Research Article |
Corresponding author: Tomáš Hovorka ( hovorkarl@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Jose Fernandez-Triana
© 2022 Sergey A. Belokobylskij, Tomáš Hovorka.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Belokobylskij SA, Hovorka T (2022) A new fossil euphorine genus and species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with the longest known ovipositor from Dominican amber. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 93: 71-80. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.93.90545
|
A new genus and species of the braconid subfamily Euphorinae, Palaeorionis longicaudis gen. et sp. nov., is described and illustrated from Miocene Dominican amber. This new genus is characterised by the long and tube-shaped petiole, presence of both radiomedial (2-SR and r-m) veins on the infuscate fore wing and long ovipositor.
Aridelus, description, fossil, Miocene, Orionis, ovipositor, petiole, Stenothremma
The subfamily Euphorinae is one of the most diverse groups of koinobiont parasitoids of the family Braconidae, which are known to attack larval, nymphal, and adult stages of hosts from the insect orders Orthoptera, Hemiptera, Psocoptera, Raphidioptera, Neuroptera, Coleoptera, Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera (
Most of the known fossil euphorine taxa have been described from amber (
This study provides an illustrated description of the female of a new euphorine genus and species from the Miocene Dominican amber that is characterised by the long tube-shape petiolate first metasomal tergite and long ovipositor.
Dominican amber (Lower Miocene age; 20–15 Ma) is the fossilized resin of the leguminose tree Hymenaea protera Poinar, being mostly transparent and often containing a high number of fossil inclusions, and it has been collected in various sites within the Dominican Republic (
During the present study, fossil braconid specimen were examined using a Leica M205 C stereomicroscope (Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Photographs were obtained using a Keyence VHX-5000 (Mechelen, Belgium) digital microscope under suitable magnifications. Subsequent image processing was performed using Helicon Focus Pro 7 software. Final plates were prepared in Adobe Photoshop CS6.
The terminology employed for morphological features, sculpture and body measurements follows
The material used for this study is deposited in the collection of the
Stuttgart Museum of Natural History, Germany (
Class Insecta Linnaeus, 1758
Order Hymenoptera Linnaeus, 1758
Family Braconidae Nees, 1811
Palaeorionis longicaudis gen. et sp. nov., by present designation and monotypy.
Named after “palaeo” (Greek for “ancient”) and the generic name of its similar extant genus, Orionis, which belongs to the subfamily Euphorinae. Gender: masculine.
Head
(Fig.
Antenna
(Fig.
Mesosoma
(Fig.
Wings
(Fig.
Legs
(Fig.
Metasoma
(Figs
Palaeorionis gen nov. is characterised by a long and tube-like petiole resembling a similar structure in some extant Euphorinae genera, especially Aridelus Marshall, 1887, Chrysopophthorus Goidanich, 1948, Orionis Shaw, 1987, Stenothremma Shaw, 1984, and Wesmaelia Foerster, 1863.
Palaeorionis gen. nov. differs from Orionis Shaw by having the last segment of the maxillary palpus very long and narrow (shorter and thicker in Orionis), discoidal (discal) cell of infuscate fore wing sessile (petiolate in hyaline fore wing in Orionis), second radiomedial vein (r-m) present (absent in Orionis), mediocubital vein (M+CU1) sinuate (straight in Orionis), brachial (subdiscal) cell long and rather narrow (short and wide in Orionis), petiole of metasoma smooth and without any carinae (at least partly sculptured and with lateral carinae in Orionis), and ovipositor sheath longer than metasoma (distinctly shorter in Orionis).
Palaeorionis gen nov. differs from Aridelus Marshall by having the last segment of maxillary palpus very long and narrow (shorter and thicker in Aridelus), mesosoma relatively long (short in Aridelus), hind coxa distinctly elongate-oval (shortly oval in Aridelus), mesosoma without areolate sculpture (entirely areolate in Aridelus), mediocubital vein (M+CU1) of fore wing sinuate (straight in Aridelus), hind femur relatively wide (narrow in Aridelus), metasoma rather compressed and with distinctly exposed apical segments (not compressed and retracted apical segments as in Aridelus), and ovipositor sheath longer than metasoma (very short and usually concealed inside of the metasoma in Aridelus).
The newly described genus also differs from Stenothremma Shaw by the last segment of the maxillary palpus very long and narrow (shorter and thicker in Stenothremma), mesosoma relatively long (short in Stenothremma), hind coxa distinctly elongate-oval (subglobal in Stenothremma), body without granulate sculpture (head, mesosoma and petiole densely granulate in Stenothremma), discoidal (discal) cell of infuscate fore wing sessile (petiolate in hyaline fore wing in Stenothremma), second radiomedial vein (r-m) present (often absent in Stenothremma), mediocubital vein (M+CU1) sinuate (straight in Stenothremma), brachial (subdiscal) cell long and rather narrow (short and wide in Stenothremma), petiole of metasoma smooth (petiole mainly granulate in Stenothremma), and ovipositor sheath longer than metasoma (distinctly shorter in Stenothremma).
The differences from the extant genera Wesmaelia and Orionis are summarized in Table
The differences between the Palaeorionis gen nov. and two similar recent genera (Wesmaelia Foerster and Chrysopophthorus Goidanich).
Genus | Palaeorionis gen. nov. | Wesmaelia | Chrysopophthorus |
---|---|---|---|
Character | |||
1. Last segment of the maxillary palpus | very long and narrow | shorter and thicker | shorter and thicker |
2. Pedicel of antenna | distinctly enlarged, more than half as long as scape | short, much less than half of the length of scape | distinctly enlarged, about half as long as scape |
3. Mesosoma | relatively long | short | short |
4. Colour of fore wing | infuscate | hyaline | hyaline |
5. Second radiomedial vein (r-m) of fore wing | present | absent | present |
6. Mediocubital vein (M+CU1) of fore wing | sinuate | straight | straight |
7. Discoidal (discal) cell of fore wing | sessile | petiolate | petiolate |
8. Hind coxa | distinctly elongate-oval | weakly oval | weakly oval |
9. Hind femur | widened | narrow | narrow |
10. Metasoma | rather compressed and with distinctly exposed apical segments | not compressed and with retracted apical segments | not compressed and with retracted apical segments |
11. Ovipositor sheath | longer than metasoma | very short and usually concealed inside of metasoma | distinctly shorter than metasoma |
Between the known fossil Euphorinae genera, Palaeorionis gen nov. is similar to Onychoura Brues, 1933 (with type species O. petiolata Brues, 1933) and Meteorites Brues, 1939 (with type species M. inopinata Brues, 1939), both from Baltic amber. This new genus differs from Onychoura by having malar area short (very long in Onychoura), mesosoma relatively elongated (very short in Onychoura), notauli present (perhaps absent in Onychoura), propodeum long (very short in Onychoura), radial (marginal) cell of fore wing weakly shortened (strongly shortened in Onychoura), recurrent vein (m-cu) distinctly postfurcal (interstitial in Onychoura), petiole of metasoma not swollen (swollen in Onychoura), and ovipositor longer than metasoma and without apical hook (distinctly shorter and with very slender apical hook in Onychoura). Palaeorionis gen nov. distinctly differs from Meteorites Brues by the last segment of maxillary palpus very long and narrow (much shorter and thicker in Meteorites), antenna long, about 33-segmented (short, 13–14-segmented in Meteorites), mesosoma relatively long, about twice longer than height (short, about as long as height in Meteorites), second radiomedial vein (r-m) of fore wing present (absent in Meteorites), nervulus (cu-a) and recurrent (m-cu) veins distinctly postfurcal (almost interstitial in Meteorites), petiole of metasoma not widened distally and almost straight (widened distally and distinct evenly curved in Meteorites), and ovipositor longer than metasoma and almost straight (distinctly shorter and strongly arcuate in Meteorites).
Holotype
: Female, preserved in Lower Miocene Dominican amber (20–15 Ma), deposited in
Female. Body length 7.7 mm; fore wing length 4.6 mm.
Head : Head not depressed, relatively high. Occiput at least weakly concave. Temple rather short. Transverse diameter of eye 3.7 times longer than temple (lateral view). Eye large, about 1.5 times as high as broad (lateral view). Malar suture perhaps absent. Malar space short. Clypeus without lower flange. Mandible rather short. Fourth segment of labial palpi the longest, 4.5 times longer than its maximum width, 1.7 times longer than second segment.
Antenna : First flagellar segment subcylindrical, 6.2 times longer than its apical width, as long as second segment; second segment 5.5 times longer than its apical with. Submedial segments about 2.5 times longer than their width. Penultimate segments short, 1.2–1.3 times longer than its width, 0.4 times as long as apical segment.
Mesosoma : Mesosoma relatively long, not depressed, its length about 2.0 times height. Neck of prothorax short. Mesoscutum highly and convex-roundly elevated above pronotum, its median lobe convex, weakly protruding forward, perhaps without anterolateral corners. Prescutellar depression (scutellar sulcus) invisible. Subalar depression shallow and sculptured. Mesopleuron widely smooth; metapleuron rugose.
Wings : Fore wing narrow, 3.9 times longer than its maximum width. Pterostigma about 5.0 times longer than width. Radial vein (r) arising behind middle of pterostigma, from basal 0.6. First (r) and second (3RSa) radial abscissae forming very obtuse angle. Second radial abscissa (3RSa) almost equal to first abscissa (r), 0.1 times as long as the straight third abscissa (3RSb), 0.2 times as long as the almost straight first radiomedial vein (2RS). Second radiomedial (submarginal) cell relatively narrow and short, 1.6 times longer than its maximum width, 0.6 times as long as the wide brachial (first subdiscal) cell. Brachial (first subdiscal) cell almost straight anteriorly. First medial abscissa ((RS+M) a) slightly curved. Recurrent vein (1m-cu) almost 0.5 times as long as first radiomedial vein (2RS), 0.3 times as long as basal vein (1M). Discoidal (first discal) cell rather long, 3.2 times longer than its maximum width. Nervulus (1cu-a) postfurcal, almost 2.0 times longer than distance from basal (1M) vein and nervulus (1cu-a). Parallel vein (2CUb) arising from posterior 0.2 of apical margin of brachial (second subdiscal) cell. Brachial (second subdiscal) cell long and wide. Hind wing relatively narrow. Radial (marginal) cell weakly widened basally and narrowed apically, without additional transverse vein (r). Nervellus (cu-a) present, oblique. Submedial (subbasal) cell short. First abscissa of mediocubital vein (M+CU) 0.6 times as long as second abscissa (M).
Legs : Fore trochanter almost twice longer than trochantellus. Fore tarsus almost as long as fore tibia. Hind coxa 2.0 times longer than maximum width, 0.7 times as long as petiole. Hind femur 6.5 times longer than width. Hind tarsus slender, 0.8 times as long as hind tibia. Second segment of hind tarsus 0.5 times as long as basitarsus, almost 2.0 times longer than fifth segment (without pretarsus).
Metasoma : Metasoma 1.2 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First metasomal tergite 9.6 times longer than medial high (at spiracles level), tergite ventrally fused in basal 0.8. Lateral suture between second and third tergites present, but dorsal suture absent. Second and third tergites combined 0.7 times as long as following tergites. Hypopygium short, obtuse distally, strongly retracted below under metasoma, almost glabrous.
Sculpture : Vertex and temple mainly smooth. Hind coxa and femur smooth. Metasoma entirely smooth. Hind tibia with rather dense and short semi-erect setae, its length 0.2–0.3 times maximum width of tibia.
Colour : Body almost entirely black or dark brown. Antenna mainly light brown. Labial palpi light brown; maxillary palpi dark reddish brown, but at least apical segment brownish yellow. Legs mainly dark brown, all tibiae basally yellow at short distance. Ovipositor sheaths light brown, infuscate apically. Fore wing almost entirely distinctly infuscate, paler basally and apically, with distinct hyaline transverse stripe under base of pterostigma. Pterostigma mainly dark brown, pale brown in basal fifth.
Male. Unknown.
Named from Latin “longus” (= long) and “caudus” (= tail, ovipositor) because this taxon has the longest known ovipositor of all fossil Euphorinae taxa.
The fossil braconid taxa from the subfamily Euphorinae are relatively common in the Paleogene in comparison to the members of some other braconid subfamilies. They were often attributed as representatives of extant genera, however various of these fossil taxa actually belong to peculiar extinct taxa, namely Elasmosomites Brues, Meteorites Brues, Oncometeorus Tobias, Onychoura Brues, Parasyrrhizus Brues and Prosyntretus Tobias (
The tubular petiole of the mesosoma is practically unknown from previously recorded fossil euphorine taxa. In this situation, the genus Palaeorionis gen nov., is the first extinct genus having such long tube-shaped petiole. Perhaps only Onychoura Brues, 1933 from Baltic amber possessed a petiole with similar structure, but it is much shorter and thickened towards the apex. The new genus is also well characterised by the distinctly infuscate fore wing having submedially only a single narrow transverse subhyaline stripe, very long ovipositor (much longer than metasoma), and distinctly thickened tibia of the hind leg. This character combination is unknown in all previously recorded amber euphorine genera.
The host of Palaeorionis longicaudis gen. et sp. nov. is unclear. However, based on available characters such as a long ovipositor and presence of both radiomedial veins (2-SR and r-m) in the fore wing this genus likely belongs to the tribe Meteorini, whose members are known to be endoparasitoids of coleopteran and lepidopteran larvae. Regarding its long ovipositor, this species might have been a parasitoid of some concealed hosts such as wood-boring beetles.
Authors are thankful to Stuttgart Museum of Natural History (Germany) for the loan of the amber piece. We are also thankful to Dr Julia Stigenberg (Stockholm, Sweden), Prof Donald J. Quicke for their useful consultations, Dr Petr Janšta and Jonah Ulmer for their useful tips and final corrections.
The authors are very thankful to Dr Alejandro Zaldívar-Riverón (UNAM, México) and Prof Cornelis van Achterberg (Naturalis, Leiden, The Netherlands) for their very useful comments on the first version of the manuscript.
This study was supported by The Charles University Grant Agency (GAUK), project No. 375421 (TH) and performed as a part of the State Research Project No 122031100272-3 (SAB).