Catalogue |
Corresponding author: Wellington D. Ferreira ( wellingtondonizet@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Michael Ohl
© 2019 Wellington D. Ferreira, Marcel G. Hermes, Bolívar R. Garcete-Barrett, James M. Carpenter.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Ferreira WD, Hermes MG, Garcete-Barrett BR, Carpenter James M (2019) Two new species of Pirhosigma Giordani Soika (Vespidae, Eumeninae), with an updated catalog for the genus. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 71: 225-240. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.71.35754
|
Two new species of eumenine wasps were described from Panama and Peru, namely Pirhosigma abregoi Garcete-Barrett & Hermes sp. nov. and P. cambrai Garcete-Barrett & Ferreira sp. nov. Lectotypes are designated for Eumenes deformata barberoi Bertoni and Eumenes superficialis mondaiensis Bertoni. Pirhosigma mearimense putumayense Giordani Soika stat. nov. is treated as a color variation of the typical P. mearimense (Zavattari). Additions to the key by
New species, Panama, Peru, Potter wasps, Taxonomy
Recently, the Eumeninae, the so-called potter wasps, have been receiving much attention in studies regarding the higher-level phylogenetic relationships of their main lineages, especially with the aid of novel molecular data (
Despite this recent phylogenetic progress, the Neotropical fauna of potter wasps remains little explored, a fact that is particularly noticeable by the poor representation of the group in most Latin American entomological collections. In fact, the group is not as abundant as the social vespids, and few experts are carrying out research within the group. Nevertheless, the number of described species has been increasing constantly for the Neotropics (e.g.
Pirhosigma is a somewhat small genus of eumenine wasps, currently comprising nine described species. Of these, two were described within the last three years (
Material from the following institutions was examined (the acronyms follow
MIUP Museo de Invertebrados Graham B. Fairchild, Universidad de Panama, Panama (Dr. Roberto Cambra, Dr. Diomedes Quintero and Jean Carlos Ábrego);
Additional acronyms mentioned in the catalog of species of Pirhosigma are:
Type specimens of species potentially closely related to the new species were examined from the cited institutions (details in the taxonomic catalog). All examined specimens were dry pinned preserved ones. Examination was undertaken with a Leica S8 APO stereomicroscope. Photographs of structures of interest were obtained with a Canon EOS Rebel T6 digital camera attached to the stereomicroscope. The same camera with a Canon Macro 100 mm lens and a Yongnuo 2x Extensor were used for photographing specimen habitus. All images were captured using Canon EOS Utility software and using a light dome modified from
Body length is taken from the frons to the hind border of T2 and expressed as an approximate measurement, as body position can modify it more or less substantially. Wing length is taken from the humeral angle of the wing at the border of the tegula to the wing tip and expressed as an approximate measurement, as wing position can affect the total measurement.
This is the only species of Pirhosigma that does not present a preapical fossa in T1 (Fig.
Pirhosigma abregoi Garcete-Barrett & Hermes, holotype female 1 habitus 2 head, frontal view 3 pronotum, frontal view, arrow pointing to the pronotal carina in the shape of an inverted “V” 4 pronotum, lateral view, arrow pointing to the well-developed lateral lamella in the pronotal carina 5 T1, dorsal view, arrow pointing to the apical portion without a well-developed preapical fossa 6 T1, lateral view, arrow pointing to the well-developed longitudinal carina. Scale bars: 1 mm (1); 0.5 mm (2–6).
Pirhosigma abregoi Garcete-Barrett & Hermes, holotype female 7 T2 with an evident punctuation, dorsal view. Pirhosigma cambrai Garcete-Barrett & Ferreira, holotype female 8 habitus 9 head, frontal view 10 head, lateral view, arrow pointing to the curved clypeus apex 11 pronotum, dorsal view, arrow pointing to the well-developed dorsally pronotal carina 12 T1, lateral view, arrow pointing to the well-developed longitudinal carina. Scale bars: 1 mm (8); 0.5 mm (7, 9–12).
Holotype female.
Body length (from head to apex of T1): 5.5 mm; Forewing length (from mid tegula to apex): 6.07 mm.
Body with predominantly brown-yellowish tegument. Yellow head, with a wide oval black mark on the frons, connected to a narrow black band extending to the occiput; brownish mark in the center of the clypeus. Mesosoma and metasoma with predominantly brown-yellowish tegument. Antennae with brownish scape and pedicel; progressively darker flagellum from the base to the apex. Mesoscutum totally blackened. Scutellum with a central black-brown spot. Brownish propodeum. Black mark in the basal portion of T1. Yellow marks more prominent in the regions that follow: parategulae; apical margin of T1; lateral and apical margins of T2; apical margin of S1. Brown wings.
Labrum truncated. Clypeus broader than long, with short and emarginated apex; small and not carinate apical teeth present. Interantennal region without cariniform elevation. Pronotal carina well developed in all its extension, in the shape of an inverted “V” in frontal view, with a well-developed lateral lamella. Lateral surface of pronotum narrow, with the distance between pronotal fovea and the mesepisternum smaller than the size of the fovea itself; pronotal fovea slit-shaped. Pretegular carina absent. Parategulae triangular. Sulcus between the scutellum and metanotum obsolete. T1 elongated, with basal portion longer than the apical portion; two lateral longitudinal carinae present, not reaching half of the segment; preapical fossa absent. T2 oval, longer than wide, with lamella well developed. S2 without abrupt basal elevation.
Clypeus without evident punctation. Frons and vertex with deep, coarse and abundant punctures, with space between them smaller than the size of a puncture. Pronotum with granular punctation, with shallow, abundant and slightly thickened punctures, distance between them smaller than the size of a puncture. Mesespisternum with deep punctures, denser in its upper portion; shallow and slightly evident punctures in its lower portion. Mesoscutum, scutellum and propodeum with deep and coarse punctures. Apex of T1 with evident shallow punctation. T2 with well-marked deep punctation, distance between them smaller than the size of a puncture.
Golden pubescence covering the entire surface of the body. Bristles shorter, thick and abundant on clypeus, frons, vertex, and mesosoma. Elongated, delicate and thin bristles in the metasoma.
Unknown.
Holotype: PANAMA • 1 ♀; Peninsula Gigante, Barro Colorado Nature Monument; 30 Jul. 1990; A. Mena leg. (MIUP).
Peninsula Gigante: Barro Colorado Nature Monument; Panama.
This species is named after the Panamanian Biologist Jean Carlos Ábrego.
P. cambrai is quite similar to P. mearimense (Zavattari) and P. sulcata Ferreira & Hermes, sharing with them the S2 without a basal slope followed by an elevation (Fig.
Representatives of Pirhosigma species 13–15 Pirhosigma cambrai Garcete-Barrett & Ferreira, holotype female 13 T1, dorsal view, arrow pointing to the apex with a pre-apical fossa well-developed 14 T1 and S2, lateral view, arrow pointing to the S2 without a basal slope followed by an elevation 15 T2, dorsal view 16 Pirhosigma mearimense (Zavattari), female head, frontal view 17 Pirhosigma sulcata Ferreira & Hermes, holotype male head, frontal view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (13–17).
Holotype female.
Body length (from head to apex of T1): 5.10 mm; Forewing length (from mid tegula to apex): 6.50 mm.
Body with predominantly blackish tegument. Yellow marks as follows: stripes on inner margin of compound eyes; upper surface of the gena; narrow range in the antero-dorsal region of pronotum; narrow bands in the distal portions of the T1–T6 and S2–S6. S1 brownish. Antennae brownish. Yellow-brownish legs. Brownish wings.
Labrum rounded, narrow. Clypeus broader than long, apically curved backwards and with short, concave and emarginated apex; small and ecarinate apical teeth present, with small distance between each other. Interantennal region without cariniform elevation. Pronotal carina well developed dorsally, gently and roundly recurved in the humeral region. Lateral surface of pronotum narrow, with the distance between pronotal fovea and the mesepisternum smaller than the size of the fovea itself. Pretegular carina absent. Parategulae pointed. Sulcus between scutellum and metanotum obsolete. T1 distinctly filiform with basal region of greater length than the apical portion; two lateral longitudinal carina present; preapical fossa present. T2 wider than long, outlined as a half oval in dorsal view; well-developed apical lamella. S2 without basal slope followed by an elevation.
Clypeus without evident punctation. Frons and vertex with evident and abundant punctures, with distance between them approximately smaller than the size of a puncture; micro-punctation evident. Pronotum, upper portion of the mesepisternum, mesoscutum, scutelum, metanotum and propodeum with deep and abundant punctures, with distance between punctures smaller than the size of a puncture. Lower portion of the mesepisternum with shallow and sparse punctures, distance between them approximately greater than the size of a puncture. T1 unpunctate. T2 with micro-punctation evident.
Fine whitish pubescence covering the entire body. Whitish bristles covering the head, concentrated in the clypeus. Brownish, short and thin bristles on mesosoma. Brownish and long bristles on T1–T6 and S2–S6.
Unknown.
Holotype: PERU • 1 ♀; Madre de Dios, Manu Reserve, Pakitza Station; 1–2 Mar. 1992; R. Cambra leg. (MIUP).
Madre de Dios: Manu Reserve, Pakitza Station; Peru.
This species is dedicated to the Panamanian entomologist Roberto Cambra.
The holotype of P. cambrai sp. nov. (female, MIUP) was compared with the holotypes of P. mearimense (Zavattari) (male,
Additional examined material. Pirhosigma mearimense (Zavattari): Holotype: BRAZIL • 1 ♂; Miarim; Gribodo leg. (
The species P. abregoi is readily differentiated from all other species in the key of
1’ | Preapical fossa on T1 absent (Fig. |
P. abregoi Garcete-Barrett & Hermes, sp. nov. |
– | Preapical fossa on T1 present (Fig. |
(couplet 1 in |
The species P. cambrai runs to couplet 6 of
6 | Pronotal carina well developed dorsally (Fig. |
6’ |
– | Pronotal carina not evident dorsally; yellowish with black marks and bands | 8 |
6’ | Short clypeus, wider than long (Fig. |
P. cambrai Garcete-Barrett & Ferreira, sp. nov. |
– | Clypeus longer than wide or almost as long as wide (Figs |
7 |
7 | Male with a well-marked groove between the metanotum and the scutellum [female unknown] | P. sulcata Ferreira & Hermes |
– | Male without a well-marked groove between the metanotum and the scutellum | P. mearimense (Zavattari) |
Pirhosigma Giordani Soika, 1978: 11, 229.
Type species: Eumenes simulans de Saussure, 1875, by original designation.
Tricomenes Giordani Soika, 1978: 10, 254.
Type species: Eumenes pilosus Fox, 1899, by original designation and monotypy.
Pirhosigma;
Pirhosigma aenigmaticum Giordani Soika, 1978
Eumenes simulans;
Pirhosigma aenigmaticum Giordani Soika, 1978: 231, 250.
Type Data: Holotype female
Type Locality: Valle Anchicaya, Cali, Colombia.
Pirhosigma aenigmaticum;
Distribution: Mexico, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador.
Pirhosigma deforme (Fox, 1899)
Eumenes deforma Fox, 1899: 453, 461.
Type Data: Lectotype female
Type Locality: Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Eumenes deforma;
Eumenes deformata [!] barberoi Bertoni, 1926: 76.
Type Data: Lectotype female by present designation (
Type Locality: Puerto Bertoni, Paraguay.
Eumenes deformata barberoi;
Pirhosigma deforme;
Distribution: Brazil, Paraguay.
Remarks. In the original description (Bertoni, 1926) of Eumenes deformata barberoi, the author did not mention how many specimens were part of the type series nor the locality where they were collected. Furthermore, Bertoni labelled seven specimens as Eumenes deformata paranensis (unpublished subspecific name), and the name barberoi was never attached to any specimen whatsoever. The lack of a locality, in this case, poses no issue, since all individuals bear a label with the locality “Puerto Bertoni”, where the author lived for many years and collected many of his specimens. Also, the only subspecific name proposed by Bertoni under the specific name deformata is indeed barberoi, which leaves no doubt about the members of the type series. Finally, the description matches these specimens, and one well-preserved female was chosen as the lectotype and labelled accordingly; the remainder of the specimens (two males and four females) are to be treated as paralectotypes.
Here we have the opportunity to correct the date of Bertoni’s paper “Hymenópteros nuevos o poco conocidos”. Though considered as published in December of 1925, as suggested in the heading of its cover, issue 2(1) of the “Revista de la Sociedad Científica del Paraguay”, was actually printed in 1926, as indicated in the foot of the very same cover. This paper contains the original descriptions of the species-level names Zetamenes rufomaculata ssp. meridionalis Bertoni, Zetamenes filiformis var. costarricensis Bertoni, Discoelius strigosus ssp. costarricensis Bertoni, Pachymenes atra var. ornatissima Bertoni, Eumenes deformata barberoi Bertoni, Amphimenes totonacus var. manateci Bertoni, Monobia paraguayensis Bertoni, Odynerus migonei Bertoni and the generic name Protozethus Bertoni.
Pirhosigma limpidum Giordani Soika, 1978
Pirhosigma limpidum Giordani Soika, 1978: 230, 240.
Type Data: Holotype female
Type Locality: Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Pirhosigma limpidum;
Distribution: Brazil.
Pirhosigma mearimense (Zavattari, 1912)
Eumenes mearimensis Zavattari, 1912: 101.
Type Data: Holotype male
Type Locality: Vitoria do Mearim, Maranhão, Brazil (
Pirhosigma mearimense;
Pirhosigma mearimense mearimense;
Pirhosigma mearimense putumayense Giordani Soika, 1978: 245. New status.
Type Data: Holotype female
Type Locality: Putumayo, Peru.
Pirhosigma mearimense putumayense; Rasmussen & Asenjo, 2009: 42.
Distribution: Suriname, Brazil, Peru, Bolivia.
Remarks. It is widely acknowledged by the vespid experts that Antonio Giordani Soika was very fond of proposing subspecies based solely on coloration (see
Pirhosigma pilosa (Fox, 1899)
Eumenes pilosa Fox, 1899: 454, 461.
Type Data: Lectotype female
Type Locality: Chapada dos Guimarães, Mato Grosso, Brazil (15°26'S 55°45'W) (
Eumenes pilosa;
Tricomenes pilosus;
Pirhosigma pilosa;
Distribution: Ecuador, Brazil.
Pirhosigma simulans (de Saussure, 1875)
Eumenes simulans de Saussure, 1875: 91.
Type Data: Lectotype female
Type Locality: Orizaba, Mexico.
Zeteumenes simulans;
Pirhosigma simulans;
Distribution: Mexico.
Pirhosigma sulcata Ferreira & Hermes, 2015
Pirhosigma sulcata
Type Data: Holotype male
Type Locality: Km 31 AM-010, Ceplac, Amazonas, Brazil.
Pirhosigma sulcata;
Distribution: Brazil.
Pirhosigma superficiale (Fox, 1899)
Eumenes superficialis Fox, 1899: 441, 460.
Type Data: Lectotype female
Type Locality: Chapada dos Guimarães, Mato Grosso, Brazil (15°26'S 55°45'W) (
Eumenes superficialis;
Eumenes superficialis mondaiensis Bertoni, 1934: 118.
Type Data: Lectotype female by present designation (
Type Locality: Puerto Bertoni, Paraguay.
Pirhosigma superficiale;
Pirhosigma superficiale impurum
Type Data: Holotype female MCZ.
Type Locality: Oran, Abra Grande, Salta, Argentina (MCZ Type Database, http://140.247.96.247/mcz/Species_record.php?id=25550).
Pirhosigma superficiale impurum;
Distribution: Brazil, Paraguay, Argentina.
Remarks.
Pirhosigma transfluvium Ferreira & Oliveira, 2017
Pirhosigma transfluvium
Type Data: Holotype male
Type Locality: Beni: Rio Itenez, Bolivia.
Distribution: Bolivia.
We thank the curators in charge of the collections from which specimens were borrowed. FAPEMIG process APQ-02784-17 provided financial support. WDF and MGH are supported by CNPq grants 141168/2018-8 and 304102/2018-0, respectively.