Short Communication
Short Communication
First record of Epipompilus excelsus (Bradley, 1944) (Hymenoptera, Pompilidae) as a koinobiont ectoparasitoid of Ariadna mollis (Holmberg, 1876) (Araneae, Segestriidae)
expand article infoGerman Antonio Villanueva-Bonilla, Antonio Domingos Brescovit§, Eduardo dos Santos|, João Vasconcellos-Neto
‡ Universidade Estadual de Campina, São Paulo, Brazil
§ Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil
| Universidade Estadual Paulista, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
Open Access


Epipompilus Kohl comprises 52 species of wasps that are parasitoids of spiders; 16 species occur in the Neotropical region and 36 species occur in the Australian region. The biological knowledge of this genus is limited and its interactions and host spiders are still incipient. Here, we report some behavioural and biological characteristics of E. excelsus, a parasitoid of the tube-dwelling spider Ariadna mollis. We observed an E. excelsus female attacking an adult female of A. mollis in São Paulo, Brazil. We photographed daily the larval development of the wasp, from the egg stage to adult emergence. The entire developmental cycle of the wasp took 24 days. This period was shorter than the developmental periods of wasps belonging to other genera of Pompilidae. Although all species within Pompilidae use spiders as host, they present great behavioural diversity, characterized by different ethological sequences. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the Neotropical species of Epipompilus exhibit biological characteristics similar to the Australian species, acting as a koinobiont ectoparasitoid, but displays differences in larval morphology. Studies on other species could elucidate the extent of these differences and similarities, contributing to our understanding of the evolutionary history of Epipompilus, and consequently of Pompilidae.


Egg-wasp development, Neotropical, Parasitoid, Tube-dwelling spider


Pompilidae is a megadiverse family of ectoparasitoid wasps, with more than 5,000 valid species distributed worldwide and approximately 1,000 species inhabiting the Neotropical region (Shimizu 1994, Pitts et al. 2006). Although some pompilid species show primitive levels of sociality, most species are solitary (Shimizu 2004, Shimizu et al. 2010, Santos et al. 2016). These species are known as “spider wasps”, since adult females usually uses spiders as food resource for their larva (Brothers and Finnamore 1993, Wasbauer 1995). Pompilids presents a wide diversity of behavioural strategies to parasitize their hosts, with species nesting in the ground, in pre-existing cavities, mud nests they have built, or using as hosts active spiders that are posteriorly killed by the wasp’s larvae (El-Hennawy 1996, Souza et al. 2015). Most species are solitary, but some show primitive levels of sociality (Shimizu 2004, Shimizu et al. 2010, Santos et al. 2016).

The genus Epipompilus Kohl comprises 52 species of spider wasps, 16 of which occur in the Neotropical region, one in the Nearctic region, and 36 species in the Australian region (Roig-Alsina and Barneche 2017). The current biological knowledge of this genus is based on three species from the Australian region, E. insularis Kohl, 1884, E. exleyae Evans, E. reiki Evans (Evans 1972, Pollard 1982, Harris 1987), and one Neotropical species, E. platensis (Roig-Alsina and Barneche 2017). Evans (1972) reported E. exleyae as an ectoparasitoid of immature Sparassidae, and E. rieki as an ectoparasitoid of an unidentified spider. Pollard (1982) and Harris (1987) reported E. insularis as a koinobiont ectoparasitoid of multiple cursorial spiders, including the clubionid Clubiona cambridgei Koch, 1873, and the salticids Salticus sp., Trite auricoma Urquhart, 1885 and T. planiceps Simon, 1899.

Segestriidae (Simon, 1893) consists of haplogyne spiders, small-to-medium in size (total body length between 2.8 and 20.25 mm) (Grismado 2008, Giroti and Brescovit 2018), usually found in loose barks, cracks in tree trunks, under rocks, or even in anthropomorphized places (Roig-Alsina and Barneche 2017). These spiders are nocturnal, sedentary, construct funnel-like webs and have been reported as a host of Epipompilus platensis (Roig-Alsina and Barneche 2017). Currently, Segestriidae comprises 130 species divided into four genera (World Spider Catalog 2018), among them Segestria Latreille, 1804 and Ariadna Audouin, 1826 occurs in South America (Grismado 2008, Giroti and Brescovit 2011, World Spider Catalog 2018).

The genus Ariadna currently consists of 105 of the 130 species included in Segestriidae (Giroti and Brescovit 2018). This genus is distributed across all continents, but the greatest number of species is found in tropical and subtropical regions. The knowledge of biology and ecology of Ariadna is quite incipient, based on a single study that reported A. maxima as host of the koinobiont ectoparasitoid Sphaerops appendiculata Philippi, 1865 (Diptera, Acroceridae). This acrocerid is the only external koinobiont parasitoid of spiders known in the family, since other species develops inside the opistosoma of spiders (Schlinger 1987).

Here, we report E. excelsus (Bradley, 1944) as a koinobiont ectoparasitoid of the tube-dwelling spider Ariadna mollis (Holmberg, 1876), with behavioural and biological notes of this wasp-spider interaction.


We observed E. excelsus attacking A. mollis on May 5, 2017 at Serra do Japi (23°13'53.60"S, 46°52'47.01"W), a tropical forest located in the municipally of Jundiaí, São Paulo state, Brazil. After the wasp attack, we collected the parasitized spider and transported it to the Laboratório Especial de Coleções Zoológicas (LECZ) - Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil, where we recorded the larval development. We kept the spider inside a terrarium (15×15×13 cm) and provided cotton balls with water, a piece of loose bark from the tree that we found the spider (used as a shelter by the spider), and we fed the spider every two days with Chrysomya putoria (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae). To access the wasp development (i.e. from the egg stage to adult emergence), we photographed the parasitized spider daily upon a mm scale. We used the software Adobe Photoshop CS6 to analyze the photographs and measure the length and width of the larvae throughout its development. We deposited the remains of the spider carcass and the adult parasitoid in the Arachnida collection of Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil (Curator: A. D. Brescovit).

Results and discussion

We found an adult female of E. excelsus in an inspection flight near a trunk of a Plinia cauliflora Mart. (Myrtaceae). The wasp found an adult female of A. mollis and flew around the spider for few (six minutes approximately) minutes, remaining at a distance of approximately 6 cm from the spider. The wasp then landed on the spider dorsum, stung and paralyzed the spider. Thereafter, the wasp laid an egg dorsally on the spider abdomen; oviposition took approximately three minutes. Then the wasp drummed the spider (Fig. 1A), and after five minutes, flew off leaving the parasitized spider paralyzed. After approximately two more minutes, the individual of A. mollis began to move slowly and continued its normal course on the tree trunk (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1. 

Adult female of Ariadna mollis (Segestriidae) parasitized by Epipompilus excelsus (Pompilidae). A) Wasp on the back of the spider (the arrow indicates the position of the egg in the abdomen). B) A. mollis moving slowly minutes after being paralyzed. C) Larval I instar of the wasp adhered to the abdomen of the spider. D) Larval II instar. E) Larval III instar. F) Larval IV instar feeding from the abdomen of the spider. G) Larva eating the remains of the legs and abdomen of the spider. H) The cocoon containing the meconium (red arrow). I) Adult female of E. excelsus.

In laboratory, the parasitized spider constructed a tube-shaped shelter in the space between the terrarium wall and the piece of bark. The spider continued to feed on the flies normally during our observations. The egg developed in two days. Once it hatched, the first instar larva emerged and stuck to the spider abdomen. The larval development included four instars distinguished by abrupt increases of the larvae size between each larval stage. The first instar measured 0.3 mm in width and 2.2 mm in length (Fig. 1C). The larvae reached the second instar (1.1 mm wide and 4.1 mm long, Fig. 1D) five days later. After three days, the larvae reached the third instar and measured 1.7 mm wide and 6.1 mm long (Fig. 1E). Finally, the fourth instar was observed five days later, measuring 2.2 mm wide and 7.8 mm long, and presented 11 retractile dorsal tubercles (Fig. 1F). The fourth instar larvae killed the host and slowly consumed more than 50% of its body. Only the legs, the part of the ventral abdomen containing the genitalia, and the anterior part of the cephalothorax were not consumed by the larvae (Fig. 1G). On the next day, the larva began to construct a cocoon in the space between the bark and the wall of the terrarium, and fixed the apical portion of the cocoon in the bark (Fig. 1H). Emergence of the adult wasp occurred by the apical region of the cocoon five days after cocoon construction. The entire developmental cycle from oviposition until the emergence of adult wasp, took 24 days. This period is shorter than the developmental periods of wasps of other Pompilidae species. Paracyphononyx scapulatus, for example, develops in 54 days (Souza et al. 2015), P. rufricus in 30 days (El-Hennawy 1996), and Notocyphus tyrannicus Smith in 46 days (Martins et al. 2016).

Studies on congeneric species do not present a detailed description of the individual’s life cycle (Roig-Alsina and Barneche 2017). Studies on the interaction between the parasitoid wasp Epipompilus insularis and the spiders Clubiona cambridgei, Trite auricoma or T. planiceps (Harris 1987) and the interaction between E. insularis and the spiders C. cambridgei or Salticus sp. (Pollard 1982) showed similar results to those of the present study. Harris (1987) and Pollard (1982) suggested that this genus of diurnal parasitoid wasps usually parasitize nocturnal non-weaver spiders because these spiders rest in shelters during the day, since this behavior of inactivity during daytime decreases the risk of attacks to the spiders, and thereby provides protection for the wasp egg and larvae. It is not possible to predict whether the parasitized spiders return to its shelters, but notably, our study specimen built a shelter and returned to it every day after goes out at night to capture the preys we offered. The spider was active during almost the entire larval development of E. excelsus, sheltering only in the final phase of development (fourth instar), before the wasp kill and consume the host. Harris (1987) reported a similar life cycle development time for E. insularis (22 days total) when compared to E. excelsus (24 days). The time of development time of each larval instar was also similar. However, the larval development of E. insularis involves five instars, while our study species presented four instars. Moreover, the final larval instar of E. insularis presents 12 lateral tubercles, while E. excelsus has 11 tubercles at the last instar.

Although all Pompilidae species use spiders as hosts, there are a high diversity of behavioural strategies characterized by different ethological sequences according to Evans (1953). This author classified the behaviour of E. insularis as VPO (Venari = to hunt; Pungere = to sting the prey; Ovum parere = to lay the egg) or VO (Venari= to hunt; Ovum parere= to lay the egg), and discussed that such ethological sequences represent primitive conditions within Aculeata, but derived conditions within Pompilidae. Species of other genera, such as Notocyphus Smith, 1855, Paracyphononyx Gribodo, 1884 and Homonotus Dahlbom, 1843 present the same ethological sequence (Evans 1953, Souza et al. 2015).

In conclusion, this study showed that the Neotropical species E. excelsus presents similar biological characteristics (e.g. koinobiont ectoparasitoidism) when compared to the Australian species. On the other hand, there are differences in larval morphology (e.g. number of tubercles) and development (e.g. number of larval instars). Studies on other koinobiont ectoparasitoid species would elucidate the extent of these differences and similarities, contributing to our understanding of the evolutionary history of Epipompilus, and consequently of Pompilidae.


This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001 (Villanueva-Bonilla GA). Also, we were fnancially supported by Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia dos Hymenoptera Parasitoides (HYMPAR – CNPq/FAPESP/CAPES) and CNPq grant number 301776/2004-0 (Brescovit AD).


  • Brothers DJ, Finnamore AT (1993) Superfamily Vespoidea. In: Goulet H, Huber JT (Eds) Hymenoptera of the World: An Identification Guide to Families.Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, 161–278.
  • El-Hennawy HK (1996) A spider (Lycosa? sp.) (Araneida: Lycosidae) providing a shelter for its predator Paracyphononyx rufcrus (Klug, 1834) (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 1: 185–188.
  • Evans HE (1972) Revision of the Australian and New Guinean species of Epipompilus (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). Pacific Insects 14(1): 101–131.
  • Grismado CJ (2008) A taxonomic revision of the spider genus Ariadna Audouin, 1826 in Argentina and Chile, with the description of five new species (Arachnida, Araneae, Segestriidae). Zoosystema 30(2): 333–360.
  • Harris AC (1987) Pompilidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera), vol. 12. Fauna of New Zealand. DSIR.
  • Martins AL, Gallão JE, Bichuette ME, Santos EF (2016) The first record of Notocyphus tyrannicus Smith (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) as parasitoid of Acanthoscurria Ausserer, 1871 (Teraphosidae: Teraphosinae). Brazilian Journal of Biology 76: 806–807.
  • Pitts JP, Wasbauer MS, Von Ohlen CD (2006) Preliminary morphological analysis of relationships between the spider wasp subfamilies (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae): revisiting an old problem. Zoologica Scripta 35(1): 63–84.
  • Roig-Alsina A, Barneche J (2017) The genus Epipompilus in Argentina (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 76(3–4): 33–38.
  • Santos EF, Waichert C, Scott-Santos CP (2016) Behavioural notes on the Neotropical parasocial spider wasp Ageniella (Lissagenia) flavipennis (Banks) (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), with host association. Ecological Entomology 42: 96–99.
  • Schlinger EI (1987) The biology of Acroceridae (Diptera): True Endoparasitoids of spiders. In: Nentwig W (Ed.) Ecophysiology of Spiders.Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 319–331.
  • Shimizu A (1994) Phylogeny and classification of the family Pompilidae (Hymenoptera). Tokyo Metropolitan University Bulletin of Natural History 2: 1–142.
  • Shimizu A (2004) Natural history and behavior of a Japanese parasocial spider wasp, Machaerothrix tsushimensis (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 77(4): 383–401.
  • Shimizu A, Wasbauer M, Takami Y (2010) Phylogeny and the evolution of nesting behaviour in the tribe Ageniellini (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 160: 88–117.
  • Souza HS, Messas YF, Masago F, dos Santos ED, Vasconcellos-Neto J (2015) Paracyphononyx scapulatus (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), a koinobiont ectoparasitoid of Trochosa sp. (Araneae: Lycosidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 46: 165–172.
  • Wasbauer MS (1995) Pompilidae. In: Hanson PE, Gauld ID (Eds) The Hymenoptera of Costa Rica, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 522–539.
  • World Spider Catalog (2018) World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Bern. Version 19.0. [Accessed 2018 June 28]
login to comment