Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new species of Iconella (Mason, 1981) (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae), a parasitoid of Melitara subumbrella (Dyar, 1925) cactus moth larvae from New Mexico with biological notes and an updated key to the American Iconella species
expand article infoColin R. Morrison, Wyatt R. Armstrong§, Robert M. Plowes, Lawrence E. Gilbert|, José L. Fernández-Triana
‡ The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States of America
§ Unaffiliated, Santa Fe, United States of America
| College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States of America
¶ Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri–Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada
Open Access

Abstract

We describe the wasp Iconella melitaraevora sp. nov. (Braconidae, Microgastrinae), a parasitoid of Melitara subumbrella caterpillars (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae, Phycitinae). Multiple wasp cohorts were reared from hosts collected in a montane dryland habitat of New Mexico, USA. This is the first case of gregariousness in Iconella. An updated key to American Iconella species is provided. We present a maximum likelihood tree using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) locus of this species relative to other described Iconella species from the Americas. We also describe the biology and environmental conditions where Iconella melitaraevora sp. nov. was discovered in the context of its prickly pear cactus (Opuntia Mill.) herbivore host. The potential biological control capacity of microgastrine wasps which attack prickly pear specialist herbivores is discussed.

Keywords

CO1, gregarious, maximum likelihood tree, Nearctic, Opuntia, Phycitinae, species description, wasp

Introduction

Microgastinae is a lineage of parasitoids wasps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) that attack Lepidoptera with approximately 3,000 named species worldwide and is estimated to comprise 30,000 to 50,000 species when undescribed species are included (Rodriguez et al. 2013; Fernandez-Triana et al. 2020). Iconella (Mason, 1981), is a small genus within Microgastrinae with four previously described species from North America, the Caribbean, and South America (Fernandez-Triana et al. 2013). Iconella are known to be solitary, koinobiont, endoparasitoids of shelter-forming microlepidopteran larvae (Whitfield et al. 1997; Fernandez-Triana et al. 2013). Besides this fundamental natural history, the ecology of Iconella species is not well understood aside from the Neotropical species I. isolata (Muesebeck, 1955) which has been investigated as a biological control agent of crop pests (Bennett 1960; Bartlett 1978).

Until now, two species were known from North America, I. canadensis Fernández-Triana 2013 and I. etiellae (Viereck 1911). Here, we describe a new species from high-elevation, dryland habitat in the southern Rocky Mountains, Iconella melitaraevora sp. nov. We present information on its biology and compare it with other species in the genus. We conclude this contribution with a discussion of biological control implications of microgastrine wasps that attack Opuntia specialist Lepidoptera.

Methods

Opuntia phaeacantha Engelm. (caterpillar host plant) pads and parasitized Melitara subumbrella (Dyar 1925) caterpillars which fed upon O. phaeacantha were collected on 23 August 2023 in Santa Fe County, New Mexico on the property of Hillary and David Armstrong (35.2216, -106.2080). The collections were made at 2225 m a.s.l. in piñon-juniper woodland near the transition from piñon-juniper to Rocky Mountain conifer forest ecoregion. The vegetation of this semi-arid ecosystem is characterized by piñon pine (Pinus edulis Engelm., Pinaceae), one-seed juniper (Juniperus monosperma (Engelm.) Sarg., Cupressaceae), desert prickly pear (Opuntia phaeacantha, Cactaceae), tree cholla (Cylindropuntia imbricata (Haw.) F.M.Knuth, Cactaceae), and Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii Nutt., Fagaceae). Temperature range varies dramatically in this region, both daily and seasonally. The average annual maximum temperature is 17 °C, with high temperatures exceeding 38 °C occasionally, and extended periods below -18 °C from November to March. The average yearly minimum temperature is 4 °C. Precipitation is driven by monsoons from June to August, with the area receiving an average of 50 cm rainfall annually. The area receives 152 cm of snow on average from November to March.

The M. subumbrella larvae were brought to The University of Texas at Austin, Brackenridge Field Laboratory on 03 September 2023 within pads of their host plant. The pads were maintained in containment at room temperature, with indirect sunlight. Pads with actively feeding M. subumbrella larvae were placed inside large plastic boxes on top of 5 cm of ProMix BX mycorrhizae growth media (Québec, Canada) within white mesh, emergence cages. Emergent wasps were collected with an aspirator and preserved in 100% ethanol between 27 November and 25 December 2023.

Wasp and caterpillar DNA extractions were performed at the Brackenridge Field Laboratory using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germany). A region of approximately 450–750 bp of the mitochondrial gene CO1 was amplified with degenerate primer sets LCO1490-F/HCO2198-R (Vrijenhoek 1994), followed by Sanger sequence analysis at Eton Bioscience Inc (California USA). Melitara subumbrella was identified as the caterpillar host following description and ecological context provided by Mann (1969) as well as via BLAST search query of the CO1 region on GenBank (Process ID NACMA004-25). CO1 sequences of other Nearctic and Neotropical Iconella species were downloaded from GenBank and the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD; (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007) (Table 1). Iconella CO1 sequences were aligned using MUSCLE version 5 (Edgar 2004) with default parameters in Geneious version 8 (Kearse et al. 2012). Maximum likelihood trees were constructed in MEGA 11 with a Tamura-Nei substitution rate model (Tamura et al. 2021) and 10,000 bootstrap replicates to infer generic placement. Iconella melitaraevora CO1 sequences were accessioned on BOLD (Process ID NACMA001-24).

Table 1.

Biological metadata, NBCI GenBank and BOLD accession numbers for specimens with COI sequences analyzed in Fig. 2.

Species Collection locality NCBI accession BOLD processID Hosts
Apanteles opuntiarum Santa Fe, Argentina NACMA002-24 Cactoblastis cactorum (Pyralidae)
Iconella melitaraevora New Mexico, U.S.A. NACMA001-24 Melitara subumbrella (Pyralidae)
Iconella etiellae California, U.S.A. JQ851291.1 HYCNE1332-11 Etiella zinckenella (Pyralidae)
Melitara junctolineella (Pyralidae)
Psorosina hammondi (Pyralidae)
Ufa rubedinella (Pyralidae)
Iconella canadensis Ontario, Canada HYCNE1310-11 Epinotia solandriana (Tortricidae)
Acrobasis betulella (Pyralidae)
Iconella andydeansi Alajuela, Costa Rica KC685304.1 ACGBA2903-12 undescribed species phyjanzen021 “Janzen855” (Pyralidae)
Iconella jayjayrodriguezae Alajuela, Costa Rica JQ851067.1 ASHYE1188-09 undescribed species “spiloBioLep01 BioLep414” (Crambidae)

Morphological terms follow Huber and Sharkey (1993), Whitfield et al. (1997), and Fernandez-Triana et al. (2014), which are included in the Hymenoptera Anatomy and Ontology (HAO) website (http://portal.hymao.org/projects/32/public/ontology/). The abbreviations F2 and F14 are used for antennal flagellomeres 2 and 14; T1 and T2 are used for metasomal mediotergites 1 and 2; and L and W refer to length and width. A diagnostic description is provided, followed by some measurements of morphological traits commonly used in Microgastrinae (Fernandez-Triana et al. 2014). The holotype and most paratype specimens are deposited in The University of Texas at Austin Insect Collection in Austin, TX (UTIC), with male and female paratypes also deposited in the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes in Ottawa, Canada (CNC) and the Smithsonian Institute in Washington D.C., USA (USNM).

Data resources

Videos and images of the interaction are provided in Suppl. material 1 available on GitHub via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14589691 (Morrison et al. 2024).

Results

Iconella melitaraevora Fernandez-Triana, sp. nov.

Holotype.

United States • ♀ (UTIC) • New Mexico, Santa Fe, Armstrong residence; 35.2268, -106.2080; 17.xi.2023; ex. Melitara subumbrella (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae, Phycitinae); Wyatt Armstrong & Colin Morrison colls; UTIC396104.

Paratypes.

Same locality and dates as holotype. UTIC: ♀ UTIC396102, ♂ UTIC396103, ♀ UTIC396105; CNC: ♂ ISRL148316.04; USNM: ♂ ISRL148316.06, ♀ ISRL148312.05.

Distribution.

New Mexico, USA. These specimens are the only known representatives of this species.

Etymolgy.

Named after its lepidopteran host species.

Diagnostic description

also see key below. This species can be recognized as Iconella based on the features first described by Mason (1981) and further expanded and discussed in Fernandez-Triana et al. (2013, 2020), namely: a sinuated vein cu-a in the hind wing and the presence of a median longitudinal carina on the propodeum. Iconella melitaraevora is very distinctive from most other described species in the New World (Fig. 1). Iconella isolata, a species recorded from the Caribbean and South America, has much lighter coloration of hind legs and veins in forewing, as well as mostly transparent or whitish pterostigma, with only thin brown margins (pterostigma almost completely brown, with only small whitish spot anteriorly in melitaraevora). Two species recorded from Central America (Costa Rica and Mexico), I. andydeansi and I. jayjayrodriguezae both have mostly transparent or whitish pterostigma, with only thin brown margins (pterostigma almost completely brown, with only small whitish spot anteriorly in melitaraevora); T1 width at anterior margin 3.1× or more its width at posterior margin (T1 width at anterior margin 2.4–2.6× its width at posterior margin in melitaraevora); metatibia with smaller darker area posteriorly and with larger yellow spot on anterior half of first segment of metatarsus (metatibia dark on posterior half and first segment of metatarsus with very small yellow spot anteriorly in melitaraevora). Iconella canadensis, recorded from Eastern Canada, has different pterostigma color (mostly transparent or whitish versus mostly brown in melitaraevora); comparatively smaller ocelli size (ocular-ocellar line 1.6× posterior ocellus diameter versus 2.0× melitaraevora); and shorter ovipositor sheath (ovipositor sheath length 0.8× or less metatibial length versus 1.06–1.12× in melitaraevora). Also see key below for additional diagnostic description.

Figure 1. 

Iconella melitaraevora, female holotype A habitus B head, frontal C wings D head, dorsal E metasoma, dorsal F mesosoma, dorsal.

The most similar species is I. etiellae, which is the only other species so far recorded from New Mexico, among several other states in the central and western U.S.A. (Rodriguez et al. 2013; Fernandez-Triana et al. 2020). The main morphological differences between these two species are the hind leg color (metatibia entirely yellow and metatarsus almost entirely yellow in etiellae, metatibia with posterior half dark brown to black and almost entire metatarsus dark brown to black in melitaraevora); different size of ocelli (ocular-ocellar line 1.6× posterior ocellus diameter in etiellae, 2.0× in melitaraevora); and T1 width slightly different (T1 width at anterior margin 2.4–2.5× T1 width at posterior margin in etiellae versus 2.0× in melitaraevora). Additionally, the longitudinal median carina on propodeum is more strongly defined in etiellae (much thinner and weak in melitaraevora), although this is a character difficult to assess unless several specimens from both species are at hand and available for comparison. The two species have different recorded caterpillar hosts within the Lepidoptera family Pyralidae (Table 1; Etiella zinckenella, Melitara junctolineella, Psorosina hammondi, and Ufa rubedinella for etiellae; Melitara subumbrella for melitaraevora). There are also molecular differences based on DNA barcodes (Fig. 2) with 43/552 bp different base pairs, or a 7.8% difference, between the two species melitaraevora (Process ID NACMA001-24) and etiellae (Process ID HYCNE1332-11). The combination of morphology, biology and molecular data allows us to separate and distinguish these two species. It is important to note that there are many undescribed species accessioned on BOLD, that are probably in Iconella, and the CO1 sequence data of this species differentiates it from those undescribed.

Figure 2. 

Maximum likelihood CO1 tree of described Nearctic and Neotropical Iconella species. Apanteles opuntiarum (Microgastrinae) from a laboratory culture originally collected in Santa Fe Province, Argentina was the outgroup. Bootstrap node support for the generic split is bolded. The scale bar is the nucleotide substitution rate visualized by the branch lengths.

Body measurements and proportions (measurements of holotype provided first, followed, between parentheses, by range based on other specimens). Body L: 3.4 mm (3.2–3.5 mm). Fore wing L: 3.5 mm (3.5–3.6 mm). F2 L/W: 0.22 mm / 0.09 mm (0.22–0.23 mm / 0.10 mm). F14 L/W: 0.10 mm / 0.07 mm (0.10 mm / 0.07–0.06 mm). F15 L/W: 0.10 mm / 0.06 mm (0.10 mm / 0.06 mm). Metafemur L/W: 0.82 mm / 0.26 mm (0.82–0.83 mm / 0.26–0.27 mm). Metatibia L: 1.06 mm (1.02– 1.06 mm). Ovipositor L: 1.12 mm (1.14–1.18 mm). OOL: 0.14 mm (0.13–0.14 mm). POL: 0.15 mm (0.14–0.15 mm). OD: 0.07 mm (0.07 mm). T1 W anterior margin / W posterior margin: 0.32 mm / 0.12 mm (0.32 mm /0.12–0.13 mm). T2 W posterior margin /L: 0.44 mm / 0.11 mm (0.44–0.45 mm / 0.11–0.12 mm). Ovipositor sheath L / metatibia L: 1.06× (1.09–1.12×). Ocular-ocellar line / posterior ocellus diameter: 2.0×. T1 width at anterior margin/ T1 width at posterior margin: 2.4–2.6×.

Biology.

The host for I. melitaraevora is Melitara subumbrella, a host-specific herbivore on Opuntia which has been recorded from three Opuntia species (Mann 1969). Melitara subumbrella larvae were collected on O. phaeacantha (Cactaceae, Fig. 3B), a mid to high elevation Opuntia distributed in dryland habitats of North America from Baja California, California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Chihuahua, Oklahoma, and Texas. Melitara subumbrella larval feeding causes the host plant cladode tissue to swell and create a shelter, which resembles a “gall”, and within which the larvae build tunnels and develop (Fig. 3B). This behavior and the associated plant-response is typical of shelter-building phycitine larvae that use Opuntia host plants (authors, unpublished data).

Figure 3. 

Iconella melitaraevora larval and host habitat images A Piñon-Juniper vegetation characteristic of the site where I. melitaraevora was collected in mid-elevation montane woodlands of Santa Fe County, New Mexico B host plant, Opuntia phaeacantha (Cactaceae) of Melitara subumbrella (Pyralidae) caterpillars, the wasp’s larval host, exuded larval frass is visible outside the swollen shelter where the caterpillar develops C excavated hole that M. subumbrella larvae used to exude frass from the interior of the host plant, note that the hole is covered with silk to prevent intruders from entering D mature M. subumbrella larva inside a tunnel it has excavated within its host plant E parasitized, ultimate instar M. subumbrella larva, parasitoid larval emergence was imminent when this image was taken F gregarious I. melitaraevora larvae emerging from their host and spinning cocoons, see Suppl. material 1 for a video of this moment G silken puparium woven by M. subumbrella larva, within which I. melitaraevora larvae emerged from the host carcass to spin cocoons and pupate.

Twelve M. subumbrella larvae arrived at the laboratory alive. This number was based on the observation of conspicuous frass emission from host plant pads (Fig. 3B, C). Ultimate instar Melitara subumbrella larvae exited the host plant pads and formed puparia within the top 5 cm of soil. This behavior is also typical of Opuntia specialist phycitine larvae (Mann 1969). Five M. subumbrella larvae had I. melitaraevora larval cohorts emerge (Fig. 3F) and make cocoons within puparia that their caterpillar hosts constructed for pupation (Fig. 3G; Suppl. material 1). The wasp larvae were gregarious, with a range of 8–20 successfully emergent individuals per caterpillar cohort (x̄ = 16 wasps ± 4 S.E.). Adult wasps from four of five cohorts emerged successfully, the reason for failed emergence of the final cohort is unknown. The sex ratio was female skewed with 28 females and 19 males reared, overall. However, one cohort had more males than females (9 ♀:10 ♂).

We do not know when I. melitaraevora oviposition took place in the field. But the M. subumbrella were clearly parasitized upon field collection on 23 August 2023 because they were held in containment for the duration of their development which precludes the possibility that they were attacked by other braconid wasps in transit from Santa Fe County, NM to Austin, TX. We observed larvae from one cohort emerge from the host and pupate on 10 December and another cohort was observed pupating on 18 December. Ultimately, two cohorts emerged on approximately 18 December 2023, the third emerged on 25 December 2023 and the fourth on 27 December 2024 (we did not observe the other two cohorts pupating). So, pupal development time was 7–8 days (N = 2), and total immature development was at least 15–19 weeks (N = 4) under laboratory conditions.

Updated key to Iconella from the New World

1 Metatibia mostly yellow, at most with very small and faint brown spot on posterior 0.1 or less; metatarsus mostly yellow, except for brown area on posterior half of first tarsomerus; fore wing with most veins transparent or white, vein margins of same color than interior of vein 2
Metatibia with brown to black coloration on posterior 0.2–0.5; metatarsus mostly dark brown to black, at most with yellowish area on anterior half of first tarsomerus; fore wing with at least some veins with thin brown margins and interior of veins yellow to light brown 3
2(1) Pterostigma almost completely brown, with only small whitish spot anteriorly; humeral complex half yellow, half brown; profemur almost completely dark brown (yellow area absent or limited to posterior 0.2); distance between posterior ocelli 2.4× or more posterior ocellus diameter; T2 width at posterior margin 4.6× or less its central length; larger species, body length 3.0 mm or more and fore wing length 3.3 mm or more [Western and central United States (AR, AZ, CA, CO, IA, NM, OK, WA). Hosts: Etiella zinckenella, Olycella junctolineella, Psorosina hammondi, Ufa rubedinella (Pyralidae)] Iconella etiellae (Viereck, 1911)
Pterostigma mostly transparent or whitish, with only thin brown margins; humeral complex yellow to white; profemur mostly yellow, dark brown area limited to anterior 0.2 or less; distance between posterior ocelli 2.1× or less posterior ocellus diameter; T2 width at posterior margin 5.0× or more its length; smaller size, body length 3.0 mm or less, and fore wing length 3.2 mm or less [Caribbean islands and northern part of South America: British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Montserrat, Puerto Rico, Saint Kitts & Nevis, Trinidad & Tobago. Host: Ancylostomia stercorea (Pyralidae)] Iconella isolata (Muesebeck, 1955)
3(1) Fore wing with pterostigma almost completely brown, with only small whitish spot anteriorly [USA: New Mexico. Host Melitara subumbrella (Pyralidae)] Iconella melitaraevora Fernandez-Triana, sp. nov.
Fore wing with pterostigma mostly transparent or whitish, at most with thin brown margins 4
4(3) Ocular-ocellar line 1.6× posterior ocellus diameter; humeral complex half yellow, half brown; T1 1 width at anterior margin 2.2× or less T1 width at posterior margin; ovipositor sheaths length 0.8× or less metatibia length; larger species, body length 3.5 mm or more (rarely 3.2 mm), fore wing length 3.5 mm or more; an extra-tropical species distributed in North America north of 40°N (Canada) [Eastern Canada: NB, ON, and QC. Host: Epinotia solandriana (Tortricidae) and, likely, Acrobasis betulella (Pyralidae)] Iconella canadensis Fernández-Triana, 2013
Ocular-ocellar line 2.0× or more posterior ocellus diameter; humeral complex fully yellow to white; T1 width at anterior margin 3.1× or more T1 width at posterior margin; ovipositor sheaths length 1.1× metatibial length; smaller size, body length 3.0 mm or less, fore wing length 3.3 mm or less; tropical species from Central America south of 17°N (Mexico and Costa Rica) 5
5(4) Profemur mostly yellow, dark brown area limited to anterior 0.2 or less; meso- and meta- femora mostly dark brown, with proximal 0.1–0.2 yellow to orange; mesoscutellar disc sculpture centrally smooth with few, scattered punctures near margins; T2 width at posterior margin 4.1× or less T2 maximum length medially; body length 2.9–3.0 mm, fore wing length 3.2–3.3 mm [Costa Rica (Area de Conservación Guanacaste) and Mexico (Chiapas). Host: undescribed species of Phycitinae (Pyralidae) Iconella jayjayrodriguezae Fernández-Triana, 2013
Profemur dark brown on anterior half, yellow on posterior half; meso- and meta- femora usually fully dark brown to black; mesoscutellar disc sculpture mostly with punctures scattered all over disc surface; T2 width at posterior margin 4.4× T2 maximum length medially; body length 2.7–2.8 mm, fore wing length 3.0 mm. [Costa Rica (Area de Conservación Guanacaste). Host: undescribed species of Spilomelinae (Crambidae)] Iconella andydeansi Fernández-Triana, 2013

Discussion

In November, temperatures fall below freezing daily, with permanent snow on the ground, in Santa Fe County, New Mexico. This extreme environmental condition provides some limitation on what the possibilities are for I. melitaraevora overwintering activity. One possibility is that I. melitaraevora overwinter as pupae within M. subumbrella puparia buried in the soil, until temperatures rise enough for the snow to thaw in the spring. Some portion of the wasps must be able to tolerate this cold period as pupae (Langer and Hance 2000), unless they can remain active as adults during the winter by attacking alternative hosts (Eoche‐Bosy et al. 2016). In the spring, we predict that moths which survived winter diapause emerge, mate, and produce a new generation of larval hosts. In general, cactus moth flight activity does not commence until their Opuntia host plants begin growing new tissue that caterpillar larvae require for development (Morrison et al. 2025). The wasps documented here emerged in room temperature conditions in November and December 2023. Thus, the average immature development time that we measured may be considerably faster than what happens in the field. We predict that I. melitaraevora developmental phenology responds to favorable conditions, presumably those which facilitate host plant growth.

Until now, all Iconella species with known host information were solitary parasitoids (Whitfield et al. 1997). This is the first time that a gregarious Iconella species has been documented. The wasps in each cohort were probably oviposited by a single female, although it is possible they experienced super parasitism (Bakker et al. 1985; Varone et al. 2024), which is a rare phenomenon in the Micrograstrinae (Fernandez-Triana, personal observations). Regardless, all adults in each cohort emerged within 24 hours of each other which is within the fecundity range of gravid microgastrine females (Harvey et al. 2014).

All known American Iconella species attack shelter-forming lepidopteran larvae in the Pyralidae, Crambidae (Pyraloidea), and Tortricidae (superfamily Tortricoidea) (Whitfield et al. 1997; Fernandez-Triana et al. 2013). Most species in these superfamilies have shelter-building larvae (Lill et al. 2007), but these host superfamilies are not closely related within the lepidopteran clade Ditrysia (Regier et al. 2013). This suggests that Iconella are adapted to circumvent the behavioral manipulations that their hosts do to their food plants (Murdoch 1969; Ghimire and Phillips 2014). Host-finding mechanisms that Iconella species may use to locate suitable hosts include following volatile chemical compounds emitted by damaged host plants (Mbata et al. 2017; Turlings and Erb 2018), and homing in on caterpillar frass volatiles (Van Leerdam et al. 1985; Ngi-Song and Overholt 1997). A tight association with shelter-building larvae is also known from the braconid subfamily, Cheloninae. Chelonine females inspect leaf surfaces to find concealed host eggs into which they oviposit directly into developing larvae (Stireman III and Shaw 2022).

Iconella melitaraevora females may oviposit into hosts directly through Opuntia pads. The ovipositor is long enough (average I. melitaraevora ovipositor length = 1.12 mm) to penetrate an Opuntia epicuticle and reach the internal vascular tissue where Melitara larvae feed (average Opuntia cuticle width = 0.05–0.10 mm thick, (Morrison et al. 2021). However, we think that this is unlikely because Opuntia pads are difficult for insects to penetrate with ovipositors (Jezorek 2011). The alternatives are that females enter pads through holes where Melitara larvae excrete frass (Fig. 3C) and attack larvae inside larval feeding cavities, or they attack when larvae expose themselves to excrete frass from the holes (Fig. 3D). In Argentina, Apanteles opuntiarum Martínez & Berta, 2012 (Microgastrinae) females attack C. cactorum larvae (Pyralidae, Phycitinae) after entering pads through the frass excretion holes as well as when larvae expose themselves outside pads to excrete frass (L. Varone, personal observations). Direct observation is required to confirm how I. melitaraevora oviposition takes place.

Iconella melitaraevora is now the second Iconella species documented to use cactus moth larvae as hosts in North America. The host, M. subumbrella, is distributed from Baja California to west Texas, north along the foothills of the Rocky Mountains to Colorado, and east into the plains of Oklahoma (Mann 1969). Melitara systematics is discordant with multiple phylogenetic hypotheses making species limits uncertain (Simonsen 2008; Regier et al. 2012; Roe 2014). So, the host distribution may be incorrect, or it could be that the I. melitaraevora host availability is considerable given this documented host distribution. Iconella etiellae has been reared from Opuntia specialist Melitara junctolineella caterpillars in Eastern New Mexico, as well as a variety of other shelter-building Pyralidae (Rodriguez et al. 2013; Fernandez-Triana et al. 2020). This indicates that I. melitaraevora may also attack multiple hosts. More shelter-building lepidopteran larvae from the area should be reared to determine if I. melitaraevora is host-specific to Melitara subumbrella, specific to Melitara species, or attacks a range of shelter-building lepidopteran larvae like its sympatric congener I. etiellae. There remains much to be learned of cactus moth trophic interactions, and of shelter-building Lepidoptera enemies in general given that likely only 10% of microgastrine species are described (Rodriguez et al. 2013; Fernandez-Triana et al. 2020).

Parasitism by coevolved Microgastrinae and other hymenopteran parasitoids accounted for 20% of invasive Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae, Phycitinae) mortality in Argentina, its native range (Varone et al. 2019). Native range host testing with several South American Microgastrinae demonstrated that A. opuntiarum is specific to C. cactorum (Martínez et al. 2012; Varone et al. 2015; Folgarait et al. 2018). Follow-up sequential no-choice tests with North American cactus moth larvae, and phylogenetic relatives, confirmed that A. opuntiarum will be host-specific to C. cactorum in North America as well (Florida Dept. Agriculture & Consumer Services, unpublished data). Large-scale rearing capacity for A. opuntiarum has advanced significantly over the past decade (Awad et al. 2019; Srivastava et al. 2019; Varone et al. 2024) and the wasp was in the final stages of regulatory approval for release in the U.S.A. at the time of publication.

North American Melitara are parasitized by wasps in at least four families, including: Braconidae (Cheloninae and Microgastrinae), Scelionidae, Eulophidae,and Chalcididae (Mann 1969; Rodriguez et al. 2013; Morales-Gálvez et al. 2022; Villegas-Luján et al. 2024) and have patchy distributions (authors, personal observations), which suggests that parasitoid pressure is high. Indeed, Mann (1969) also remarked how rare native cactus moth larvae were during a multi-decadal survey of Opuntia herbivores in the U.S.A. and Mexico. Given the shared biology and evolutionary proximity of American cactus moths, we hypothesize that some native North American cactus moth parasitoids in the Microgastrinae can utilize C. cactorum as a host and thus provide a level of natural biological control of this invasive species (Morrison et al. 2025). Ongoing studies and collections by groups at the Brackenridge Field Lab and Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro (Saltillo, Mexico) are investigating this possibility.

Acknowledgements

Laura Springer and Zach Mann assisted with rearing of the wasps. Caroline Boudreault prepared the type specimens and took images. Jenna Haines performed DNA extraction and edited the CO1 sequences. Alex Wild accepted the holotype plus several paratypes at the UTIC. We also thank the USNM and CNC for accepting the paratypes for other workers to examine. We are grateful to Hillary and David Armstrong for preserving high quality land where we were able to discover the wasps.

References

  • Awad J, Hodges A, Hight S, Srivastava M, Howe A, Rohrig E (2019) Laboratory rearing and sex ratio of Apanteles opuntiarum (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a potential biocontrol agent of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Florida Entomologist 102: 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.102.0135
  • Bakker K, Van Alphen J, Van Batenburg F, Van der Hoeven N, Nell H, Van Strien-Van Liempt W, Turlings T (1985) The function of host discrimination and superparasitization in parasitoids. Oecologia 67: 572–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00790029
  • Bartlett BR (1978) Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds: a world review. Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, 545 pp.
  • Bennett FD (1960) Parasites of Ancylostomia stercorea (Zell.),(Pyralidae, Lepidoptera) a pod borer attacking pigeon pea in Trinidad. Bulletin of Entomological Research 50: 737–757. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300054778
  • Eoche‐Bosy D, Outreman Y, Oliveira Andrade T, Krespi L, Van Baaren J (2016) Seasonal variations of host resources influence foraging strategy in parasitoids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 161: 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12494
  • Fernandez-Triana JL, Cardinal S, Whitfield JB, Hallwachs W, Smith MA, Janzenr DH (2013) A review of the New World species of the parasitoid wasp Iconella (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae). ZooKeys 321: 65–87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.321.5160
  • Fernandez-Triana JL, Whitfield JB, Rodriguez JJ, Smith MA, Janzen DH, Hallwachs WD, Hajibabaei M, Burns JM, Solis MA, Brown J (2014) Review of Apanteles sensu stricto (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae) from Area de Conservación Guanacaste, northwestern Costa Rica, with keys to all described species from Mesoamerica. ZooKeys 383: 1–565. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.383.6418
  • Folgarait PJ, Montenegro GA, Plowes RM, Gilbert L (2018) A study of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in its native range: further insights into life cycle, larval identification, developmental parameters, natural enemies, and damage to the host plant Opuntia ficus-indica (Caryophyllales: Cactaceae). Florida Entomologist 101: 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.101.0416
  • Ghimire MN, Phillips TW (2014) Oviposition and reproductive performance of Habrobracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on six different pyralid host species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 107: 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1603/AN14046
  • Harvey JA, Visser B, Le Lann C, De Boer J, Ellers J, Gols R (2014) Convergence and divergence in direct and indirect life-history traits of closely related parasitoids (Braconidae: Microgastrinae). Evolutionary Biology 41: 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-013-9253-4
  • Jezorek H (2011) The invasive cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum: Host plant testing, species interactions, and effects on local Opuntia populations. University of South Florida, 165 pp.
  • Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
  • Langer A, Hance T (2000) Overwintering strategies and cold hardiness of two aphid parasitoid species (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae). Journal of Insect Physiology 46: 671–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(99)00155-9
  • Lill JT, Marquis RJ, Cuddington K, Byers J, Wilson W, Hastings A (2007) Microhabitat manipulation: ecosystem engineering by shelter-building insects. Ecosystem Engineers: Plants to Protists, 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1875-306X(07)80008-6
  • Martínez JJ, Berta C, Varone L, Logarzo G, Zamudio P, Zaldívar-Riverón A, Aguilar-Velasco RG (2012) DNA barcoding and morphological identification of Argentine species of Apanteles (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), parasitoids of cactus-feeding moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Phycitinae), with description of a new species. Invertebrate Systematics 26: 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS12060
  • Mason WRM (1981) The polyphyletic nature of Apanteles Foerster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): a phylogeny and reclassification of Microgastrinae. The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 113: 1–147. https://doi.org/10.4039/entm113115fv
  • Mbata GN, Eason J, Payton M, Davis M (2017) Putative host volatiles used by Habrobracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to locate larvae of Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 30: 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-017-9619-z
  • Morales-Gálvez M, Villegas-Luján R, Plowes R, Gilbert L, Matson T, Gallegos-Morales G, Sanchez-Peña S (2022) Natural egg parasitism by Scelionidae on a Phycitine cactus moth in Mexico. The Florida Entomologist 105: 174–177. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.105.0212
  • Morrison CR, Plowes RM, Jones NT, Gilbert LE (2021) Host quality does not matter to native or invasive cactus moth larvae: grave implications for North American prickly pears. Ecological Entomology 46: 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12964
  • Morrison CR, Armstrong WR, Plowes RM, Gilbert LE, Fernández-Triana JL (2024) Data from: A new species of Iconella (Mason 1981) (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae), a parasitoid of Melitara subumbrella (Dyar 1925) cactus moth larvae from New Mexico with biological notes and an updated key to the American Iconella species. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14589691
  • Morrison CR, Plowes RM, Springer LE, Sanchez-Peña S, Gilbert LE (2025) Establishment and range expansion of invasive Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Phycitinae) in Texas. Florida Entomologist 108: 20240052. https://doi.org/10.1515/flaent-2024-0052
  • Murdoch WW (1969) Switching in general predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecological monographs 39: 335–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942352
  • Ngi-Song AJ, Overholt WA (1997) Host location and acceptance by Cotesia flavipes Cameron and C. sesamiae (Cameron)(Hymenoptera: Braconidae), Parasitoids of African Gramineous Stemborers: Role of Frass and Other Host Cues. Biological Control 9: 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1997.0524
  • Regier JC, Mitter C, Solis MA, Hayden JE, Landry B, Nuss M, Simonsen TJ, YEN SH, Zwick A, Cummings MP (2012) A molecular phylogeny for the pyraloid moths (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea) and its implications for higher‐level classification. Systematic Entomology 37: 635–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2012.00641.x
  • Regier JC, Mitter C, Zwick A, Bazin et al., Cummings MP, Kawahara AY, Sohn J-C, Zwickl DJ, Cho S, Davis DR (2013) A large-scale, higher-level, molecular phylogenetic study of the insect order Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies). PLoS ONE 8: e58568. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058568
  • Rodriguez JJ, Fernández-Triana JL, Smith MA, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Erwin TL, Whitfield JB (2013) Extrapolations from field studies and known faunas converge on dramatically increased estimates of global microgastrine parasitoid wasp species richness (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Insect Conservation and Diversity 6: 530–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12003
  • Roe AD (2014) Phycitinae phylogeny based on two genes, with implications for morphological trait evolution and Heinrich’s tribal classification (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). The Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 69: 157–173. https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.69i3.a3
  • Simonsen T (2008) Phylogeny of the cactus-feeding phycitines and their relatives (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) based on adult morphology: Evaluation of adult character-systems in phycitine systematics and evidence for a single origin of Cactaceae-feeding larvae. Insect Systematics & Evolution 39: 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1163/187631208788784200
  • Srivastava M, Srivastava P, Karan R, Jeyaprakash A, Whilby L, Rohrig E, Howe AC, Hight SD, Varone L (2019) Molecular detection method developed to track the koinobiont larval parasitoid Apanteles opuntiarum (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) imported from Argentina to control Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Florida Entomologist 102: 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.102.0207
  • Stireman III JO, Shaw SR (2022) Natural history and ecology of caterpillar parasitoids. In: Caterpillars in the middle: Tritrophic interactions in a changing world. Springer, 225–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86688-4_8
  • Turlings TC, Erb M (2018) Tritrophic interactions mediated by herbivore-induced plant volatiles: mechanisms, ecological relevance, and application potential. Annual review of entomology 63: 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043507
  • Van Leerdam M, Smith Jr J, Fuchs T (1985) Frass-mediated, host-finding behavior of Cotesia flavipes, a braconid parasite of Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 78: 647–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/78.5.647
  • Varone L, Aguirre MB, Lobos E, Ruiz Pérez D, Hight SD, Palottini F, Guala M, Logarzo GA (2019) Causes of mortality at different stages of Cactoblastis cactorum in the native range. BioControl 64: 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-019-09938-0
  • Varone L, Benda N, Guala ME, Martínez JJ, Bruzzone OA (2024) Reproductive biology and rearing improvements of Apanteles opuntiarum, potential biocontrol agent of the Argentine cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum. Insects 15: 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15080604
  • Varone L, Logarzo G, Martínez JJ, Navarro F, Carpenter JE, Hight SD (2015) Field host range of Apanteles opuntiarum (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Argentina, a potential biocontrol agent of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in North America. Florida Entomologist 98: 803–806. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0265
  • Villegas-Luján R, Morales-Gálvez M, Plowes R, Gilbert L, Gallegos-Morales G, Bremer JS, Talamas E, Sánchez-Peña S (2024) A member of the Telenomus californicus Ashmead, 1893 complex parasitizing native cactus moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs in Mexico. Zootaxa 5497: 444–450. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5497.3.9
  • Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3: 294–299.
  • Whitfield J, Wharton R, Marsh P, Sharkey M (1997) Subfamily microgastrinae. Manual of the New World genera of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera) Special Publication, 333–364.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Video of Iconella melitaraevora sp. nov. larvae emerging from its host, Melitara subumbrella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), to spin cocoons within which they pupated

Colin R. Morrison, Wyatt R. Armstrong, Robert M. Plowes, Lawrence E. Gilbert, José L. Fernández-Triana

Data type: zip

Explanation note: Available on GitHub via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14589691 (Morrison et al. 2024).

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (32.27 MB)
login to comment