Research Article |
Corresponding author: Volker Mauss ( volker.mauss@gmx.de ) Academic editor: Michael Ohl
© 2022 Volker Mauss, Alexander V. Fateryga, Erol Yildirim, James M. Carpenter.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Mauss V, Fateryga AV, Yildirim E, Carpenter JM (2022) Contribution to the taxonomy, bionomics and distribution of the Palaearctic Celonites cyprius-group (Hymenoptera, Vespidae, Masarinae) with the description of two new species from the North Caucasus and East Anatolia. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 89: 109-155. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.89.79832
|
Celonites ivanovi sp. nov. is described as a new species from Dagestan where it has been recorded from dry habitats in a small area on the northern side of the Greater Caucasus. Celonites cagrii sp. nov. is described from Erzurum Province in east Turkey. As in other members of the C. cyprius-group, the females of both species were observed to visit flowers of Heliotropium (Boraginaceae). A morphological examination including the male genitalia of all species of the C. cyprius-group revealed that C. ivanovi sp. nov. and C. cagrii sp. nov. share the apomorphic characters of this group and are closely related to Celonites osseus Morawitz, 1888. Mean genetic distance between C. ivanovi sp. nov. and C. cagrii sp. nov. based on COI-5 sequences is 7.40%. The geographical distribution of all members of the C. cyprius-group is summarized and an illustrated key is provided for the identification of males and females of the species. A lectotype is designated for C. osseus.
Boraginaceae, distribution, flower visiting behaviour, Heliotropium, key to species, male genitalia, Palaearctic region, taxonomy, trophic relationships
The pollen wasp genus Celonites Latreille, 1802 forms a well defined monophylum (
The purpose of the present paper is to describe two new species of Celonites belonging to the C. cyprius-group from the Republic of Dagestan, Russia, and Erzurum Province in East Anatolia, Turkey, as well as to summarize taxonomic and chorological data on the related taxa and to provide a key for their identification.
Field investigations of the hitherto unknown Celonites ivanovi sp. nov. were made by A. Fateryga on 23 June 2018 in the vicinity of Maydanskoye in the Untsukulskiy district of the Republic of Dagestan, Russia [locality 1: 42°37'36"N, 46°56'48"E], where 3 females were observed and 2 females were collected, and on 11 June 2019, 15 and 16 June 2021 at a second site in the vicinity of Maydanskoye, 3 km to the southeast of the first locality [locality 2: 42°36'07"N, 46°58'13"E], where numerous females and males were observed and 17 females and 10 males were collected. Wasp activity and flower visiting behaviour were observed with the naked eye for approximately one hour in the morning of 11 June 2019 and documented with a Canon PowerShot SX160 IS camera. The pictures were compared to single frames of video sequences of C. cyprius and C. rugiceps Bischoff, 1928 visiting Heliotropium flowers in Rhodes (taken with a Canon EOS 80D, 50 frames per second, scale up to 1:1, Mauss et al. in prep.). Flower preferences of the wasps were studied by counting the number of sightings (= first observations) of flower visiting individuals while walking randomly across the locality. A single female was recorded on 22 June 2021 in the vicinity of Turtsi in the Lakskiy district [locality 3: 42°11'34"N, 47°09'33"E]. Field observations of Celonites cagrii sp. nov. were made by E. Yildirim at Şenkaya-Akşar in the Erzurum province of Turkey on 12 July, 14 July and 1 August 2020. For identification of the collected Heliotropium plants the keys provided by
For the morphological and chorological investigations in total 479 dry specimens of the Celonites cyprius-group were examined from the following collections:
Museum of Zoology Lausanne, Switzerland (MCZL),
Museum of Natural History Mainz, Germany (NHM),
Natural History Museum of Venice, Italy (MSNVE),
Upper Austrian State Museum – Biology Centre, Linz, Austria (
Specimens were investigated under a WILD M3 stereo microscope (maximum magnification 80 times). Numbers of terga and sterna apply to metasomal segments. Antennal articles are termed A1–A12 counted from the proximal to the distal end. Nomenclature of male genitalia follows that of
DNA barcoding was accomplished by AIM Advanced Identification Methods GmbH Leipzig following standard methods of DNA extraction from a single leg of dry specimens or specimens collected and stored in 96% pure ethanol, PCR for Cytochrome Oxidase subunit 1 (COI-5P), cycle sequencing of forward and reverse strand and sequence editing. Nucleotide sequences of ten individuals from four taxa of the C. cyprius-group were obtained uploaded and compared to the BOLD database (www.BOLDsystem.org). Another eight COI-5P sequences of three taxa of the C. cyprius-group were obtained from the BCHYM- and GBACU-project by courtesy of Christian Schmid-Egger and Stefan Schmidt and added to the data set. Finally genetic distances (Kimura 2 Parameter) and a neighbour joining BOLD TaxonID Tree were computed including 18 COI-5P sequences of morphologically identified specimens of C. cagrii sp. nov., C. cyprius, C. ivanovi sp. nov., C. rugiceps and C. yemenensis Giordani Soika, 1957 using the following parameters: distance model Kimura 2 Parameter; pairwise deletion of positions containing gaps and missing data; minimum complete overlap 100 bp; alignment with BOLD Aligner (Amino Acid based HMM); individual nucleotide sequence length 557–699 bp.
For the investigation of the geographic distribution label information of 479 specimens of the C. cyprius-group coming from 114 localities was entered into the database Mauss (Suppl. material
Celonites osseus
Morawitz, 1888: 268–269, ♀, type locality: “territorio transcaspico (Tschikischljar) [Turkmenistan]”, lectotype (designated here): ♀, <golden disc>, “Tschikischljar. Pom.[eranzev]”, “Celonites osseus ♀. F. Moraw.”, “к. Ф Моравица [coll. F Morawitz]”, “Lectotypus ♀ Celonites osseus Morawitz des. Fateryga, 2018 <red label>”
Armenia: Zanga [currently Hrazdan] River, near Yerevan, 19.07.1935 1♀ (dbM 5855) leg. G. Kostylev
The identity of C. osseus was probably not clear to O.W. Richards, since in his key and in his description of the species he emphasizes that the dorsal area of the mesoscutum has smooth shining interstices at least as wide as the punctures, which is clearly inconsistent with the original description of
Armenia, Turkmenistan, Iran (new record) (Fig.
♀ (dbM 5610) “[Turkey] TR-Erzurum Şenkaya-Akşar [40.648262°N, 42.342351°E] 14.VII.2020-1275 m Leg. E. Yildirim [on Heliotropium ellipticum Ledeb.]”
“[Turkey] TR-Erzurum Şenkaya-Akşar [40.648262°N, 42.342351°E] 20.VIII.2011-1275 m Leg. E. Yildirim” 1♀ (dbM 4574) EY; “[Turkey] TR-Erzurum Şenkaya-Akşar [40.648262°N, 42.342351°E] 12.VII.2020-1275 m Leg. E. Yildirim [on Heliotropium ellipticum Ledeb.]” 3♀ (dbM 5607, 5608 (BOLD process ID CECYP005-20), 5609) VM; “[Turkey] TR-Erzurum Şenkaya-Akşar [40.648262°N, 42.342351°E] 01.VIII.2020-1275 m Leg. E. Yildirim [on Heliotropium ellipticum Ledeb.]” 1♀ (dbM 5616) AMNH, 1♂ (dbM 5619) 3♀ (dbM 5611, 5612, 5615) VM, 4♀ (dbM 5613, 5614, 5617, 5618) EY; “ARMENIA Erevan Monti desertici Aighepat 40 Km. SE 23-VII-63 [leg. Giordani Soika]” 2♂♂ (dbM 5789, 5790) MSNVE.
See key.
Female. Colour (Figs
Variation (number of differing specimens in brackets): Light yellowish-white markings: spot on each ocular sinus dorso-medially separated from spot on lateral part of frons (1); frons with two isolated little (4) or medium-sized (2) spots above antennal sockets, or both spots above antennal sockets large and dorso-laterally fused with large marking extending from ocular sinus over lateral part of frons (1); continuous narrow stripe on gena and postgena along occipital carina from dorso-lateral corner of head to postero-ventral corner of compound eye (1), this stripe can be shortly interrupted (1) or reduced to short narrow spot on gena and postgena along occipital carina at dorso-lateral corner of head (3) and/or little spot on postgena adjacent to occipital carina level with postero-ventral corner of compound eye (7); minute spot on malar area above condylus (7); humeral spot small (2); little spot antero-dorsally on ventral mesepisternum (2); mesoscutum completely black (1) or with rectangular spot (2) or triangular spot with top directing posteriorly (1); transversal spot postero-medial on scutellum large (2); narrow transversal stripe on median third of metanotum (10); minute spot on pointed protuberance on posterior face of propodeum dorsally on each side of middle (1); tergum I with little (1) or medium sized (1) separated longitudinal antero-medial spot that can be posteriorly fused with posterior band in median axis in addition (1); posterior band on tergum II (4) or on terga II–III (2) not completely interrupted along posterior margin on each side of middle; tergum VI with large medial spot and little spot on each postero-lateral angle (2) or only with large (5) or small (2) medial spot that can be reduced to four weak minute little dots (1); continuous stripe on outside of mid-tibia only (1) or on outside of mid- and hind-tibia (7). Other markings: light yellowish-white marking on A7 darkened (1); medial on proximal part of A8 only light brownish suffused (3) or with same colour than distal part (1).
Structure: Head in frontal view 1.50 times as wide as long in median (min 1.45, max 1.54, n=5) (Fig.
Pronotum with anterior margin raised to carina; anterior pronotal carina (sensu
Fore-femur postero-ventrally produced in middle forming anteriorly curved lobe distally changing into tapering carina along ventral margin of femur; end of tibia when folded against femur coinciding with produced region; tarsomeres I–IV broad and flattened; underside of tibia and tarsomere I with strong obliquely distally directing setae forming stiff brush; underside of tarsomere I and II with comb-like row of particularly strong setae along distal margin. Claws ventrally with small tooth.
Metasomal terga with postero-lateral corners slightly produced; posterior margin of tergum I weakly crenulated, crenulation not produced into spines and not projecting over smooth translucent lower posterior margin of tergum; posterior margin of terga II–V weakly to moderately crenulated, crenulation in middle of terga II–IV produced into little slightly raised teeth projecting approximately to end of translucent lower posterior margin of terga; cuticula moderately shining, densely covered with reticulate macropunctation, punctures distinct, smaller and more regular than on mesoscutum; interstices finely shagreened. Tergum VI with lateral margins converging in weakly convex, nearly straight or slightly concave curve, at transition to posterior median lobe strongly bend inwards forming distinct postero-lateral angle on each side; posterior margin of posterior median lobe running in convex oval curve formed by distinct translucent lamella; posterior median lobe set off from more strongly sloping median area of tergum VI by well-definded concave curvature at its base; cuticula covered with fine pubescence of thin pale setae arising from micropunctures on interstices of reticulate macropunctation, slightly projecting beyond postero-median translucent lamella and lateral margins; on ventral side (viewed from ventral) posterior translucent lamella of median lobe continues on both sides into distinct carina running anteriorly along medial margin adjoining sternum VI, thereby slightly but continuously diverging from lateral margin of tergum VI.
Metasomal sternum I shiny, finely shagreened, with tiny setae but without punctures. Sterna II–V posteriorly with broad stripe of asetose, translucent cuticula adjacent to posterior margin of more strongly sclerotized cuticula; small sparse row of setae along posterior sclerotized margin somewhat projecting over anterior part of translucent stripe of cuticula; small outer area of postero-lateral corners distinctly depressed with some deep macropunctures; rest of sclerotized cuticula shiny, at least on anterior half of each sternum finely shagreened becoming weaker towards its posterior end; sternum II with median area moderately covered with small shallow macropunctures from which short pale setae arise, laterally sparsely covered with shallow macropunctures and micropunctures, micropunctation becoming fairly denser along posterior margin; sterna III–V anteriorly with moderate to dense shallow macropunctation, posteriorly changing into nearly unpunctured cuticula becoming moderately to densely covered by micropunctures further postero-laterally and along posterior margin. Posterior margin of sterna I–IV straight, posterior margin of sternum V medially concave running in a gentle curve. Sternum VI (Fig.
Right side of postero-lateral part of the propodeum of females in dorso-posterior view a C. yemenensis (dbM 4759) b C. clarus (dbM 4616) c C. cagrii sp. nov. (dbM 5611) d C. rugiceps (dbM 5446) e C. cyprius (dbM 5433) f C. osseus (dbM 5677) g C. ivanovi sp. nov. (dbM 5491) (ps = posterior surface of propodeum fp = postero-medial flange of propodeum pp = postero-lateral process ll = lateral lamella).
Male. Colour (Fig.
a–c Female sternum VI in ventral view a C. yemenensis (dbM 4759) b C. ivanovi sp. nov. (dbM 5491) c C. cagrii sp. nov. (dbM 5611) d–f female fore femur in posterior view d C. cyprius (dbM 5431) e C. osseus (dbM 5678) f C. ivanovi sp. nov. (dbM 5493) g–i female sternum VI posterior margin in dorso-posterior view g C. ivanovi sp. nov. (dbM 5493) h C. cagrii sp. nov. (dbM 5607) i C. cagrii sp. nov. (dbM 5618).
Structure: Resembles female, except as follows. Head in front view 1.49 times as wide as long (Fig.
a, b Male head in frontal view a C. ivanovi sp. nov. (dbM 5498) b C. cagrii sp. nov. (dbM 5619) c–e male tergum VII in dorso-posterior view c C. osseus (dbM 5521) d C. ivanovi sp. nov. (dbM 5498) e C. cagrii sp. nov. (dbM 5619) f, g male antennal club in dorsal view f C. ivanovi sp. nov. (dbM 5499) g C. cagrii sp. nov. (dbM 5619) h, i male head in dorsal view h C. ivanovi sp. nov. (dbM 5498) i C. cagrii sp. nov. (dbM 5619).
Tergum VII at posterior end with narrow median lobe and well set off postero-lateral angle on each side (Fig.
Male genitalia in dorsal view a C. rugiceps (dbM 2834) b C. cyprius (dbM 5452) c C. yemenensis (dbM 5531) d C. osseus (dbM 5521) e C. ivanovi sp. nov. (dbM 5497) f C. cagrii sp. nov. (dbM 5619) (ad = aedoeagus at = apodema thyrsos bs = basal sclerite cu = cupula ha = harpide sp = stipes).
Sternum VIII (Fig.
Male genital as in Figs
Measurements of the exoskeleton are listed in Table
COI-5P gene sequences were obtained from two specimens and entered in BOLD database (CECYP005-20, CECYP006-20). The intraspecific sequence divergence of C. cagrii sp. nov. is 0.37%. The clade is clearly separated from the other investigated Celonites taxa (Fig.
The species is named after M. Çağrı Yildirim, the son of E. Yildirim.
Turkey, Armenia (Fig.
Habitat. The locus typicus of C. cagrii sp. nov. is situated in an arid mountainous area at an altitude of 1275 m a.s.l. in a valley near Akşar, which is a village in the Şenkaya district of Erzurum. Mean annual temperature is approximately 7.2 °C, annual precipitation is 456 mm (calculated by https://de.climate-data.org). The sides of the valley are formed by the steep slopes of adjacent dry mountains and a stream is running at its bottom. The upper part of the valley is covered with rocks, while the lower part is characterized by stony ruderal sites mainly used for grazing, and a few dry pastures and fields (Fig.
Twelve females and a single male of C. cagrii sp. nov. were collected while they were visiting flowers of Heliotropium ellipticum.
♀ (dbM 5492), “[Russia] Dagestan, Maydanskoye 42°36'16"N 46°58'10"E [corrected to 42°36'07"N, 46°58'13"E in 2021] 11.VI.2019 on Heliotropium styligerum leg. [A.V.] Fateryga”
“[Russia] Dagestan, Untsukulskiy distr. vicinity of Maydanskoye [42°37'36"N 46°56'48"E] on Heliotropium styligerum 23.06.2018 leg. [A.V.] Fateryga”, 1♀ AF, 1♀ (dbM 5287) VM; “[Russia] Dagestan Maydanskoye 42°36'16"N 46°58'10"E [corrected to 42°36'07"N, 46°58'13"E in 2021] 11.VI.2019 leg. [A.V.] Fateryga”, 1♂ (dbM 5497) AMNH, 1♂ (dbM 5498)
Measurements of the exoskeleton of females and males of Celonites cagrii sp. nov., C. ivanovi sp. nov., C. osseus and C. clarus (x = median; min = minimum, max = maximum, n = sample size; maximum accuracy 0.011 mm, all distances in mm).
Genus | female | male | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | C. cagrii sp. nov. | C. ivanovi sp. nov. | C. osseus | C. clarus | C. cagrii sp. nov. | C. ivanovi sp. nov. | C. osseus | |||||||||||||||||||
Parameter | x | min | max | n | x | min | max | n | x | min | max | n | x | min | max | n | x | min | max | n | x | min | max | n | x | n |
lateral ocelli distance | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.42 | 13 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 11 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 10 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.42 | 3 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 3 | 0.39 | 0.32 | 0.43 | 5 | 0.39 | 1 |
med./lat. ocellus distance | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 13 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 11 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 10 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 3 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 3 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 5 | 0.13 | 1 |
compound eyes distance | 1.17 | 1.11 | 1.22 | 13 | 1.21 | 1.16 | 1.24 | 11 | 1.17 | 1.12 | 1.24 | 10 | 1.21 | 1.16 | 1.22 | 3 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.94 | 3 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 1.09 | 5 | 1.09 | 1 |
A1 length | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 13 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 11 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 10 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 3 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 3 | 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 5 | 0.17 | 1 |
A3 length | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 13 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 11 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 10 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 3 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 3 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 5 | 0.22 | 1 |
A3 width | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 13 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 11 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 10 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 3 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 3 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 5 | 0.11 | 1 |
A4–A5 length | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 13 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 11 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 10 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 3 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 3 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 5 | 0.21 | 1 |
A8–A12 length | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 13 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 11 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 10 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 3 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 3 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.95 | 5 | 0.99 | 1 |
A8–A12 width | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 13 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 11 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 10 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 3 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 3 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.51 | 5 | 0.45 | 1 |
antennal sockets distance | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.59 | 13 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 11 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 10 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 3 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 3 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.48 | 5 | 0.47 | 1 |
clypeus max. width | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 13 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.97 | 11 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 10 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 3 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 3 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.84 | 5 | 0.77 | 1 |
clypeus apical width | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.51 | 13 | 0.54 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 11 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.48 | 10 | 0.41 | 0.31 | 0.44 | 3 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 3 | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.50 | 5 | 0.39 | 1 |
clypeus length | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 13 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 11 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 10 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 3 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 3 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 5 | 0.58 | 1 |
mesonotum width | 2.10 | 1.99 | 2.18 | 13 | 2.30 | 2.13 | 2.38 | 11 | 2.21 | 2.10 | 2.27 | 10 | 2.04 | 1.93 | 2.13 | 3 | 1.90 | 1.88 | 2.02 | 3 | 2.24 | 1.85 | 3.77 | 5 | 2.18 | 1 |
mesoscutum length | 1.31 | 1.24 | 1.38 | 13 | 1.48 | 1.39 | 1.53 | 11 | 1.42 | 1.29 | 1.50 | 10 | 1.33 | 1.29 | 1.39 | 3 | 1.12 | 1.03 | 1.19 | 3 | 1.12 | 1.00 | 1.34 | 5 | 1.24 | 1 |
wing length | 4.14 | 4.00 | 4.32 | 13 | 4.69 | 4.46 | 4.90 | 11 | 4.53 | 4.23 | 4.65 | 10 | 4.09 | 4.00 | 4.32 | 3 | 3.96 | 3.77 | 4.09 | 3 | 4.14 | 3.77 | 4.62 | 5 | 4.37 | 1 |
R+Sc length | 2.21 | 2.18 | 2.32 | 13 | 2.49 | 2.41 | 2.58 | 11 | 2.44 | 2.24 | 2.55 | 10 | 2.16 | 2.13 | 2.35 | 3 | 2.13 | 2.04 | 2.21 | 3 | 2.16 | 2.04 | 2.60 | 5 | 2.32 | 1 |
number of hamuli | 7 | 6 | 8 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 1 |
femur I length | 1.01 | 0.97 | 1.06 | 13 | 1.11 | 1.08 | 1.14 | 10 | 1.04 | 0.94 | 1.10 | 10 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.99 | 3 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.95 | 3 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 1.07 | 4 | 0.95 | 1 |
tibia I length | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 13 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 11 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 10 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 3 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 3 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 5 | 0.64 | 1 |
tibia I width | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 13 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 11 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 10 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 3 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 3 | 0.33 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 5 | 0.34 | 1 |
metatarsus I length | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.48 | 13 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 11 | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 10 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.51 | 3 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 3 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.48 | 5 | 0.51 | 1 |
metatarsus I width | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 13 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 11 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 10 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 3 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 3 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 5 | 0.19 | 1 |
tarsus I T2–T5 length | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 13 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 11 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 10 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 3 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 3 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 5 | 0.11 | 1 |
tergum I width | 2.21 | 2.10 | 2.30 | 13 | 2.41 | 2.30 | 2.49 | 11 | 2.30 | 2.13 | 2.46 | 10 | 2.10 | 2.07 | 2.27 | 3 | 2.07 | 2.04 | 2.27 | 3 | 2.27 | 1.90 | 2.52 | 5 | 2.30 | 1 |
tergum I length | 0.88 | 0.73 | 0.94 | 13 | 1.02 | 0.95 | 1.04 | 11 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 1.04 | 10 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 3 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.96 | 3 | 0.97 | 0.80 | 1.12 | 5 | 1.00 | 1 |
tergum II width | 2.18 | 2.07 | 2.24 | 13 | 2.41 | 2.27 | 2.52 | 11 | 2.32 | 2.21 | 2.46 | 10 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.30 | 3 | 2.07 | 1.99 | 2.18 | 3 | 2.24 | 1.96 | 2.52 | 5 | 2.35 | 1 |
total length | 5.7 | 5.3 | 6.6 | 13 | 6.0 | 5.6 | 6.5 | 11 | 6.1 | 5.4 | 6.2 | 10 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 6.5 | 3 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 2 | 6.2 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 4 | 6.5 | 1 |
See key.
Female. Colour (Figs
Variation (number of specimens in brackets): Yellowish-white markings: clypeus with two additional lateral spots (1), only with two small separate spots dorso-medial on clypeus (1) or clypeus completely black (1); spot on ocular sinus and frons narrowly fused (1); spot on ocular sinus or frons asymmetrically reduced (4) or completely reduced (1); short narrow spot on gena along postocular carina at dorso-lateral corner of head (3); humeral spot small (4); little spot antero-ventrally on mesepimeron (1); little spot postero-medially on mesoscutum (5); bands on terga II–V interrupted on each side of middle by blackish-brown area (3); antero-medial spot on tergum VI absent (2); continuous stripe on outside of mid-tibia (5); continuous stripe on outside of hind-tibia (2) or marking on outside of mid- and hind-tibia reduced to small area at distal and proximal end (3); little spot disto-medially on A3 (1), weak yellowish markings medial on A7 (3).
Microphotos of male genitalia in dorsal view a C. rugiceps (dbM 5450) b C. cyprius (dbM 5439) c C. yemenensis (dbM 5532) d C. osseus (dbM 5521) e C. ivanovi sp. nov. (dbM 5498) f C. cagrii sp. nov. (dbM 5619) (ad = aedoeagus at = apodema thyrsos bs = basal sclerite cu = cupula ha = harpide sp = stipes).
Structure: Head in front view 1.48 times as wide as long in median (min 1.45, max 1.53, n=5) (Fig.
Pronotum with anterior margin raised to carina; anterior pronotal carina (sensu
Male genitalia in ventral view a C. rugiceps (dbM 2834) b C. cyprius (dbM 5452) c C. yemenensis (dbM 5531) d C. osseus (dbM 5521) e C. ivanovi sp. nov. (dbM 5497) f C. cagrii sp. nov. (dbM 5619) (ad = aedoeagus bs = basal sclerite cu = cupula ha = harpide sp = stipes vo = volsella ut = uncus thyrsos).
Fore-femur postero-ventrally produced in middle forming anteriorly curved lobe (Fig.
Microphotos of male genitalia in ventral view a C. rugiceps (dbM 5450) b C. cyprius (dbM 5439) c C. yemenensis (dbM 5532) d C. osseus (dbM 5521) e C. ivanovi sp. nov. (dbM 5498) f C. cagrii sp. nov. (dbM 5619) (ad = aedoeagus bs = basal sclerite cu = cupula ha = harpide sp = stipes vo = volsella ut = uncus thyrsos).
Metasomal terga with postero-lateral corners slightly produced; posterior margin of tergum I weakly crenulated, crenulation not produced into spines and not projecting over smooth translucent lower posterior margin of tergum; posterior margin of terga II–V weakly to moderately crenulated, crenulation in middle of terga II–IV produced into little slightly raised teeth projecting approximately to end of translucent lower posterior margin of terga (Fig.
Metasomal sternum I shiny, finely shagreened, with tiny setae but without punctures. Sterna II–V posteriorly with broad stripe of asetose, translucent cuticula adjacent to posterior margin of more strongly sclerotized cuticula; small sparse row of setae along posterior sclerotized margin somewhat projecting over anterior part of translucent stripe of cuticula; outer area of postero-lateral corners distinctly depressed, densely covered with macropunctures; rest of sclerotized cuticula shiny, finely shagreened on sterna II–III, shagreening weaker or missing on sternum IV and absent on sternum V; sternum II antero-laterally with moderately spaced shallow macropunctation and a few micropunctures becoming barely punctured towards posterior margin, whole medial area densely covered with small macropunctures from which short pale setae arise; sterna III–V anteriorly with moderate to dense shallow macropunctation, posteriorly changing into nearly unpunctured area along posterior margin. Posterior margin of sterna I–IV straight, posterior margin of sternum V medially concave running in a gentle curve. Sternum VI tapering towards distal end; with outer margin forming bulged rim, anteriorly raised to inwardly bent carina, posteriorly running in regular curve postero-medially protruded into little median spine (Fig.
Male. Colour (Fig.
Variation (number of specimens in brackets): yellowish-white M-shaped band on frons filling ocular sinus completely (1), medially not completely interrupted (1); short narrow interrupted yellowish-white streak on gena along occipital carina at dorso-lateral corner of head (2); one or two little yellowish-white spots postero-medial on mesoscutum (2); humeral plate with yellowish-white marking (4); outside of mid-metatarsus yellowish-white (1).
Structure: Resembles female, except as follows. Head in front view 1.4–1.6 times as wide as long (Fig.
Tergum VII at posterior end with characteristically narrow median lobe and well set off postero-lateral angle on each side (Fig.
Sternum VIII acutely produced running into two pointed lancet-like tips at posterior end with deep median incision between them (Fig.
Male genital as in Figs
Measurements of the exoskeleton are listed in Table
COI-5P gene sequences were obtained from three specimens and entered in BOLD database (AIMEJ036-20, AIMEJ037-20, AIMEJ038-20). The intraspecific sequence divergence of C. ivanovi sp. nov. is low, reaching at most 0.18%. The clade is distinctly separated from the other investigated Celonites taxa (Fig.
The species is named after Prof. Sergey P. Ivanov, a Crimean entomologist and the scientific advisor of A. Fateryga.
Russia (Dagestan) (Fig.
Habitat. Imagines were observed at roadsides with richly flowering ruderal herbaceous vegetation (Fig.
Adults of Celonites ivanovi sp. nov. visited exclusively flowers of Heliotropium styligerum. A total of 36 females and 1 male were recorded on flowers of this plant (“first observations”). A female visiting a flower, stood on the corolla holding on to the margins or distal parts of the petals of the same or adjacent flowers of the inflorescence with her mid- and hind-legs, while her head was situated above the corolla opening. The fore-legs were on the level surface of the corolla postero-laterally to the sides of her head. Then she rapidly protruded the proboscis thereby inserting it into the corolla tube (Fig.
Flower visits were periodically interrupted by alighting on the ground. Standing on a stone a female repeatedly regurgitated and withdrew again a mass of pollen and nectar that became visible as a droplet of liquid between her mouthparts (Fig.
Geographic distribution of members of the C. cyprius-group (full circles specimens investigated, open circles records from literature; previously published records of C. cyprius from Iran and Armenia excluded; made with Natural Earth, www.naturalearthdata.com).
Males performed patrol flights across the area covered with H. styligerum in a low constant flight. Patrolling was regularly interrupted by perching on the ground. Courtship and copulation were not observed.
a–e, g, h Flower visiting behaviour of Celonites ivanovi sp. nov. females at flowers of Heliotropium styligerum and behaviours associated with it (details see text) f habitat of C. ivanovi sp. nov. at locality 2 in the vicinity of Maydanskoye, Dagestan i habitat of C. cagrii sp. nov. near Akşar, Turkey (aspect in autumn).
Male of Celonites clarus Gusenleitner, 1973 not known.
1 | Female | 2 |
– | Male | 8 |
2 | Larger, body length approximately 7–8 mm, more sturdily built (Fig. |
Celonites rugiceps Bischoff, 1928 |
– | Smaller, body length approximately 5–6.5 mm (Figs |
3 |
3 | Postero-lateral process of propodeum with blunt apical end, outline of emargination between lateral lamella and postero-lateral process narrowly elongated (Fig. |
Celonites yemenensis Giordani Soika, 1957 |
– | Postero-lateral process of propodeum and outline of emargination between lateral lamella and postero-lateral process different (Fig. |
4 |
4 | Head and especially clypeus appear less broad in frontal view, head in median 1.43 times as wide as long (1.38–1.48) (Fig. |
Celonites cyprius Saussure, 1854 |
– | Head and especially clypeus appear distinctly broader in frontal view, head at least 1.45 times as wide as long (Fig. |
5 |
5 | Mesoscutum with dense macropunctation with smooth shiny interstices (Fig. |
Celonites clarus Gusenleitner, 1973 |
– | Mesoscutum reticulate, with distinctly raised narrow interstices partly forming lines (Fig. |
6 |
6 | Outline of emargination between lateral lamella and postero-lateral process of propodeum with narrow short neck, its apical end small oval-shaped (Fig. |
Celonites cagrii Mauss & Yildirim, sp. nov. |
– | Outline of emargination between lateral lamella and postero-lateral process of propodeum with broad short neck, its apical end medially enlarged (Fig. |
7 |
7 | Head in frontal view more triangular, outline of compound eye less strongly curved (Fig. |
Celonites ivanovi Mauss & Fateryga, sp. nov. |
– | Head in frontal view more elliptic, outline of compound eye nearly semi-circular (Fig. |
Celonites osseus Morawitz, 1888 |
8 | Larger, body length approximately 7–8 mm, more sturdily built (Fig. |
Celonites rugiceps Bischoff, 1928 |
– | Smaller, body length approximately 5–6.5 mm (Figs |
9 |
9 | Posterior lobes of sternum VIII of medium length, wedge-shaped with acute-angled end (Fig. |
Celonites cyprius Saussure, 1854 |
– | Posterior lobes of sternum VIII different (Figs |
10 |
10 | Posterior lobes of sternum VIII short with blunt ending (Fig. |
Celonites yemenensis Giordani Soika, 1957 |
– | Posterior lobes of sternum VIII long, lanceolate with pointed tip (Fig. |
11 |
11 | Male genital broader at base (Figs |
Celonites osseus Morawitz, 1888 |
– | Male genital narrower at base (Figs |
12 |
12 | Head in frontal view more triangular (Fig. |
Celonites ivanovi Mauss & Fateryga, sp. nov. |
– | Head in frontal view strongly oval (Fig. |
Celonites cagrii Mauss & Yildirim, sp. nov. |
The distribution of the members of the C. cyprius-group is shown in Fig.
Celonites cagrii sp. nov., C. ivanovi sp. nov. and C. osseus can be assigned to Eucelonites and to the Celonites cyprius-group without contradictions since the imagines share the potential apomorphic characters of these taxa, that is the axilla is produced into a curved tapering projection which fits into a slight emargination of the tegula (
Celonites osseus differs from C. cagrii sp. nov. and C. ivanovi sp. nov. in the shape of the harpides and the base of the male genital which is associated with different proportions of tergum VII and sterna VII+VIII of the males. Differences between C. cagrii sp. nov. and C. ivanovi sp. nov. exist in the form of the male antennal club, the proportions of tergum VII and sternum VIII, as well as some structures of the aedoeagus. All of these characteristics can be assumed to be associated with mating behaviour in Celonites (cf.
Besides other morphological characteristics many species of the C. cyprius-group vary in the shape of the postero-lateral process and the lateral lamella of the propodeum resulting in different outlines of the emargination between them. Species specific differences in the shape of the postero-lateral part of the propodeum were already observed between C. cyprius, C. rugiceps and C. clarus (
The relation of Celonites clarus to the C. cyprius-group is still unresolved. It is only known from the type series collected near Teheran (
Celonites ivanovi sp. nov. and C. cagrii sp. nov. were exclusively recorded from flowers of different Heliotropium species. This corresponds to other members of the C. cyprius-group for which flower visiting records are available, that is C. cyprius and C. rugiceps, that were also found at flowers of various Heliotropium plants (
The geographic range of Celonites osseus is similar to Iranian faunal elements sensu
Just three species of pollen wasps (all in the genus Celonites) were previously known from Russia (
Sergey A. Belokobylskij and Yulia V. Astafurova supported the second author during his work in
The work of A.V. Fateryga was a part of the State research project No. 121032300023-7.
Supplementary material
Data type: investigated specimens, published records, localities
Explanation note: List of all specimens, published records and localities included in the study.