Research Article |
Corresponding author: Volker Mauss ( volker.mauss@gmx.de ) Academic editor: Michael Ohl
© 2018 Volker Mauss, Rainer Prosi.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Mauss V, Prosi R (2018) Identity and distribution of Celonites hermon Gusenleitner, 2002 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Masarinae) from the Middle East with a description of the hitherto unknown male. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 66: 55-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.66.29795
|
Based on the morphological examination of the exoskeleton and the male genitalia of newly discovered specimens from Syria the status and taxonomic position of Celonites hermon Gusenleitner, 2002 is reinvestigated. The hitherto unknown male is formally described. Celonites hermon is a member of the C. abbreviatus-complex. It shares several probably derived characters with C. andreasmuelleri, from which it is considered to be reproductively isolated by differences in the male genitalia, the form of sternum VIII and tergum VII as well as the colour pattern of the male antennae. Therefore C. hermon is hypothesized to represent a separate biospecies. It has been recorded only from a small area in the mountain ranges along the Lebanese section of the Dead Sea Transform in Syria and Israel.
Pollen wasps, biogeography, taxonomy, Palaearctic, Israel, Syria
The genus Celonites is very distinct from other pollen wasps in the wide horizontal lamellae on the propodeum and the acute sides of the metasoma (
Celonites hermon was described from a single female collected by Bytinski-Salz at Mount Hermon in the Golan Mountains by Gusenleitner in 2002. He separated the specimen from the “very similar” Celonites abbreviatus because of its extremely long proboscis that reaches the distal end of the abdomen (
However,
Based on new material of Celonites hermon, the aim of this study is to reinvestigate the status of the taxon carefully, to characterize its taxonomic position within the genus Celonites and to describe the newly discovered male.
The specimens of Celonites studied belong to the public collection of the Upper Austrian State Museum (Linz, Austria) (OLML), as well as to the private collection of J. Gusenleitner (Linz, Austria) (JG). The specimens were investigated under a WILD M3 stereo microscope (maximum magnification 80 times). Measurements of the exoskeleton were made using an ocular micrometer (highest resolution 0.011 mm). Distances between the ocelli, the compound eyes and the mesonotum width were measured according to
Israel: Mt. Hermon, 33.416111N, 35.857500E, 1900 m a.s.l., 17.07.1971, 1♀ (holotype, dbM No. 3579), leg. Bytinski-Salz, coll. JG. Syria: 40 km NE of Damascus, 33.416667N, 35.866667E, 13.05.1996, 4♀♀ (dbM No. 3684, 3685, 3686, 3687), 2♂♂ (dbM No. 3688, 3689), leg. Mi. Halada, coll. OLML; West Syria, Tartus env., 34.900000N, 35.883333E, 25.05.1996, 2♀♀ (dbM No. 3691, 3692), leg. Mi. Halada, coll. OLML.
Pale markings light yellowish to yellow without reddish tinges (Fig.
Females with head in front view more elongated in relation to its length. Clypeus with lateral margins more continuously rounded leading to elongated appearance (Fig.
Males with only two oval-shaped tyloids situated ventrally on articles A9 and A10 of club-shaped antennae. Midcoxa with a small but distinct spine at distal end, on anterior side of midcoxa close to its antero-medial angle. Tergum VII markedly lobed posteriorly (Fig.
Colour (Fig.
Structure: Head in front view as long as broad. Clypeus a little broader than long, distal margin deeply emarginate; cuticula shiny and smooth with close macropunctation becoming less distinct towards distal margin; pale stiff setae arising from macropunctures without distal “knob”; lateral setae with distal ends frequently curved in distal-medial direction. Frons diagonally striated with moderately spaced to close macropunctation, interstices smooth; bearing pale stiff setae, up to 0.22 mm long, 1.1 times as long as diameter of median ocellus, laterally some with curved distal end, in centre mainly with tiny distal “knob”; frontal line in one specimen raised to form a small protuberance in centre of frons. Median ocellus circular, lateral ocelli more or less obliquely oval; diameter of median ocellus distinctly larger than diameter of lateral ocelli. Vertex falling away obliquely towards occipital carina immediately behind ocelli (Fig.
Anterior margin of pronotum raised to carina especially sharp medially (erroneously termed anterior pronotal carina by
Metasomal terga with dark anterior part continuing into posterior pale part by slight declivity; postero-lateral corners slightly produced; posterior margin of tergum I weakly crenulated, crenulation not produced into spines and not projecting over smooth translucent posterior margin of tergum; posterior margin of terga II–VI crenulated, crenulation produced into short partially posteriorly truncated spines, not or only slightly projecting over smooth translucent lower posterior margin of terga (Fig.
Male genitalia as in Figs
Male genital of Celonites hermon (dbM No. 3689) in dorsal (left) and ventral view (right). Setae only shown on one side of each drawing. Nomenclature follows that of
Measurements of the exoskeleton are summarized in Table
Unknown.
Celonites hermon is known only from three localities in the ranges of the Lebanon and Anti-Lebanon Mountains along the Lebanese section of the Dead Sea Transform (Fig.
Measurements of the exoskeleton of imagines of Celonites hermon (x = median; min = minimum, max = maximum; measurements were made with a Wild M3 stereomicroscope with maximum magnification 80×, maximum accuracy 0.011 mm, all distances in mm).
Parameter | Female | Male | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | min | max | n | x | min | max | n | |
lateral ocelli distance | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 7 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 2 |
median/lateral ocellus distance | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 7 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 2 |
compound eyes distance | 1.28 | 1.22 | 1.36 | 7 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 2 |
A1 length | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 7 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 2 |
A3 length | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 7 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 2 |
A3 width | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 7 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 2 |
A4–5 length | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 7 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 2 |
A8–12 length | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 7 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 2 |
A8–12 width | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 7 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 2 |
antennal sockets distance | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 7 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 2 |
clypeus maximum width | 1.11 | 1.04 | 1.16 | 7 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 2 |
clypeus apical width | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 7 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 2 |
clypeus length | 0.90 | 0.84 | 1.38 | 7 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 2 |
mesonotum width | 2.74 | 2.55 | 2.80 | 6 | 2.60 | 2.49 | 2.72 | 2 |
mesoscutum length | 1.96 | 1.88 | 2.10 | 6 | 1.96 | 1.88 | 2.04 | 2 |
wing length | 5.54 | 5.25 | 5.68 | 7 | 5.47 | 5.40 | 5.54 | 2 |
R+Sc length | 2.94 | 2.81 | 3.13 | 7 | 2.88 | 2.85 | 2.90 | 2 |
number of hamuli | 12 | 10 | 14 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 2 |
femur I length | 1.39 | 1.34 | 1.48 | 6 | 1.33 | 1.31 | 1.34 | 2 |
tibia I length | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 7 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 2 |
metatarsus I length | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 7 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 2 |
tergum I width | 2.74 | 2.58 | 2.81 | 7 | 2.65 | 2.60 | 2.69 | 2 |
tergum I length | 1.00 | 0.95 | 1.14 | 7 | 1.04 | 0.94 | 1.14 | 2 |
tergum II width | 2.77 | 2.63 | 2.90 | 7 | 2.67 | 2.60 | 2.74 | 2 |
total length | 7.2 | 6.7 | 7.5 | 7 | 7.3 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 2 |
For illustrations of the morphological characters of C. abbreviatus, C. tauricus and C. andreasmuelleri see
1 | Female | 2 |
– | Male | 5 |
2 | Cuticula on frons with a dull, densely shagreened, semi-circular central area covered with knobbed pollen-collecting setae, contrasting distinctly to the adjacent smooth, shiny cuticula. Clypeus and vertex much more shiny. Terga of metasoma with extensive yellowish-white and reddish markings | Celonites andreasmuelleri Mauss, 2013 |
– | Cuticula on frons and at least dorsal half of clypeus densely and strongly shagreened leading to a conspicuous dull region covered with knobbed pollen-collecting setae, changing gradually into the adjacent smooth, shiny cuticula on vertex (Fig. |
3 |
3 | Pollen collecting knobbed setae on frons longer and thinner, up to 1.4 times as long as diameter of median ocellus (Figs |
Celonites hermon Gusenleitner, 2002 |
– | Pollen collecting knobbed setae on frons shorter and more robust, not more than 1.0 times as long as diameter of median ocellus. Ocelli smaller, with median ocellus only slightly larger than lateral ocelli. Lateral ocelli more evenly rounded. Vertex continues more or less horizontally behind ocelli towards occipital carina. Mesoscutum less shiny, with dense, moderately coarse punctures separated by knife-like interstices, especially anteriorly resulting in a more comb-like appearance | 4 |
4 | Antennal club (A8–12) with dark tip, that is, at least distal end of A12 is blackish markedly contrasting on ventral side to adjacent light reddish brown area of antennal club. On dorsal side blackish marking extends usually over distal parts of A11 fading gradually towards proximal end (for differences between geographic populations see |
Celonites tauricus Kostylev, 1935 |
– | Antennal club (A8–12) of individuals from Balkan populations completely orange, in some dark coloured individuals from western populations club becomes darker dorsally, while immediate tip and especially ventral side of A12 remain lighter | Celonites abbreviatus (Villers, 1789) |
5 | Tergum VII trilobed. Posterior emargination of sternum VIII medially bent at an angle of about 135°. Laterally the posterior, angled margin of sternum VIII continues directly into the lateral surface of the sternum without a prominent edge or a distinct spine, so that even a small postero-lateral transverse section is lacking. Genitalia as in |
Celonites andreasmuelleri Mauss, 2013 |
– | Tergum VII quadrilobed, since the median lobe is medially distinctly emarginate (Fig. |
6 |
6 | Posterior margin of stipes of male genitalia with dorso-medial concavity (Figs |
Celonites hermon Gusenleitner, 2002 |
– | Posterior margin of stipes of male genitalia straight, without dorso-medial concavity. Stipes in dorsal view shorter, with medial and lateral margin diverging continuously towards posterior end. Posterior process of volsella flat. Medial process of volsella continues gradually into shaft. Ocelli smaller. Vertex running more or less horizontally towards occipital carina behind ocelli | 7 |
7 | Antennal club (A8–12) orange, ventrally with distinct blackish marking on A12 extending on distal parts of A11 well set off from orange of adjacent ventral area, orange on dorso-posterior parts of A8–A12 can be darkened to variable extend. Clypeus white to whitish-yellow. Emargination of sternum VIII more evenly concave. Male genital broader. Volsella strongly sclerotized, with a larger medial process | Celonites tauricus Kostylev, 1935 |
– | Antennal club (A8–12) of individuals from Balkan populations completely orange, in some dark coloured individuals from western populations club becomes darker dorsally, while immediate tip and especially ventral side of A12 remain lighter. Clypeus yellow, except in one rare variety from Switzerland in which it is nearly white. Emargination of sternum VIII medially angled. Genital less broad. Volsella less sclerotized, with a smaller medial process | Celonites abbreviatus (Villers, 1789) |
Celonites hermon can be assigned to the subgenus Celonites s.str., the Celonites abbreviatus-group and finally the C. abbreviatus-complex without contradiction as it shares all characters of these taxa established by
On the other hand, Celonites hermon is lacking some of the potential autapomorphies of C. andreasmuelleri recognized by
The hypotheses proposed by
Celonites hermon has been recorded only from a small area in the mountain ranges along by both sides of the Lebanese section of the Dead Sea Transform (Fig.
Fritz Gusenleitner (Upper Austrian State Museum, Linz) and Josef Gusenleitner (Linz) generously provided the investigated specimens of Celonites hermon. We are especially grateful to Jim Carpenter (American Museum of Natural History, New York) for valuable comments on the manuscript and improvement of our English and Rainer Neumeyer and Andreas Müller for their careful reviews.