Research Article |
Corresponding author: German Antonio Villanueva-Bonilla ( germanvillanueva9@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Mark Shaw
© 2016 German Antonio Villanueva-Bonilla, Helena Carolina Onody, Bernardo F. Santos, João Vasconcellos-Neto.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Villanueva-Bonilla GA, Onody HC, Santos BF, Vasconcellos-Neto J (2016) First record of egg sac predation on a wall crab spider Selenopidae (Araneae) by the wasp Camera lunavenatrix sp. n. (Ichneumonidae, Cryptinae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 49: 65-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/JHR.49.7862
|
We report the first record of egg sac predation on the wall crab spider Selenops cocheleti by wasps of the genus Camera (Ichneumonidae: Cryptinae) with the description of a new species, as well as biological information on the wasp and the spider host. The rearing record and information presented herein are the first biological data for the genus.
Egg sac structure, egg predation, Hymenoptera , neotropical
Interactions between adult spiders and predatory or parasitoid wasps are a well-known phenomenon. Wasps from the families Crabronidae, Sphecidae and Pompilidae paralyze adult or sub-adult spiders, which are taken as food for the larvae (
On the other hand, predators of spider eggs have received much less attention, particularly in regard to their host-seeking behavior and their influence on the fitness of spiders.
Some groups of wasps are egg parasitoids, including members of the families Encyrtidae, Eulophidae (
Spiders of the species Selenops cocheleti Simon 1880 (Araneae: Selenopidae) are sit-and-wait predators occurring on tree trunks, under bark or in crevices of rocks (
In this study we present information on the egg sac structure of Selenops cocheleti, as well as the first record of egg predation by wasps of the genus Camera (Ichneumonidae: Cryptinae), with the description of a new species. We also present biological information on the wasp and the spider host.
The Serra do Japi highlands area is a small mountainous region in southeastern Brazil, located in the west of the Atlantic Plateau in the state of São Paulo. This area has an altitudinal variation between 700 m and 1300 m above sea level. Average annual temperatures oscillate between 15.7 °C and 19.2 °C in the higher and lower parts of the highlands. A mesophyll seasonal forest covers most of the forest area of Serra do Japi (
On September 28th and October 3rd of 2014, we searched at night (18:00 to 21:00) for egg sacs and for gravid adult females of Selenops cocheleti in trunks of Plinia cauliflora (Myrtaceae; commonly known as jaboticaba) and Pinus elliottii (Pinaceae) where these spiders are frequently seen.
The egg sacs and gravid adult females obtained in the field were photographed and taken to the laboratory where they were kept in plastic pots to inspect for potential larvae or pupae of parasitoids or predators. The attacked egg sacs were isolated and the emerging adult wasps collected. All egg sacs (attacked or not) were opened for structural analysis and description. Gravid adult females of S. cocheleti collected in the field were also taken and maintained under laboratory conditions. Then we collected the egg sacs laid by the females to estimate the number of eggs per sac and the development time of the early instars of this species of spider.
All methods and conventions, including morphological terminology and biometrics, follow
The studied specimens are deposited at
Selenops cocheleti builds an egg sac consisting of three steps, with layers of web giving protection to the eggs: (1) The female at first produces a concave dish that is adhered to the bark of the tree where the eggs are laid; (2) later it builds a layer that will close the egg sac; and (3) when the egg sac is complete, a dense layer of silk threads is added. The egg sac can be found attached on the inner surface of loose bark on Plinia and Pinus tree trunks (Figure
Egg sac of Selenops cocheleti. A In a tree trunk B Egg sac structure in layers C Eggs D Newly emerged spiderlings from the egg inside the egg sac (1st instar) and detail of one of the embryos E Second instar spiders F Spiderling (3rd instar) on tree trunk G Adult female on Plinia cauliflora (Myrtaceae) tree trunk in Serra do Japi, SP, Brazil.
We collected five egg sacs in the field, of which three had Camera lunavenatrix sp. n. larva feeding on the eggs, in each case gregariously (Table
Pupae of Camera lunavenatrix sp. n. in egg sac of Selenops cocheleti (Selenopidae). A, B Egg sac collected under bark of jaboticaba (Plinia cauliflora, Myrtaceae) with wasp larvae developing; the white fragments correspond to consumed eggs C Egg sac collected under bark of pine (Pinus elliottii) D, E Adult female of Camera lunavenatrix emerging from the egg sac of Selenops cocheleti.
Number of pupae of Camera lunavenatrix sp. n. (Ichneumonidae: Cryptinae) per egg sac of S. cocheleti recorded in the trees trunks of jaboticaba (Plinia cauliflora, Myrtaceae) and pine (Pinus elliottii, Pinaceae) during September (Sep.) and October (Oct.) of 2014 in the Ecological Station Serra do Japi, SP-Brazil.
Month | Pupae | Males | Females | Survival rate of spiders | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Egg sac 1 | Sep. | 3 | 1 | - | 0% |
Egg sac 2 | Sep. | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0% |
Egg sac 3 | Sep. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 88% |
Egg sac 4 | Oct. | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0% |
Egg sac 5 | Oct. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 91% |
Total | 9 | 3 | 4 |
After the emergence of the adult wasps, we dissected all attacked egg sacs and did not find spiderlings or exuviae inside, indicating that all of the eggs had been consumed. The wasp pupae were arranged next to each other in all the egg sacs attacked (Figure
Adult females of the wasp Camera lunavenatrix were observed in the field from 19:50 PM to 20:25 PM inspecting cracks in the trunk as well as spaces under bark on Plinia trees trunks, possibly looking for egg sacs of Selenops cocheleti. On the trunks, the female wasps performed a “hammering” movement with the antennae on the trunk surface for about 15 minutes before flying to another trunk to continue searching.
Camera: Townes 1962: 432. Type species: Mesostenus euryapsis (Cameron, 1885), by original designation.
Clypeus distinctly convex, subpyramidal in profile; malar space 0.80–1.00 as long as basal width of mandible. Mesoscutum only slightly convex; hind margin of metanotum with distinct tooth-like projection. Propodeum short, about as long as maximum length of mesopleuron; anterior and posterior transverse carinae usually complete, posterior carina sometimes medially indistinct. Areolet moderately small, longer than wide, crossveins 2r-m and 3r-m subparallel or weakly convergent. First metasomal tergite with anterolateral tooth, its spiracle placed at posterior 0.4–0.3; ovipositor sheath 0.25–0.42 as long as hind tibia.
The new species C. lunavenatrix is the fifth species for the genus. There are three other Neotropical species, from Brazil, Mexico and Cuba, in addition to the type species, Camera euryapsis, which occurs from Texas to Mexico and also in Cuba. Species of Camera seem to be rarely collected by Malaise and yellow pan traps (e.g., none collected by the extensive sampling of
Holotype ♀ (
Head, mesosoma and metasoma almost entirely black except legs ferruginous; occipital carina incomplete ventrally; tergite 1 relatively short, almost as long as tergite 2; body covered with moderately dense white pilosity; ovipositor short, 0.25× as long as hind tibia; clypeus convex, in lateral view almost pyramidal; posterior transverse carina of propodeum medially arched forwards, raised laterally; crossveins 2r-m and 3r-m of areolet subparallel; vein 2m-cu almost straight, reclivous; forewing vein 1cu-a arising distinctly basad of 1M+Rs.
Female. Forewing 9.0 mm. Head. Densely pilose; mandible stout, apex 0.6× as wide as base; malar space 0.8× as long as basal width of mandible. Clypeus densely punctate, 2.0× as wide as high, in front view more or less trapezoidal, width at apex 1.4× of basal width, distinctly convex, apically abruptly truncate, in lateral view almost pyramidal; apical margin medially straight, laterally not projecting. Antenna with 33 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 6.5× as long as wide; apex of apical flagellomere uniformly tapered; area between antennae with small rounded tubercle. Supra-clypeal area convex, distinctly rugose-punctate. Supra-antennal area distinctly rugose-punctate, medially with a distinct longitudinal depression. Vertex finely punctate. Occipital carina sharp, laterally sinuous, incomplete ventrally, not meeting hypostomal carina or base of mandible.
Thorax. Mostly mat, uniformly and densely pilose. Pronotum densely punctate, ventrally striate; epomia distinct, diverging from pronotal collar, dorsally straight, almost reaching dorsal margin of pronotum. Mesoscutum almost flattened, subcircular, 1.1× as long as wide, shiny, densely punctate; notaulus distinct over more than 0.5 of mesoscutum length, with transverse striae, strongly impressed anteriorly, weaker posteriorly; scutellum shiny, punctate; scuto-scutellar groove deep, anteriorly mostly smooth, posteriorly with longitudinal striae. Mesopleuron ranging from densely punctate to rugose-punctate; subalar ridge distinctly projecting, narrow; epicnemial carina reaching about 0.7 of distance to subalar ridge; sternaulus incomplete and weak, reaching 0.6 of distance to mid coxa. Transverse sulcus at base of propodeum deep, about 0.4× as long as anterior area of propodeum, medially smooth; metapleuron densely punctate, juxtacoxal carina absent. Fourth tarsomere not bilobed.
Propodeum. 1.1× as long as wide; anterior margin medially concave, with distinct anterolateral projections; anterior area moderately punctate, shiny and smooth between punctures and slightly rugose on first lateral area, medially with distinct longitudinal carina; spiracle elliptic, spiracle 2.0× as wide as long; anterior transverse carina medially slightly arched forwards. Posterior area of propodeum rugulose; posterior transverse carina complete, medially distinctly arched forwards, raised laterally; median longitudinal carina of propodeum present between anterior and posterior transverse carinae.
Wings. Forewing vein 1-Rs+M and crossvein 1m-cu both almost straight; bulla of 1-Rs+M placed almost on its midlength; forewing crossvein 1cu-a arising distinctly basad of 1M+Rs; vein 2Cua 1.1× as long as crossvein 2cu-a; crossvein 2m-cu almost straight, reclivous, bulla placed on midlength; areolet of moderate size, 1.30 as long as pterostigma, pentagonal, 1.1x as long as wide; crossveins 2r-m and 3r-m subparallel, about same length; vein 3-M distinctly shorter than 2-M. Hind wing vein 1-M forming right angle with vein Cua; vein Cub weakly convex, forming right angle with vein Cua.
Metasoma. First tergite moderately short, almost as long as tergite 2, about 2.0× as long as maximum width; in cross section approximately depressed, mostly striate, sparsely pilose; apex 2.5× as wide as base; spiracle at posterior 0.4 of its length, distinctly prominent; ventrolateral and median dorsal carinae absent; dorsolateral carinae present, reaching 0.5 of tergite 1 length. Tergite 2 short, 1.1× as long as maximum width, in dorsal view trapezoidal, posterior width 1.7× anterior width, mostly strongly punctate, apically finely punctate; thyridium slightly longer than wide; tergites 3–8 finely pilose and punctate. Ovipositor very short, 0.25× as long as hind tibia, slender, straight, distinctly compressed, nodus slight but distinct; lower valve without conspicuous teeth.
Color. Black with ferruginous legs. Head: black; palpi ferruginous; antenna black, flagellomeres 6 apically and 7–13 entirely white. Mesosoma: black; legs mostly ferruginous; fore and mid legs basally slightly dark ferruginous, generally lighter towards apex except tarsomere 5 of foreleg and tarsomeres 3–5 of mid leg dark brown; hind leg with coxa, trochanters and femur dark ferruginous; hind tibia ferruginous on basal 0.65, apical 0.35 blackish; hind tarsomeres 1 basally, 3 apically and 4–5 dark brown to blackish, tarsomeres 1 apically and 2 entirely white. Metasoma: black, except very base of tergite 1 marked with ferruginous; ovipositor ferruginous and ovipositor sheath black; wings hyaline, apically infumate.
Male. Forewing 6.0–8.0 mm long. Generally similar to female except: vertex more sparsely punctate; first flagellomere shorter, about 3.5× as long as wide; tergite 1 apically narrower, its maximum width about 1.3–1.5× minimum width; hind leg with tibia more extensively blackish and basal 0.25 of tarsomere 1 and tarsomere 5 entirely black.
Variation. Forewing 9–9.5 mm long. Two females have metasoma with tergites 2–8 having some dark ferrugineous areas.
Camera lunavenatrix sp. n. (♀ holotype). 5 Head in lateral view 6 Mesoscutum in dorsal view 7 Mesopleuron and metapleuron in lateral view 8 Propodeum in dorsal view 9 Fore and hind wings 10 Ovipositor in lateral view. Scale bars: 0.25 mm (5); 0.2 mm (6); 0.5 mm (7); 0.25 mm (8); 0.5 mm (9); 0.1 mm (10).
Camera lunavenatrix sp. n. is similar in general morphology to the North American species C. euryapsis Cameron and C. californica Kasparyan and Ruíz-Cancino. The three species have the body approximately cylindrical, with the propodeum about as tall dorso-ventrally as the anterior part of the thorax, and a relatively short tergite 1. However, C. lunavenatrix can be readily distinguished from the other two species by the body almost entirely black (versus with extensive yellow marks); clypeus almost pyramidal in lateral view (versus only moderately convex, with rounded profile); posterior transverse carina of propodeum medially distinctly arched, bell-shaped (versus slightly and uniformly arched); and ovipositor quite short, only 0.25× as long as hind tibia (versus 0.42).
The Brazilian species C. thoracica Szépligeti is quite different from the other species of the genus in having the anterior part of the thorax rather stout, with the propodeum distinctly shorter in lateral view; furthermore, tergite1 is distinctly longer than tergite 2, very different from the short tergite1 of the other species. Additionally, C. lunavenatrix can be separated from C. thoracica by the black metasoma (versus bright orange); and forewing vein 1cu-a arising based to crossvein 1M+Rs (versus opposite).
From the Latin luna (“moon”) and venatrix (“huntress”). The name of the spider genus Selenops derives from Selene, the moon goddess, and the suffix -ops, Greek for “eye”. Therefore the new species is deemed a “moon huntress” as it parasitizes egg sacs of Selenops.
It is known that the egg sac works as a physical barrier isolating the eggs from the outside environment. In addition, maternal care provides additional protection by guarding of the eggs (
The observation of adult females of C. lunavenatrix inspecting tree trunks between 19:50 PM and 20:25 PM seems to suggest some degree of nocturnal activity for the species. This is somewhat inconsistent with the general tendency of nocturnal ichneumonids to have pale body color and enlarged ocelli (
Females of C. lunavenatrix may search for egg sacs of S. cocheleti during the night because during this period the adult spider female leaves its shelter to feed, leaving the egg sac vulnerable. On the other hand, while the (rather rapid) development of the wasp takes place, the female spider continues to guard the egg sac. This suggests that the spider may be unable to perceive any wasp activity or change inside the egg sac.
The larvae of C. lunavenatrix observed in this study consumed 100% of spider eggs. This is not unusual, as recorded for Tromatobia sp. (Ichneumonidae: Pimplinae) and Aprostocetus sp. (Ichneumonidae: Eulophidae) attacking Araneus omnicolor (Araneidae) (
This research was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Processes: 2013/16469-8; 2012/15875-0) and the Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia dos Hymenoptera Parasitoides da Região Sudeste (INCT-HYMPAR/SUDESTE) (CNPq, FAPESP, CAPES).The third author was supported by a fellowship from the Richard Gilder Graduate School; a “mini-ARTS” award by the Society of Systematic Biologists; a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant by the National Science Foundation (Award # 1501802) and an Annette Kade Graduate Student Exchange Fellowship Program by the American Museum of Natural History. We are grateful to the editor and the two reviewers for their appropriate and constructive suggestions to improve the paper.