Research Article
Research Article
Pediobius cajanus sp. n. (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae), an important natural enemy of the Asian fly (Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch)) (Diptera, Agromyzidae) in the Dominican Republic
expand article infoRosina Taveras, Christer Hansson§
‡ Laboratorio Control Biologico Facultad de Ciencias Agronomicas y Veterinarias de la Universidad Autonoma de Santo Domingo, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
§ The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom
Open Access


Pediobius cajanus sp. n. is described based on material from the Dominican Republic, where it is widespread, and it is anticipated to have a much larger distribution in tropical America. It is compared to other species of Pediobius from the New World, and is also compared to P. vignae (Risbec), a similar species from Africa with similar biology. The new species is a gregarious endoparasitoid of the pupae of the Asian fly, Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch), an agromyzid that causes major damage to pigeon pea, Cajanus cajan (L). Millspauh. In the Dominican Republic P. cajanus sp. n. is the most important parasitoid of this pest. Details on its biology are provided.


Guandul, potential biocontrol agent, Neotropics


Pediobius is a cosmopolitan genus with 217 described species (Noyes 2015), 25 of which have been recorded from the Neotropical region (Hansson 2002). Species of Pediobius develop as primary or secondary endoparasitoids in eggs, larvae or pupae of other insects, and the host range is extensive (Bouček 1988). The host species belong mainly to Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera. Some species have been reared from egg sacks of spiders, but then act as secondary parasitoids of ichneumonid larvae (Hymenoptera) feeding on the spider eggs. In the Neotropical region Pediobius species have been recorded from Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera but not from Diptera (Hansson 2002). Some Pediobius species have been used in biological control, most notable is perhaps P. foveolatus (Crawford), which has been used successfully to control populations of the Mexican bean beetle, Epilachna varivestis Mulsant, 1850 (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in North America (Barrows and Hooker 1981). Here we describe a new species of Pediobius that is the main enemy and a potential biocontrol agent of the Asian fly, Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch, 1914) (Diptera: Agromyzidae). The Asian fly is an invasive pest in tropical America that causes extensive damage to pigeon pea, Cajanus cajan (L) Millspauh. Pigeon pea is an important source of food in tropical America, and as processed food is an important source of income from export.

The components of the tritrophic system including Pediobius cajanus sp. n

The pigeon pea, “guandúl” in Spanish (Fig. 1), is a legume native to tropical India, and it has been grown in the Dominican Republic and other countries in tropical America since the late 15th century, when the Spanish came to the Americas. It is a very important source of nutrition: Miquilena and Higuera Moros (2012) gave a protein value of 17.52%, and compared it to lentil and soy, with 18 and 35% protein values respectively. The plant is very tolerant to heat and drought and in dry areas without access to irrigation, it is a valuable alternative to less tolerant crops. In addition to its usefulness as food for humans the plant fixates nitrogen and thus contributes to the fertilization of the soil; the empty seedpods are an important food source for livestock, the remaining plant parts can be used as firewood, and it also has some medicinal properties (Cedano 2006).

Figures 1–4. 

1 pigeon pea, Cajanus cajan (L). Millspauh 2 seed pods of pigeon pea with marks indicating windows created by larvae of the Asian fly, Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch), prior to pupation, a window that facilitates the emergence of the adult fly from the pod 3 opened seed pods of pigeon pea with pupae of the Asian fly 4 imago of the Asian fly with pupa.

Figure 5. 

Map of the island of Hispaniola showing localities in the Dominican Republic where Pediobius cajanus sp. n. has been reared from Melanagromyza obtusa during this investigation. Specific names of localities and coordinates are provided in Table 1.

In the Dominican Republic, the study area for this paper, the pigeon pea is grown in approximately 25,000 hectares, by nearly 3,000 farmers (statistics from the Ministry of Agriculture 2013). However, this figure is underestimated because much of the production is in small lots, along paths and road edges, and it is used as property borders, and these areas are not included in the statistics. Thus, the total area of cultivation is unknown, but the unrecorded areas are significant and contribute to the diet of some of the country’s population. In the Dominican Republic its cultivation has also been developed as a source of income for farmers who process the bean as canned or freshly frozen beans for export. The export of pigeon pea has diversified and today it is being exported to many countries, including countries in Europe, but the largest importers are in the arc of the Antilles.

The pigeon pea is attacked by a complex of insect pests, mainly from the orders Lepidoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera and Coleoptera (Schmutterer 1990). One of the major pests is the Asian fly (Fig. 4) which causes great damage to the crops of pigeon pea, considerably reducing the production and export volumes.

Studies in India have shown that the damage caused by the Asian fly affects 25.5 to 36% of the crop (Sharma et al. 2011). These data are in accordance with those found in the Dominican Republic, where the Asian fly was detected in 2000 (Phytosanitary Alert system 2004, and Etienne et al. 2004). An investigation in the Dominican Republic by Guzman et al. (2010) indicated that the percentage of damage, even though the crops were treated with insecticides every 21 days, reached a level of 27%. However, the amount of damage varies considerably between different localities and the state of crop development in the Dominican Republic. In 2012 the level of damage was evaluated in 122 localities and in the town of Rancho Los Vargas, Puerto Plata, it reached 76% (Taveras and Guzman 2013).

Yadaf and Yadaf (2011) conducted a review of the parasitoids of the Asian fly in India and listed 21 Hymenoptera parasitoids in 10 genera. They found that Euderus lividus (Ashmead, 1886) (Eulophidae) and Ormyrus orientalis Walker, 1871 (Ormyridae) were the main parasitoids, and these two species were also the most studied parasitoids for control of the fly. Species of Pediobius have, prior to this paper, not been recorded from the Asian fly.

In the Dominican Republic Ormyrus orientalis and an unidentified species of Pediobius have been reared from the Asian fly on pigeon pea. In a paper by Taveras and Guzman (2013) the presence of these beneficial parasitoids was recorded from 103 sites that included 25 of the 31 provinces in the country. The level of parasitism was 27.8%, with the Pediobius species responsible for 25.8%, and Ormyrus orientalis for 2%. This information clearly indicates that these parasitoids are distributed throughout the country, which is also supported by this investigation, and very probably have a far larger distribution outside the Dominican Republic. It also indicates that the Pediobius species is an important natural enemy of the Asian fly, and as such might be considered as a biocontrol agent against this invasive pest.

Because of the economic importance of the pigeon pea, and because the unidentified Pediobius species obviously is an eminent natural enemy of its main pest, the Asian fly, in the Dominican Republic, it is important to identify this Pediobius species. After a close examination of several specimens of Pediobius we found that it belongs to an undescribed species. To facilitate the identification of this new species it is described and diagnosed here, and given a scientific name so that future information can be linked to it.


The color photos were made with a Nikon SMZ 1000 stereomicroscope and a Nikon DS-5M camera. To eliminate reflections from the metallic and shiny body, a dome light manufactured as described by Kerr et al. (2008), was used as the light source for photography. Photos were taken at different focus levels and Helicon Focus Pro version 4.75 was used to merge them into a single image. The SEM photos were made from uncoated specimens on their original cardboard mounts. These were taken in low vacuum mode on a JEOL® JSM 5600LV scanning electron microscope.

Pods of pigeon pea were collected in several different parts of the Dominican Republic and were placed in plastic bags with holes for ventilation and prevention of condensation inside the bags. The samples were brought to the laboratory where the pods were opened and fly larvae, pupae and adults were counted. The larvae and pupae were placed in plastic containers (9 × 9 cm) with a piece of cloth at the opening to facilitate aeration. The emerging parasitoids and imagines of the Asian fly were killed and stored in vials with ethanol.

Measurements were taken using the Nikon stereomicroscope mentioned above, using a eyepiece micrometer at 80 times magnification. The female holotype and ten paratypes of each sex were measured.

Morphological terms follow Gibson (1997). For illustrations of the morphological terms see also Hansson (2015).


Pediobius cajanus sp. n.

Figures 6–12, 13–14, 15–19

Material examined

Type material: HOLOTYPE ♀ labelled “DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: San Juan Province, San Juan de la Maguana, 20.x.2014, Rosina Taveras”, “Ex pupae of Melanagromyza obtusa on pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan)” (in the Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom). PARATYPES: 42♀ 15♂ with same label data as holotype (in the Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom; Canadian National Collection of Insects and Arachnids, Ottawa, Canada; Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Dominican Republic; Museum of Biology (Entomology), Lund, Sweden; United States National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C., USA). Additional material: 42♀ 12♂ from the Dominican Republic: Luperon Province, Puerto Plata, v.2013 (in the Museum of Biology (Entomology), Lund, Sweden).


Hind leg with tibial spur 0.4 times as long as length of hind tarsus; propodeum with strong submedian carinae that diverge towards posterior part (Fig. 18); propodeal callus with four setae; female gaster elongate (Figs 13, 19), 2 times as long as wide; small species (0.9–1.5 mm).

In the most recent keys to the Neotropical species of Pediobius (see Hansson 2002) and in the key to Nearctic species (Peck 1985), P. cajanus runs to P. pyrgo (Walker, 1839). It differs from P. pyrgo in having median third of scutellum smooth (Fig. 17) (completely reticulate in P. pyrgo), posterior margin of dorsellum tridentate (Fig. 18) (rounded in P. pyrgo), and petiole in female 0.7 times as long as wide (1.0 times as long as wide in P. pyrgo).

Pediobius cajanus sp. n. also appears to be morphologically similar to P. vignae (Risbec, 1951) from Nigeria, as described in Kerrich (1973). The host of P. vignae, Melanagromyza vignalis Spencer, 1959 in seeds of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. (Fabaceae), is also similar to the host of P. cajanus. When Kerrich (1973) revised the tropical and subtropical species of Pediobius he was unable to find the type material of P. vignae and designated a neotype for the species, to be deposited in BMNH. However, this neotype, or the series it was pulled from, cannot be located in BMNH (Natalie Dale-Skey, pers. comm.). Thus we rely totally on the redescription of P. vignae in Kerrich (1973) for the interpretation of this species. Pediobius cajanus sp. n. differs from P. vignae in having eyes bare (Figs 15, 16) (setose in P. vignae), scutellum smooth in median third (Fig. 17) (reticulate throughout in P. vignae), female first gastral tergite 0.5 times as long as length of gaster (Figs 13, 19) (well over half the length of gaster in P. vignae), female with first gastral tergite with very weak and superficial reticulation posteromedially (Figs 13, 19) (this part with strong and very distinct reticulation in P. vignae).


Female: length of body 1.1–1.5 mm.

Antenna dark and metallic (Figs 6, 11). Frons dark golden-purple with bluish tinges (Fig. 8). Vertex shiny with dark golden and blue tinges (Fig. 10). Pronotum with part in front of transverse carina dark golden-purple, part behind transverse carina metallic bluish-green (Fig. 13). Mesoscutum dark golden-purple (Fig. 13). Scutellum dark golden-purple with lateral and posterior parts with greenish tinges (Fig. 13). Propodeum golden-green (Fig. 13). Coxae, femora and tibiae dark and metallic (Fig. 6); tarsal segments 1–3 dusky on fore leg and white on mid and hind legs, fourth segment dark brown on all legs. Wings hyaline. Petiole dark golden-purple. Gaster with first tergite metallic bluish-green in anterior fourth, posterior three quarters and remaining tergites dark golden-purple (Fig. 13).

Figures 6–12. 

Pediobius cajanus sp. n. 6–7 habitus in lateral view 6 female 7 male 8–9 head in frontal view 8 female 9 male 10 vertex, female 11–12 antenna in lateral view 11 female 12 male.

Figures 13–14. 

Pediobius cajanus sp. n., habitus in dorsal view 13 female 14 male.

Antenna as in Figs 6, 11. Frons smooth and shiny below level of toruli and above frontal suture, between these parts with very weak reticulation (Fig. 16); antennal scrobes join frontal suture separately (Fig. 8). Vertex inside and behind ocellar triangle with weak, small-meshed reticulation, outside ocellar triangle smooth (Fig. 15). Occipital margin with a weak carina behind posterior ocelli, otherwise rounded (Fig. 15). Eyes bare (Figs 15, 16). Ratios: length of head (in dorsal view)/width of head (measured at widest part): holotype 0.49, paratypes 0.46–0.52; height of eye in frontal view/malar space: holotype 2.06, paratypes 1.87–2.33; height of eye in frontal view/width of mouth opening: holotype 1.45, paratypes 1.29–1.46; distance between posterior ocelli/distance between eye and posterior ocellus: holotype 2.38, paratypes 1.75–2.40

Figures 15–19. 

Pediobius cajanus sp. n., female 15 vertex 16 head in frontal view 17 thoracic dorsum 18 propodeum in dorsal view 19 petiole and gaster in dorsal view.

Mesoscutum with weak reticulation (Fig. 17), meshes isodiametric in anteromedian part but otherwise elongate; notauli distinct and narrow in anterior two thirds, indistinct in posterior third. Scutellum convex with median third smooth, lateral parts to either side of smooth, median part reticulate with elongate meshes (Fig. 17). Posterior margin of dorsellum with a prominent medial projection and with weak and blunt lateral projections (Fig. 18). Transepimeral sulcus strongly curved. Fore wing speculum closed below; 12 admarginal setae. Hind leg with tibial spur 0.4 times as long as length of hind tarsus. Propodeum with strong submedian carinae that diverge towards posterior part (Fig. 18); with a short but distinct nucha; callus with four setae. Petiolar foramen rounded. Ratios: length of fore wing/length of marginal vein: holotype 1.98, paratypes 1.85–2.04; length of fore wing/height of fore wing: holotype 1.67, paratypes 1.63–1.75; length of postmarginal vein/length of the stigmal vein: holotype 0.96, paratypes 0.63–1.00.

Petiole 0.7 times as long as wide, with strong irregular sculpture (Fig. 19). Gaster with first tergite smooth (Fig. 19), posteromedially with very weak and superficial reticulation, meshes incomplete; first tergite covers 0.5 times the length of gaster in both sexes (Figs 13, 14, 19). Ratio length of the mesosoma (measured along the median mesosoma from the pronotal collar carina to posterior margin of the propodeum)/length of gaster: holotype 0.88, paratypes 0.81–0.93.

Male: length of body 0.9–1.3 mm.

Similar to female except as follows. Frons bright metallic bluish-green (Fig. 9). Mesoscutum golden-green (Fig. 14). Scutellum golden-green (Fig. 14). Gaster with first tergite metallic bluish-green in anterior half, posterior half and remaining tergites dark golden-purple (Fig. 14).

Antenna as in Figs 7, 12. Ratios: height of eye in frontal view/malar space: 1.75–1.94; height of eye in frontal view/width of mouth opening: 1.30–1.60.

Petiole 1.1 times as long as wide. Gaster with first tergite completely smooth. Ratio length of the mesosoma (measured along the median mesosoma from the pronotal collar carina to posterior margin of the propodeum)/length of gaster: 1.09–1.58.


Named after the host plant.


The Dominican Republic. The first author of this paper has reared this new species from its host from 90 sites (Fig. 5, Table 1).

Table 1.

List of localities in the Dominican Republic where Pediobius cajanus sp. n. has been reared from Melanagromyza obtusa

Locality Province Decimals Degrees
13 de Azua Azua 18.459420, -70.853738 18°27'33.9"N, 70°51'13.5"W
Guanábano, Azua Azua 18.447210, -70.790729 18°26'50.0"N, 70°47'26.6"W
Los Jovillos Azua 18.449151, -70.801853 18°26'56.9"N, 70°48'06.7"W
Santana Bahoruco 18.417995, -71.193348 18°25'04.8"N, 71°11'36.0"W
Pizarrete, Bani Peravia 18.290396, -70.229342 18°17'25.4"N, 70°13'45.6"W
Barahona Barahona 18.201356, -71.093906 18°12'04.9"N, 71°05'38.1"W
Caballero, Cachón Barahona 18.248869, -71.195371 18°14'55.9"N, 71°11'43.3"W
Caletón, Enriquillo Barahona 17.960965, -71.266760 17°57'39.5"N, 71°16'00.3"W
Charco Prieto, Higuero Barahona 18.024770, -71.210300 18°01'29.2"N, 71°12'37.1"W
El Puerto, Polo Barahona 18.052038, -71.280082 18°03'07.3"N, 71°16'48.3"W
Enriquillo Barahona 17.895977, -71.238366 17°53'45.5"N, 71°14'18.1"W
Higuero, Barahona 18.055723, -71.287129 18°03'20.6"N, 71°17'13.7"W
La Cueva, Polo Barahona 18.159054, -71.251670 18°09'32.6"N, 71°15'06.0"W
Naranjal, Enriquillo Barahona 17.902976, -71.237133 17°54'10.7"N, 71°14'13.7"W
Paraíso Barahona 18.031771, -71.198618 18°01'54.4"N, 71°11'55.0"W
Polo Barahona 18.093777, -71.283545 18°05'37.6"N, 71°17'00.8"W
San Rafael de Los Patos Barahona 17.956199, -71.190141 17°57'22.3"N, 71°11'24.5"W
Cañongo, Dajabón 19.623469, -71.692030 19°37'24.5"N, 71°41'31.3"W
Monte Grande, Loma de C. Dajabón 19.395277, -71.617351 19°23'43.0"N, 71°37'02.5"W
Sangre Linda, La Ceiba Dajabón 19.589494, -71.703911 19°35'22.2"N, 71°42'14.1"W
El Seibo El Seibo 18.770027, -69.059393 18°46'12.1"N, 69°03'33.8"W
Miches El Seibo 18.980588, -69.051765 18°58'50.1"N, 69°03'06.3"W
Pedro Sánchez El Seibo 18.865925, -69.111536 18°51'57.3"N, 69°06'41.5"W
Corozito Elías Piña 18.845685, -71.712592 18°50'44.5"N, 71°42'45.3"W
Km 5 Elías Piña 18.878255, -71.663325 18°52'41.7"N, 71°39'48.0"W
Matayaya Elías Piña 18.888584, -71.590058 18°53'18.9"N, 71°35'24.2"W
Gaspar Hernández Espaillat 19.633862, -70.284616 19°38'01.9"N, 70°17'04.6"W
Hoyoncito Hato mayor 18.743150, -69.413553 18°44'35.3"N, 69°24'48.8"W
Las Cañas Hato mayor 19.013698, -69.382548 19°00'49.3"N, 69°22'57.2"W
Los Cocos de Los López Hato mayor 18.764635, -69.264540 18°45'52.7"N, 69°15'52.3"W
Villa Tapia, Hermanas Mirabal 19.304531, -70.423018 19°18'16.3"N, 70°25'22.9"W
Barranca Sección Jamo La Vega 19.265503, -70.462317 19°15'55.8"N, 70°27'44.3"W
Toro Cenizo, La Vega 19.267749, -70.435889 19°16'03.9"N, 70°26'09.2"W
Guanuma Monte Plata 18.695502, -69.923678 18°41'43.8"N, 69°55'25.2"W
La luisa Blanca Monte Plata 18.741184, -69.897959 18°44'28.3"N, 69°53'52.6"W
Monte Plata Monte Plata 18.795157, -69.775756 18°47'42.6"N, 69°46'32.7"W
Monte Plata Monte Plata 18.811407, -69.772323 18°48'41.1"N, 69°46'20.4"W
Doña Antonia Montecristi 19.673590, -71.230963 19°40'24.9"N, 71°13'51.5"W
El Cerro Gordo Montecristi 19.758288, -71.211732 19°45'29.8"N, 71°12'42.2"W
Juan Gómez Montecristi 19.702509, -71.409304 19°42'09.0"N, 71°24'33.5"W
Juancho, Oviedo Pedernales 17.859494, -71.290455 17°51'34.2"N, 71°17'25.6"W
La Colonia, Villa Esperanza Pedernales 17.851947, -71.331894 17°51'07.0"N, 71°19'54.8"W
Pedernales Pedernales 18.042637, -71.740322 18°02'33.5"N, 71°44'25.2"W
Altamira Puerto Plata Puerto Plata 19.667481, -70.831862 19°40'02.9"N, 70°49'54.7"W
Canada Bonita Puerto Plata 19.623430, -70.841566 19°37'24.4"N, 70°50'29.6"W
Cruce Guanabano-Navarrete Puerto Plata 19.645546, -70.831922 19°38'44.0"N, 70°49'54.9"W
El Clavo, Altamira Puerto Plata 19.688241, -70.838275 19°41'17.7"N, 70°50'17.8"W
El Corral, La Isabella Puerto Plata 19.889946, -71.078641 19°53'23.8"N, 71°04'43.1"W
El estrecho de Luperon Puerto Plata 19.811370, -70.927220 19°48'40.9"N, 70°55'38.0"W
Llano de Perez Puerto Plata 19.735383, -70.836076 19°44'07.4"N, 70°50'09.9"W
Los pilones Estero Hondo Puerto Plata 19.850299, -71.194336 19°51'01.1"N, 71°11'39.6"W
Los Saballos Puerto Plata 19.762564, -70.852450 19°45'45.2"N, 70°51'08.8"W
Luperón, Puerto Plata Puerto Plata 19.888215, -70.965599 19°53'17.6"N, 70°57'56.2"W
Ranchito de los Vargas Puerto Plata 19.800079, -70.951472 19°48'00.3"N, 70°57'05.3"W
Tiburcio, Estero Hondo Puerto Plata 19.824297, -71.169407 19°49'27.5"N, 71°10'09.9"W
Boruga San Cristobal 18.467846, -70.111334 18°28'04.2"N, 70°06'40.8"W
Dona Ana San Cristobal 18.367099, -70.172548 18°22'01.6"N, 70°10'21.2"W
Hato Viejo, Nigua San Cristobal 18.375388, -70.054718 18°22'31.4"N, 70°03'17.0"W
Juan Barón San Cristobal 18.254917, -70.178947 18°15'17.7"N, 70°10'44.2"W
La Pared Haina San Cristobal 18.459363, -70.050263 18°27'33.7"N, 70°03'00.9"W
Limón Dulce San Cristobal 18.476587, -70.102365 18°28'35.7"N, 70°06'08.5"W
Najayo Arriba San Cristobal 18.393321, -70.167548 18°23'36.0"N, 70°10'03.2"W
Nizao San Cristobal 18.251518, -70.215143 18°15'05.5"N, 70°12'54.5"W
Palenque San Cristobal 18.259212, -70.146696 18°15'33.2"N, 70°08'48.1"W
Pedro Caballero San Cristobal 18.486706, -70.085832 18°29'12.1"N, 70°05'09.0"W
Santana, Nizao San Cristobal 18.277117, -70.216288 18°16'37.6"N, 70°12'58.6"W
Yaguate San Cristobal 18.340808, -70.189547 18°20'26.9"N, 70°11'22.4"W
IDIAF, Sabana Larga San Jose de Ocoa 18.592277, -70.492133 18°35'32.2"N, 70°29'31.7"W
La ciénaga San Jose de Ocoa 18.605390, -70.461812 18°36'19.4"N, 70°27'42.5"W
Los Naranjos San Jose de Ocoa 18.582174, -70.424650 18°34'55.8"N, 70°25'28.7"W
Arroyo Loro San Juan de la Maguana 18.815161, -71.274463 18°48'54.6"N, 71°16'28.1"W
El llanito, Pedro Corto San Juan de la Maguana 18.843386, -71.411901 18°50'36.2"N, 71°24'42.8"W
Perfecto Socorro, Santomé San Juan de la Maguana 18.813673, -71.268493 18°48'49.2"N, 71°16'06.6"W
Sabana Alta San Juan de la Maguana 18.729593, -71.111594 18°43'46.5"N, 71°06'41.7"W
Batey Los Chicharrones San Pedro de Macorís 18.619355, -69.265162 18°37'09.7"N, 69°15'54.6"W
San José de los llanos San Pedro de Macorís 18.630262, -69.488109 18°37'48.9"N, 69°29'17.2"W
San José de los llanos San Pedro de Macorís 18.632422, -69.487457 18°37'56.7"N, 69°29'14.8"W
Gurabo Abajo Santiago 19.487863, -70.671401 19°29'16.3"N, 70°40'17.0"W
Navarrete Santiago 19.563186, -70.892973 19°33'47.5"N, 70°53'34.7"W
Villa González Santiago 19.535330, -70.788074 19°32'07.2"N, 70°47'17.1"W
El Toro, Guerra Santo Domingo 18.550604, -69.697820 18°33'02.2"N, 69°41'52.1"W
Engombe Santo Domingo 18.457893, -70.006814 18°27'28.4"N, 70°00'24.5"W
Engombe Santo Domingo 18.458875, -70.005151 18°27'31.9"N, 70°00'18.5"W
Batey Libertad, Mao Valverde 19.622122, -70.988046 19°37'19.6"N, 70°59'17.0"W
Boca de Mao Valverde 19.588610, -71.042608 19°35'19.0"N, 71°02'33.4"W
Damajagua, Mao Valverde 19.650145, -70.994961 19°39'00.5"N, 70°59'41.9"W
Damajagua, Mao Valverde 19.651787, -70.995733 19°39'06.4"N, 70°59'44.6"W
Jicomé Valverde 19.629866, -70.953735 19°37'47.5"N, 70°57'13.4"W
Mao Valverde 19.562764, -71.087287 19°33'46.0"N, 71°05'14.2"W
Los Mogotes, Villa Altagracia San Cristobal 18.738189, -70.245321 18°44'17.5"N, 70°14'43.2"W
Navarrete Santiago 19.563186, -70.892973 19°33'47.5"N, 70°53'34.7"W
Villa González Santiago 19.535330, -70.788074 19°32'07.2"N, 70°47'17.1"W
El Toro, Guerra Santo Domingo 18.550604, -69.697820 18°33'02.2"N, 69°41'52.1"W
Engombe Santo Domingo 18.457893, -70.006814 18°27'28.4"N, 70°00'24.5"W
Engombe Santo Domingo 18.458875, -70.005151 18°27'31.9"N, 70°00'18.5"W
Batey Libertad, Mao Valverde 19.622122, -70.988046 19°37'19.6"N, 70°59'17.0"W
Boca de Mao Valverde 19.588610, -71.042608 19°35'19.0"N, 71°02'33.4"W
Damajagua, Mao Valverde 19.650145, -70.994961 19°39'00.5"N, 70°59'41.9"W
Damajagua, Mao Valverde 19.651787, -70.995733 19°39'06.4"N, 70°59'44.6"W
Jicomé Valverde 19.629866, -70.953735 19°37'47.5"N, 70°57'13.4"W
Mao Valverde 19.562764, -71.087287 19°33'46.0"N, 71°05'14.2"W
Los Mogotes, Villa Altagracia San Cristobal 18.738189, -70.245321 18°44'17.5"N, 70°14'43.2"W


Pediobius cajanus sp. n. is a gregarious endoparasitoid in pupae of Melanagromyza obtusa. The female wasps lay 3–15 eggs per fly pupa (mean = 7.6, n = 50). In laboratory conditions, with 25 °C, the development time from egg to pupa of the parasitoid was 21 days. Without food the female wasps lived for four days and males for two days. The sex ratio female to male is 5:1 (n = 50).

Biology of the Asian fly

The female fly lays eggs on immature pods, and the emerging larvae feed in the developing seeds, initially feeding externally but after the first molt feed inside the seed, which they eventually destroy (Fig. 3). A single seed may be enough for a larva to complete its development, but usually more than one seed is devoured. The larva goes through three stages prior to pupation. Before pupating in the seed pod the larva emerges from the seed and opens a window in the wall of the pod (Fig. 2).


Pediobius cajanus sp. n. is so far known only from the Dominican Republic, but its distribution throughout this country suggests a larger distribution. It is certainly found over the entire island of Hispaniola, of which the Dominican Republic constitutes the larger part. It is possibly also found on neighboring islands in the Caribbean, e.g. Cuba, and perhaps also in tropical parts of the mainland in the Americas. Some Pediobius species have a very large distribution (Kerrich 1973, Hansson 2002), thus indicating a strong dispersal ability. If this ability is present also in P. cajanus sp. n. future investigations must establish.

In the Dominican Republic P. cajanus sp. n. is an important natural enemy of the Asian fly, killing on average 25% of the fly larvae in investigated areas. The fly is found in many tropical countries, in Asia, its native area, as well as in other tropical parts of the World, and is a serious pest on economically valuable crops in these areas. The record of parasitism of P. cajanus sp. n. in the Dominican Republic makes it worthwhile to investigate the potential of this parasitoid as a biocontrol agent of the Asian fly.


Thanks are due to Consejo Nacional de Investigación Agropecuarias y Forestal, CONIAF, for providing the financial support of a project that resulted in the discovery of the new Pediobius species described here. Thanks also to the Biology Department, Lund University, Sweden, for use of their SEM facility.


  • Barrows EM, Hooker ME (1981) Parasitization of the Mexican bean beetle by Pediobius foveolatus in urban vegetable gardens. Environmental Entomology 10: 782–786. doi: 10.1093/ee/10.5.782
  • Bouček Z (1988) Australasian Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera): A biosystematic revision of fourteen families, with a reclassification of species. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 832 pp.
  • Cedano J (2006) Guia Tecnica Cultivo de Guandul.Centro para el Desallorro Agropecuario y Forestal CEDAF, Santo Domingo, Republica Dominicana, 84 pp.
  • Etienne J, Martinez M, Boëcasse G (2004) Première signalisation avérée du ravageur Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) dans la région néotropicale (Dipt., Agromyzidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 109(1): 105–106.
  • Gibson GAP (1997) Morphology and terminology. In: Gibson GAP, Huber JT, Woolley JB (Eds) Annotated Keys to the Genera of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). National Research Council Research Press, Ottawa, 16–44.
  • Guzman R, Lopez L, Taveras R (2008) Dinámica Poblacional de la Mosca Asiática del Guandúl Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) y sus Enemigos Naturales en República Dominicana. (Consideraciones Económicas del Control Químico Utilizado por los Productores durante el Estudio). Informe final de proyecto CONIAF, 60 pp.
  • Hansson C (2002) Eulophidae of Costa Rica (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), 1. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 67: 1–290.
  • Kerr PH, Fisher EM, Buffington M (2008) Dome lighting for insect imaging under a microscope. American Entomologist 54: 198–200. doi: 10.1093/ae/54.4.198
  • Kerrich GJ (1973) A revision of the tropical and subtropical species of the Eulophid genus Pediobius Walker (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) 29: 115–199.
  • Miquilena E, Higuera Moros A (2012) Evaluation of protein content, mineral content and amino acid profile of Cajanus cajan, Vigna unguiculata and Vigna radiata flours as alternative in human feeding. Departamento de Química y Departamento de Agronomía, Facultad de Agronomía, La Universidad del Zulia. Venezuela. Revista Científica UDO Agrícola 12(3): 730–740.
  • Peck O (1985) The taxonomy of the Nearctic species of Pediobius (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), especially Canadian and Alaskan forms. The Canadian Entomologist 117: 647–704. doi: 10.4039/Ent117647-6
  • Sharma O, Bhosle B, Kamble K, Bhede B, Seeras N (2011) Management of pigeon pea pod borers with special reference to pod fly (Melanagromyza obtusa). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81(6): 539–43.
  • Schmutterer H (1990) Crop Pests in the Caribbean. Plagas de las plantas cultivadas en el Caribe. Technical Cooperation – Federal Republic of Germany, Eschborn, 345 pp.
  • Taveras R, Guzman R (2013) Control biológico de Melanagromyza obtusa, mosca asiática del Guandúl con la producción y liberación del parasitoide Ormyrus sp. Informe final de proyecto CONIAF, 35 pp.
  • Yadaf A, Yadaf S (2011) Review of the Parasitoid-Complex of Melanagromyza obtusa (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Indian Journal of Biological Studies and Research 1(2): 1–37.
login to comment