a ratio between its total number and total number of workers in dissected C. sirindhornae colonies, collected in wet and dry seasons. For actual mean + SD numbers of each variable, see Results and Table 1.

Colony founding

While collecting colonies in the field, we encountered several initial colonies situated on the young stems of Sphenodesme pentandra. We often observed the founding delate queens during the wet season: they chewed on the young stem of the host plant below the node about 1–2 cm, thereby constructing an entrance hole under the node (referred to as “primary hole”). This primary hole, formed by the founding queen, finally led to the formation of a swollen node, and the primary hole was completely closed due to the growth and development of the tree (Fig. 1). The primary hole of the initially established colonies was blocked by the head of founding dealate queens. This behavior was commonly observed when the new colony started. These initially established colonies were notably found more often in the wet season than the dry season, even though we did not record the actual numbers. Initial colonies typically consisted of a single dealate queen, little brood and nanitic workers.

Discussion

A pioneer ant-plant mutualism

The ant genus Cladomyrma has been reported to nest in cavities of at least 24 plant species in ten genera from Sundaland and Indochina (Maschwitz et al. 1991; Eguchi and Bui 2007; Moog 2009; Jaitrong et al. 2013) (Table 2). These ant nest in domatia within living shoots, stems, and branches of their host plants. While five species of Cladomyrma can be found in various hosts, eight other species (including C. sirindhornae) exhibit a preference for specific host plant genera (Table 2). Contrary to most host plants of Cladomyrma that inhabit primary or advanced secondary forests (Moog 2009), S. pentandra is a pioneer species found in secondary forests, forest edges, and along forest paths in dry evergreen forests. By extension, the nesting habitat of C. sirindhornae is unique among Cladomyrma. In addition, we found 92% of S. pentandra were occupied by C. sirindhornae. This high occupation rate is comparable to other associations between myrmecophytes and Cladomyrma (100% in Callerya, 93–95% in Drypetes, 86% in Luvunga, and 98% in Spatholobus, Moog 2009) and suggests considerably high level of specialisation between the ant and the plant, with likely mutual benefits. Indeed, while myrmecophytes provide a nesting space and indirect nutrition through scale insects to the ants, plant-ants usually benefit their host by protecting them against herbivores, pathogens and plant competitors (Heil and McKey 2003) and, consequently, increase seed set when ants are present on the plant (Letourneau 1998). However, different plant-ant species can confer different advantages to a same host (Frederickson 2005). C. sirindhornae may provide particular benefits that allow S. pentandra to grow in open microhabitats. Furthermore, their waste accumulation could supply essential nutrients for the host plant (Leroy 2023). The activities of ants, which are a by-product of their behavior, can considerably benefit the nutrient budget of the host plant (Petitclerc et al. 2012), ultimately benefiting both the plant and the ants by reducing competition. The direct benefits of C. sirindhornae to S. pentandra remain to be investigated in future studies.

Table 2.

List of geographic regions and host plants colonized by Cladomyrma ants. Geographic region; B = Borneo, MP = Malay Peninsula, SU = Sumatra, V = Vietnam, TH = Thailand.

Cladomyrma species Host plant Geographic region References
C. andrei Callerya nieuwenhuisii B Agosti et al. 1999
Spatholobus oblongifolius B Agosti et al. 1999
Drypetes longifolia B, MP Agosti et al. 1999
C. aurochaetae Neonauclea gigantea B Agosti et al. 1999
C. crypteroniae Crypteronia griffithii B, MP, SU Agosti 1991
C. macrophylla B Moog et al. 1998
C. dianeae Neonauclea borneensis B Moog 2009
N. gigantea B Moog 2009
N. longipedunculata B Moog 2009
N. paracyrtopoda B Moog 2009
C. hewitti Neonauclea longipedunculata B Maschwitz et al. 1989
N. pseudocalycina B Moog 2009
C. hobbyi Spatholobus oblongifolius B Agosti et al. 1999
Drypetes longifolia B, MP Donisthorpe 1937
C. maryatiae Neonauclea spp. B Agosti et al. 1999
Spatholobus oblongifolius B Moog 2009
C. maschwitzi Crypteronia griffithii B Moog et al.1998
C. macrophylla B Moog 2009
C. nudidorsalis Ryparosa fasciculata MP Moog et al. 2003
Drypetes longifolia B, MP Moog 2009
C. petalae Sphatholobus bracteolatus MP Ridder-Numan and Wiriadinata 1985
Strychorus vanprukii MP Moog 2009
Luvunga sp. MP Moog et al. 2003
Ryparosa fasciculata MP Moog et al. 2003
Sacara thaipingensis MP Maschwitz et al. 1991
Drypetes longifolia B, MP Moog et al. 2003
C. yongi Drypetes fusiformis B, MP Agosti et al. 1999
D. longifolia B, MP Agosti et al. 1999
C. scopulosa Saraca dives V Eguchi and Bui 2006
S. thaipingensis MP Moog 2009
C. sirindhornae Sphenodesme pentandra TH This study
Table 3.

The GLMM result for the fixed and random effects in the colony size model. An asterisk (*) indicates statistically significant at 0.05 level (N = 7 for each season).

Fixed effects Random effects
Estimate Std. Error z-value p-value Groups Name Variance
(Intercept) 8.836 1.027 8.608 <2e-16* Colony (Intercept) 0.6756
Season (Wet) -0.304 0.443 -0.686 0.493
Plant length -0.024 0.091 -0.259 0.795

Division of labor and queen fecundity

The colonies of C. sirindhornae were large, with an average of 5349 workers. This is comparable to the findings of Moog (2009) who reported several thousand workers in colonies of other Cladomyrma species. Approximately 30% (9 to 44%) of workers were major workers, a higher proportion than other ant genera with dimorphic worker castes. For comparison, in Colobopsis, another genus of arboreal formicines, the proportion of major workers is 15% in Colobopsis nipponicus (Hasegawa 1993), and 20% in C. impressus (Walker and Stamps 1986). The high proportion of majors in C. sirindhornae suggests that the major caste is crucial to perform specific tasks (e.g. phragmosis) while maintaining a wide behavioral repertoire (Wilson 1984). At least three Cladomyrma species (C. andrei, C. maschwitzi, and C. petalae) are known to ingest water and regurgitate it outside to prevent their nest from flooding (Moog et al. 1997). Major workers, in virtue of their larger body size, can perform this task more efficiently than minor workers. C. sirindhornae may perform such water-bailing behavior during the wet season and benefit from a high proportion of major workers. Behavioral differences between major and minor workers are an interesting perspective for future studies.

According to our data, C. sirindhornae from eastern Thailand exhibits monogyny, a trait shared with some species in the Malay Peninsula, Borneo, and Sumatra (C. cryptata, C. andrei, C. dianeae, C. maschwitzi, and C. petalae) (Agosti et al. 1999). Polygyny has only been reported for C. scopulosa from northern Vietnam, where founding queens likely cooperate (Eguchi and Bui 2007). The fact that we did not find any founding dealate queen in seven of the twenty dissected colonies (queenless colonies) might be caused probably by the loss of queens during branch collection, as they typically reside near the lower swollen node and may have escaped during cutting. Additionally, worker numbers did not differ significantly between queenright and queenless colonies.

Queens of C. sirindhornae had 27 to 37 ovarioles with dense mature oocytes and yellow bodies, while workers had only two ovarioles without yellow bodies. This number is comparable to what is commonly observed in Formicinae (Peeters and Ito 2015) but unexpectedly low considering colony size. Queen ovariole number varies between species and is an indicator of potential reproductive capacity (Lachaud et al. 1999), as a high number of ovarioles means that more eggs can develop and mature concurrently. For example, in Formicinae, queens of Formica pratensis have 128 to 180 ovarioles and colonies can have over 30,000 workers (Jensen 1977; Brian 1979) whereas queens of Myrmoteras iriodum and M. jaitrongi have only four ovarioles and colony size is below twenty (Kaspari and Vargo 1995; Ito et al. 2017). However, queens of C. sirindhornae were highly physogastric and contained numerous mature and developing oocytes in their elongated ovaries. Physogastry is associated with a high fecundity and can explain how single founding queens with only ~30 ovarioles can give birth to thousands of workers. One physogastric queen has also been reported in C. petalae (Moog 2009), but the reproductive condition of Cladomyrma queens remains poorly studied.

Myrmecophytes as an oasis in the dry season

The interspecific interactions between insects and plants are the important success processes of morphological adaptation (Thompson 2013). Ant-plant relationships are particularly important in many tropical communities, standing out as cornerstones when compared to other animal groups (Hölldobler and Wilson 1990; Blüthgen et al. 2000; Rosumek et al. 2009). Myrmecophytes act as a refuge for herbivores during the dry season. Plants that experience climate change, water stress, or nutritional deficiencies are more vulnerable to herbivory, making them more attractive to herbivores (Edwards and Wratten 1981; Bezemer and Jones 1998; Agrell et al. 2006). Martins et al. (2020) reported that the highest proportion of herbivory occurred during the dry season, a period that abundance of ants also increased. The myrmecophilous herbivorous species are able to occupy the enemy-free space in the host plant due to the benefit from the protection by the associated ants (Pierce et al. 2002). Ants gain benefits not only from the extrafloral nectar but also from the secretions produced by the larvae of myrmecophilous herbivores. Meanwhile, the plants lose protection from other herbivores, as they are being consumed by larvae, leading to a significant increase in the herbivorous area (Martins et al 2020). During the dry season, plants receive protection from ants and, in return, provide them with nourishment from both plant resources and herbivorous insects, serving as an important food source when food is scarce.

In case of colonies of C. sirindhornae here, they produced more reproductives during the wet season. As the development of reproductives requires more energy than workers, this result may indicate a shortage of resources in the dry season. However, no differences in colony size, number of worker pupae, larvae and scale insects were observed between the wet and the dry seasons. This result suggests that the dry season has negligible effects on colony growth and the host plant. Instead, the variation in production of reproductives could simply mean that mating flight exclusively takes place in the wet season. Indeed, in the field, we consistently found more founding queens in the wet season than the dry season, chewing a hole on the young stem of their host or using their head to seal the nest entrance. Reproductives need to leave their host plant to mate, hence favourable abiotic parameters such as moderate temperature and high humidity may be crucial for successful mating and colony founding.

During the dry season, while C. sirindhornae colonies were proliferating, many ground-dwelling ant colonies (e.g. Ponerinae) were found without brood at the same locations (pers. obs.). This contrast is analogous to an oasis in the desert: ant-plants buffer harsh environmental conditions and provide a nesting space with humidity and even nutrition through scale insects and food-bodies year-round. Although honeydew is a beneficial food source, it is nitrogen-poor and likely insufficient for colony growth (Helms and Vinson 2008). Plant-ants can also get proteins from bacteria, fungi, and herbivores that attack their hosts (Defossez et al. 2011; Arcila Hernández et al. 2017). As a consequence, they do not need to leave the domatia, except for the reproductives that can be produced specifically in the wet season when conditions outside are favorable. Ants and plants have coexisted together for at least 140 million years (Moreau et al. 2006) and developed a large range of mutualistic interactions. The role of abiotic factors in the evolution of ant-plant mutualisms is undeniable (Kersch and Fonseca 2005; Mayer et al. 2014) but remains to be investigated on a large scale.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the staff of Ban Ang-Ed Community Forest Development Project for their help in field study. We also thank to the Forest Herbarium of the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation who allowed Weeyawat Jaitrong to examine Sphenodesme specimens in the collection. We would like to thank Mr. Krittanun Tantraporn for his photography in the field. This study was partly financially supported by Burapha University and Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) (grant no. FF 3.7/2566) JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Numbers 24405010 and 16H05769) and Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute, KURDI (grant no. YF(KU)36.67).

References

  • Abbott A (1978) Nutrient dynamics of ants. In: Brian MV (Ed.) Production ecology of ants and termites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 233–244.
  • Agosti D, Moog J, Maschwitz U (1999) Revision of the oriental plant-ant genus Cladomyrma. American Museum Novitates 3283: 1–24.
  • Arcila Hernández LM, Sanders JG, Miller GA, Ravenscraft A, Frederickson ME (2017) Ant–plant mutualism: a dietary by‐product of a tropical ant’s macronutrient requirements. Ecology 98(12): 3141–3151. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2036
  • Beccari O (1884) Piante ospitatrici ossa piante formicarie della Malesia e delle Papuasia. Malesia. Istitudo Sordo-Muti, Genova.
  • Bezemer TM, Jones TH (1998) Plant insect-herbivore interactions in elevated atmospheric CO2: quantitative analyses and guild effects. Oikos 82: 212–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546961
  • Blüthgen N, Reifenrath K (2003) Extrafloral nectaries in an Australian rainforest - structure and distribution. Australian Journal of Botany 51: 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT02108
  • Blüthgen N, Verhaagh M, Goitía W, Jaffé K, Morawetz W, Barthlott W (2000) How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125(2): 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000449
  • Boudinot BE (2015) Contributions to the knowledge of Formicidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata): a new diagnosis of the family, the first global male-based key to subfamilies, and a treatment of early branching lineages. European Journal of Taxonomy 120: 1–62. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2015.120
  • Chantarasawat N, Sitthicharoenchai D, Chaisuekul C, Lekprayoon C (2013) Comparison of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) diversity in dry dipterocarp and mixed-deciduous forests at Sri Nan National Park, Northern Thailand. Tropical Natural History 13: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.58837/tnh.13.1.103037
  • Chuakul W, Saralamp P, Boonpleng A (2002) Medicinal plants used in the Kutchum District, Yasothon Province, Thailand. Thai Journal of Phytopharmacy 9(1): 22–49.
  • Davidson DW, McKey D (1993) The evolutionary ecology of symbiotic ant-plant relationships. Journal of Hymenopteran Research 2: 13–83.
  • Defossez E, Djiéto-Lordon C, McKey D, Selosse MA, Blatrix R (2011) Plant-ants feed their host plant, but above all a fungal symbiont to recycle nitrogen. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278(1710): 1419–1426. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1884
  • Dejean A, Petitclerc F, Roux O, Orivel J, Leroy C (2012) Does exogenic food benefit both partners in an ant-plant mutualism? The case of Cecropia obtusa and its guest Azteca plant-ants. Comptes Rendus Biologies 335(3): 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2012.01.002
  • Edwards PJ, Wratten SD (1981) Ecologia das interações entre insetos e plantas São Paulo: EPU/Editora da Universidade de Sao Paulo 27.
  • Eguchi K, Bui TV (2006) Cladomyrma scopulosa new species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Formicinae) from Vietnam. Sociobiology 47: 305–314.
  • Eguchi K, Bui TV (2007) Ecological notes on a plant ant, Cladomyrma scopulosa Eguchi & Bui (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae) associating with a tree species Saraca dives Pierre (Leguminosae). Asian Myrmecology 1: 51–58.
  • Fiala B, Maschwitz U (1992) Domatia as most important adaptations in the evolution of myrmecophytes in the paleotropical tree genus Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 180: 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940397
  • Hasegawa E (1993) Nest defense and early production of the major workers in the dimorphic ant Colobopsis nipponicus (Wheeler) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33: 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171658
  • Ito F, Miyazaki S, Hashim R (2017) Colony composition and behavioral characteristics of Myrmoteras iriodum and M. jaitrongi in Ulu Gombak, Peninsular Malaysia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Asian Myrmecology 9: 1–9.
  • Jaitrong W, Laedprathom K, Yamane S (2013) A new species of the ant genus Cladomyrma Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Formicinae) from Thailand. Species Diversity 18: 15–22. https://doi.org/10.12782/sd.18.1.015
  • Janzen DH (1973) Sweep samples of tropical foliage insects: effects of seasons, vegetation types, elevation, time of day, and insularity. Ecology 54(3): 687–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935359
  • Jensen T (1977) Annual foraging activity of a colony of Formica pratensis Retz. Proceedings VIII International Congress IUSSI, Wageningen, 217–218.
  • Judd TM (2005) The effects of water, season, and colony composition on foraging preferences of Pheidole ceres (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 18: 781–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-005-8740-6
  • Kaspari M, Vargo EL (1995) Colony size as a buffer against seasonality: Bergmann’s rule in social insects. American Naturalist 145(4): 610–632. https://doi.org/10.1086/285758
  • Kersch MF, Fonseca CR (2005) Abiotic factors and the conditional outcome of an ant–plant mutualism. Ecology 86(8): 2117–2126. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1916
  • Lachaud JP, Cadena A, Schatz B, Perez-Lachaud G, Ibarra-Nunez G (1999) Queen dimorphism and reproductive capacity in the ponerine ant, Ectatomma ruidum Roger. Oecologia 120: 515–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050885
  • Leroy C (2023) Fungi in ant–plant interactions: a key to enhancing plant nutrient-acquisition strategies. New Phytologist 238(5): 1752–1754. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18830
  • Martins J, Moreira A, Assunção M, Oliveira A, Almeida J (2020) Trade-off in plant-ant interactions: seasonal variations. Brazilian Journal of Biology 80(4): 921–933. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.229848
  • Maschwitz U, Fiala B, Lee YF, Chey VK, Tan FL (1989) New and little known myrmecophytic associations from Bornean rainforests. Malayan Nature Journal 43: 106–115.
  • Maschwitz U, Fiala B, Linsenmair KE (1994) Clerodendrum fistulosum (Verbenaceae), an unspecific Myrmecophyte from Borneo with spontaneously opening domatia. Blumea: Biodiversity, Evolution and Biogeography of Plants 39(1/2): 143–150.
  • Maschwitz U, Fiala B, Moog J, Saw LG (1991) Two new myrmecophytic associations from the Malay Peninsula: ants of the genus Cladomyrma (Formicidae, Camponotinae) as partners of Saraca thaipingensis (Caesalpiniaceae) and Crypteronia griffithii (Crypteroniaceae). Insectes Sociaux 38: 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01242710
  • Mayer VE, Frederickson ME, McKey D, Blatrix R (2014) Current issues in the evolutionary ecology of ant–plant symbioses. New Phytologist 202(3): 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12690
  • Mizuno R, Suttiprapan P, Jaitrong W, Ito F (2019) Daily and seasonal foraging activity of the oriental non-army ant doryline Cerapachys sulcinodis species complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 66(2): 239–246. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v66i2.3775
  • Moog J (2009) The association of the plant-ant Cladomyrma with plants in southeast Asia. PHD thesis. Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Moog J, Drude T, Maschwitz U (1998) Protective function of the plant-ant Cladomyrma maschwitzi to its host, Crypteronia griffithii, and the dissolution of the mutualism (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 31(1): 105–129.
  • Moog J, Drude T, Maschwitz U, Agosti D (1997) Flood control by ants: Water-bailing behaviour in the Southeast Asian plant-ant genus Cladomyrma Wheeler (Formicidae, Formicinae). Naturwissenschaften 84: 242–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140050387
  • Moog J, Fiala B, Werner M, Weissflog A, Saw LG, Maschwitz U (2003) Ant-plant diversity in Peninsular Malaysia, with special reference to the Pasoh Forest Reserve. In: Okuda T, Manokaran N, Matsumoto Y, Niiyama K, Thomas SC, Ashton PS (Eds) Pasoh: ecology of a lowland rain forest in southeast Asia. Springer Press, Tokyo, 459–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-67008-7_33
  • Moses J, Peters MK, Tiede Y, Mottl O, Donoso DA, Farwig N, Fayle TM, Novotny V, Sanders NJ, Klimes P (2023) Nutrient use by tropical ant communities varies among three extensive elevational gradients: A cross-continental comparison. Global Ecology and Biogeography 32(12): 2212–2229. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13757
  • Peeters C, Ito F (2015) Wingless and dwarf workers underlie the ecological success of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News 21: 117–130.
  • Ridder-Numan JWA, Wiriadinata H (1985) A revision of the genus Spatholobus (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae). Reinwardtia 10(2): 139–205.
  • Rosumek FB, Silveira FAO, Neves FS, Barbosa NPU, Diniz L, Oki Y, Pezzini F, Fernandes GW, Cornelissen T (2009) Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the role of ants as plant biotic defenses. Oecologia 160(3): 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1309-x
  • Stradling DJ (1978) Food and feeding habits of ants. In: Brian MV (Ed.) Production ecology of ants and termites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 81–106.
  • Vasconcellos A, Andreazze R, Almeida AM, Araujo HF, Oliveira ES, Oliveira U (2010) Seasonality of insects in the semi-arid Caatinga of northeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 54: 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262010000300019
  • Walker J, Stamps J (1986) A test of optimal caste ratio theory using the ant Camponotus (Colobopsis) impressus. Ecology 67: 1052–1062. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939828
  • Wilson EO (1984) The relation between caste ratios and division of labor in the ant genus Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 16: 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00293108
login to comment