Research Article |
Corresponding author: Neveen Samy Gadallah ( n_gadallah@hotmail.com ) Academic editor: Petr Janšta
© 2020 Muhammad Athar Gul, Ahmed Mostafa Soliman, Neveen Samy Gadallah, Hathal Mohammed Al Dhafer, Gérard Delvare.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Gul MA, Soliman AM, Gadallah NS, Al Dhafer HM, Delvare G (2020) The genus Phasgonophora Westwood, 1832 (Hymenoptera, Chalcididae) in Saudi Arabia: re-evaluation of its limits and description of three new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 76: 1-38. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.76.38340
|
A phylogenetic study based on 25 species of Phasgonophorinae (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) and 36 characters was carried out for ensuring the generic placement of three new species from Saudi Arabia. As a result of this study, the genera Trigonura Sichel, 1866, Bactrochalcis Kieffer, 1912, Centrochalcis Cameron, 1913, Centrochalcidia Gahan & Fagan, 1923, Chalcidellia Girault, 1924, Urochalcis Nikol’skaya, 1952, Trigonurella Bouček, 1988, and Muhabbetella Koçak & Kemal, 2008 are synonymized with Phasgonophora Westwood, 1832. This genus is recorded in Saudi Arabia for the first time, represented here by P. rubens (Klug), and newly described species P. baiocchii Soliman & Gul, sp. nov., P. granulis Delvare, sp. nov., and P. magnanii Gadallah & Gul, sp. nov. An illustrated key to species of the Arabian Peninsula is provided. The relevant specimens were mostly reared from buprestid species infesting Acacia sp. and Dodonaea viscosa in Al-Baha, Asir and Riyadh regions, Saudi Arabia.
Al-Baha, Asir, Riyadh, Buprestidae, new species, Phasgonophora, Phasgonophorini, phylogeny
Phasgonophorinae were first recognized as discrete group by
Phasgonophorinae are parasitoids of wood-boring beetles belonging to the families Buprestidae, Curculionidae (including Scolytinae), Cerambycidae and Anthribidae (
The subfamily currently includes two tribes (
Phasgonophorini have the following features: a hardly sclerotized body, most often with rasp-like sculpture on pronotum and mesonotum; malar sulcus absent; antennal scrobes quite deep and entirely delimited by carinae; antennal toruli on about the level of lower ocular line; both mandibles with three teeth; propodeum often strongly sloping; mesopleuron frequently with a ventral shelf that is regularly longer than epicnemium; procoxa with a deep depression anteriorly, delimited by an oblique carina raised into a flange; metatibia without spur; postmarginal vein short, only surpassing stigmal vein in length; petiole very short, either entirely concealed dorsally or visible here as a ring-like sclerite, but better visible ventrally; first tergite with dorsolateral costulae and syntergum often elongated into a stylus; ovipositor sheaths and valvulae straight.
Phasgonophora with 38 described species is distributed in arid and temperate zones of Asia (21 species), New World (11 species), Africa (2 species) and Australia (4 species). The genus parasitizes xylophagous beetles of the families Anthribidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae and Curculionidae (including Scolytinae) (
Until now Phasgonophora was represented by only two species in the Arabian Peninsula, P. ninae (Nikol’skaya, 1952) and P. rubens (Klug, 1834), reported by
A phylogenetic study based on morphology was carried out for exploring the possible congruence between molecular and morphological data and hypothesizing the systematic placement of the species collected in Saudi Arabia.
Sampling (Table
Specimens used for the phylogenetic study. Generic names as in the present literature.
Specimen | Specimen status | Subfamily | Tribe | Country | Year collect | Molecular code |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brachymeria minuta (Linnaeus, 1761) | Brachymeriinae | Brachymeriini | France | 1986 | ||
Kopinata partirubra Boucek, 1988 | paratype | Phasgonophorinae | Stypiurini | PNG | 1981 | |
Stypiura GDEL00236 | Phasgonophorinae | Stypiurini | French Guiana | 2005 | GDEL00236 | |
Stypiura GDEL00580 | Phasgonophorinae | Stypiurini | French Guiana | 2010 | GDEL00580 | |
Trigonura GDEL00487 | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Cameroon | 2003 | GDEL00487 | |
Trigonura GDEL00489 | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Cameroon | 2003 | GDEL00489 | |
Trigonura steffani Narendran, 1987 | holotype | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | India, Kerala | 1985 | |
Trigonura javensis Narendran, 1987 | holotype | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Indonesia, Java | 1930 | |
Trigonura bakeri Masi, 1926 | holotype | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Philippines | ||
Trigonura tarsata (Dalla Torre, 1898) | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Canada, Quebec | 1948 | ||
Trigonura elegans (Provancher, 1887) | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | USA | |||
Trigonura nishidai Narendran, 1989 | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Laos | 2013 | JRAS5401_0101 | |
Muhabbetella JRAS5401_0301 | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Laos | 2013 | JRAS5401_0301 | |
Trigonura rubens (Klug, 1834) | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Saudi Arabia | 2017 | ||
Trigonura ninae (Nikols’kaya, 1952) | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | UAE | 2006 | ||
Phasgonophora ruficaudis (Cameron, 1905) | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Guinea | 1986 | ||
Trigonura euthyrrhini (Dodd, 1921) | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | PNG | 2018 | JRAS7369 | |
Trigonura crassicauda (Sichel, 1866) | holotype | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Mexico | ||
Phasgonophora baiochii sp. nov. | holotype | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Saudi Arabia | 2017 | |
Phasgonophora magnanii sp. nov. | holotype | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Saudi Arabia | 2016 | |
Phasgonophora granulis sp. nov. | holotype | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Saudi Arabia | 2016 | |
Trigonura Nkolbisson | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Cameroon | 1965 | ||
Trigonura Kenya Mt Elgon | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | Kenya | 2011 | ||
Phasgonophora sulcata Westwood, 1832 | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | USA, Virginia | 1986 | ||
Phasgonophora nr. sulcata Westwood, 1832 | Phasgonophorinae | Phasgonophorini | USA, North Carolina | 2014 | JRAS5708_0101 |
Phylogenetic inference
. A matrix of 36 characters (Tables
Characters and their states used for phylogenetic inference of the Phasgonophorini.
[1] | Mandibular formula. (0) mandibles 2.2; (1) mandibles 3.3. [unordered] |
[2] | Upper tooth of mandible. (0) sharp or narrowly rounded at apex; (1) truncate at apex. [unordered] |
[3] | Lower face: presence of differentiate median stripe. (0) strip absent; (1) alutaceous strip present; (2) narrow, non-sculptured strip present. [unordered] |
[4] | Preorbital carina or ridge. (0) absent; (1) present. [unordered] |
[5] | Malar sulcus. (0) present, at least partly; (1) completely absent. [irreversible] |
[6] | Antennal insertion. (0) not or hardly above lower ocular line; (1) much above lower ocular line. [unordered] |
[7] | Interantennal projection. (0) ventral surface triangular, not compressed ventrally; (1) ventral surface moderately compressed laterally; (2) ventral surface strongly compressed, forming a lamina. [unordered] |
[8] | Interocellar distance (between median and lateral ocellus). (0) not especially short, at least as large as ocellus diameter; (1) very short, shorter than ocellus diameter. [unordered] |
[9] | Carina behind ocellar triangle. (0) carina absent; (1) carina present; (2) carina present and raised to form a bump behind ocellar triangle. [unordered] |
[10] | Sculpture of occiput behind ocellar triangle. (0) occiput punctured behind ocellar triangle; (1) occiput punctured strigulose mesally behind ocellar triangle; (2) occiput strigulose mesally behind ocellar triangle (with vertical carinulae there). [unordered] |
[11] | Sculpture of occiput on lateral surface. (0) occiput punctured; (1) occiput punctured strigulose, the puncturation alternating with vertical carinulae; (2) occiput entirely strigulose. [unordered] |
[12] | Length of flagellomeres. (0) flagellomeres relatively short, F1 at most 1.5× as long as wide; (1) flagellomeres elongate, F1 more than 2× as long as wide. [unordered] |
[13] | Segmentation of clava. (0) clava 3-segmented; (1) clava at most 2-segmented (rarely 1-segmented). [irreversible] |
[14] | Pronotum: median depression. (0) absent; (1) present. [unordered] |
[15] | Pronotal collar: anterior margin. (0) collar with rounded or blunt anterior margin sometimes not differentiate mesally; (1) collar strongly angulate with collum, angle acute; (2) pronotum sloping from posterior margin, collar not differentiate, at least mesally.[unordered] |
[16] | Pronotum: hind margin. (0) margin slightly concave; (1) margin strongly concave. [unordered] |
[17] | Mesonotum: sculpture. (0) mesonotum entirely punctured; (1) mesonotum at least partly cristate; (2) mesonotum entirely strigose. [unordered] |
[18] | Mesoscutellum: anterior margin. (0) mesoscutellum truncate anteriorly on transscutal line; (1) anterior margin of mesoscutellum forming a blunt angle as the axillar grooves are meeting or almost so on transscutal line. [unordered] |
[19] | Setation of axilla. (0) sparse to moderately dense; (1) quite dense. [unordered] |
[20] | Mesodiscrimen. (0) visible as raised carina dorsally and a fovea ventrally on mesal surface of epicnemium; (1) visible as a low ridge on mesal surface of epicnemium. [unordered] |
[21] | Epicnemial carina laterally. (0) not or moderately raised; (1) strongly raised. [unordered] |
[22] | Epicnemial carina ventrally. (0) not or slightly raised, not forming or forming small tooth in lateral view; (1) strongly raised forming a projecting tooth in lateral view. [unordered] |
[23] | Length of ventral shelf of mesepisternum. (0) ventral shelf not or not much longer than epicnemium; (1) ventral shelf much longer than epicnemium and several times long as long as mesocoxa. [unordered] |
[24] | Procoxa. (0) coxa depressed on front side, depression margined posterodorsally by faint carina; (1) coxa deeply depressed on front side, depression margined posterodorsally by raised carina forming flange. [unordered] |
[25] | Dorso-apical margin of protibia. (0) not forming projection; (1) forming a short and apically blunt projection; (2) well expanded with sharp apex. [unordered] |
[26] | Outer dorsal surface of metacoxa. (0) flattened posteriorly, on less than half-length; (1) convex. [unordered] |
[27] | Metatibia spur. (0) one spur present; (1) spur absent. [irreversible] |
[28] | Postmarginal vein. (0) longer than marginal vein; (1) about twice as long as stigmal vein (not or hardly longer than marginal vein). [irreversible] |
[29] | Number of gastral tergites in female. (0) seven, Gt1 and Gt2 not fused; (1) less than seven as Gt1 and Gt2 are fused. [irreversible] |
[30] | First gastral tergite ornamentation. (0) no ornamentation, tergite regularly convex dorsally; (1) tergite with basal transverse carina and longitudinal ridges joining it. |
[31] | First tergite: lateral line. (0) absent; (1) present. [unordered] |
[32] | Penultimate tergite: depth of puncturation. (0) deep as usual; (1) superficial. [unordered] |
[33] | Spiracle on penultimate tergite. (0) of usual size, quite visible; (1) very small with aperture smaller than diameter of punctures. [unordered] |
[34] | Syntergum length. (0) syntergum not especially elongate, not more than 2 times as long as its basal width; (1) syntergum elongate as a stylus much more than twice its basal width. [unordered] |
[35] | Position of cercal plates. (0) near anterior margin of syntergum; (1) situated about at mid length of syntergum; (2) situated near apex of syntergum. [unordered] |
[36] | Ovipositor sheaths. (0) sheaths as usual, not especially curved; (1) sheaths curved downwards. [unordered] |
Data matrix for the phylogenetic inference of the Phasgonophorini (Chalcididae).
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
Brachymeria minuta | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Kopinata partirubra | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ? | ? | ? | ? | 1 | 1 | 0 | ? | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Stypiura GDEL00236 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Stypiura GDEL00580 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Trigonura GDEL00487 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trigonura GDEL00489 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trigonura euthyrrhini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Muhabbetella JRAS5401 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trigonura steffani | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trigonura javensis | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trigonura tarsata | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Trigonura elegans | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trigonura nishidai | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ? | 1 | ? | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Trigonura bakeri | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Trigonura Nkolbisson | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Trigonura Kenya Mt Elgon | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Trigonura ninae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Phasgonophora baiocchii | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Phasgonophora magnanii | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Phasgonophora granulis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Trigonura rubens | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Trigonura crassicauda | ? | ? | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ? | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 2 | 1 | ? | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ? | ? | ? | 1 | 0 | ? |
Trigonura ruficaudis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Phasgonophora sulcata | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | - | ? | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Phasgonophora nr sulcata | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | - | ? | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Specimens were examined using a Leica M205 C stereomicroscope. Some specimens were photographed using a digital microscope Keyence VHX-5000. Photographs were digitally optimized (artifacts removal, background standardization) using the photoshop V-program. The photos made with the aforementioned equipment were used for measurements of the types (holotypes and some paratypes). Further photographs were taken using Canon EOS camera attached to a Leica MZ 125 stereomicroscope. Individual source images were then stacked using HeliconFocus v.6.22 (HeliconSoft Ltd) extended depth of field software. Further image processing was done using the software Adobe photoshop CS5.1 (v.12.1) and Adobe photoshop Lightroom v.5.2 Final [ChingLiu]. The distribution of Phasgonophora species in Saudi Arabia was plotted (Fig.
Morphological terminology follows
We examined the types of 18 species of Phasgonophora sensu lato, thus including those described in Trigonura. The relevant species included all those described from the New World, the west Palaearctic and the Afrotropical regions, and part of those described from the Oriental region. We used keys and descriptions provided by
Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom (
F1−F3 = first to third funicular segments; Gt = gastral tergite; MGV = marginal vein of fore wing; OOL = distance between lateral ocelli and inner eye margin; PMV = postmarginal vein; POL = distance between lateral ocelli; Rs = radial sector; r-m = radio-medial cross vein; SMV = submarginal vein of fore wing; STV = stigmal vein.
The initial analysis provided 33 equally parsimonious trees with a length of 88 steps, and values of 0.489, 0.831 and 0.406 respectively for the consistency (CI), retention (RI), and rescaled consistency (RC) indices. Stypiurini and Phasgonophorini are retrieved monophyletic with moderately strong supports (respectively 78, 64 for the bootstrap values) in the strict consensus tree (CST) (Fig.
Strict consensus tree of the Phasgonophorini achieved from phylogenetic inference using parsimony. Bootstrap support below nodes. A, B, C denote the supported clades; * denote specimens used for the phylogenetic study using the Ultra Conserved Elements (
The successive weighing procedure provided three trees with length of 34.232, CI, RI, and RC, respectively of 0.665, 0.933 and 0.658. Ordering versus non-ordering characters do not change the topology. The preferred tree is presented as the Fig.
Phasgonophora Westwood, 1832: 432 (fig. 77). Type species: Phasgonophora sulcata Westwood, 1832, by monotypy.
= Phasganophora [sic] subg. Trigonura Sichel, 1866: 358−376. Type species: Phasganophora (Trigonura) crassicauda Sichel, 1866, by monotypy, syn. nov.
= Trigonura Kirby, 1883: 54, 59–60 (raised to genus level), syn. nov.
= Bactrochalcis Kieffer, 1912: 463. Type species: Bactrochalcis reticulata Kieffer, by monotypy. Synonymized with Trigonura by Steffan, 1951: 147, syn. nov.
= Centrochalcis Cameron, 1913: 92. Type species: Centrochalcis ruficaudis Cameron, by monotypy. Synonymized with Trigonura by Waterston, 1922: 10, syn. nov.
= Centrochalcidea Gahan & Fagan, 1923. Replacement name for Centrochalcis Cameron, 1913, nec Cameron, 1905, syn. nov.
= Chalcidellia Girault, 1924: 3. Type species: Chalcis euthyrrhini Dodd, 1921, by original designation. Synonymized with Trigonura by Bouček, 1988: 63−64, syn. nov.
= Urochalcis Nikol’skaya, 1952: 91. Type species: Urochalcis ninae Nikol’skaya, 1952, by original designation. Synonymized with Trigonura by Nikol’skaya, 1960: 90, syn. nov.
= Trigonurella Bouček, 1988: 64. Type species: Trigonurella elegans Bouček, 1988, by original designation, syn. nov.
= Muhabbetella Koçak & Kemal, 2008: 3. Replacement name for Trigonurella Bouček, 1988 nec Trigonurella Maa, 1963, syn. nov.
The above synonymies are just the taxonomic implications resulting from phylogenetic inference using UCE (
1 | Gaster shortly acute (Figs |
2 |
– | Gaster lanceolate (Figs |
3 |
2 | Body entirely red (Figs |
P. baiocchii Soliman & Gul, sp. nov. |
– | Meso- and metasoma mostly black (Figs |
P. magnanii Gadallah & Gul, sp. nov. |
3 | Propodeum without spiracular teeth (Fig. |
P. ninae (Nikol’skaya) |
– | Propodeum with sharp spiracular teeth (Fig. |
4 |
4 | Body 7.0–9.6 mm in length. Gena sparsely punctured (Fig. |
P. rubens (Klug) |
– | Body 9.5–13.6 mm in length. Gena densely punctured (Figs |
P. granulis Delvare, sp. nov. |
Table
Measurements of the types of the described species of Phasgonophora (in µm).
Character | Phasgonophora baiocchii holotype ♀ | Phasgonophora granulis holotype ♀ | Phasgonophora magnanii holotype ♀ | Phasgonophora baiocchi paratype ♂ | Phasgonophora magnanii paratype ♂ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
head width | 1537 | 1705 | 1897 | 1276 | 1821 |
head maximal length | 784 | 989 | 1038 | 691 | 1054 |
head length on median line | 511 | 608 | 654 | 447 | 717 |
eye length | 532 | 648 | 737 | 455 | 690 |
temple length | 121 | 182 | 64 | 138 | 163 |
frontovertex width | 774 | 926 | 1026 | 740 | 989 |
distance between lateral ocelli | 263 | 455 | 353 | 289 | 370 |
ocular – lateral ocellus distance | 137 | 74 | 186 | 122 | 168 |
diameter of lateral ocellus | 158 | 182 | 167 | 122 | 152 |
distance between median and lateral ocelli | 95 | 142 | 109 | 102 | 98 |
head height | 1058 | 1269 | 1477 | 1079 | 1284 |
eye height | 571 | 744 | 781 | 584 | 798 |
distance lower edge antennal torulus – ventral margin of clypeus (ATC) | 314 | 481 | 500 | 317 | – |
distance lower edge antennal torulus – lower edge of median ocellus (ATOM) | 538 | 603 | 719 | 455 | – |
length of malar space | 455 | 513 | 781 | 396 | – |
width of oral fossa | 551 | 679 | 781 | 505 | – |
scape length | 570 | 730 | 815 | 444 | – |
pedicel length | 127 | 131 | 109 | 98 | 110 |
pedicel width | 80 | 108 | 125 | 76 | 106 |
anellus length | 59 | 59 | 62 | 33 | 37 |
anellus width | 75 | 98 | 125 | 79 | 102 |
2nd flagellomere (= F1) length | 159 | 280 | 308 | 139 | 301 |
2nd flagellomere width | 102 | 127 | 161 | 133 | 163 |
8th flagellomere (= F7) length | 110 | 172 | 232 | 136 | 272 |
8th flagellomere width | 112 | 105 | 151 | 133 | 159 |
clava length | 310 | 292 | 446 | 234 | 472 |
Calculated ratios for the females of Phasgonophora from measurements of Table
Ratio | Phasgonophora baiochii holotype ♀ | Phasgonophora granulis holotype ♀ | Phasgonophora magnanii holotype ♀ |
---|---|---|---|
head width : head maximal length | 1.960 | 1.724 | 1.827 |
head width : head length on median line | 3.010 | 2.804 | 2.902 |
head width : head height | 1.453 | 1.343 | 1.285 |
fronto-vertex width : eye height | 1.356 | 1.245 | 1.313 |
ocular – lateral ocellus distance : diameter of lateral ocellus | 0.520 | 0.406 | 1.115 |
distance between median and lateral ocelli : diameter of lateral ocellus | 0.600 | 0.781 | 0.654 |
ATC : ATOM | 0.583 | 0.798 | 0.696 |
length of malar space : eye height | 0.798 | 0.690 | 1.000 |
length of malar space : width of oral fossa | 0.826 | 0.755 | 1.000 |
scape length : eye height | 1.000 | 0.981 | 1.043 |
pedicel length : pedicel width | 1.585 | 1.218 | 0.873 |
anellus length : anellus width | 0.789 | 0.600 | 0.492 |
F1 length : F1 width | 1.558 | 2.200 | 1.914 |
F7 length : F7 width | 0.982 | 1.638 | 1.539 |
mesosoma length : mesosoma (= mesoscutum) width | 1.600 | 1.640 | 1.612 |
mesosoma length : mesosoma height | 1.538 | 2.335 | 2.265 |
pronotum width : pronotum maximal length | 1.707 | 1.714 | 1.849 |
pronotum width : pronotum length on median line | 3.559 | 2.754 | 2.688 |
pronotum width : mesoscutum width | 1.077 | 0.977 | 1.042 |
mesoscutum length : pronotum length on median line | 1.729 | 1.475 | 1.375 |
mesoscutellum length : mesoscutellum width | 0.898 | 0.810 | 0.978 |
fore wing length : fore wing width | 2.858 | 2.690 | 2.263 |
marginal vein length : costal cell length | 0.348 | 0.269 | 0.284 |
marginal vein length : stigmal vein length | 3.512 | 3.016 | 3.643 |
marginal vein length : postmarginal vein length | 4.800 | 2.603 | 4.857 |
metacoxa length : metacoxa width | 2.153 | 1.747 | 2.000 |
metafemur length : metafemur width | 1.764 | 1.774 | 1.684 |
syntergum length : mesotibia length | 0.276 | 1.226 | 0.546 |
Calculated ratios for the males of Phasgonophora from measurements of Table
Ratio | Phasgonophora baiocchii paratype ♂ | Phasgonophora magnanii paratype ♂ |
head width : head maximal length | 1.847 | 1.727 |
head width : head length on median line | 2.855 | 2.538 |
head width : head height | 1.183 | 1.418 |
fronto–vertex width : eye height | 1.267 | 1.240 |
ocular – lateral ocellus distance : diameter of lateral ocellus | 1.000 | 1.107 |
distance between median and lateral ocelli : diameter of lateral ocellus | 0.833 | 0.643 |
ATC : ATOM | 0.696 | – |
length of malar space : eye height | 0.678 | – |
length of malar space : width of oral fossa | 0.784 | – |
scape length : eye height | 0.759 | – |
pedicel length : pedicel width | 1.286 | 1.038 |
anellus length : anellus width | 0.414 | – |
F1 length : F1 width | 1.041 | 1.850 |
F7 length : F7 width | 1.020 | 1.718 |
mesosoma length : mesosoma (= mesoscutum) width | 1.671 | 1.781 |
mesosoma length : mesosoma height | 1.521 | 1.605 |
pronotum width : pronotum maximal length | 3.296 | 4.064 |
pronotum width : pronotum length on median line | 1.047 | 1.130 |
pronotum width : mesoscutum width | 1.556 | 2.574 |
mesoscutum length : pronotum length on median line | 0.878 | 1.000 |
mesoscutellum length : mesoscutellum width | 2.650 | 2.892 |
fore wing length : fore wing width | 0.307 | 0.367 |
marginal vein length : costal cell length | 2.629 | 3.143 |
marginal vein length : stigmal vein length | 4.182 | 2.973 |
marginal vein length : postmarginal vein length | 2.154 | 1.901 |
metacoxa length : metacoxa width | 1.875 | 1.784 |
Comparison between the sexes of P. baiocchii sp. nov. and P. magnanii through ratios calculated from measurements of Table
Ratio | Phasgonophora baiocchii holotype ♀ | Phasgonophora baiocchii paratype ♂ | Phasgonophora magnanii holotype ♀ | Phasgonophora magnanii paratype ♂ |
---|---|---|---|---|
head width : head maximal length | 1.960 | 1.847 | 1.827 | 1.727 |
head width : head length on median line | 3.010 | 2.855 | 2.902 | 2.538 |
head width : head height | 1.453 | 1.183 | 1.285 | 1.418 |
fronto–vertex width : eye height | 1.356 | 1.267 | 1.313 | 1.240 |
ocular – lateral ocellus distance : diameter of lateral ocellus | 0.520 | 1.000 | 1.115 | 1.107 |
distance between median and lateral ocelli : diameter of lateral ocellus | 0.600 | 0.833 | 0.654 | 0.643 |
ATC : ATOM | 0.583 | 0.696 | 0.696 | – |
length of malar space : eye height | 0.798 | 0.678 | 1.000 | – |
length of malar space : width of oral fossa | 0.826 | 0.784 | 1.000 | – |
scape length : eye height | 1.000 | 0.759 | 1.043 | – |
pedicel length : pedicel width | 1.585 | 1.286 | 0.873 | 1.038 |
anellus length : anellus width | 0.789 | 0.414 | 0.492 | 0.360 |
F1 length : F1 width | 1.558 | 1.041 | 1.914 | 1.850 |
F7 length : F7 width | 0.982 | 1.020 | 1.539 | 1.718 |
mesosoma length : mesosoma (= mesoscutum) width | 1.600 | 1.671 | 1.612 | 1.781 |
mesosoma length : mesosoma height | 1.538 | 1.521 | 2.265 | – |
pronotum width : pronotum maximal length | 1.707 | 3.296 | 1.849 | 1.605 |
pronotum width : pronotum length on median line | 3.559 | 1.047 | 2.688 | 4.064 |
pronotum width : mesoscutum width | 1.077 | 1.556 | 1.042 | 1.130 |
mesoscutum length : pronotum length on median line | 1.729 | 0.878 | 1.375 | 2.574 |
mesoscutellum length : mesoscutellum width | 0.898 | 2.650 | 0.978 | 1.000 |
fore wing length : fore wing width | 2.858 | 0.307 | 2.263 | 2.892 |
marginal vein length : costal cell length | 0.348 | 2.629 | 0.284 | 0.367 |
marginal vein length : stigmal vein length | 3.512 | 4.182 | 3.643 | 3.143 |
marginal vein length : postmarginal vein length | 4.800 | 2.154 | 4.857 | 2.973 |
metacoxa length : metacoxa width | 2.153 | 1.875 | 2.000 | 1.901 |
metafemur length : metafemur width | 1.764 | – | 1.684 | 1.784 |
syntergum length : mesotibia length | 0.276 | – | 0.546 | – |
Holotype
♀: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, Ad Diriyah, Al Uyaynah, Wadi Al Hesiyah (40 NW of Riyadh) [24°55'22.44"N, 46°12'15.13"E, Alt. 790 m], 8.IV.2017, reared from Anthaxia sp. (Buprestidae), e.l. Acacia, leg. D. Baiocchi [
Body mostly red; fore wing hyaline with white setation (Fig.
This species is dedicated to Daniele Baiocchi, who reared this species from Anthaxia spp. (Buprestidae) infesting Acacia sp. (Fabaceae).
Specimen glued on rectangular card, metasoma glued separately. Head and mesosoma partly covered with a thin artifactual layer in bottom of areoles, appearing artificially dull rather than glossy by places; second to fifth terga with sides wide apart from each other, probably resulting from immersion in some medium.
♀: Body length 5.0 mm. Colour. Body reddish brown; antennal scape and pedicel, anellus and basal half of F1 reddish (Fig.
Head
(Fig.
Antenna
(Fig.
Mesosoma
(Figs
Wings
(Fig.
Legs
(Fig.
Metasoma
(Fig.
Male (Figs
None of the described Phasgonophora from the Afrotropical region have the short syntergum exhibited by P. baoicchii. Considering the Oriental species, the species would run, using
Only known from Saudi Arabia, in Riyadh Region (Fig.
Anthaxia (Haplanthaxia) abdita Bílý, 1982 and A. (H.) kneuckeri ssp. zabranskyi Bílý, 1995 (Coleoptera, Buprestidae).
Holotype
♀: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Al-Baha, Al Mikhwa (Shada Al-Ala Natural Reserve) [19°50'51"N, 41°18'06.12"E, Alt. 1358 m], 14.IV.2016, e.l. Acacia, leg. D. Baiocchi [
Gaster longer than mesosoma and acuminate, with syntergum longer than mesotibia (1.15×) (Fig.
The name is chosen in reference to the secondary sculpture of the areoles on the head and mesonotum, giving to them a dull, granulose appearance (see Fig.
Specimen glued on rectangular card. Head and mesosoma partly covered with a thin layer on the bottom of areoles; second to fifth tergites with sides wide apart from each other, probably resulting from immersion in some medium.
Body 8.4 mm. Colour. Head and mesosoma entirely black (Fig.
Head
(Figs
Antenna
(Fig.
Mesosoma
(Figs
Wings
(Fig.
Legs
(Fig.
Metasoma
(Fig.
Male. Unknown.
Known from Saudi Arabia only in Al-Baha and Asir Regions (Fig.
Holotype
♀: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Asir, Abha (Garf Raydah Natural Reserve) [18°12'14.04"N, 42°24'42.84"E, Alt. 2809 m], 16.IV.2016, e.l. Dodonaea viscosa, reared from Chrysobothris sp. (Buprestidae), leg. G. Magnani [
Body mostly black with head predominantly red (Figs
The new species is dedicated to Gianluca Mangani (Roma, Italy) who reared this species from Chrysobothris sp. (Buprestidae) infesting Dodonaea viscosa (L.) Jacq. (Sapindaceae).
Specimen glued on rectangular card; head and mesosoma partly covered with a thin artifactual layer on bottom of areoles, appearing artificially dull by places; second to fifth tergites with sides widely separated from each other, probably resulting from immersion in some medium.
♀: Body length 6.5 mm. Colour. Head mostly red (Fig.
Head
(Fig.
Antenna
(Fig.
Mesosoma
(Figs
Wings
(Fig.
Legs
(Fig.
Metasoma
(Fig.
Male (Figs
None of the Afrotropical species described in Trigonura or Phasgonophora has the short syntergum exhibited by P. magnanii. In the key of the Oriental species provided by
Only known from Saudi Arabia in Asir Region (Fig.
Chrysobothris (Abothris) sp. (Coleoptera, Buprestidae).
Chalcis rubens Klug, 1834: tab. 37, fig. 7, n. 2.
Phasganophora rubens (Klug), Sichel, 1866: 368.
Urochalcis maura Nikol‘skaya, 1952: 91–92.
Type material. Two conspecific, pinned, ♀ syntypes, labelled “Abissynien /Ambukohl /Ehrbg. L’ [manuscript, black ink, green label] ‘rubens Kl’ [manuscript, black pencil] ‘type’ [red label] ‘GBIF-ChalcISE /ID: Chalc0656’ [
Other material (all from Saudi Arabia): 1♀, 2♂, Al-Baha, 2 km E of Nawan [19°32'48"N, 41°11'34"E, Alt. 117 m], 31.III.2017, e.l. Acacia, leg. D. Baiocchi [
Female with gena sparsely setose (Fig.
General distribution. ALGERIA: mostly northwestern and central Sahara, less common in southern Sahara and Sahel (Mateu, 1972); EGYPT: surrounds of Cairo (
Hosts. Anthaxia [as Cratomerus] angustipennis (Klug, 1829) (Buprestidae) (
Vachellia [= Acacia] farnesiana (L.) Willd, 1806 (
(
The three new species, as well as P. rubens, undoubtedly belong to the genus Phasgonophora, sharing with its type species: 1) a laterally compressed interantennal projection (homoplastic); 2) a transverse carina behind ocellar triangle on the vertex (homoplastic); 3) a strigulose occiput behind the ocellar triangle (homoplastic); 4) a punctured strigulose or even strigulose occiput laterally (homoplastic); 5) a partial fusion of the claval segments (fusion complete in P. baiocchii) (a true synapomorphy within the subfamily); 6) the mesodiscrimen appearing as a low carina dorsally and as a vestigial fovea ventrally (a true synapomorphy of a part of clade B); 7) the apical projection of the protibia forming a sharp tooth (a true synapomorphy of a part of clade B); 8) a very small spiracle on the penultimate tergite with the peritreme not raised (homoplastic).
Phasgonophora granulis is retrieved as the sister species of P. rubens but this relationship is solely supported by a reversal on the mesoscutellum (anteriorly truncate). Phasgonophora granulis might otherwise have been the sister species of P. ruficaudis (Cameron, 1905) as the setation of the axilla in these species (and in some undescribed Afrotropical Phasgonophora as well) is quite dense; nevertheless, this conflicts with a derived state on the epicnemial carina (here strongly raised laterally) shared by P. granulis and P. rubens. Apparently, a radiation occurred in what appears in the tree as the sister group of Phasgonophora sensu stricto (P. sulcata and its sister species) with a high diversity of forms in the Afrotropical fauna.
Phasgonophora magnanii is retrieved as sister group of the well supported clade C (Fig.
Phasgonophora baiocchii is a quite enigmatic species according to its amazing combination of character states that would prompt it within the clade A, as it is the case when using the available key (
Detailed biological data and hosts are available for T. rubens, the latter apparently restricted to Buprestidae belonging to the genera Anthaxia and Acmaeodera (Buprestidae). The same host family (genus Anthaxia) was retrieved for P. baiocchii and P. granulis.
Sincere gratitude to Daniele Baiocchi and Gianluca Mangani (Roma, Italy) for providing us with the Phasgonophora specimens reared from buprestid beetles attacking Acacia and Dodonaea viscosa trees. The authors express their appreciation to Natalie Dale-Skey (Natural History Museum, London, UK), Claire Villemant and Agnièle Touret-Alby (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris); Lukas Kirschey (Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany) for the loan of types and their kind and helpful welcome during the visits of GD, Gary Gibson (Canadian National Collection of Insects, Ottawa, Canada) and Michael Gates (United States Museum of Natural History, Washington D.C., USA) for the loan of types. Sincere appreciation extended to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this research group number RGP-1437-009.