Research Article |
Corresponding author: Marko Prous ( mprous@ut.ee ) Academic editor: Hannes Baur
© 2017 Marko Prous, Katja Kramp, Veli Vikberg, Andrew Liston.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Prous M, Kramp K, Vikberg V, Liston A (2017) North-Western Palaearctic species of Pristiphora (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 59: 1-190. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.29.12656
|
North-Western Palaearctic species of Pristiphora Latreille, 1810 are revised. Altogether, 90 species are treated, two of which are described as new: P. caraganae Vikberg & Prous, sp. n. from Finland and P. dedeara Liston & Prous, sp. n. from Germany. Host plant of P. caraganae is Caragana arborescens Lam. Pristiphora dasiphorae (Zinovjev, 1993) (previously known from East Palaearctic) and P. cadma Wong & Ross, 1960 (previously known from North America) are recorded for the first time from Europe. Nematus nigricans Eversmann, 1847 [= Pristiphora nigricans (Eversmann, 1847), comb. n.], N. breviusculus Eversmann, 1847 [= Euura melanocephalus (Hartig, 1837)], and N. caudalis Eversmann, 1847 [= E. caudalis (Eversmann, 1847), comb. n.] are removed from synonymy with P. pallidiventris (Fallén, 1808), N. paralellus Hartig, 1840 [= P. paralella (Hartig, 1840), comb. n.] is removed from synonymy with P. bufo (Brischke, 1883), and P. mesatlantica Lacourt, 1976 is removed from synonymy with P. insularis Rohwer, 1910. The following 29 new synonymies are proposed: P. nigropuncticeps Haris, 2002, syn. n. with P. albitibia (Costa, 1859); Lygaeonematus karvoneni Lindqvist, 1952, syn. n. with P. alpestris (Konow, 1903); P. (P.) anivskiensis Haris, 2006, syn. n. with P. appendiculata (Hartig, 1837); Nematus canaliculatus Hartig, 1840, syn. n with P. carinata (Hartig, 1837); P. nigrogroenblomi Haris, 2002, syn. n. with P. cincta Newman, 1837; Tenthredo flavipes Zetterstedt, 1838, syn. n., Nematus congener W.F. Kirby, 1882, syn. n., and P. thomsoni Lindqvist, 1953, syn. n. with P. dochmocera (Thomson, 1871); P. atrata Lindqvist, 1975, syn. n. with P. friesei (Konow, 1904); P. gelida Wong, 1968, syn. n. with P. frigida (Boheman, 1865); Pachynematus nigricorpus Takagi, 1931, syn. n. with P. laricis (Hartig, 1837); Nematus (Pikonema) piceae Zhelochovtsev in Zhelochovtsev and Zinovjev, 1988, syn. n. and P. (P.) hoverlaensis Haris, 2001, syn. n. with P. leucopodia (Hartig, 1837); Mesoneura arctica Lindqvist, 1959, syn. n., Pachynematus incisus Lindqvist, 1970, syn. n., Pachynematus intermedius Verzhutskii, 1974, syn. n., and P. mongololaricis Haris, 2003, syn. n. with P. malaisei (Lindqvist, 1952); Nematus anderschi Zaddach, 1876, syn. n., P. inocreata Konow, 1902, syn. n., and P. discolor Lindqvist, 1975, syn. n. with P. nigricans (Eversmann, 1847); Lygaeonematus tenuicornis Lindqvist, 1955, syn. n. with P. paralella (Hartig, 1840); Lygaeonematus concolor Lindqvist, 1952, syn. n. with P. pseudocoactula (Lindqvist, 1952); P. flavipicta Lindqvist, 1975, syn. n., P. flavopleura Haris, 2002, syn. n., P. mongoloexigua Haris, 2002, syn. n., and P. mongolofausta Haris, 2003, syn. n. with P. punctifrons (Thomson, 1871); P. listoni Lacourt, 1998, syn. n. with P. sootryeni Lindqvist, 1955; P. gaunitzi Lindqvist, 1968, syn. n. with P. testacea (Jurine, 1807); and Nematus breviusculus Eversmann, 1847, syn. n. with Euura melanocephalus (Hartig, 1837). The valid name of Pachynematus (Pikonema) carpathiensis Haris, 2001 is Nematinus carpathiensis (Haris, 2001) comb. n. Lectotypes are designated for 43 taxa. An illustrated electronic key made with Lucid and a traditional dichotomous key are provided to facilitate identification of the species. Species belonging to the carinata (previously Lygaeotus), micronematica (previously Lygaeophora), and rufipes (also known as thalictri or aquilegiae) groups are not keyed to the species level, because additional research is needed to delimit the species more reliably in these groups. Phylogeny of Pristiphora is reconstructed based on one mitochondrial (COI) and two nuclear (NaK and TPI) genes. Remarkably, around 50–60% (depending on the exclusion or inclusion of the carinata, micronematica, and rufipes groups) of the species cannot be reliably identified based on COI barcodes. Limited data from nuclear genes indicate a better identification potential (about 20% remain problematic).
Sawflies, revision, new synonyms, nomenclature, taxonomy, identification key, phylogeny, DNA barcoding
Pristiphora Latreille, 1810, as defined by
The most comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of Pristiphora so far published were part of broader analyses dealing mainly with higher level relationships of Nematinae (
Mitochondrial COI barcodes are widely used for species identification. This often works rather well (
Specimens examined or mentioned are deposited in the following collections:
CEH Collection of Erik Heibo, Lierskogen, Norway;
CMH Collection of Mikk Heidemaa, Tartu, Estonia;
CMV Collection of Matti Viitasaari, Helsinki, Finland;
COL Collection of Ole Lønnve, Oslo, Norway;
CVV Collection of Veli Vikberg, Turenki, Finland;
CTN Collection of Thierry Noblecourt, Quillan, France;
EJC Collection of Ewald Jansen, Leipzig, Germany;
LPNC Collection of Pierre-Nicolas Libert, Somal, Belgium;
NFVG Niedersächsische Forstliche Versuchsanstalt, Göttingen, Germany;
NUORTJ Collection of Juoko Nuorteva, Helsinki, Finland;
RSME National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh, United Kingdom;
SMTP Swedish Malaise Trap Project, Station Linné, Öland, Sweden;
UEF University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland;
Names of the mentioned host plants follow The Plant List (http://www.theplantlist.org/). Unless otherwise stated, species distribution data at the level of zoogeographic regions is taken from
Collection data of the examined specimens is included in an excel file available at figshare (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5235835).
To photograph penis valves and lancets (valvula 1 or ventral part of saw), genital capsules and ovipositors were separated from the specimen and macerated in KOH (10–15%) for 6–10 hours at room temperature or treated with proteinase during DNA extraction (see below). Temporary or permanent slide preparations were made of dissected lancets and penis valves. For temporary slides, glycerine was used. After photographing, the lancets and penis valves were glued on a piece of cardboard, which was pinned with the corresponding specimen. For permanent slides, Euparal or PVA-mounting medium (
All the rearing data newly published here were obtained by VV. These data are given under Rearing notes in the Taxonomy section. Plants chosen for ovipositing experiments were mainly those from which females were collected in the field or reared from larvae. Our main intention was to find at least one acceptable host plant for rearing particular species. Ovipositing experiments were carried out indoors, at room temperature. Suitable parts of plants were cut, the cut end put in water or wrapped in moistened filter paper (paper towel), and the leaves offered to the sawfly in a closed container. Larvae were fed with fresh leaves that were changed every day or every second day. Cocoons were placed in glass vials and overwintered outdoors in a wooden chest.
DNA was extracted and purified with an EZNA Tissue DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and stored at -20 °C for later use. Typically, the middle right leg was used for DNA extraction, but for males the whole genital capsule was often additionally used to increase DNA yield and to free penis valves from muscles for photographing. One mitochondrial and two nuclear regions were used in phylogenetic analyses. Primers used for amplification and sequencing are listed in Table
PCR reactions were carried out in a total volume of 15–25 μl containing 1–2 μl of extracted DNA, 1.0–1.5 μl (5.0–7.5 pmol) of primers and 7.5–12.5 μl of 2x Multiplex PCR Plus Master mix (QIAGEN). The PCR protocol consisted of an initial DNA polymerase (HotStar Taq) activation step at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 38–40 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 90 s at 47–59 °C depending on the primer set used, and 30–120 s (depending on the amplicon size) at 72 °C; the last cycle was followed by a final 30 min extension step at 68 °C. 3 μl of PCR product was visualised on a 1.4% agarose gel and then purified with FastAP and Exonuclease I (Thermo Scientific). 1.0–1.8 U of both enzymes were added to 12–22 μl of PCR solution and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C, followed by 15 min at 85 °C. Purified PCR products were sent to Macrogen (Netherlands) for sequencing. To obtain unequivocal sequences, both sense and antisense strands were sequenced, using the primers listed in Table
Primers used for PCR and sequencing, with information provided on respective gene fragment, primer name, direction (forward, F or reverse, R) and location (internal, i or external, o) according to each gene fragment, primer sequence, standard PCR annealing temperature, utilization (PCR/ sequencing), and reference. Primer annealing temperatures used for sequencing at Macrogen were 47°C for COI and 50°C for nuclear genes.
Gene Region | Primer name | F/R i/o | Primer sequence 5'–3' | PCR annealing temperature (°) | PCR/ Sequencing | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COI | SymF1 | F o | TTTCAACWAATCATAAARAYATTGG | 47 | PCR, seq |
|
COI | SymF2 | F o | TTTCAACAAATCATAAARAYATTGG | 47 | PCR, seq |
|
COI | sym- C1-J1718 | F i/o | GGAGGATTTGGAAAYTGAYTAGTWCC | 49 | PCR, seq | ( |
COI | symC1-J1751 | F i/o | GGAGCNCCTGATATAGCWTTYCC | 47 | PCR, seq |
|
COI | C1-N1760 | R i/o | GGTARAAATCARAATCTTATATTAT | 47 | PCR, seq | (Prous et al. 2011) |
COI | SymR1 | R i/o | TAAACTTCWGGRTGICCAAARAATC | 47 | PCR, seq |
|
COI | SymR2 | R i/o | TAAACTTCTGGRTGTCCAAARAATCA | 47 | PCR, seq |
|
COI | A2590 | R o | GCTCCTATTGATARWACATARTGRAAATG | 49 | PCR, seq | ( |
TPI | TPI_29Fi | F o | GYAAATTYTTYGTTGGNGGIAA | 52 | PCR, seq |
|
TPI | TPI hym intF | F i | AARGGHGCNTTYACYGGNGA | 56 | Seq | ( |
TPI | TPI hym intR | R i | TCNGARTGDCCHADRATNACCCA | 52 | Seq | ( |
TPI | TPI385Fi | F o | GTRATYGCNTGYATYGGIGARA | 52 | PCR, seq |
|
TPI | TPI 275Ri | R o | GCCCANACNGGYTCRTAIGC | 56 | PCR, seq | ( |
TPI | TPI706R | R o | ACNATYTGTACRAARTCWGGYTT | 52 | PCR, seq |
|
NaK | NaK_263F | F o | CTYAGCCAYGCRAARGCRAARGA | 59 | PCR, seq | This study |
NaK | NaK_809F | F i/o | GCWTTYTTCTCNACSAAYGCSGTNGARGG | 55 | PCR, seq | This study |
NaK | NaK_907Ri | R i/o | TGRATRAARTGRTGRATYTCYTTIGC | 54 | PCR, seq | This study |
NaK | NaK_910R | R i/o | TGRATRAARTGRTGRATYTCYTT | 50 | PCR, seq | This study |
NaK | NaK_1250Fi | F i | ATGTGGTTYGAYAAYCARATYATIGA | 56 | Seq | This study |
NaK | NaKFor470 | F i | ATGTGGTTYGAYAAYCARATYATCGA | 56 | Seq |
|
NaK | NaKRev475 | R i | TCGATRATYTGRTTRTCRAACCACAT | 56 | Seq |
|
NaK | NaK_1918R | R o | GATTTGGCAATNGCTTTGGCAGTDAT | 59 | PCR, seq | This study |
Sequences reported here have been deposited in the GenBank (NCBI) database (accession numbers KY698031–KY698412 and MF426916–MF426924). Some of the sequences analysed here were originally published by
Sequences of COI, NaK, and TPI without introns were aligned manually, among which only one COI sequence of P. friesei (DEI-GISHym11558) had a single bp deletion.
For concatenation of separate alignments of different genes we used FASconCAT-G (
For phylogenetic analyses we used the maximum likelihood method (ML) implemented in RAxML v. 8.2.9 (
Some of the COI barcode sequences used here were obtained from BOLD (http://www.boldsystems.org/). In this case, DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing were conducted at the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding (CCDB) in Guelph, Canada, using standardised high-throughput protocols (
The electronic identification key for the species of Pristiphora was prepared in Lucid 3.5 Builder (http://www.lucidcentral.org/) and a zip file containing all the Lucid data files is available at figshare (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5235805). If the licence for Lucid 3.5 is lacking, the free version of Lucid 3.3 can be used to run the key. In case of ambiguities or polymorphisms in character states, we conservatively coded these as multiple states. The key contains 90 morphological features with 244 character states, and 68 male and 71 female entities (species or groups). The first choice given in the key is between female and male, one of which has to be chosen to see all other characters. After that, characters can be chosen freely or one can use ‘Best’ and ‘Next Best’ tools in Lucid to suggest the most efficient sequence of characters for identification. A traditional dichotomous key was constructed manually to emphasise the most reliable characters (usually penis valve for males, and valvula 3 or lancet for females).
The genus was recently delimited mainly by phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequence data by
Some of the nuclear sequences from males included polymorphic sites (double peaks in chromatograms) indicating heterozygosity or the presence of paralogous genes. Because these few polymorphic sites are restricted to synonymous positions (i.e. not affecting protein sequence) and so far there is no evidence for paralogous NaK and TPI genes at least in sawflies, these polymorphic sites might indicate heterozygosity because of diploidy. This can happen if there is no heterozygosity at the complementary sex determination (CSD) locus, preventing female development from a diploid embryo (
Maximum likelihood tree of Pristiphora and nematine outgroups based on three genes (3408 bp). Specimens having at least two of the three genes were included. Numbers above branches show bootstrap proportions (%). Support values for weakly supported branches (BP<70) are not shown. Part of Pristiphora is shown without support values and tip labels, which are shown in Fig.
COI sequence of one P. friesei specimen (DEI-GISHym11558) had a single bp deletion, which was caused by shortening of 8 bp repeat of thymines (T) to 7 thymines, compared to a different P. friesei specimen and closely related P. laricis. Because the P. friesei sequence with the deletion was of good quality (trace files at figshare http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5235832), was found in amplicons obtained with two sets of different primers, and did not show anomalous phylogenetic position, it is possible that this COI sequence is functional despite the frameshift mutation (
Phylogenetic relationships at the base of Pristiphora are not well resolved by our three-gene dataset (Fig.
To enable easier discussion of relationships among Pristiphora species, we define the following informal species groups based on morphology and the phylogenetic analysis: abietina, alpestris, carinata, depressa, erichsonii, laricis, leucopodia, malaisei, micronematica, nigella, pallida, pallidiventris, retusa, ruficornis, and rufipes group. The names of the groups are based on the oldest valid species name in that group.
The following treated species were not assigned to any species groups: abbreviata, angulata, biscalis, bufo, cadma, cincta, condei, conjugata, dedeara sp. n., fausta, geniculata, insularis, maesta, mollis, monogyniae, paralella, pseudogeniculata, punctifrons, tenuiserra, and testacea.
Part of the maximum likelihood tree shown in Fig.
Maximum likelihood tree of Pristiphora based on COI gene (1078 bp). Shortest sequence included was 462 bp (subarctica MHV00166). Numbers above branches show bootstrap proportions (%). Support values for weakly supported branches (BP<70) are not shown. BIN numbers (BOLD:XXXXXXX) referred to in the text are shown for representative specimens. Part of Pristiphora is shown without support values and tip labels, which are shown in Figs
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: abietina, compressa, decipiens, gerula, pseudodecipiens, robusta, and saxesenii. All species feed on Picea (
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: alpestris, pseudocoactula, and possibly dissimilis. Penis valves and lancets are very similar in alpestris and pseudocoactula (Figs
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: albilabris, borea, breadalbanensis, carinata, coactula, groenblomi, lativentris, and trochanterica. Species of the carinata group have a distinctly matt mesepisternum, and completely or largely black body. Valvula 3 of females varies from simple (short, slightly tapering from base to apex, and without scopa; Figs
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: depressa, subbifida, and tetrica. This species group was reviewed by
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: erichsonii, glauca, and wesmaeli. All species feed on Larix (
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: friesei and laricis. Both species feed on Larix (
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: leucopodia and nigriceps. Both species feed on Picea (
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: malaisei and dasiphorae. Both species feed on Potentilla fruticosa L. (=Dasiphora fruticosa) (
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: affinis, atripes, kontuniemii, micronematica, nordmani, reuteri, sermola, and possibly lanifica. In contrast to other group names, we use the name micronematica (
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: amphibola, nigella, and parva. All species feed on Picea (
Part of the maximum likelihood tree shown in Fig.
Part of the maximum likelihood tree shown in Fig.
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: pallida and subarctica. Both species feed on Picea (
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: nigricans and pallidiventris. Both species feed on herbaceous Rosaceae (
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: exigua and retusa. A host plant is known only for P. retusa (Prunus padus;
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species divided into five subgroups (
Includes the following North-Western Palaearctic species: brevis, dochmocera, rufipes, thalictri, and thalictrivora. The species feed on Aquilegia (P. rufipes) or Thalictrum (P. brevis, P. thalictri, P. thalictrivora, and possibly P. dochmocera). Species of this group are usually black-bodied, valvula 3 of females has a distinct scopa, and lancets are without setae. Lancets and penis valves are very similar in all species. Penis valves of the rufipes group have a somewhat rectangular and unmodified pseudoceps, a somewhat oval-, rectangular- or square-shaped paravalva that is dorsoapically abruptly narrowed before the valvispina, a small and straight valvispina that arises on the ventral part of the paravalva, and a valvar strut that is distinct along its entire length (Figs
If a well defined morphospecies corresponds to exclusive genetic clusters (not mixed with other morphospecies) based on more than one unlinked genetic marker (independently segregating gene regions that reside on different chromosomes or far from each other on the same chromosome) and individuals of that morphospecies have different relationships based on those different markers, then we are probably dealing with a single and well separated species. Unfortunately, such extensive genetic data (many markers and individuals) are not available for most species (due to lack of suitable material or/and high costs associated with sequencing). Nevertheless, it is possible to get some idea about species boundaries based on much smaller amounts of genetic data. Based on our results (see Discussion), within species divergence of mitochondrial genes seems to remain within 5% and based on nuclear genes within 1%. Although divergence higher than 2% in COI barcode sequences is commonly regarded as good evidence for different species (
On the other hand, where we have consistent morphological (based on adults or larvae) or ecological (different hosts) evidence without clear genetic evidence (even if based on all three genes we sampled) for the existence of different species within groups of closely related species, we have not synonymised these species. In our view, the genetic evidence we have so far is not sufficient (too few specimens and gene regions sampled) to decide this.
For females, the shape of valvula 3 (apical sawsheath) is an important and relatively stable character for identification, but nevertheless it was necessary to key many species more than once, because of variability or intermediate character states. Still, it might be difficult to key out some species or individiuals, especially when valvula 3 is distorted (which usually happens with specimens dried from alcohol). In these cases lancets should be examined, although they can sometimes be very similar, even among distantly related species.
Males in Pristiphora usually lack good external non-colour characters, and therefore penis valves should be studied in most cases, which are stable within species and often show good differences between the species.
Coloration is the easiest character to observe, but unfortunately it often varies quite a lot within species. The abdomen can be completely pale or (almost) completely black in some species. Thorax coloration varies somewhat less, but can occasionally still vary from completely black to extensively pale. Head coloration is the most stable, in most species being black or with small pale spots. In a minority of species the head tends to be extensively pale around the eyes. Leg coloration can also vary extensively within species, but can often still be used for identification (see the Key). Coloration of the pterostigma is often a useful character for species identification, but it can be problematic in older pinned specimens. In species that normally have a dark pterostigma, the dark coloration can fade, causing the pterostigma to appear pale.
Unreliable characters. We have not used the length of the inner spur of the metatibia (in relation to the length of metatarsus for example) in species identification (e.g.
The key for females relies heavily on sawsheaths and ovipositors, and for males on penis valves, as these are most reliable for species identification. For females it is advisable to dissect the saw of one or more specimens of a series and for males it is in most cases necessary to pull out the genital capsule to see at least the tip of the penis valve. Fresh and clean specimens greatly help in species identification: particularly in females, where the shape of sawsheath can be of critical importance. Generally we recommend using the electronic key, which can be significantly faster (when using ‘Best’ and ‘Next Best’ options), easier to use, and more reliable because of the possibility to check more characters.
Females of P. dissimilis are unknown.
1 | a Head dorsally extensively pale (Fig. |
2 |
– | aa Head dorsally black or with small brown or pale spots (Figs |
21 |
2(1) | a In dorsal view, valvula 3 with distinct scopa (e.g. Figs |
3 |
– | aa In dorsal view, valvula 3 without distinct scopa (e.g. Figs |
11 |
3(2) | a Scopa partly positioned dorsally (Figs |
|
b Claws without or with small subapical tooth (Figs |
23 | |
– | aa Scopa positioned posteriorly or posteroventrally (e.g. Figs |
|
bb Claws with large subapical tooth (Figs |
4 | |
4(3) | a In lateral view, posterior margin of valvula 3 truncate (Fig. |
5 |
– | aa In lateral view, posterior margin of valvula 3 round (Fig. |
7 |
5(4,14) | a Hypopygium posteriorly excised (Fig. |
P. decipiens |
– | aa Hypopygium posteriorly not excised (Fig. |
6 |
6(5) | a Mesopleuron (mesepisternum + mesepimeron) extensively pale (Fig. |
|
b Ventral margin of lancet not curved upwards (Fig. |
||
c Body length 6.0–9.0 mm | P. pseudodecipiens | |
– | aa Mesopleuron black (Fig. |
|
bb Ventral margin of lancet apically strongly curved upwards (Fig. |
||
cc Body length 4.0–6.5 mm | P. abietina | |
7(4) | a Metatibia black (Fig. |
|
b Claws with large subapical tooth or bifid (Fig. |
||
c Valvula 3 with deep scopa (Fig. |
P. fausta | |
– | aa Metatibia at least with basal 2/3 pale (Fig. |
|
bb Claws with large or small subapical tooth (Figs |
||
cc Valvula 3 with shallow scopa (e.g. Figs |
8 | |
8(7) | a Mesepisternum completely or nearly completely pale (Fig. |
|
b Thorax dorsally extensively pale to completely black (Figs |
||
c Claws with large subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
d Lancet with numerous setae and apical serrulae protruding (Figs |
P. cadma | |
– | aa-dd Combination of characters not as in a–d 9 | |
9(8) | a Scopa of valvula 3 shallow (Figs |
|
b Claws with small subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
c Lancet with few setae and apical serrulae flat (Fig. |
P. bufo | |
– | aa Scopa of valvula 3 not shallow (104–105) | |
bb Claws usually with large subapical tooth (Figs |
||
cc Lancet without or with numerous setae, and apical serrulae more protruding (Figs |
10 | |
10(9,37) | a Pterostigma bicoloured (Fig. |
|
b Mesepisternum black or partly pale (Figs |
||
c Abdomen dorsally black or pale (Figs |
||
d Lancet with numerous setae (Figs |
P. conjugata | |
– | aa Pterostigma unicoloured (Fig. |
|
bb Mesepisternum black (Fig. |
||
cc Abdomen nearly always completely pale (Fig. |
||
dd Lancet without setae (Figs |
P. testacea | |
11(2) | a Claws bifid or subbifid (Figs |
|
b Abdomen completely pale (Figs |
P. subbifida | |
– | aa Claws with small subapical tooth (Fig. |
|
bb Abdomen dorsally at least partly black (Figs |
12 | |
12(11) | a In lateral view, posterior margin of valvula 3 distinctly truncate and about as long as ventral margin (Fig. |
13 |
– | aa Valvula 3 with different combination of characters (e.g. Figs |
14 |
13(12) | a In posterior view, valvula 3 without scopa (Fig. |
|
b Pterostigma usually pale (Fig. |
P. gerula | |
– | aa In posterior view, valvula 3 with small scopa (Fig. |
|
bb Pterostigma usually dark (Fig. |
P. saxesenii | |
14(12) | a In dorsal view, valvula 3 elongate, not tapering from base to apex, and with distinct scopa (Fig. |
|
b In lateral view, valvula 3 distinctly truncate (Fig. |
5 | |
– | aa In dorsal view, valvula 3 with different combination of characters (Figs |
|
bb In lateral view, valvula 3 round or indistinctly truncate (Figs |
15 | |
15(14) | a In dorsal view, valvula 3 abruptly constricted at apex, but not tapering completely (Fig. |
|
b In lateral view, valvula 3 indistinctly truncate (Fig. |
16 | |
– | aa In dorsal view, valvula 3 not abruptly constricted (Figs |
|
bb In lateral view, valvula 3 round or indistinctly truncate (Figs |
17 | |
16(15) | a Ovipositor (valvula 3 + valvifer 2, Figs |
|
b Distance between cenchri more than one and half times the breadth of one of them (Benson, 1958) | P. wesmaeli | |
– | aa Ovipositor about 1.1 times as long as protibia (Benson, 1958) | |
bb Distance between cenchri less than one and half times the breadth of one of them (Benson, 1958) | P. glauca | |
17(15) | a In dorsal view, valvula 3 narrow (Fig. |
|
b In lateral view, valvula 3 indistinctly truncate (Fig. |
||
c Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
||
d Abdomen sometimes dorsally extensively pale (Fig. |
18 | |
– | aa-dd Combination of characters not as in a–d | 19 |
18(17) | a Gap between basal serrulae small, and basal annuli with more numerous setae (Fig. |
|
b Abdomen (usually?) dorsally extensively pale (Fig. |
P. pallida | |
– | aa Gap between basal serrulae large, and basal annuli with fewer setae (Fig. |
|
bb Abdomen (usually?) dorsally extensively black (Fig. |
P. subarctica | |
19(17) | a Mesepisternum matt and black (Fig. |
few specimens of carinata group |
– | aa Mesepisternum smooth and partly pale (Figs |
20 |
20(19) | a In lateral view, valvula 3 not truncate (Fig. |
|
b Anterior protibial spur with velum (Fig. |
P. bufo | |
– | aa In lateral view, valvula 3 indistinctly truncate (Fig. |
|
bb Anterior protibial spur without velum, but with hairs (Fig. |
P. paralella | |
21(1) | a In dorsal view, valvula 3 with distinct scopa (Figs |
22 |
– | aa In dorsal view, valvula 3 without distinct scopa (Figs |
63 |
22(21) | a Scopa partly positioned dorsally (Figs |
|
b Claws without, or with small subapical tooth (Figs |
||
c Body length 3.0–4.5 mm | 23 | |
– | aa Scopa positioned posteriorly or posteroventrally (Figs |
|
bb Claws with large subapical tooth (Figs |
||
cc Body length 3.0–11.0 mm | 25 | |
23(22,3) | a Sawsheath (valvula 3 + valvifer 2; Figs |
|
b Head dorsally black (Fig. |
||
c Posterior margin of pronotum black or narrowly pale (Fig. |
P. amphibola | |
– | aa Sawsheath about 0.93–1.03 times longer than metatibia ( |
|
bb Head dorsally black to extensively pale (Figs |
||
cc Posterior margin of pronotum black to extensively pale (Fig. |
24 | |
24(23) | a Sawsheath about 0.93–0.97 times longer than metatibia ( |
|
b Tegula black or slightly pale (Fig. |
P. nigella | |
– | aa Sawsheath about 1.00–1.03 times longer than metatibia ( |
|
bb Tegula extensively pale (Figs |
P. parva | |
25(22) | a In lateral view, posterior margin of valvula 3 truncate (Fig. |
26 |
– | aa In lateral view, posterior margin of valvula 3 round (Figs |
29 |
26(25) | a Head, thorax, and abdomen black (Fig. |
|
b Hypopygium posteriorly not excised (Fig. |
||
c Body length 9–11 mm | P. robusta | |
– | aa Head, thorax, and abdomen ventrally at least partly pale (Figs |
|
bb Hypopygium posteriorly excised (Fig. |
||
cc Body length 4–9 mm | 27 | |
27(26) | a Hypopygium posteriorly excised (Fig. |
|
b Ventral margin of lancet not strongly curved upwards (Figs |
28 | |
– | aa Hypopygium posteriorly not excised (Fig. |
|
bb Ventral margin of lancet apically strongly curved upwards (Fig. |
P. abietina | |
28(27) | a Mesopleuron usually extensively pale (Fig. |
|
b Ventral margin of lancet and its annuli more distinctly curved upwards (Fig. |
P. decipiens | |
– | aa Mesopleuron usually black or slightly pale (Fig. |
|
bb Ventral margin of lancet and its annuli less distinctly curved upwards (Figs |
P. compressa | |
29(25) | a In lateral view, valvula 3 with round outgrowth at posterior margin (Figs |
|
b In dorsal view elongate and with distinct or indistinct scopa (Figs |
30 | |
– | aa-bb Combination of characters not as in a–b | 32 |
30(29,67) | a In lateral view, valvula 3 more abruptly narrowed at apex (Fig. |
|
b In dorsal view, valvula 3 broader (Fig. |
||
c Anterior protibial spur with velum (Fig. |
P. insularis | |
– | aa In lateral view, valvula 3 less abruptly narrowed at apex (Fig. |
|
bb In dorsal view, valvula 3 narrower (Fig. |
||
cc Anterior protibial spur without velum, but with hairs (Fig. |
31 | |
31(30) | a Thorax and abdomen extensively pale (Figs |
P. nigriceps |
– | aa Thorax and abdomen mostly black (Fig. |
P. leucopodia |
32(29) | a Abdomen with red band (rarely in dorsal aspect entirely reduced), terga 1 and 9–10 black (Figs |
|
b Scopa of valvula 3 with short medial projection (Figs |
33 | |
– | aa-bb Abdomen without red band (Figs |
34 |
33(32) | a Antenna ventrally partly paler than dorsally (Fig. |
|
b Supraclypeal area pale (Fig. |
||
c Postocellar area 1.5–2.5 times longer than diameter of lateral ocellus (Fig. |
P. condei | |
– | aa Antenna usually uniformly black (Fig. |
|
bb Supraclypeal area usually black (Figs |
||
cc Postocellar area 1.0–1.5 times longer than diameter of lateral ocellus (Fig. |
P. cincta | |
34(32) | a Valvula 3 with deep scopa and without long medial projection (Fig. |
|
b Claws without, or with minute subapical tooth (Figs |
||
c Abdomen usually ventrally black or partly pale (Fig. |
||
d Terga 9–10 usually extensively pale (Fig. |
P. punctifrons | |
– | aa Valvula 3 with shallow scopa or with long medial projection (Figs |
|
bb Claws with large subapical tooth (Figs |
||
cc Abdomen ventrally completely pale (Fig. |
||
dd Terga 9–10 black (Fig. |
35 | |
35(34) | a Height of eye in lateral view often about 2–3 times as long as distance from dorsal margin of eye to dorsalmost point of head (Fig. |
|
b Clypeus emarginate (Fig. |
||
c Claws with small subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
d Abdomen usually ventrally black or partly pale (Fig. |
||
e Metatibia and often metatarsus nearly completely pale (Fig. |
P. malaisei | |
– | aa Height of eye in lateral view about 3–4 times as long as distance from dorsal margin of eye to dorsalmost point of head (Fig. |
|
bb Clypeus truncate or slightly emarginate (Figs |
||
cc Claws without, or with small or large subapical tooth (Figs |
||
dd Abdomen ventrally completely pale (Fig. |
||
ee Metatibia and metatarsus black (Fig. |
36 | |
36(35) | a Abdomen ventrally completely or nearly completely pale (Fig. |
37 |
– | aa Abdomen ventrally black or partly pale (Figs |
38 |
37(36) | a Scopa of valvula 3 with long lateral lobes and long medial projection (Fig. |
|
b Claws usually with small subapical tooth (Fig. |
39 | |
– | aa Scopa of valvula 3 with short lateral lobes and / or short medial projection (100, 104) | |
bb Claws usually with large subapical tooth (Figs |
10 | |
38(36) | a Scopa of valvula 3 with long lateral lobes and long medial projection (Fig. |
|
b Postocellar area 1.0–1.5 times longer than diameter of lateral ocellus (Fig. |
||
c Claws usually with small subapical tooth (Fig. |
39 | |
– | aa Scopa of valvula 3 with short lateral lobes and / or short medial projection (Figs |
|
bb Postocellar area 1.0–2.5 times longer than diameter of lateral ocellus (Figs |
||
cc Claws without, or with small or large subapical tooth (Figs |
40 | |
39(37,38) | a Metafemur (Fig. |
|
b Pterostigma dark (Fig. |
||
c Posterovenral tip of serrulae broader and gap between serrulae smaller (Figs |
P. pallidiventris | |
– | aa Metafemur completely yellow (Fig. |
|
bb Pterostigma usually pale (Fig. |
||
cc Posterovenral tip of serrulae narrower and gap between serrulae larger (Fig. |
P. nigricans | |
40(38) | a Abdomen laterally and ventrally with pale spots (Fig. |
41 |
– | aa Abdomen laterally and ventrally black (Fig. |
42 |
41(40) | a Clypeus at least partly pale (Figs |
|
b Terga 9–10 pale (Fig. |
||
c Metafemur pale (Fig. |
||
d Serrulae papilliform (Fig. |
P. alpestris | |
– | aa Clypeus black (Fig. |
|
bb Tergum 10 at least partly black (Fig. |
||
cc Metafemur extensively black (Figs |
||
dd Serrulae flat (Fig. |
P. maesta | |
42(40) | a Postocellar area 2.0–2.5 times longer than diameter of lateral ocellus (Fig. |
|
b Claws with large subapical tooth (Figs |
43 | |
– | aa-bb Combination of characters not as in a–b | 44 |
43(42) | a Flagellum about 2.4–2.5 times as long as width of head | |
b Metatarsomere 1 at least in apical 2/3 black (Fig. |
||
c Valvifer 2 pale (Fig. |
||
d Lancet with few setae and ventral margin of serrulae straight (Fig. |
P. geniculata | |
– | aa Flagellum about 1.9–2.0 times as long as width of head | |
bb Metatarsomere 1 completely or nearly completely pale (Fig. |
||
cc Valvifer 2 black (Fig. |
||
dd Lancet with numerous setae and ventral margin of serrulae slightly concave (Fig. |
P. pseudogeniculata | |
44(42) | a Mesopostnotum smooth (Fig. |
|
b Claws without subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
c Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
||
d Antenna usually ventrally paler than dorsally (Fig. |
P. appendiculata | |
– | aa-dd Combination of characters not as in a–d | 45 |
45(44) | a Postocellar area 1.5–2.5 times longer than diameter of lateral ocellus (Fig. |
|
b Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
||
c Lancet without setae (Figs |
rufipes group | |
– | aa Postocellar area 1.0–1.5 times longer than diameter of lateral ocellus (Fig. |
|
bb Mesepisternum matt (Figs |
||
cc Lancet with setae (Figs |
46 | |
46(45) | a Metafemur mainly pale (Figs |
47 |
– | aa Metafemur mainly black (Fig. |
49 |
47(46) | a Claws with large subapical tooth (Figs |
|
b Antenna ventrally paler than dorsally (Fig. |
||
c Metafemur whitish (Fig. |
P. leucopus | |
– | aa Claws with small subapical tooth (Fig. |
|
bb Antenna uniformly black (Fig. |
||
cc Metafemur yellowish (Fig. |
48 | |
48(47) | a Lancet without setae (Figs |
rufipes group |
– | aa Lancet with numerous setae (Fig. |
P. aphantoneura (on Lathyrus) and P. luteipes (on Salix) (see |
49(46) | a Claws with long subapical tooth close to apical one (bifid) (Fig. |
50 |
– | aa Claws with small or large subapical tooth clearly separated from apical one (Figs |
51 |
50(49) | a Hind trochanters, trochantelli, and tibiae partly pale | |
b Antenna (usually?) ventrally at least slightly paler than dorsally (Fig. |
||
c Apical serrulae of lancet short and protruding, and tangium long and narrow (Fig. |
P. bifida | |
– | aa Hind trochanters, trochantelli, and usually tibiae uniformly black or brown | |
bb Antenna uniformly black (Fig. |
||
cc Apical serrulae of lancet long and flat, and tangium short and broad (Fig. |
P. frigida | |
51(49) | a Tangium of lancet with distinct lobe (Fig. |
|
b Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
||
c Claws with small subapical tooth (rarely with large) (Fig. |
52 | |
– | aa Tangium of lancet without distinct lobe (Figs |
|
bb Mesepisternum matt (Figs |
||
cc Claws with large subapical tooth (Figs |
53 | |
52(51) | a Antenna ventrally distinctly paler than dorsally (Fig. |
P. ruficornis |
– | aa Antenna usually uniformly black (Fig. |
P. melanocarpa |
53(51) | a Lancet without setae (Figs |
|
b Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
||
c Claws with small subapical tooth (Fig. |
rufipes group | |
– | aa Lancet with numerous or few setae (Figs |
|
bb Mesepisternum matt (Figs |
||
cc Claws with large subapical tooth (Figs |
54 | |
54(53) | a Inner surface of lancet with small spiny pectines (or dentes semicirculares) that reach sclerora (Figs |
55 |
– | aa Inner surface of lancet without small spiny pectines (Figs |
58 |
55(54) | a Pterostigma basally dark brown and apically brown (Fig. |
|
b Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
||
c Lancet with numerous setae (Fig. |
||
d Apical serrulae of lancet short (Figs |
56 | |
– | aa Pterostigma uniformly yellow or brown (Fig. |
|
bb Mesepisternum usually at least slightly matt (Figs |
||
cc Lancet with few setae (Fig. |
||
dd Apical serrulae of lancet long (Fig. |
57 | |
56(55) | a Antenna (usually?) ventrally paler than dorsally (Fig. |
|
b Trochanters and trochantelli (usually?) pale (Fig. |
||
c Pronotum (usually?) extensively pale (Fig. |
||
d Inner surface of lancet with (usually?) indistinct spiny pectines (or dentes semicirculares) that reach sclerora (Fig. |
P. caraganae sp. n. | |
– | aa Antenna uniformly black (Fig. |
|
b Trochanters and trochantelli black (Fig. |
||
c Pronotum black or posterior margin narrowly pale (Fig. |
||
d Inner surface of lancet with distinct spiny pectines (or dentes semicirculares) that reach sclerora (Fig. |
P. albitibia | |
57(55) | a Lancet with numerous setae (Fig. |
|
b Apical serrulae of lancet long (Fig. |
P. sootryeni | |
– | aa Lancet with few setae (Figs |
|
bb Apical serrulae of lancet short (Figs |
P. astragali | |
58(54) | a Lancet with few setae (Fig. |
|
b Serrulae of lancet flat (Fig. |
||
c Mesepisternum at least slightly matt (Fig. |
||
d Antenna usually ventrally slightly paler than dorsally (Fig. |
P. pusilla | |
– | aa Lancet with numerous setae (Figs |
|
bb Serrulae of lancet protruding (Figs |
||
cc Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
||
dd Antenna uniformly black (Fig. |
59 | |
59(58) | a Mesepisternum (usually?) strongly matt (Fig. |
|
b Antenna uniformly black (Fig. |
||
c Pterostigma (usually?) uniformly yellow or brown (Fig. |
||
d Arctic habitats | P. staudingeri | |
– | aa Mesepisternum (usually?) smooth or slightly matt (Figs |
|
bb Antenna ventrally paler than dorsally (Fig. |
||
cc Pterostigma uniformly yellow to dark brown (Figs |
||
dd Usually non-arctic habitats | 60 | |
60(59) | a Apical serrulae protruding (Figs |
|
b Antenna often ventrally paler than dorsally (Fig. |
61 | |
– | aa Apical serrulae flat (Figs |
|
bb Antenna uniformly black (Fig. |
62 | |
61(60) | a Pterostigma usually basally dark brown and apically brown (Fig. |
|
b Setae of lancet more distinct (Fig. |
P. confusa | |
– | aa Pterostigma usually uniformly dark brown (Fig. |
|
bb Setae of lancet less distinct (Figs |
P. armata (on Crataegus) and P. leucopus (on Tilia) (see |
|
62(60) | a Tangium of lancet without fold (Fig. |
|
b Antenna uniformly black (Fig. |
||
c Pterostigma uniformly yellow (Fig. |
P. subopaca | |
– | aa Tangium of lancet with fold (Fig. |
|
bb Antenna ventrally slightly paler than dorsally (Fig. |
||
cc Pterostigma (usually?) basally dark brown and apically brown (Fig. |
P. opaca | |
63(21) | a Claws bifid or subbifid (Figs |
64 |
– | aa Claws without or with small or large subapical tooth (Figs |
66 |
64(63) | a Pterostigma dark (Fig. |
|
b Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
||
c Valvula 3 in dorsal view more or less square-shaped or tapering towards apex, and longest setae not concentrated in two dense, lateroapically positioned bundles (Fig. |
65 | |
– | aa Pterostigma pale (Fig. |
|
bb Mesepisternum often matt (45–46) | ||
cc Valvula 3 in dorsal view more or less square-shaped, and longest setae concentrated mainly in two dense, lateroapically positioned bundles (Fig. |
P. sermola | |
65(64) | a Supraclypeal area black (Figs |
|
b Head dorsally usually black (Fig. |
||
c Legs often extensively black | P. tetrica | |
– | aa Supraclypeal area pale (Fig. |
|
bb Head dorsally with pale spots (Fig. |
||
cc Legs mostly pale (Fig. |
P. depressa | |
66(63) | a Abdomen with red band, terga 1 and 7–10 black (Fig. |
|
b In dorsal view, valvula 3 narrow (Fig. |
||
c In lateral view, posterior margin of valvula 3 somewhat truncate, and without round outgrowth (Fig. |
P. erichsonii | |
– | aa Abdomen without red band (Figs |
|
bb In dorsal view, valvula 3 broad (Figs |
||
cc In lateral view, posterior margin of valvula 3 with different combination of characters (Figs |
67 | |
67(66) | a In lateral view, valvula 3 with round outgrowth at posterior margin (Figs |
|
b In dorsal view elongate and with distinct or indistinct scopa (Figs |
30 | |
– | aa-bb Combination of characters not as in a–b | 68 |
68(67) | a In lateral view, posterior margin of valvula 3 distinctly truncate (Fig. |
|
b In dorsal view valvula 3 elongate and with scopa (Fig. |
69 | |
– | aa-bb Combination of characters not as in a–b | 71 |
69(68) | a Head, thorax, and abdomen black (Fig. |
|
b Hypopygium posteriorly not excised (Fig. |
||
c Body length 9–11 mm | P. robusta | |
– | aa Head, thorax, and abdomen ventrally at least partly pale (Fig. |
|
bb Hypopygium posteriorly excised (Fig. |
||
cc Body length 4–9 mm | 70 | |
70(69) | a Hypopygium posteriorly excised (Fig. |
|
b Ventral margin of lancet not strongly curved upwards (Figs |
P. compressa | |
– | aa Hypopygium posteriorly not excised (Fig. |
|
bb Ventral margin of lancet apically strongly curved upwards (Fig. |
P. abietina | |
71(68) | a Height of eye in lateral view often about 2–3 times as long as distance from dorsal margin of eye to dorsalmost point of head (Fig. |
|
b Clypeus emarginate (Fig. |
||
c In lateral view, posterior margin of valvula 3 round (Fig. |
72 | |
– | aa Height of eye in lateral view about 3–4 times as long as distance from dorsal margin of eye to dorsalmost point of head (Fig. |
|
bb Clypeus truncate or slightly emarginate (Figs |
||
cc In lateral view, posterior margin of valvula 3 slightly truncate (Figs |
73 | |
72(71) | a Valvula 3 without scopa but with indistinct or distinct carina posteriorly (Figs |
|
b Lancet without setae (Fig. |
||
c Pronotum extensively pale (Figs |
P. dasiphorae | |
– | aa Valvula 3 with small scopa (Fig. |
|
bb Lancet with numerous setae (Fig. |
||
cc Pronotum usually darker | P. malaisei | |
73(71) | a Labrum asymmetrical with right lobe much longer than left (Fig. |
|
b Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
||
c Claws without subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
d Pterostigma sometimes basally paler than apically (Fig. |
||
e Body length 3.0–4.5 mm | 74 | |
– | aa Labrum usually symmetrical, or asymmetrical with right lobe slightly longer than left (Figs |
|
bb Mesepisternum matt (Figs |
||
cc Claws with small or large subapical tooth (Figs |
||
dd Pterostigma usually unicoloured (Figs |
||
ee Body length 3.0–8.0 mm | 75 | |
74(73) | a Valvula 3 narrow (Fig. |
|
b Metafemur usually mostly black (Fig. |
P. retusa | |
– | aa Valvula 3 broader (Figs |
|
bb Metafemur completely pale (Fig. |
P. exigua | |
75(73) | a Valvula 3 without scopa and distinct posterior carina, and slightly tapering from base to apex (Figs |
76 |
– | aa Valvula 3 with distinct posterior carina (Figs |
79 |
76(75) | a Valvula 3 long, not tapering from base to apex, and with or without indistinct scopa (Figs |
|
b Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
P. tenuiserra | |
– | aa Valvula 3 short, slightly tapering from base to apex and without scopa (Figs Figs |
|
bb Mesepisternum matt (Fig. |
77 | |
77(76) | a Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
|
b Pterostigma dark (Fig. |
||
c Claws without subapical tooth (Fig. |
P. dedeara sp. n. | |
– | aa Mesepisternum matt (Fig. |
|
bb Pterostigma usually pale (Fig. |
||
cc Claws with small subapical tooth (Fig. |
78 | |
78(77) | a Valvifer 2 black (Fig. |
|
b Tergum 10 usually black (Fig. |
||
c Clypeus black (Fig. |
||
d Metatarsus usually mostly pale (Figs |
||
e Lancet with numerous setae (Fig. |
P. mollis | |
– | aa Valvifer 2 often pale (Fig. |
|
bb Tergum 10 often pale (Fig. |
||
cc Clypeus often partly pale (Fig. |
||
dd Metatarsus mostly black (Fig. |
||
ee Lancet without setae (Figs |
carinata group | |
79(75) | a In lateral view, ventral margin of valvula 3 straight along most of its length (Fig. |
|
b Valvula 3 posteriorly with distinct carina (Figs |
||
c Metatibia only with small dark area at apex (Fig. |
P. angulata | |
– | aa In lateral view, ventral margin of valvula 3 bending gradually upwards (Figs |
|
bb Valvula 3 posteriorly without distinct carina (Figs |
||
cc Metatibia with small dark area at apex to completely black | 80 | |
80(79) | a Valvula 3 with distinct posterior carina and without scopa (Figs |
|
b Pronotum extensively pale (Fig. |
||
c Basal 1/3 or less of metatibia pale (Fig. |
||
d Clypeus black (Fig. |
||
e Body length 3.0–5.0 mm | P. abbreviata | |
– | aa Valvula 3 without posterior carina, but usually with small scopa (Figs |
|
bb Pronotum black to extensively pale (Figs |
||
cc Metatibia completely pale to completely black | ||
dd Clypeus pale (Figs |
||
ee Body length 3.0–8.0 mm | 81 | |
81(80) | a Claws with large subapical tooth (Fig. |
|
b Abdomen completely black (Fig. |
||
c Metatarsomere 1 completely or nearly completely pale (Figs |
||
d Postocellar area 2.0–2.5 times longer than diameter of lateral ocellus (Fig. |
||
e Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
||
f Body length 7–8 mm | P. pseudogeniculata | |
– | aa-ff Combination of characters not as in a–f | 82 |
82(81) | a Cercus clearly extends beyond apex of valvula 3 (Fig. |
|
b Anterior protibial spur without velum (Fig. |
||
c Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
83 | |
– | aa-cc Combination of characters not as in a–c | 84 |
83(82) | a Labrum pale (Figs |
|
b Pronotum extensively pale (Fig. |
||
c Tangium with (usually?) two campaniform sensilla and lancet with numerous setae (Figs |
P. laricis | |
– | aa Labrum black or dark brown (Fig. |
|
bb Pronotum black or only posterior margin narrowly pale (Fig. |
||
cc Tangium without (usually?) campaniform sensilla and lancet with fewer setae (Figs |
P. friesei | |
84(82) | a Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
85 |
– | aa Mesepisternum matt (Fig. |
90 |
85(84) | a Abdomen completely black (Fig. |
|
b Claws without subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
c Pronotum black | ||
d Body length 3.0–4.0 mm | P. monogyniae | |
– | aa-dd Combination of characters not as in a–d. | 86 |
86(85) | a Abdomen laterally and ventrally with pale patches (Fig. |
|
b Valvula 3 in dorsal view more or less square-shaped and longest setae not concentrated in two dense, lateroapically positioned bundles (Figs |
87 | |
– | aa Abdomen black (Fig. |
|
bb Valvula 3 in dorsal view more or less square-shaped and longest setae concentrated mainly in two dense, lateroapically positioned bundles (Fig. |
micronematica group | |
87(86) | a Serrulae of lancet flat (Figs |
|
b Pterostigma usually dark (Fig. |
88 | |
– | aa Serrulae of lancet distinctly papilliform (Figs |
|
bb Pterostigma pale (Fig. |
89 | |
88(87) | a Cercus black (Fig. |
|
b Clypeus at least partly pale (Fig. |
||
c Valvula 3 somewhat narrower (Figs |
P. biscalis | |
– | aa Cercus usually pale (Fig. |
|
bb Clypeus black (Fig. |
||
cc Valvula 3 somewhat broader (Fig. |
P. maesta | |
89(87) | a Valvula 3 somewhat narrower (Fig. |
|
b Middle serrulae small compared to height of lancet (ratio around 1/10–1/7) (Fig. |
P. pseudocoactula | |
– | aa Valvula 3 somewhat broader (Fig. |
|
bb Middle serrulae large compared to height of lancet (ratio around 1/6–1/4) (Fig. |
P. alpestris | |
90(84) | a Serrulae of lancet distinctly papilliform (Fig. |
|
b Lancet with setae (Fig. |
P. pseudocoactula | |
– | aa-bb Combination of characters not as in a–b | 91 |
91(90) | a Valvula 3 in dorsal view more or less square-shaped and longest setae concentrated mainly in two dense, lateroapically positioned bundles (Fig. |
|
b Lancet with setae (Figs |
micronematica group | |
– | aa Valvula 3 in dorsal view tapering towards apex and / or with longest setae not concentrated in two dense, lateroapically positioned bundles (Figs |
|
bb Lancet without setae (Figs |
carinata group |
Males of P. aphantoneura, P. astragali, P. depressa, and P. subbifida are unknown.
1 | a At least mesepisternum partly pale (Fig. |
2 |
– | aa At least mesepisternum black (Figs |
22 |
2(1) | a Metatibia black (Fig. |
|
c Metafemur black (Fig. |
||
b Claws with large subapical tooth or bifid (Fig. |
P. fausta | |
– | aa At least basal 2/3 of metatibia pale (Figs |
|
bb Metafemur usually pale (Figs |
||
cc Claws usually with small subapical tooth (Fig. |
3 | |
3(2) | a Abdomen with red band dorsally | |
b Paravalva somewhat rhombus-shaped, pseudoceps somewhat rectangular and unmodified, valvispina small, slightly bent and asymmetrical at apex (Fig. |
P. erichsonii | |
– | aa Abdomen without red band | |
bb Penis valve different | 4 | |
4(3) | a Supraclypeal area black (Figs |
|
b Antenna uniformly black (Fig. |
||
c Antenna with numerous stout black setae among finer paler ones (Figs |
||
d Paravalva rectangular, with straight ventral margin, and apically distinctly shorter than pseudoceps; pseudoceps somewhat rectangular and unmodified; relatively large and straight valvispina forming right or acute angle with paravalva (Fig. |
P. insularis | |
– | aa Supraclypeal area pale (Fig. |
|
bb Antenna uniformly black to uniformly pale (Figs |
||
cc Antenna without or apparently without numerous stout black setae among finer paler ones (Fig. |
||
dd Penis valve different | 5 | |
5(4) | a Mesepisternum completely or nearly completely pale (Fig. |
|
b Valvispina straight and positioned in middle or upper third of paravalva (Fig. |
||
c Paravalva somewhat oval shaped or rectangular (Fig. |
||
d Pseudoceps unmodified, more or less rectangular (Fig. |
P. cadma | |
– | aa-dd Combination of characters not as in a–d | 6 |
6(5) | a Paravalva and pseudoceps more or less rectangular (Figs |
|
b Valvispina straight or slightly bent and positioned in middle or upper third of paravalva (Figs |
P. pallidiventris | |
– | aa-bb Combination of characters not as in a–b | 7 |
7(6) | a Claws usually with large subapical tooth (Fig. |
|
b Paravalva basally much broader than apically (Figs |
||
c Pseudoceps more or less rectangular, not distinctly modified (Figs |
||
d Valvispina simple and straight or slightly bent and positioned close to but nevertheless distinctly removed from ventral margin of paravalva (Figs |
P. conjugata | |
– | aa-dd Combination of characters not as in a–d | 8 |
8(7) | a Valvispina absent or indistinct (Figs |
|
b Pseudoceps dorsally with loose membranous region covered with hair (Figs |
||
c Propleuron black (Fig. |
||
d Claws sometimes bifid (Fig. |
micronematica group | |
– | aa Valvispina distinct (Figs |
|
bb Pseudoceps without loose membranous region (Figs |
||
cc Propleuron often pale (Fig. |
||
dd Claws without or with small subapical tooth (Figs |
9 | |
9(8) | a Valvispina small, simple, and bent dorsally (Figs |
|
b Paravalva and pseudoceps similar in size and shape (Figs |
||
c Paravalva dorsally concave, and ventrally convex or more or less straight (Figs |
||
d Body length 3.0–4.5 mm | 84 | |
– | aa-dd Combination of characters not as in a–d | 10 |
10(9) | a Pseudoceps with spines, and narrow tip extending far from valvispina (Fig. |
|
b Valvispina small, simple, and straight (Fig. |
P. bufo | |
– | aa Pseudoceps without spines, and with broad or narrow tip not extending far from paravalva (Figs |
|
bb Valvispina variously shaped (Figs |
11 | |
11(10) | a Valvispina large and bent, replacing half of paravalva (Figs |
86 |
– | aa Valvispina smaller and paravalva less modified (Figs |
12 |
12(11) | a Valvispina large, gradually bent, and simple (Fig. |
P. paralella |
– | aa Valvispina smaller, straight, abruptly bent, or dorsally serrate (Figs |
13 |
13(12) | a Pseudoceps with distinctly narrow tip (Fig. |
|
b Valvispina simple and more or less straight (Fig. |
P. tenuiserra | |
– | aa Pseudoceps with broad tip (Figs |
|
bb Valvispina bent, dorsally serrate (Figs |
14 | |
14(13) | a Valvispina sharply bent, and short and broad (Figs |
|
b Paravalva somewhat trapez-shaped (Figs |
15 | |
– | aa Valvispina not sharply bent, and narrower (Figs |
|
bb Paravalva not trapez-shaped, or less distinctly trapez-shaped (Figs |
16 | |
15(14) | a Ventral margins of paravalva and valvispina forming obtuse angle (Fig. |
|
b Paravalva anteriorly (usually?) slightly more concave (Fig. |
P. wesmaeli | |
– | aa Ventral margins of paravalva and valvispina forming almost right angle (Fig. |
|
bb Paravalva anteriorly (usually?) slightly less concave (Fig. |
P. glauca | |
16(14) | a Valvispina small, more or less straight, and almost simple (Fig. |
|
b Paravalva broad (Fig. |
||
c Body length 8–9 mm | P. robusta | |
– | aa-cc Combination of characters not as in a–c | 17 |
17(16) | a Paravalva and pseudoceps relatively narrow (Fig. |
|
b Valvispina distinctly bent, and with thin and non-serrate dorsal margin (Fig. |
||
c Body length 3.5–5.0 mm | P. abietina | |
– | aa-cc Combination of characters not as in a–c | 18 |
18(17) | a Valvispina simple and angled in middle (Fig. |
P. decipiens |
– | aa Valvispina with at least serrate dorsal margin and angled or not angled in middle (Figs |
19 |
19(18) | a Paravalva relatively broad and abruptly narrowing at apex (Figs |
20 |
– | aa Paravalva slightly narrower and more gradually narrowing at apex (Figs |
21 |
20(19) | a Apical margin of paravalva more or less entirely convex (Fig. |
|
b Valvispina smaller and more or less straight (Fig. |
P. compressa | |
– | aa Apical margin of paravalva with concave part followed by convex part (Fig. |
|
bb Valvispina larger and slightly bent (Fig. |
P. saxesenii | |
21(19) | a Valvispina with dorsal and ventral thinned and serrate margins (Fig. |
|
b Paravalva more elongate (Fig. |
P. gerula | |
– | aa Valvispina only with dorsal thinned and serrate margin (Fig. |
|
bb Paravalva less elongate (Fig. |
P. pseudodecipiens | |
22(1) | a Tergum 8 with distinct apical projection (Fig. |
|
b Antenna ventrally distinctly paler than dorsally, or uniformly pale (Figs |
||
c Claws with large subapical tooth (Figs |
||
d Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
P. armata (on Crataegus) and P. leucopus (on Tilia) (see |
|
– | aa Tergum 8 without distinct apical projection (Figs |
|
bb Antenna uniformly black to uniformly pale (Figs |
||
cc Claws without or with small subapical tooth (Figs |
||
dd Mesepisternum matt (Figs |
23 | |
23(22) | a Terga and sterna 2–6 at least partly pale (Fig. |
24 |
– | aa Terga and sterna 2–6 black (Fig. |
43 |
24(23) | a Metatibia black (Fig. |
|
b Metafemur black (Fig. |
||
c Claws with large subapical tooth or bifid (Figs |
25 | |
– | aa At least basal 1/3 of metatibia pale (Fig. |
|
bb Metafemur pale (Figs |
||
cc Claws without or with small subapical tooth (Figs |
26 | |
25(24) | a Head extensively pale around eyes (Fig. |
|
b Paravalva and valvura almost forming right angle (Fig. |
||
c Valvispina broad with curved anteroventral margin (Fig. |
P. fausta | |
– | aa Head at most with small brown or pale spots (Figs |
|
bb Paravalva and valvura more or less at the same level (Fig. |
||
cc Valvispina thin and symmetrical (Fig. |
P. tetrica | |
26(24) | a Basal 1/3–1/2 of metatibia pale (Fig. |
|
b Supraclypeal area pale (Fig. |
||
c Abdomen with red band (Fig. |
||
d Claws usually with large subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
e Dorsoapical margin of paravalva and dorsal margin of valvispina forming distinct s-shape (Fig. |
||
f Valvispina at ventral margin of paravalva, and gradually merging with paravalva at ventral and dorsal side | P. condei | |
– | aa-ff Combination of characters not as in a–f | 27 |
27(26) | a Supraclypeal area black (Figs |
|
b Claws usually bifid or subbifid (Figs |
||
c Penis valve with long, bent, and symmetrical valvispina (Fig. |
P. tetrica | |
– | aa-cc Combination of characters not as in a–c | 28 |
28(27) | a Supraclypeal area pale (Fig. |
29 |
– | aa Supraclypeal area black (Figs |
32 |
29(28) | a Abdomen with red band dorsally | |
b Antenna extensively pale (Figs |
||
c Claws with small subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
d Paravalva somewhat rhombus-shaped, pseudoceps somewhat rectangular and unmodified, valvispina small, slightly bent, and asymmetrical at apex (Fig. |
P. erichsonii | |
– | aa-dd Combination of characters not as in a–d | 30 |
30(29) | a Claws usually with large subapical tooth (Fig. |
|
b Abdomen often completely pale (Fig. |
||
c Pterostigma dark (Fig. |
||
d Paravalva apically distinctly narrower than pseudoceps; pseudoceps more or less rectangular, unmodified; valvispina small, simple and bent upwards (Fig. |
P. testacea | |
– | aa-dd Combination of characters not as in a–d | 31 |
31(30) | a Dorsal margin of paravalva somewhat s-shaped (Figs |
|
b Valvispina small or large, and directed dorsally (Figs |
||
c Claws without, or with small subapical tooth (Figs |
||
d Body length 3.0–5.5 mm | 76 | |
– | aa Dorsal margin of paravalva not s-shaped (Figs |
|
bb Valvispina absent, or larger, or not directed dorsally (Figs |
||
cc Claws with large subapical tooth (Figs |
||
dd Body length 4.0–7.0 mm | 32 | |
32(31,28) | a Anterior margin of paravalva forming acute or right angle with valvispina (Figs |
|
b Valvispina arising from ventral margin of paravalva (Figs |
33 | |
– | aa-bb Combination of characters not as in a–b | 34 |
33(32,53) | a Valvispina larger (Fig. |
|
b Ventral margin of paravalva not protruding (Fig. |
P. insularis | |
– | aa Valvispina smaller (Fig. |
|
bb Ventral margin of paravalva protruding (Fig. |
P. biscalis | |
34(32) | a Valvispina absent or indistinct (Figs |
|
b Pseudoceps dorsally with loose membranous region covered with setae (Figs |
||
c Claws sometimes bifid (Fig. |
micronematica group | |
– | aa Valvispina distinct (Figs |
|
bb Pseudoceps without loose membranous region (Figs |
||
cc Claws without or with small subapical tooth (Figs |
35 | |
35(34) | a Valvispina long and ventrally bent (Fig. |
|
b Pseudoceps apically relatively narrow and ventrally bent (Fig. |
P. dissimilis | |
– | aa Valvispina not ventrally bent (Figs |
|
bb Pseudoceps not ventrally bent (Figs |
36 | |
36(35) | a Dorsal margin of penis valve from tip of valvura to tip of pseudoceps almost forming semicircle (Figs |
|
b Paravalva and pseudoceps broad (Figs |
||
c Mesepisternum sometimes matt (Figs |
37 | |
– | aa Dorsal margin of penis valve not forming semicircle (Figs |
|
bb Paravalva and pseudoceps narrow (Figs |
||
cc Mesepisternum usually smooth (Fig. |
38 | |
37(36) | a Valvispina close to ventral margin of paravalva (Figs |
P. pseudocoactula |
– | aa Valvispina distinctly removed from ventral margin of paravalva (Figs |
P. alpestris |
38(36) | a Penis valve relatively small and narrow (Fig. |
|
b Pseudoceps apically distinctly narrowed (Fig. |
||
c Valvispina starting from ventral margin of paravalva and dorsally with round hump (Fig. |
P. punctifrons | |
– | aa-cc Combination of characters not as in a–c | 39 |
39(38) | a Paravalva and pseudoceps of similar size and shape (Figs |
|
b Ventral margin of paravalva more or less straight (Figs |
||
c Valvispina positioned in middle or upper third of paravalva (Figs |
40 | |
– | aa-cc Combination of characters not as in a–c | 41 |
40(39) | a Penis valve elongate, paravalva and pseudoceps more or less rectangular (Figs |
|
b Pterostigma dark (Fig. |
P. pallidiventris | |
– | aa Paravalva and pseudoceps broader, less rectangular (Fig. |
|
bb Pterostigma (usually?) pale (Fig. |
P. nigricans | |
41(39) | a Valvispina positioned more or less in middle of paravalva (Fig. |
|
b Dorsally, paravalva narrowing gradually at apex (Fig. |
P. maesta | |
– | aa Valvispina positioned in lower part of paravalva (Figs |
|
bb Dorsally, paravalva narrowing abruptly at apex (Figs |
42 | |
42(41) | a Paravalva more elongate (Figs |
|
b Valvispina longer (Figs |
||
c Abdomen sometimes with red band (Fig. |
||
d Mesepisternum sometimes matt (Fig. |
P. cincta | |
– | aa Paravalva less elongate (Figs |
|
bb Valvispina usually shorter | ||
cc Abdomen without red band | ||
dd Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
few specimens of rufipes group | |
43(23) | a Penis valve apically truncate (Figs |
|
b Valvispina absent (Figs |
||
c Clypeus emarginate (Fig. |
44 | |
– | aa Penis valve apically pointed or round (Figs |
|
bb Valvispina usually present (Figs |
||
cc Clypeus truncate or slightly emarginate (Figs |
45 | |
44(43) | a Penis valve apically strongly bent, L-shaped (Fig. |
|
b Apical margin of penis valve with middle notch (Fig. |
P. malaisei | |
– | aa Penis valve apically weakly bent, not L-shaped (Fig. |
|
bb Apical margin of penis valve without middle notch (Fig. |
P. dasiphorae | |
45(43) | a Claws with long subapical tooth close to apical one (bifid) (Fig. |
46 |
– | aa Claws without or with small or large subapical tooth clearly separated from apical one (Figs |
49 |
46(45) | a Valvispina absent or indistinct (Figs |
|
b Pseudoceps dorsally with loose membranous region covered with setae (Figs |
micronematica group | |
– | aa Valvispina merged with paravalva forming large spine (Figs |
|
bb Pseudoceps with or without loose membranous region (Figs |
47 | |
47(46) | a Pseudoceps of penis valve short and broad (Figs |
|
b Antenna ventrally paler than dorsally (Fig. |
P. caraganae sp. n. | |
– | aa Pseudoceps of penis valve longer and narrower (Figs |
|
bb Antenna uniformly black (Figs |
48 | |
48(47) | a Hind trochanters, trochantelli, and tibia partly pale | |
b Antenna (usually?) ventrally at least slightly paler than dorsally (Fig. |
||
c Antenna with numerous and clearly visible stout black setae among finer paler ones (Fig. |
||
d Penis valve without membranous fold near tip of valvispina and pseudoceps with distinct dorsal depression in middle or basal part (Fig. |
P. bifida | |
– | aa Hind trochanters, trochantelli, and tibia uniformly black or brown | |
bb Antenna uniformly black (Figs |
||
cc Antenna with only some barely visible stout black setae among finer paler ones (Fig. |
||
dd Penis valve with membranous fold near tip of valvispina and pseudoceps without dorsal depression in middle or basal part (Fig. |
P. frigida | |
49(45) | a Labrum asymmetrical with right lobe much longer than left (Fig. |
|
b Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
||
c Claws without subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
d Penis valves as in Figs |
||
e Body length 3.0–4.5 mm | 50 | |
– | aa Labrum usually symmetrical or asymmetrical with right lobe slightly longer than left (Figs |
|
bb Mesepisternum matt (Figs |
||
cc Claws with small or large subapical tooth (Figs |
||
dd Penis valves different (Figs |
||
ee Body length 3.0–7.0 mm | 51 | |
50(49) | a Anterior margin of paravalva forming acute or right angle with valvispina (Fig. |
|
b Valvispina short and bent (Fig. |
||
c Posterior margin of pronotum black or narrowly pale (Fig. |
||
d Metafemur black (Fig. |
||
e Trochanters and trochantelli from black to pale (Figs |
P. retusa | |
– | aa Anterior margin of paravalva forming obtuse angle with valvispina (Fig. |
|
bb Valvispina long and straight (Fig. |
||
cc Pronotum extensively pale (Fig. |
||
dd Metafemur black or pale (Figs |
||
ee Trochanters and trochantelli pale (Fig. |
P. exigua | |
51(49) | a Pseudoceps with dorsal membranous region covered with setae and / or apically bent upwards (Figs |
|
b Valvispina small and bent, small and straight, or absent (Figs |
micronematica group | |
– | aa Pseudoceps not strongly modified (Figs |
|
bb Valvispina distinctly present (Figs |
52 | |
52(51) | a Valvispina relatively small and more or less straight (Figs |
53 |
– | aa Valvispina large and / or bent (Figs |
65 |
53(52) | a Anterior margin of paravalva forms acute or right angle with valvispina (Figs |
|
b Valvispina relatively broad or ventral margin of paravalva distinctly protruding (Figs |
||
c Sternum 9 pale (Figs |
33 | |
– | aa Anterior margin of paravalva forms obtuse or rarely right angle with valvispina (Figs |
|
bb Valvispina thin and ventral margin of paravalva usually not distinctly protruding (Figs |
||
cc Sternum 9 black (Fig. |
54 | |
54(53) | a Pseudoceps apically distinctly narrowed (Fig. |
|
b Penis valve relatively small and narrow (Fig. |
||
c Valvispina arising from ventral margin of paravalva and dorsally with round hump (Fig. |
P. punctifrons | |
– | aa Pseudoceps apically broad (Figs |
|
bb Penis valve longer or broader (Figs |
||
cc Valvispina arising from middle of paravalva, dorsally without round hump (Figs |
55 | |
55(54) | a Shape of paravalva more or less symmetrical around valvispina (Fig. |
|
b Valvispina small and positioned in middle of paravalva (Fig. |
||
c Posterior margin of pronotum and tegula extensively pale (Fig. |
||
d Metafemur black (Fig. |
||
e Mesepisternum smooth or slightly matt (Figs |
P. kontuniemii (micronematica group) | |
– | aa Shape of paravalva clearly asymmetrical around valvispina (Figs |
|
bb Valvispina large, positioned close to dorsal or ventral margin (Figs |
||
cc Posterior margin of pronotum and tegula black (Fig. |
||
dd Metafemur pale (Figs |
||
ee Mesepisternum matt (Fig. |
56 | |
56(55) | a Paravalva and pseudoceps more or less rectangular (Figs |
|
b Valvispina positioned in middle or upper third of paravalva (Figs |
||
c Posterior margin of pronotum and tegula pale (Fig. |
||
d Supraclypeal area, clypeus, antenna ventrally, metafemur, and sternum 9 often pale (Figs |
P. pallidiventris | |
– | aa-dd Combination of characters not as in a–d | 57 |
57(56) | a Ventral margin of paravalva abruptly bent before valvispina (Fig. |
|
b Dorsal margin of paravalva gradually tapering towards valvispina (Fig. |
||
c Valvura slightly bent ventrally (Fig. |
P. angulata | |
– | aa-cc Combination of characters not as in a–c | 58 |
58(57) | a Vertical distance between dorsalmost part of paravalva and valvispina relatively long (Fig. |
|
b Valvispina relatively large (Fig. |
||
c Ventral margin of paravalva slightly protruding (Fig. |
||
d Dorsobasal part of paravalva without angulate dark area (Fig. |
||
e Metatibia in basal 1/3 pale | ||
f Mesepeisternum smooth (Fig. |
P. dedeara sp. n. | |
– | aa-ff Combination of characters not as in a–f | 59 |
59(58) | a Vertical distance between dorsalmost part of paravalva and valvispina short (Figs |
|
b Dorsal margin of paravalva gradually tapering towards valvispina (Figs |
||
c Paravalva relatively narrow (Figs |
||
d Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
60 | |
– | aa Vertical distance between dorsalmost part of paravalva and valvispina long (Figs |
|
bb Dorsal margin of paravalva abruptly tapering towards valvispina (Figs |
||
cc Paravalva usually relatively broad (Figs |
||
dd Mesepisternum matt (Figs |
62 | |
60(59) | a Dorsobasal part of paravalva with angulate dark area (Fig. |
P. maesta |
– | aa Dorsobasal part of paravalva without angulate dark area (Figs |
61 |
61(60) | a Flagellum about 2.4–2.5 times as long as width of head | |
b Metatarsus mainly black (Fig. |
P. geniculata | |
– | aa Flagellum about 2.0–2.1 times as long as width of head | |
bb Metatarsus mainly pale (Fig. |
P. pseudogeniculata | |
62(59) | a Dorsal margin of penis valve from tip of valvura to tip of pseudoceps almost forming semicircle (Figs |
|
b Paravalva and pseudoceps broad (Figs |
P. pseudocoactula | |
– | aa Dorsal margin of penis valve not forming semicircle (Figs |
|
bb Paravalva and pseudoceps narrow (e.g. Figs |
63 | |
63(62) | a Valvar strut not clearly evident at anterior margin (Figs |
|
b Mesepisternum matt (Fig. |
carinata group | |
– | aa Valvar strut distinct along its entire length (Figs |
|
bb Mesepisternum usually smooth (Fig. |
64 | |
64(63) | a Paravalva more elongate (Figs |
|
b Valvispina longer (Figs |
||
c Mesepisternum sometimes matt (Fig. |
P. cincta | |
– | aa Paravalva less elongate (Figs |
|
bb Valvispina usually shorter (Figs |
||
cc Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
rufipes group | |
65(52) | a Mesopostnotum smooth (Fig. |
|
b Claws without subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
c Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
||
d Antenna usually ventrally paler than dorsally (Fig. |
||
e Paravalva largely present (Fig. |
||
f Valvispina large and strongly bent, about as long as apical margin of paravalva and more or less parallel to it (Fig. |
P. appendiculata | |
– | aa Mesopostnotum (usually?) matt (Fig. |
|
bb Claws with subapical tooth (Figs |
||
cc Mesepisternum matt (Figs |
||
dd Antenna uniformly black to uniformly pale (Figs |
||
ee Paravalva nearly completely merged with valvispina (Figs |
||
ff Valvispina smaller, or not strongly bent, or not parallel to apical margin of paravalva, or not as long as apical margin of paravalva (Figs |
66 | |
66(65) | a Paravalva nearly completely merged with valvispina, forming large spine (Figs |
67 |
– | aa Paravalva largely present and valvispina usually smaller (Figs |
75 |
67(66) | a Penis valve with membranous fold near or covering tip of valvispina (Figs |
|
b Claws with small subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
c Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
68 | |
– | aa Penis valve without membranous fold (Figs |
|
bb Claws with large subapical tooth (Figs |
||
cc Mesepisternum matt (Figs |
69 | |
68(67) | a Valvispina of penis valve less sharply bent (forming half circle) (Fig. |
P. ruficornis |
– | aa Valvispina of penis valve more sharply bent (being almost L-shaped) (Fig. |
P. melanocarpa |
69(67) | a Pseudoceps of penis valve short and broad (Figs |
|
b Mesepisternum (usually?) smooth (Fig. |
87 | |
– | aa Pseudoceps of penis valve longer and narrower (Figs |
|
bb Mesepisternum matt (Figs |
70 | |
70(69) | a Penis valve with weakly bent and broad valvispina, and with narrow pseudoceps without distinct dorsal depression in middle part (Fig. |
P. confusa |
– | aa Penis valve with different combination of characters (Figs |
71 |
71(70) | a Valvispina of penis valve narrow and with blunt tip (Fig. |
|
b Antenna ventrally paler than dorsally (Fig. |
P. opaca | |
– | aa Valvispina of penis valve broad or narrow and with sharp tip (Figs |
|
bb Antenna uniformly black (Fig. |
72 | |
72(71) | a Valvispina of penis valve narrow (Fig. |
|
b Antenna uniformly black (Fig. |
73 | |
– | aa Valvispina of penis valve broad (Figs |
|
bb Antenna ventrally paler than dorsally (Fig. |
74 | |
73(72) | a Mesepisternum smooth to slightly matt (Figs |
|
b Usually non-arctic habitats | P. luteipes | |
– | aa Mesepisternum usually strongly matt (Fig. |
|
bb Arctic habitats | P. staudingeri | |
74(72) | a Pseudoceps of left and right penis valve without distinct dorsal depression in middle part and with weakly bent valvispina (Fig. |
|
b Antenna uniformly black (Fig. |
P. subopaca | |
– | aa Pseudoceps of left penis valve with distinct dorsal depression in middle part and with strongly bent valvispina (Fig. |
|
bb Antenna ventrally paler than dorsally (Fig. |
P. pusilla | |
75(66) | a Dorsal margin of paravalva somewhat s-shaped (Figs |
|
b Valvispina small and narrow or large and narrow (Figs |
||
c Supraclypeal area pale (Fig. |
||
d Body length 3.0–5.5 mm | 76 | |
– | aa Dorsal margin of paravalva not s-shaped (Figs |
|
bb Valvispina large and broad or small and narrow (Figs |
||
cc Supraclypeal area black (Figs |
||
dd Body length 3.0–7.0 mm | 78 | |
76(75) | a Valvispina large (Fig. |
|
b Body length 4.0–5.5 mm | P. paralella | |
– | aa Valvispina small (Figs |
|
bb Body length 3.0–4.5 mm | 77 | |
77(76) | a Paravalva ventrally abruptly narrowed before valvispina (Fig. |
P. nigella |
– | aa Paravalva ventrally gradually narrowed before valvispina (Fig. |
P. amphibola |
78(75) | a Valvispina broad (Fig. |
|
b Mesepisternum matt (Fig. |
P. mollis | |
– | aa Valvispina narrow (Figs |
|
bb Mesepisternum smooth (Fig. |
79 | |
79(78) | a Pseudoceps covered with setae and expanded apically (Fig. |
|
b Valvispina long and abruptly bent apically (Fig. |
||
c Claws without subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
d Pronotum black | ||
e Body length 3.0–4.0 mm | P. monogyniae | |
– | aa Pseudoceps apparently without setae and not expanded apically (Figs |
|
bb Valvispina shorter or more gradually bent (Figs |
||
cc Claws with subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
dd Pronotum often pale (Fig. |
||
ee Body length 3.0–7.0 mm | 80 | |
80(79) | a Valvispina long, and dorsally without posteriorly constricted hump (Fig. |
|
b Claws without subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
c Body length about 4.3 mm (based on a single male available for study) | P. abbreviata | |
– | aa Valvispina short or dorsally with posteriorly constricted hump (Figs |
|
bb Claws with small subapical tooth (Fig. |
||
cc Body length 5.0–7.0 mm | 81 | |
81(80) | a Valvispina long and with posteriorly constricted hump (Figs |
82 |
– | aa Valvispina short and without posteriorly constricted hump (Figs |
83 |
82(81) | a Pseudoceps apically with narrow thickening (Fig. |
|
b Paravalva distinctly angled dorsobasally (Fig. |
P. nigriceps | |
– | aa Pseudoceps apically with broad thickening (Fig. |
|
bb Paravalva not angled dorsobasally (Fig. |
P. leucopodia | |
83(81) | a Labrum pale (Figs |
|
b Pronotum extensively pale or posterior margin narrowly pale (Figs |
||
c Flagellum about 2.4–3.2 times as long as width of head | P. laricis | |
– | aa Labrum black or dark brown (Fig. |
|
bb Pronotum (usually?) black | ||
cc Flagellum about 3.6–3.8 times as long as width of head | P. friesei | |
84(9) | a Paravalva ventrally abruptly narrowed before valvispina (Fig. |
P. nigella |
– | aa Paravalva ventrally gradually narrowed before valvispina (Figs |
85 |
85(84) | a Tegula and pronotum extensively pale (Fig. |
|
b Penis valve ventrally somewhat bent (Fig. |
P. parva | |
– | aa Tegula and pronotum black (Fig. |
|
bb Penis valve ventrally more or less straight (Fig. |
P. amphibola | |
86(11) | a Depression on apical part of valvispina absent (Fig. |
P. pallida |
– | aa Depression on apical part of valvispina present (Fig. |
P. subarctica |
87(69) | a Antenna ventrally paler than dorsally (Fig. |
|
b Ventroapical part of pseudoceps only slightly extended beyond dorsalmost margin (Fig. |
||
c Valvispina narrower and its posterior and anterior margin of similar shape (Fig. |
P. caraganae sp. n. | |
– | aa Antenna uniformly black (Fig. |
|
bb Ventroapical part of pseudoceps distinctly extended beyond dorsalmost margin (Fig. |
||
cc Valvispina broader and its posterior and anterior margin of distinctly different or of similar shape (Fig. |
88 | |
88(87) | a Pterostigma (usually?) basally dark brown and apically brown (Fig. |
|
b Pseudoceps of penis valve somewhat broader (Fig. |
P. albitibia | |
– | aa Pterostigma (usually?) uniformly yellow (Fig. |
|
bb Pseudoceps of penis valve somewhat narrower (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4690174) | P. sootryeni |
Tenthredo
Pini
[sic!] Retzius, 1783: 73, by indication to
Tenthredo
abietina
Christ, 1791: 447, by indication to
Tenthredo
abietum
Hartig in Hartig and Hartig, 1834: 984–985. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3183; here designated) in
Nematus (Nematus) limbatus Dahlbom, 1835b: 9. Not available. Nomen nudum. Note. Not available through an indication, only internal reference on “Nematus abietinus No. 86”, without giving any differences.
Nematus (Nematus) abietinus
Dahlbom, 1835b: 9. Note. Description by indication on “Mouche à scie du Sapin De Geer”. Syntype(s) possibly in
Nematus
truncatus
Hartig, 1837: 207. Holotype ♀ possibly lost. Type locality: Harz, Germany. Synonymised with Lygaeonematus pini by
The most similar species is P. compressa, which is on average larger (6.0–9.0 vs. 4.0–6.5 mm) and has hypopygium posteriorly excised (not excised in P. abietina) (Figs
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. abietina belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAK9450) as P. compressa, P. decipiens, P. gerula, P. pseudodecipiens, P. saxesenii, and possibly P. robusta. Maximum distance within the BIN is 2.18% and minimum between species distance is 0.00%. The nearest neighbour to BOLD:AAK9450, diverging by minimum of 3.92%, is BOLD:ACO1401 (P. euxantha Huflejt, 2006, a species not treated here). Based on nuclear data, within species divergence is 0.1% (based on two specimens and NaK) and the nearest neighbour is 1.2% different (P. saxesenii, both genes combined).
Picea abies (L.) Karsten (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Germany, Latvia, and Sweden.
Nematus
compressus
Hartig, 1837: 213–214. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3223; here designated) in
The most similar species are P. abietina and P. decipiens. Pristiphora abietina is on average smaller (4.0–6.5 vs 6.0–9.0 mm) and has a posteriorly sinuate hypopygium (excised in P. compressa). Pristiphora decipiens tends to be paler (with extensively pale mesepisternum, while in P. compressa it is usually black). Lancets and penis valves of these species can also be distinguished (see the Key).
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. compressa belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAK9450) as P. abietina, P. decipiens, P. gerula, P. pseudodecipiens, P. saxesenii, and possibly P. robusta (Fig.
Picea sp. (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Germany, Slovakia, and Sweden.
Lygaeonematus
compressus
var.
decipiens
Enslin, 1916: 499. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3259; here designated) in
The most similar species is P. compressa, which tends to be darker (usually has a black mesepisternum, while in decipiens it is extensively pale), and has a different lancet and penis valve (see the Key).
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. decipiens belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAK9450) as P. abietina, P. compressa, P. gerula, P. pseudodecipiens, P. saxesenii, and possibly P. robusta. Maximum distance within the BIN is 2.18% and minimum between species distance is 0.00%. The nearest neighbour to BOLD:AAK9450, diverging by minimum of 3.92%, is BOLD:ACO1401 (P. euxantha). No nuclear data are available.
Picea sp. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Germany, and Slovakia.
Lygaeonematus
gerulus
Konow, 1904a: 194, 199–200. Lectotype ♂ (GBIF-GISHym3898; here designated) in
The most similar species is P. saxesenii, valvula 3 of which possesses a small scopa in posterior view (completely absent in P. gerula) and which usually has a dark brown pterostigma (usually pale in P. gerula). Males are best recognised by examining penis valves (see the Key).
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. gerula belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAK9450) as P. abietina, P. compressa, P. decipiens, P. pseudodecipiens, P. saxesenii, and possibly P. robusta (Fig.
Picea sp. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Estonia, France, Germany, Slovakia, and Sweden.
Pristiphora
pseudodecipiens
Beneš & Křístek, 1976: 404–414. Holotype ♀ (Cat. No. 26 237) in
The most similar species is P. decipiens, females of which can be distinguished by having a posteriorly excised hypopygium (not excised in P. pseudodecipiens). Males are best recognised by examining penis valves.
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. pseudodecipiens belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAK9450) as P. abietina, P. compressa, P. decipiens, P. gerula, P. saxesenii, and possibly P. robusta (Fig.
Picea abies (L.) Karsten (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Czech Republic, Germany, and Ukraine.
Lygaeonematus
robustus
Konow, 1895: 53. Holotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3897) in
Combination of the structure of valvula 3, nearly completely black coloration, and the large size (9–11 mm) enable easy identification of the females. Males are best recognised by examining penis valves. Interestingly, a reared male specimen from Finland (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5198) has vein 2r-rs present on both wings.
No data.
Picea abies (L.) Karsten (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Czech Republic, Finland, and Sweden.
Nematus (Nematus) hospes Dahlbom, 1835b: 9. Not available. Nomen nudum.
Nematus
saxesenii
Hartig, 1837: 212–213. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF -GISHym3409; here designated) in
Pristiphora
thalenhorsti
Wong, 1975: 453–454. Holotype ♂ in
The most similar species is P. gerula, valvula 3 of which lacks a scopa (present in posterior view in P. saxesenii) and which usually has a pale pterostigma (usually dark brown in P. saxesenii). Males are best recognised by examining penis valves (see the Key).
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. saxesenii belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAK9450) as P. abietina, P. compressa, P. decipiens, P. gerula, P. pseudodecipiens, and possibly P. robusta (Fig.
Picea abies (L.) Karste (
Ovipositing experiment no.19/1987: Finland, South Häme, Hämeenlinna (uniform grid reference 676:336). On 5–6.VI.1987 one captured female laid eggs on new needles of Picea abies, the eggs were on outer margin of needle near its middle and entirely visible. Larvae hatched on 9.VI.1987. Four to five larval instars were observed, the development of larvae was rapid and on 21.VI.1987 prepupae were seen. No extra moult after feeding.
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Czech Republic, Estonia, Germany, Slovakia, and Sweden.
Pachynematus
alpestris
Konow, 1903: 380 (key). Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3921; here designated) in
Lygaeonematus
karvoneni
Lindqvist, 1952: 116–117, syn. n. Holotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym20888) in
The most similar species is P. pseudocoactula, from which it can be distinguished by usually having paler coloration (yellow clypeus, labrum, metafemur, and valvula 3) and different lancet and penis valve (see the Key). The holotype of karvoneni Lindqvist is not separable from P. alpestris (Figs
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. alpestris belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAK9467) as P. pseudocoactula (Fig.
Betula pendula Roth (
Ovipositing experiment no. 3/1983: Finland, Janakkala, Kalpalinna. One captured female laid eggs on 7.V.1983 in pockets on undersides of the young leaves of Betula pendula, the egg pockets are attached to side veins. Larvae hatched on 11.V.1983, four larval instars were observed. They grew rapidly and prepupae were seen on 20.V.1983 and the next days. No extra moult after feeding.
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland.
Pristiphora
dissimilis
Lindqvist, 1971: 13–14. Holotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym20906) in
Possibly belongs to the alpestris group. Only the holotype male is known, which can easily be distinguished from other species by its distinct penis valve (Fig.
No data.
Unknown.
West Palaearctic. One male specimen studied from Finland.
Lygaeonematus
pseudocoactulus
Lindqvist, 1952: 115–116. Holotype ♀ not found in
Lygaeonematus
concolor
Lindqvist, 1952: 117–118, syn. n. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym31689) in
The most similar species is P. alpestris, from which it can be distinguished by usually having darker coloration (black clypeus, labrum, metafemur, and valvula 3) and different lancet and penis valve (see the Key). The differences
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. pseudocoactula belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAK9467) as P. alpestris (Fig.
Betula pubescens Ehrh. (ex ovo rearing experiments by VV). Possibly also B. nana L. (incomplete ex ovo rearing experiments by VV) and Salix sp. (reared ex larva by
Rearing no. 56/1970 as P. concolor: Saana, Finnish Lapland. On 5.VII.1970 several larvae were found on Betula pubescens var. pumila. Next year one female emerged and buds of B. pubescens were offered her. She laid several eggs in pockets on underside of young leaves, egg pockets were near veins rather close to leaf margin.
Ovipositing experiment no. 12/1972 as P. concolor: Finland, North Karelia, Kontiolahti, Venejoki. One captured female laid two eggs in pockets on undersides of young leaves of Betula nana, young larvae died for technical reasons (food too old).
Ovipositing experiment 15/1972 as P. pseudocoactula: Finland, North Karelia, Kontiolahti, Venejoki. On 2.VI.1972 one captured female laid one egg in pocket near the midvein on underside of young leaf of Betula pubescens. She laid no eggs on Betula nana or Salix aurita. Four larval instars were observed and prepupa was seen on 16.VI.1972. No extra moult after feeding.
West Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland and Sweden.
Nematus (Nematus) albilabris Dahlbom, 1835b: 7. Not available. Nomen nudum.
Nematus
albilabris
Boheman, 1852: 172. Syntype(s) not found in
Nematus
albilabris
Thomson, 1863: 622. Primary homonym of Nematus albilabris Boheman, 1852 [= Pristiphora albilabris (Boheman, 1852)]. Holotype ♀ (
Nematus
collaris
Stein, 1884: 305–308. 4 ♀ syntypes possibly in
Species limits in the carinata group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the carinata group are divided between four BIN clusters (BOLD:AAF4995, BOLD:ABU8603, BOLD:ACL1744, BOLD:ACL1745), which form a monophyletic group (Fig.
Betula sp. (
Ovipositing experiment no. 16/1972: Finland, North Karelia, Kontiolahti, Venejoki. One captured female laid eggs on 2–3.VI.1972 in pockets on underside of teeth (leaf edges) of young leaves of Betula pubescens. Larvae hatched on 8–9.VI.1972, four larval instars were observed. The final feeding instar lasted about 17 days. Rather small prepupae (male sex?) were seen on 4.VII.1972. No extra moult after feeding.
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland and Sweden.
Nematus
astutus
Cameron, 1885: 77–78. Nomen oblitum. Syntypes (♀♂) have not been found (
Lygaeonematus
boreus
Konow, 1904: 196–197 (key). Nomen protectum. See Liston, Taeger and Blank (2006). Syntype ♂ (GBIF-GISHym3908) in
Pachynematus
lapponicus
Enslin, 1916: 462–463. 2 ♀ and 1 ♂ syntypes in
Species limits in the carinata group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the carinata group are divided between four BIN clusters (BOLD:AAF4995, BOLD:ABU8603, BOLD:ACL1744, BOLD:ACL1745), which form a monophyletic group (Fig.
Betula nana L. (
Ovipositing experiment no. 10/1970: Finland, North Karelia, Kontiolahti, Selkie. On 28–29.V. 1970 one captured female laid several eggs in pockets near leaf-margin on underside of the young leaves of Betula nana. Larvae hatched on 2.VI.1970 and 6 larval instars were observed; larvae eat margins of leaves. Last instar was some 30–40 days long. No “extra” moult after feeding, prepupae were seen on 27.VII.–12.VIII.1970.
Ovipositing experiment no. 15/1970: Finland, North Karelia, Tuupovaara. One captured female laid several eggs on leaves of Betula nana; she did not lay any eggs on Vaccinium uliginosum. Larvae developed, as in earlier experiment.
Ovipositing experiments 17/1970 and 18/1970: Finland, North Karelia, Kontiolahti, Venejoki. Two females laid many eggs on Betula nana, but respectively no and only two eggs on Vaccinium uliginosum. Otherwise very similar results as in previous two experiments.
Ovipositing experiments no. 4/1988, 5/1988, 6/1988, and 7/1988: Finland, South Häme, Janakkala, Suurisuo. Four captured females laid eggs on 26–27.V.1988 in pockets on undersurface of leaves of Betula nana, four larval instars were observed in all rearings and last instar lasted long.
Larvae observed on Betula pubescens var. pumila (L.) Govaerts (=Betula pubescens ssp. czerepanovii) in Saana, Finnish Lapland on 27.VII.1971.
West Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland and Russia (Nenets Autonomous Okrug).
Nematus
breadalbanensis
Cameron, 1882: 531–532. Syntypes possibly in
Lygaeonematus
tromsöensis [sic!] Kiær, 1898: 48–49. 2 ♀ syntypes in
Lygaeonematus
corpulentus
Konow, 1904a: 196 (key). Syntype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3909) in
Lygaeonematus
arcticola
Enslin, 1916: 514–515.1 ♀ and 1 ♂ syntype in
Species limits in the carinata group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the carinata group are divided between four BIN clusters (BOLD:AAF4995, BOLD:ABU8603, BOLD:ACL1744, BOLD:ACL1745), which form a monophyletic group (Fig.
Unknown.
West Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Norway, Russia (North Ural), and United Kingdom.
Tenthredo
pallipes
Fallén, 1808: 110–111. Primary homonym of Tenthredo pallipes Spinola, 1808 [= Ametastegia (Protemphytus) pallipes (Spinola, 1808)]. Syntype ♀ in
Nematus carinatus Hartig, 1837: 199–200. Syntype ♂ (GBIF-GISHym4689) in NFVG, examined. Type locality: Harz, Germany.
Nematus canaliculatus Hartig, 1840: 23, syn. n. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym4691; here designated) in NFVG, examined. Type locality: Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Nematus
denudatus
Hartig, 1840: 23. Lectotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym80268; here designated) in
Pachynematus
alticola
Enslin, 1916: 463. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3192; here designated) in
Species limits in the carinata group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the carinata group are divided between four BIN clusters (BOLD:AAF4995, BOLD:ABU8603, BOLD:ACL1744, BOLD:ACL1745), which form a monophyletic group (Fig.
Vaccinium myrtillus L. (ex ovo rearing experiments by VV).
Ovipositing experiment no. 3/1986: Finland, South Häme, Janakkala, Kalpalinna. On 22.V.1986 one captured female laid 5 eggs in pockets near leaf-margin on underside of the leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus. Larvae hatched on 27–28.V.1986, 5 larval instars were observed. Larvae eat margins of shoots and margins of leaves near their bases. Last instar was more than 16 days long. No “extra” moult after feeding. Larvae were put in alcohol on 27.VI.1986.
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Czech Republic, Finland, and Germany.
Nematus
coactulus
Ruthe, 1859: 307–308. Holotype ♀ in
Nematus
winnipeg
Norton, 1867b: 198. Lectotype ♀ in
Nematus
alpinus
Thomson, 1871: 98. Lectotype ♀ (MZLU2014449; here designated) in
Nematus winnipegensis W.F. Kirby, 1882: 143. Replacement name for Nematus winnipeg Norton, 1867.
Lygaeonematus
pachyvalvis
Konow, 1904a: 197 (key). Syntype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3913) in
Pristiphora
dawsoni
Rohwer, 1908: 109. Holotype ♀ in
Species limits in the carinata group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the carinata group are divided between four BIN clusters (BOLD:AAF4995, BOLD:ABU8603, BOLD:ACL1744, BOLD:ACL1745), which form a monophyletic group (Fig.
Vaccinium uliginosum L (ex ovo rearing experiments by VV).
Ovipositing experiment no. 46/1969: Finland, North Karelia, Kontiolahti, Venejoki. On 14–15.VI.1969 one captured female laid several eggs in pockets near leaf-margin on underside of the young leaves of Vaccinium uliginosum. Larvae hatched on 20.VI.1969, 6 larval instars were observed. Larvae fed on the margins of leaves at night. During the day they hid near the bottom of the rearing container. The final feeding instar lasted some 30 days. No “extra” moult after feeding, prepupae were seen on 7.VIII.1969.
West Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, France, and Sweden.
Lygaeonematus
(Lygaeotus)
grönblomi [sic!] Lindqvist, 1952: 101. Note. The spelling groenblomi is in predominant usage, not gronblomi, which would be correct according to Article 32.5.2 (
Species limits in the carinata group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the carinata group are divided between four BIN clusters (BOLD:AAF4995, BOLD:ABU8603, BOLD:ACL1744, BOLD:ACL1745), which form a monophyletic group (Fig.
Perhaps Betula sp. (
West Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland.
Nematus
lativentris
Thomson, 1871: 99–100 Lectotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym31596; here designated) in
Nematus
scoticus
Cameron, 1881: 563–564. Syntype(s) ♀ possibly in
Nematus
extremus
Holmgren, 1883: 148. Syntypes ♂♀ in
Pristiphora
bucoda
Kincaid, 1900: 350–351. Syntype ♀ (USNMENT00778160) in
Lygaeonematus
alpicola
Konow, 1904: 197 (key). Syntypes ♂♀ lost (
Lygaeonematus
pallipes
var.
femoralis
Zirngiebl, 1953: 32. Holotype ♂ (GBIF-GISHym3275) in
Species limits in the carinata group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the carinata group are divided between four BIN clusters (BOLD:AAF4995, BOLD:ABU8603, BOLD:ACL1744, BOLD:ACL1745), which form a monophyletic group (Fig.
Unknown.
West Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Norway and Sweden.
Lygaeonematus (Lygaeotus) trochantericus
Lindqvist, 1952: 101–102. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym31566) in
Species limits in the carinata group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the carinata group are divided between four BIN clusters (BOLD:AAF4995, BOLD:ABU8603, BOLD:ACL1744, BOLD:ACL1745), which form a monophyletic group (Fig.
Unknown.
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland.
Nematus
depressus
Hartig, 1840: 24. Lectotype ♀ (designated by
Pristiphora
Carpentieri [sic!] Konow, 1902: 18. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3902; designated by
The most similar species are P. subbifida and P. tetrica. Pristiphora subbifida has an extensively pale head in dorsal view (with only small pale spots in P. depressa) and at least partly pale metapostnotum (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. depressa forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:ABU7027) (Fig.
Acer sp. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from France, Germany, Italy, and Sweden.
Nematus
subbifidus
Thomson, 1871: 105. Lectotype ♀ in
The most similar species is P. depressa, which has a black metapostnotum (at least partly pale in P. subbifida: Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. subbifida forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:AAU8503) (Fig.
Acer campestre L. (
West Palaearctic, (Nearctic, see
Nematus
tetricus
Zaddach in Brischke, 1883b: 148–149. Holotype ♀ possibly destroyed (
Nematus
velatus
Zaddach in Brischke, 1883b: 149. Holotype ♀ was not found in
Pristiphora
nievesi
Haris, 2004: 164–165. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20461) in
The most similar species are P. depressa and P. subbifida, from which it can be distinguished by having a black supraclypeal area (pale in P. depressa and P. subbifida) and usually black head in dorsal view (at least with small pale spots in P. depressa). See
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of this species are divided between five BIN clusters (BOLD:ACL2117, BOLD:ABA3515, BOLD:ACL2098, BOLD:ACL2099, BOLD:ACL2100) (Fig.
Acer pseudoplatanus L. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Morocco, Russia (Karachay-Cherkess Republic), and Spain.
Nematus
Leachii
[sic!] Dahlbom, 1835a: 27–28. Suppressed. Note. Suppressed for the purposes of the Law of Priority but not for those of the Law of Homonymy. (Opinion 906,
Nematus (Nematus) leachei Dahlbom, 1835b: 10. Not available. Nomen nudum.
Nematus
erichsonii
Hartig, 1837: 187–188. Holotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3272) in
Nematus
notabilis
Cresson, 1880: 7. Lectotype ♀ in
Females can be distinguished from other Pristiphora species relatively easily by the shape of the valvula 3 (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences (only one specimen in BOLD), P. erichsonii forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG8325). The nearest neighbour to BOLD:AAG8325, diverging by a minimum of 5.04%, is BOLD:ACO1401 (P. euxantha). Based on nuclear data (one specimen and NaK), the nearest neighbour is 0.7% different (P. parva).
Larix decidua Mill. (
Palaearctic, (Nearctic). Specimens studied are from Finland, Germany, and Norway.
Pachynematus
laricivorus
Takagi, 1931: 28–32 (Jap.), 8–11(Engl.). Secondary homonym of Nematus laricivorus Brischke, 1883a [= Pristiphora laricis (Hartig, 1837)]. Syntypes possibly in the National Institute of Forest Science (previously Forestry Experiment Station), Seoul, South Korea (
Pristiphora
glauca
Benson, 1954a: 113–114. Holotype ♀ in
Pristiphora takagii Wong, 1975: 459. Replacement name for Pachynematus laricivorus Takagi, 1931.
The most similar species is P. wesmaeli. The differences in adults are small and might not be always reliable. According to
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. glauca belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:ABY3989) as P. wesmaeli (Fig.
Larix decidua Mill. (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Germany and Russia (Primorsky Krai).
Nematus
Wesmaeli [sic!] Tischbein, 1853: 347–348. 34 ♀♀ and 32 ♂♂ syntypes probably destroyed (
Nematus
solea
Snellen van Vollenhoven, 1870: 59–60. Holotype ♂ in
The most similar species is P. glauca. The differences in adults are small and might not always be clear. According to
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. wesmaeli belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:ABY3989) as P. glauca (Fig.
Larix decidua Mill., Larix gmelinii (Rupr.) Rupr., L. kaempferi (Lamb.) Carrière, Larix × eurolepis Henry (
Palaearctic. One male specimen studied from France. The second specimen mentioned under Genetic data is from a larva (voucher 3c, Belgium, collected on 7.VIII.2000) that we have not studied.
Lygaeonematus
Friesei [sic!] Konow, 1904a: 195, 208. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3914; here designated) in
Pristiphora
atrata
Lindqvist, 1975: 13, syn. n. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20834) in
The most similar species is P. laricis, which tends to be paler, but darker specimens could be mistaken for P. friesei. There are small differences in the structure of the lancets: the tangium appears to be without campaniform sensilla and there are fewer setae in P. friesei, while campaniform sensilla are present and there are more setae in P. laricis (Figs
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. friesei forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:ABV3411). When specimens that have 1 bp deletion in the barcoding region (e.g. DEI-GISHym11558) are included (excluded from calculations in BOLD), maximum distance within P. friesei is 3.5% and the nearest P. laricis specimens are only 2.3% different (based on full barcodes), but P. friesei nevertheless forms a monophyletic group (Fig.
Larix decidua Mill. (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Germany, Italy, Russia (Irkutsk Oblast), Switzerland, and United Kingdom.
Nematus
laricis
Hartig, 1837: 203–204. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3328; here designated) in
Nematus
ruficollis
Hartig, 1840: 27. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3405; here designated) in
Nematus
leucocnemis
Förster, 1854b: 433–434. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3333; designated by
Nematus
oblongus
Cameron, 1882: 539. Syntype(s) possibly in
Nematus
laricivorus
Brischke, 1883a: pl. I, 1e. Described from larvae, types possibly destroyed (
Nematus
rusticanus
Brischke, 1884: 128–129. Holotype ♀ possibly destroyed (
Pachynematus
ravidus
Konow, 1903: 382 (key). Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3855; designated by
Lygaeonematus
paedidus
Konow, 1904a: 195, 205. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3854; designated by
Pachynematus nigricorpus Takagi, 1931: 32–33 (Jap.), 11–12(Engl.), syn. n. Syntypes possibly in the National Institute of Forest Science (previously Forestry Experiment Station), Seoul, South Korea, not examined. Type locality: North Korea.
The most similar species is P. friesei, which tends to be darker (see the Key). There are small differences in the structure of the lancets: campaniform sensilla are present on the tangium and there are more setae in P. laricis, while campaniform sensilla appear to be absent and there are fewer setae in P. friesei (Figs
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. laricis forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:AAQ3707). Maximum distance within the BIN is 2.09% (Fig.
Larix decidua Mill. (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Austria, Finland, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, Japan, Slovenia, and Switzerland.
Nematus
leucopodius
Hartig, 1837: 200. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3336; here designated) in
Nematus
nitens
Borries, 1896: 232. Primary homonym of Nematus nitens Thomson, 1888 [= Euura respondens (Förster, 1854b) comb. n.]. Syntypes ♀♂ have not been located in
Pachynematus
sagulatus
Konow, 1903: 382 (key). Lectotype ♀(GBIF-GISHym3903; designated by
Lygaeonematus leucopodius ab. flavipes Lindqvist, 1941: 70. Not available. Infrasubspecific name.
Nematus (Pikonema) piceae
Zhelochovtsev in Zhelochovtsev and Zinovjev, 1988: 170, syn. n. Holotype ♀ in
Pristiphora (Pristiphora) hoverlaensis
Haris, 2001: 82, syn. n. Holotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym80339; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5091895) in
The most similar species is P. nigriceps, females of which have an extensively pale thorax and abdomen. In P. leucopodia, thorax and abdomen are usually black, palest specimens have a nearly completely pale abdomen and slightly pale thorax. Males are best recognised by examining penis valves. Although we did not study the holotype of piceae Zhelochovtsev, differences mentioned by
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. leucopodia belongs to its own BIN cluster (BOLD:AAH7553) (Fig.
Picea abies (L.) Karsten (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Estonia, Finland, Germany, Norway, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, and Ukraine.
Nematus
nigriceps
Hartig, 1840: 24. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3362; here designated) in
Nematus
bistriatus
Thomson, 1871: 105–106. Lectotype ♀ (
The closest species is P. leucopodia, females of which usually have a black thorax and abdomen (extensively pale in P. nigriceps). In paler specimens of P. leucopodia, at least the thorax remains relatively dark compared to P. nigriceps. Males are best recognised by examining penis valves (see the Key).
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of this species are divided between two BIN clusters (BOLD:AAO1445 and BOLD:ABV9762), which form a monophyletic group (Fig.
Picea abies (L.) Karsten (
Ovipositing experiment no.20/1987: Finland, South Häme, Janakkala (uniform grid reference 6757:3376). On 6.VI.1987 one captured female laid 2 eggs on new needles of Picea abies, the eggs were on outer margin of needle near its apex and mostly inside needle. Larvae hatched on 9.VI.1987. Four larval instars were observed, the development of larvae was rapid and on 22.VI.1987 one prepupa was seen. No extra moult after feeding.
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Germany, Russia (Primorsky Krai), Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, and Ukraine.
Pristicampus
dasiphorae
Zinovjev, 1993: 81–84. Holotype ♀ in
The most similar species is P. malaisei, which can be separated based on the valvula 3, the lancet, and the penis valve (see the Key).
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. dasiphorae belongs to its own BIN cluster (BOLD:ACO2064). Maximum distance within the BIN is 0% (based on two specimens). The nearest neighbour to BOLD:ACO2064, diverging by minimum of 8.45%, is P. malaisei (no BIN number has been assigned yet). Based on nuclear data, the nearest neighbour is 4.3% different (P. punctifrons, both genes combined).
Potentilla fruticosa L. (=Dasiphora fruticosa) (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Russia (Zabaykalsky Krai) and Sweden (Öland).
Lygaeonematus (Lygaeophora) malaisei
Lindqvist, 1952: 112–113. Holotype ♀ (
Mesoneura
arctica
Lindqvist, 1959: 68–70, syn. n. Holotype ♂ (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5218) in
Pachynematus
incisus
Lindqvist, 1970: 103, syn. n. Holotype ♀ in
Pachynematus
intermedius
Verzhutskii, 1974: 160, syn. n. Original paper not seen, cited in
Pristiphora
mongololaricis
Haris, 2003: 116–117, syn. n. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym80350; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5053627) in
The most similar species is P. dasiphorae, which can be separated by differences in the valvula 3, lancet, and penis valve (see the Key). Contrary to
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. malaisei belongs to its own cluster (no BIN number has been assigned yet). Maximum distance within P. malaisei is 0.6% (based on full barcodes). The nearest neighbour to P. malaisei, diverging by minimum of 8.45%, is BOLD:ACO2064 (P. dasiphorae). Based on nuclear data, within species divergence is 0.4% (based on two specimens and both genes combined) and the nearest neighbour is 5.1% (P. luteipes, only TPI) or 5.3% different (P. punctifrons, both genes combined).
Potentilla fruticosa L. (=Dasiphora fruticosa) (
Ovipositing experiment no. 1/1994: Finland, South Häme, Janakkala, Turenki, Alanko. On 11.V.1994 two females were swept from Potentilla fruticosa, one of them in copula. On the same day they laid eggs in pockets on the underside of young leaves of P. fruticosa, the eggs were near the leaf margin. On 17.V.1994 larvae hatched. Four larval instars were observed, the development of larvae was rapid. On 31.V.1994 prepupae and three cocoons were found. No extra moult after feeding.
Ovipositing experiment no. 2/1998: the same locality as above. On 2.V.1998 one female was offered leaves of Potentilla argentea agg., in which she showed no interest. On the next day small leaves and buds of Comarum palustre were offered, and the female began immediately to lay eggs in petioles of young leaves and unopened buds. Larvae hatched but did not live many days.
Larval feeding experiment on 26.VI.1998. 11 larvae from Potentilla fruticosa were put into container with Comarum palustre and Potentilla crantzii (Crantz) Beck ex Fritsch. Within an hour 6 larvae were eating Comarum but not Potentilla. Inspection on the next day: many larvae were feeding on Comarum and many leaves of Comarum had large holes. In addition, no larvae were observed to feed on Potentilla argentea L. In the evening the larvae were put again on Potentilla fruticosa.
Larval feeding experiment in July 1998. Many rather large larvae were put into a container with Potentilla anserina L., P. argentea, and P. erecta (L.) Raeusch. After 3 hours no larva was feeding on them, but they walked around, seeking better food.
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, France, Mongolia, Russia (Irkutsk Oblast), and Sweden.
Lygaeonematus (Lygaeophora) affinis
Lindqvist, 1952: 109–110. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20898) in
Species limits in the micronematica group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the micronematica group belong to the BIN cluster BOLD:ACG2488. Maximum distance within the BIN is 2.45%. The nearest neighbour to BOLD:ACG2488, diverging by minimum of 4.1%, is BOLD:ACO1401 (P. euxantha). Based on nuclear data, maximum divergence within the group is 2.5% (based on four specimens and TPI) and the nearest neighbour is 4.7% (P. nigella, only TPI) or 0.6% different (P. siskiyouensis Marlatt, 1896, a Nearctic species not treated here; only NaK).
Salix sp. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland.
Nematus (Lygaeonematus) lanificus ab. atripes Hellén, 1948a: 46. Not available. Infrasubspecific name.
Lygaeonematus
atripes
Lindqvist, 1952: 111–112. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym31610) in
Species limits in the micronematica group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the micronematica group belong to the BIN cluster BOLD:ACG2488. Maximum distance within the BIN is 2.45%. The nearest neighbour to BOLD:ACG2488, diverging by minimum of 4.1%, is BOLD:ACO1401 (P. euxantha). Based on nuclear data, maximum divergence within the group is 2.5% (based on four specimens and TPI) and the nearest neighbour is 4.7% (P. nigella, only TPI) or 0.6% different (P. siskiyouensis, only NaK).
Unknown, but could be Salix herbacea L. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Sweden.
Lygaeonematus
kontuniemii
Lindqvist, 1952: 113–114. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20880) in
Species limits in the micronematica group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the micronematica group belong to the BIN cluster BOLD:ACG2488. Maximum distance within the BIN is 2.45%. The nearest neighbour to BOLD:ACG2488, diverging by a minimum of 4.1%, is BOLD:ACO1401 (P. euxantha). Based on nuclear data, maximum divergence within the group is 2.5% (based on four specimens and TPI) and the nearest neighbour is 4.7% (P. nigella, only TPI) or 0.6% different (P. siskiyouensis, only NaK).
Salix pentandra L., Salix daphnoides Vill. (ex ovo rearing experiments by VV).
Rearing no. 47/1987: Finland, South Häme, Hämeenlinna, Katinen. On 14.VI.1987 larvae on Salix pentandra; head coloration characteristic.
Ovipositing experiment no. 5/2009: Finland, South Häme, Janakkala. On 8.V.2009 one female was found ovipositing in a bud of Salix pentandra. When captured she laid 12 eggs in pockets on undersides of young leaves of S. pentandra. The eggs were close to the leaf margin. On 8.V.2009 the larvae hatched, and during the next days they gnawed holes in the leaf margins. Four larval instars were observed. Development of the larvae was rapid, and prepupae were found on 22–24.V.2009. No extra moult after feeding.
Rearing no. 2/1999: Finland, Uusimaa, Espoo, Överby school. On 29.V.1999 eggs were found in large buds of Salix daphnoides subsp. acutifolia (Willd.) Ahlfv., the eggs were on underside of outer leaves near the leaf margin in the apical part of the leaf. Larvae hatched and four instars were observed. Prepupae were seen on 1–3.VI.1999. No extra moult after feeding. In next March males and females emerged.
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland.
Pristiphora
micronematica
Malaise, 1931: 58–59. Lectotype ♀ (
Lygaeonematus (Lygaeophora) leucostoma
Lindqvist, 1952: 108. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym31675) in
Species limits in the micronematica group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the micronematica group belong to the BIN cluster BOLD:ACG2488. Maximum distance within the BIN is 2.45%. The nearest neighbour to BOLD:ACG2488, diverging by a minimum of 4.1%, is BOLD:ACO1401 (P. euxantha). Based on nuclear data, maximum divergence within the group is 2.5% (based on four specimens and TPI) and the nearest neighbour is 4.7% (P. nigella, only TPI) or 0.6% different (P. siskiyouensis, only NaK).
Salix caprea L. (
Ovipositing experiment no. 1/1973: Finland, North Karelia, Joensuu, Purola. One female was captured and buds of Salix phylicifolia and young leaves of Betula pubescens were offered her. On 18–19.V.1973 several eggs were laid in buds of Salix, the egg pockets were on undersides of leaves near the leaf margin. Four larval instars were observed, their development was rapid and on 28.V.1973 several prepupae were seen. No extra moult after feeding.
Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland and Russia (Kamchatka Krai).
Lygaeonematus
nordmani
Lindqvist, 1949: 85–86. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20890) in
Species limits in the micronematica group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the micronematica group belong to the BIN cluster BOLD:ACG2488. Maximum distance within the BIN is 2.45%. The nearest neighbour to BOLD:ACG2488, diverging by minimum of 4.1%, is BOLD:ACO1401 (P. euxantha). Based on nuclear data, maximum divergence within the group is 2.5% (based on four specimens and TPI) and the nearest neighbour is 4.7% (P. nigella, only TPI) or 0.6% different (P. siskiyouensis, only NaK).
Unknown.
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland.
Lygaeonematus (Lygaeophora) reuteri
Lindqvist, 1960b: 33–34. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym31676) in
Species limits in the micronematica group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the micronematica group belong to the BIN cluster BOLD:ACG2488. Maximum distance within the BIN is 2.45%. The nearest neighbour to BOLD:ACG2488, diverging by a minimum of 4.1%, is BOLD:ACO1401 (P. euxantha). Based on nuclear data, maximum divergence within the group is 2.5% (based on four specimens and TPI) and the nearest neighbour is 4.7% (P. nigella, only TPI) or 0.6% different (P. siskiyouensis, only NaK).
Salix phylicifolia L. (
Ovipositing experiment no. 2/1973: Finland, North Karelia, Joensuu, Purola. One female was captured and offered buds of Salix phylicifolia and young leaves of Betula pubescens. On 18–19.V.1973 several eggs were laid in buds of Salix, the egg pockets were on the undersides of leaves near the leaf margin. Larvae hatched on 22.V.1973. Four larval instars were observed, their development was rapid and on 30.V.1973 some prepupae were seen. No extra moult after feeding.
West Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland and Sweden.
Lygaeonematus (Lygaeophora) variipes
Lindqvist, 1952: 106–107. Secondary homonym of Pristiphora varipes Serville, 1823. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20889) in
Lygaeonematus (Lygaeophora) variipes ab. xanthopus Lindqvist, 1952: 107. Not available. Infrasubspecific name.
Lygaeonematus (Lygaeophora) variipes ab. morio Lindqvist, 1952: 107. Not available. Infrasubspecific name.
Pristiphora sermola Liston, 1993: 104. Replacement name for Lygaeonematus (Lygaeophora) variipes Lindqvist, 1952.
Species limits in the micronematica group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the micronematica group belong to the BIN cluster BOLD:ACG2488. Maximum distance within the BIN is 2.45%. The nearest neighbour to BOLD:ACG2488, diverging by a minimum of 4.1%, is BOLD:ACO1401 (P. euxantha). Based on nuclear data, maximum divergence within the group is 2.5% (based on four specimens and TPI) and the nearest neighbour is 4.7% (P. nigella, only TPI) or 0.6% different (P. siskiyouensis, only NaK).
Salix caprea L. [
Ovipositing experiment no. 2/1971 as P. variipes: Finland, North Karelia: Kontiolahti, Jaamankangas. On 30–31.V.1971 one captured female laid several eggs in pockets near leaf margin of Salix phylicifolia. Larvae hatched on 2–3.VI.1971. Four larval instars were observed, their development was rapid and prepupae were seen on 11–13.VI.1971. No extra moult after feeding.
Ovipositing experiment no. 23/1973: Finland, North Karelia, Kontiolahti, Jaamankangas. On 28–29.V.1973 one captured female laid several eggs in buds of Salix starkeana, in egg pockets on the undersides of leaves near the leaf margin. Larvae hatched on 1.VI.1973. Five larval instars were observed, their development was rapid and on 11.VI.1973 prepupae were seen. No extra moult after feeding.
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland and Sweden.
Nematus
amphibolus
Förster, 1854b: 329–330. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3195) in
Nematus
laetus
Cameron, 1883: 194–195. Syntype(s) ♀ possibly in
Nematus fraternus Cameron, 1885: 73–74. Replacement name for Nematus laetus Cameron, 1883.
The most similar species are P. nigella and P. parva, from which females of P. amphibola can be distinguished by the combination of dark coloration (almost completely black) and long valvula 3 (see the Key, and
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. amphibola belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAF5120) as P. nigella (Fig.
Picea abies (L.) Karsten (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland and Germany.
Tenthredo
ambigua
Fallén, 1808: 112–113. Primary homonym of Tenthredo ambigua O.F. Müller, 1776. Lectotype ♂ (designated by
Nematus
occultus
Förster, 1854a: 331–332. Lectotype ♂ (GBIF-GISHym3371; designated by
Nematus
nigellus
Förster, 1854a: 328–329. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3361; designated by
Nematus
furvescens
Cameron, 1876: 308–311. Syntype(s) possibly in
Nematus
obscurus
Zaddach in Brischke, 1884: 126. Primary homonym of Nematus obscurus Norton, 1861 [= Euura obscura (Norton, 1861)]. Syntypes possibly destroyed (
Nematus
xanthomus
Zaddach in Brischke, 1884: 138. Syntype ♂ and ♀ possibly destroyed (
Nematus obscurior Dalla Torre, 1894: 246. Replacement name for Nematus obscurus Zaddach, 1884.
The most similar species are P. amphibola and P. parva. In females, the shorter valvula 3 (see the Key) of P. nigella enables its separation from P. amphibola, but differences (slightly shorter valvula 3 and darker coloration) from P. parva might not always be evident. Penis valves of P. nigella, however, seem to show more reliable differences from P. amphibola and P. parva: in nigella, the paravalva is ventrally abruptly narrowed before the valvispina (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. nigella belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAF5120) as P. amphibola (Fig.
Picea abies (L.) Karsten (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Estonia, Finland, Germany, and Sweden.
Nematus
parvus
Hartig, 1837: 208–210. Lectotype ♂ (GBIF-GISHym3376; designated by
Nematus
nigricornis
Zaddach in Brischke, 1883b: 146–147. Primary homonym of Nematus nigricornis Serville, 1823 [= Euura nigricornis (Serville, 1823)]. Holotype ♂ possibly destroyed (
Nematus germanicus Dalla Torre, 1894: 227, 7. Replacement name for Nematus nigricornis Zaddach, 1883.
Lygaeonematus
ambiguus
var.
flavater
Enslin, 1916: 503–504. Lectotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym31699; here designated) in
Most similar species is P. nigella. Pristiphora parva tends to be paler than P. nigella, and in females the valvula 3 is slightly longer in P. parva than in P. nigella (see the Key). Penis valves seem to show more reliable differences: in P. parva, the paravalva narrows distinctly more gradually than in P. nigella (Figs
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. parva belongs to its own BIN cluster (BOLD:ABV9415) (Fig.
Picea abies (L.) Karsten (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Estonia, Finland, Germany, and Sweden.
Lygaeonematus
pallidus
Konow, 1904a: 195, 204. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3906; here designated) in
Lygaeonematus
Stecki [sic!] Nägeli, 1936: 218–219. No type specimens were found in
The most similar species is P. subarctica. For females, there might be small differences in basal annuli of the lancet: in P. pallida, the gap between basal serrulae is smaller and setae are more numerous on basal three annuli than in P. subarctica. Additional differences mentioned by
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. pallida forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:AAX8150). Maximum distance within the BIN is 0.69%. The nearest neighbour to BOLD:AAX8150, diverging by minimum of 2.44%, is P. subarctica (no full barcode available, but possibly belonging also to BOLD:AAX8150). Based on nuclear data (one specimen and NaK), the nearest neighbour is 1.1% different (P. parva).
Picea abies (L.) Karsten (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Germany.
Lygaeonematus
subarcticus
Forsslund, 1936: 14–22. Holotype ♀ was not found in
Pristiphora
pseudosaxesenii
Lindqvist, 1968a: 138–139. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym31526) in
The most similar species is P. pallida. For females, there might be small differences in basal annuli of the lancet: in P. subarctica, the gap between basal serrulae is larger and setae are less numerous on basal three annuli than in P. pallida. Additional differences mentioned by
No full COI barcode available, but a 462 bp fragment available in BOLD of one Finnish specimen (FISYM334-15, MHV000166) is closest to BOLD:AAX8150 (P. pallida) differing by a minimum of 2.44%. No nuclear data are available.
Picea abies (L.) Karsten (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland and Sweden.
Nematus
nigricans
Eversmann, 1847: 16. Lectotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym30030; here designated) in
Nematus
Anderschi
[sic!] Zaddach, 1876: 62–63, syn. n. Holotype ♀ possibly destroyed (
Pristiphora
inocreata
Konow, 1902: 181, syn. n. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3923; designated by
Pristiphora
discolor
Lindqvist, 1975: 13–14, syn. n. Holotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym20870) in
The most similar species is P. pallidiventris. Females of P. nigricans have a completely pale metafemur and black terga 9 and 10, while in P. pallidiventris metafemur and terga 9–10 are completely pale or at least the metafemur is apically slightly black. The lancet and penis valve also show consistent differences (see the Key).
Based on a COI barcode sequence of one confidently identified specimen (DEI-GISHym20619), P. nigricans belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAU3334) as P. pallidiventris (Fig.
Sanguisorba sp. (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Czech Republic, France, Germany, Kazakhstan, Russia (Irkutsk Oblast and Republic of Tatarstan), and Ukraine.
Tenthredo
pallidiventris
Fallén, 1808: 120–121. Lectotype ♀ (MZLU2014482; here designated) in
Nematus (Nematus) luridus Dahlbom, 1835b: 7. Not available. Nomen nudum.
Nematus
ephippiger
Hartig, 1840: 24. Out of 7 ♀♀ and 2 ♂♂ syntypes, 2 ♀♀ and 2 ♂♂ were not found in
Nematus
flavicomus
Tischbein, 1846: 77. Types probably destroyed (
Nematus
gemellus
Förster, 1854a: 425–427. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3288; here designated) in
Nematus
Marshalli [sic!] Cameron, 1875: 9. Syntype(s) possibly in
Nematus
cirrhostomus
Zaddach in Brischke, 1883b: 195. Two syntypes possibly destroyed (
Pristiphora
pallidiventris
var.
denudata
Konow, 1902: 165, 179. Lectotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym3905; here designated) in
Pristiphora
zella
Rohwer, 1909: 20. Holotype ♀ in
Pristiphora
pallicoxa
Rohwer, 1910b: 200. Holotype ♀ (USNMENT00779341) in
Pristophora
[sic!] xanthotrachela Rohwer, 1913: 281. Holotype ♀ (USNMENT00779593) in
Pristiphora
pallidiventris
var.
haemorrhoidalis
Enslin, 1916: 526. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3291; here designated) in
Pristiphora
pallidiventris
var.
stigmatica
Enslin, 1916: 526. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3444; here designated) in
Pristiphora
ostiaria
MacGillivray, 1920: 236. Lectotype ♀ in
Pristiphora
atlantica
Malaise, 1939: 1–3. Holotype ♀ in
Nematus (Pristiphora) pallidiventris ab. flaviapex Hellén, 1948a: 45. Not available. Infrasubspecific name.
Nematus (Pristiphora) pallidiventris ab. nigrofemoratus Hellén, 1948a: 45. Not available. Infrasubspecific name.
Pristiphora pallidiventris atlantica Lacourt, 1987: 261–262. Primary homonym of Pristiphora atlantica Malaise, 1939 [= Pristiphora pallidiventris (Fallén, 1808)]. Holotype ♀ in CTN, examined. Type locality: Ifrane, Meknès-Tafilalet, Morocco.
Pristiphora pallidiventris megalpina Lacourt, 1987: 262–264. Holotype ♀ in CTN, examined. Type locality: St Véran, Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur, France.
The most similar species is P. nigricans. Females of P. pallidiventris have a completely pale metafemur and terga 9–10, or at least partly black metafemur, while in P. nigricans the metafemur is completely pale and terga 9–10 are black. The lancets (Figs
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of this species are divided between at least two BIN clusters (BOLD:ACO1634 and BOLD:AAU3334) (Fig.
Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim. (
Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Austria, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, United Kingdom, Morocco, Poland, Portugal, Russia (Primorsky Krai), Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and Ukraine.
Lygaeonematus
exiguus
Lindqvist, 1955a: 143. Holotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym20912) in
The most similar species is P. retusa, females of which usually have a mostly black metafemur in (pale in P. exigua) and narrower valvula 3 (Figs
Based on COI barcode sequences (only one specimen in BOLD), P. exigua belongs to its own BIN cluster (BOLD:ADD4067). The nearest neighbour to BOLD:ADD4067, diverging by a minimum of 4.3%, is BOLD:ABU7029 (P. retusa). No nuclear data are available.
Unknown.
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland.
Nematus
retusus
Thomson, 1871: 109–110. Lectotype ♀ (
The most similar species is P. exigua, females of which have a completely pale metafemur (usually in most part black in P. retusa) and a broader valvula 3. Males are best recognised by examining penis valves (see the Key).
Based on COI barcode sequences, belongs to its own BIN cluster (BOLD:ABU7029) (Fig.
Prunus padus L. (
Ovipositing experiment no. 1/1978: Finland, South Häme, Janakkala, Hangastenmäki. On 22–23.V.1978 two captured females laid eggs into pockets on undersides of young leaves of Prunus padus. Larvae hatched on 27.V.1978, and ate holes into leaves. Four larval instars were observed, the development of larvae was rapid and on 7.VI.1978 prepupae were found. No extra moult after feeding.
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Germany, Russia (Primorsky Krai), and Sweden.
Nematus albitibia Costa, 1859: 21. Syntype(s) ♂ possibly in MZUN, not examined. Type locality: Sila Grande, Calabria, Italy.
Nematus
puncticeps
Thomson, 1863: 619. Syntypes ♀♂ in
Nematus
agilis
Zaddach in Brischke, 1884: 142. Primary homonym of Nematus agilis Cresson, 1880 [= Euura agilis (Cresson, 1880)]. 3 ♂♀ syntypes possibly destroyed (
Pristiphora
aterrima
Lindqvist, 1977: 92. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20896) in
Pristiphora
nigropuncticeps
Haris, 2002: 75–76, syn. n. Holotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym80345; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5057701) in
Externally, the most similar species are P. armata, P. confusa, P. leucopus, P. opaca, P. sootryeni, and P. subopaca, from which it is best distinguished by the structure of the lancet (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of this species are divided between two BIN clusters (BOLD:ACH1762 and BOLD:ADH0371) (Fig.
Vicia cracca L. (
See
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Estonia, Finland, Germany, Mongolia, Russia (Irkutsk Oblast), and Sweden.
Tenthredo
fulvipes
Fallén, 1808: 113. Primary homonym of Tenthredo fulvipes Scopoli, 1763(
Nematus
aphantoneurus
Förster, 1854b: 323–325. Lectotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym31561; designated by
Cryptocampus
distinctus
Costa, 1882: 198. Syntype(s) ♀ possibly in MZUN, not examined. Type locality: Oschiri, Sardinia, Italy. Synonymised with P. fulvipes by
Pristiphora
pygmaea
Lindqvist, 1964: 130. Holotype ♀ in
The most similar species is P. luteipes, from which it cannot be always distinguished morphologically.
Based on a COI barcode sequence of one confidently identified specimen (reared ex ovo from Lathyrus pratensis) from Finland (DEI-GISHym80037), P. aphantoneura belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG3568) as P. bifida, P. confusa, P. luteipes, P. opaca, P. pusilla, P. staudingeri, and P. subopaca (Fig.
Lathyrus pratensis L. (
See
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Estonia, Finland, and Germany.
Pristiphora
pallipes
Serville, 1823: 75. Secondary homonym of Tenthredo pallipes Fallén, 1808 [= Pristiphora carinata (Hartig, 1837)]. Lectotype ♀ (designated by
Pristiphora
pallipes
Lepeletier, 1823: 60. Primary homonym of Pristiphora pallipes Serville, 1823 [= Pristiphora appendiculata (Hartig, 1837)]. Lectotype ♀ (designated by
Tenthredo (Nematus) pallicornis T.W. Harris, 1835: 583. Type(s) not available. Nomen nudum.
Tenthredo (Nematus) labrata T.W. Harris, 1835: 583. Type(s) not available. Nomen nudum.
Nematus
flavipes
Dahlbom, 1835a: 25–26. Nomen oblitum. Holotype ♀ in
Nematus
appendiculatus
Hartig, 1837: 202–203. Nomen protectum. See
Nematus
fuscicornis
Hartig, 1837: 225. No syntypes were found in
Nematus enervis Herrich-Schäffer, 1840: 176. Replacement name for Pristiphora pallipes Lepeletier, 1823.
Nematus
cathoraticus
Förster, 1854: 325–326. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3214; designated by
Nematus
pallicornis
Norton, 1861: 160. 3 ♀ syntypes in
Nematus
pallicornis
var.
labratus
Norton, 1861: 160. Holotype ♀ possibly in
Pristiphora
grossulariae
Walsh, 1866: 123. Neotype ♀ (designated by
Nematus Peletieri [sic!] André, 1880: 111. Replacement name for Pristiphora pallipes Lepeletier, 1823.
Nematus
hypobalius
Zaddach in Brischke, 1884: 154. Holotype ♀ possibly destroyed (
Nematus
pumilus
Zaddach in Brischke, 1884: 172. 2 ♂ syntypes possibly destroyed (
Nematus
Ghilianii [sic!] Costa, 1894: 73. Syntype(s) ♂ possibly in MZUN, not examined. Type locality: Alps [Alpi boreali], Europe. Synonymised with P. pallipes by
Pristiphora (Pristiphora) anivskiensis
Haris, 2006a: 194–195, syn. n. Holotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym80340; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5100763) in
Smooth mesopostnotum (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of this species are divided between two BIN clusters (BOLD:AAG7866 and BOLD:AAU8684) (Fig.
Ribes spp. Ribes alpinum L. (
Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Austria, Canada, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Russia (Republic of Bashkortostan, Sakhalin Oblast), and Sweden.
Nematus
crassicornis
Hartig, 1837: 204–205. Primary homonym of Nematus crassicornis Stephens, 1835 [= Cladius (Cladius) pectinicornis (Geoffroy, 1785)]. 3 ♀♀ and 13 ♂♂ possible syntypes belonging to P. armata and P. leucopus in
Nematus
armatus
Thomson, 1863: 619. Seven possible female syntypes belonging to P. armata and P. leucopus in
Nematus
crataegi
Brischke, 1883b: pl. I(7), 6. Syntype(s) possibly destroyed (
Nematus
Fletcheri [sic!] Cameron, 1884: 26. Syntype(s) possibly in
Nematus
melanostomus
Zaddach in Brischke, 1884: 140–141. Holotype ♀ possibly destroyed (
Nematus
ensicornis
Jacobs, 1884: XXIII. Syntype(s) ♀ possibly in
Nematus
nigricollis
Cameron, 1885: 66. Syntype(s) possibly in
The most similar species is P. leucopus. Differences between these two species, which unfortunately are not very strong, were discussed by
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. armata belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAQ2302) as P. leucopus (Fig.
Crataegus species (Brischke 1883,
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and Sweden.
Pristiphora
astragali
Vikberg, 1978: 133–137. Holotype ♀ (PR.354VV) in
Based on the external morphology, the most similar species are P. confusa, P. opaca, P. pusilla, P. sootryeni, P. staudingeri, and P. subopaca, from which it is best distinguished by the structure of the lancet (Figs
Based on a COI barcode sequences, specimens of P. astragali are divided between two BIN clusters (BOLD:AAL8292, BOLD:AAL8277), one of which (BOLD:AAL8292) includes also P. sootryeni (Fig.
Astragalus alpinus L. (
See
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland and Sweden.
Nematus (Pristiphora) bifidus
Hellén, 1948b: 116–117. Lectotype ♀ (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5214; designated by
Externally, perhaps the most similar species is P. frigida, from which it can be distinguished by having pale hind trochanters, trochantelli, and tibiae (black or brown in P. frigida). In addition, antennae of males have numerous and clearly visible stout black setae among finer paler ones (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. bifida belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG3568) as P. aphantoneura, P. confusa, P. luteipes, P. opaca, P. pusilla, P. staudingeri, and P. subopaca (Fig.
Salix viminalis L. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Germany, Norway, and Sweden.
Female (holotype DEI-GISHym80209 and one paratype), Figs
Male (31 paratypes), Figs
The species name refers to the host plant Caragana.
Externally, females of this species (only the holotype and one paratype known so far) are not distinguishable from many specimens of P. confusa, as well as from P. armata and P. leucopus that have completely black metafemora. However, the lancet has small spiny pectines on its inner surface (Fig.
Based on two identical COI barcode sequences, P. caraganae possibly forms its own cluster (no BIN number has been assigned yet) (Fig.
Caragana arborescens Lam.
The type specimens were collected from Caragana arborescens that grew intermixed with Populus tremula. One larva swept on 18.VI.2017 from the same spot as the adults was offered leaves of Caragana, Populus, and Vicia cracca L., but fed only on Caragana. The larvae made a cocoon on 22.VI.2017 and a female emerged on 2.VII.2017. The reared female laid 44 eggs in leaflets of Caragana and one egg in a leaflet of Vicia. The first larvae emerged on 7.VII.2017. The larva emerged from Vicia was also feeding on Vicia, but died the following day (8.VII.2017). The larvae feeding on Caragana had four instars and possibly a few (3?) had five instars and their development was rapid. On 17–19.VII.2017, 41 prepupae were counted (three larvae had died earlier as rather young) and they made brown cocoons in filter paper in petri dishes, except four prepupae which were stored in alcohol. On 31.VII.–5.VIII.2017, 30 males emerged.
West Palaearctic. Finland.
Holotype. Female. Finland, Hame, Janakkala, Kuumola [ETRS-TM35FIN 67558:[8]3721], 60.91707°N 24.64196°E, 28.VIII.2016, leg. V. Vikberg (
Pristiphora
confusa
Lindqvist, 1955: 40–41. Holotype ♀ (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5209) in
Based on the external morphology, the most similar species are P. albitibia, P. armata, P. leucopus, P. opaca, P. pusilla, P. sootryeni, and P. subopaca. Pristiphora confusa is best distinguished by the structure of the male penis valve (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG3568) as P. aphantoneura, P. bifida, P. luteipes, P. opaca, P. pusilla, P. staudingeri, and P. subopaca (Fig.
Salix caprea L. (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Russia (Primorsky Krai), Sweden, and Switzerland.
Nematus
frigidus
Boheman, 1865: 568–569. Lectotype ♂ (
Pristiphora
Adelungi [sic!] Konow, 1902: 162, 167–168. Lectotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym30151; designated by
Pristiphora
gelida
Wong, 1968: 185, syn. n. Holotype ♂ (USNMENT00778416) in
Externally, perhaps the most similar species is P. bifida, from which it can be distinguished by having black or brown hind trochanters and trochantelli, and usually black tibiae (pale in P. bifida). In addition, antennae of males have only some barely visible stout black setae among finer paler ones (Fig.
No data.
Unknown.
West Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Canada and Norway (Svalbard).
Nematus
vitreipennis
Eversmann in Kawall, 1864: 295. Nomen oblitum (
Nematus (Pristiphora) ruficornis var. leucopus
Hellén, 1948b: 116. Nomen protectum (
The most similar species is P. armata. Differences between these two species, which unfortunately are not very strong, were discussed by
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. leucopus belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAQ2302) as P. armata (Fig.
Tilia cordata Mill. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Austria, Finland, Germany, United Kingdom, Russia (Ural mountains), and Sweden.
Pristiphora
luteipes
Lindqvist, 1955b: 47–48. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20897) in
The most similar species is P. aphantoneura, from which it cannot be always distinguished morphologically. Sometimes the separation of P. luteipes from P. staudingeri can also be problematic, when the colour of metafemur is intermediate between completely black and completely pale (e.g. specimen DEI-GISHym80238 from an arctic habitat in Sweden has a nearly completely pale metafemur). See
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. luteipes belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG3568) as P. aphantoneura, P. bifida, P. confusa, P. opaca, P. pusilla, P. staudingeri, and P. subopaca (Fig.
Salix alba L., S. aurita L., S. babylonica L., S. repens L. S. rosmarinifolia L., S. phylicifolia L., S. viminalis L., S. purpurea L. (see
See
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, France, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden.
Nematus
melanocarpus
Hartig, 1840: 27. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3349; designated by
Nematus
funerulus
Costa, 1859: 20–21. Syntypes ♂♀ possibly in MZUN, not examined. Type locality: vicinity of Naples, Campania, Italy. Synonymised with P. wustneii [sic!] by
Nematus
wuestneii
Stein, 1885 [mandatory correction of incorrect original spelling N. Wüstneii]: 304. Lectotype ♀ (designated by
Pristiphora
ortinga
Kincaid, 1900: 349–350. Holotype ♀ (USNMENT00778199) in
The most similar species is P. ruficornis, which has paler antennae compared to P. melanocarpa. Females have the ventral side of antennae uniformly black (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens are divided between three BIN clusters (BOLD:AAG3540, BOLD:ACZ4465, BOLD:ACZ4466), two of them (BOLD:ACZ4465 and BOLD:ACZ4466) including also P. ruficornis (Fig.
Betula pendula Roth (
Holarctic. Specimens studied are from Canada, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Norway, Russia (Primorsky Krai), and Sweden.
Pristiphora
opaca
Lindqvist, 1955b: 42–43. Holotype ♀ (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5204) in
Based on the external morphology, the most similar species are P. albitibia, P. confusa, P. pusilla, P. sootryeni, and P. subopaca. The species is best distinguished through the structure of male penis valve (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. opaca belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG3568) as P. aphantoneura, P. bifida, P. confusa, P. pusilla, P. staudingeri, and P. subopaca (Fig.
Unknown.
Western Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland and Sweden.
Pristiphora
pusilla
Malaise, 1921: 11–12. Lectotype ♂ (
Pristiphora
amaura
Lindqvist, 1955b: 43–45. Holotype ♀ (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5205) in
Based on the external morphology, the most similar species are P. albitibia, P. astragali, P. confusa, P. opaca, P. sootryeni, P. staudingeri, and P. subopaca. The species is best distinguished through the structure of male penis valve (Figs
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. pusilla belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG3568) as P. aphantoneura, P. bifida, P. confusa, P. opaca, P. staudingeri, and P. subopaca (Fig.
Unknown.
Western Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Norway, and Sweden.
Nematus
ruficornis
Olivier in Olivier and Manuel, 1811: 167. No unambiguous type specimens were found in
Pristiphora
testaceicornis
Serville, 1823: 75. Syntype(s) ♂ not found in
Nematus (Nematus) robustellus Dahlbom, 1835b: 9. Type(s) not available. Nomen nudum.
Nematus
fraxini
Hartig, 1837: 204. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3285; designated by
Nematus
testaceicornis
Jacobs, 1884: XXIII-XXIV. Syntype(s) ♀ possibly in
Nematus (Pristiphora) ruficornis var. integer
Hellén, 1948b: 116. Primary homonym of Nematus integer Say, 1836. Holotype ♀ (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5212) in
The most similar species is P. melanocarpa, which has darker antennae compared to P. ruficornis. Females usually have a distinctly paler ventral side of antennae (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of P. ruficornis are divided between two BIN clusters (BOLD:ACZ4465 and BOLD:ACZ4466) that also include P. melanocarpa (Fig.
Betula pubescens Ehrh. (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, France, Germany, Portugal, Russia (Republic of Bashkortostan, Republic of Buryatia), Sweden, and Ukraine.
Pristiphora
sootryeni
Lindqvist, 1955b: 46. Holotype ♀ in
Pristiphora listoni Lacourt, 1998: 129–130, syn. n. Holotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym31733) in CTN, examined. Type locality: Saint-Véran, Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur, France.
Most similar species are P. albitibia and P. astragali. Females of P. sootryeni are best distinguished by the structure of the lancet (Fig.
Based on a COI barcode sequence of one confidently identified specimen from Kuusamo (Finland; DEI-GISHym80036), it belongs to the same BIN cluster as P. astragali (BOLD:AAL8292), which in the BOLD database includes two other unidentified specimens from Manitoba, Canada (Fig.
Oxytropis campestris (L.) DC. (
See
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland and France.
Nematus
Staudingeri [sic!] Ruthe, 1859: 306–307. Lectotype ♀ (designated by
Pristiphora
circularis
Kincaid, 1900: 350. Holotype ♀ (USNMENT00778165) in
Pristiphora
hyperborea
Malaise, 1921: 11. Lectotype ♀ (
Pristiphora
asperlatus
Benson, 1935: 35–38. Holotype ♀ in
The most similar species is P. luteipes, which can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from P. staudingeri: occasional specimens from arctic habitats have intermediate coloration of metafemur (between completely black and completely pale, e.g. specimen DEI-GISHym80238 has a nearly completely pale metafemur). See
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. staudingeri belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG3568) as P. aphantoneura, P. bifida, P. confusa, P. opaca, P. pusilla, and P. subopaca (Fig.
Salix herbacea L. and S. phylicifolia L. (
Ovipositing experiment no. 11/1974 as P. hyperborea: Finland, Enontekiö Lapland, Saana. On 21–22.VI.1974 one captured female laid 11 eggs into leaf-edge teeth of Salix phylicifolia. No eggs were laid on Salix reticulata, Betula pubescens var. pumila, Astragalus alpinus and A. frigidus. Larvae hatched on 25–26.VI.1974. They feed on the leaf margin. Four larval instars were observed. Their development was rapid and on 6.VII.1974 prepupae were found. No extra moult after feeding.
West Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, France, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and United Kingdom.
Pristiphora
subopaca
Lindqvist, 1955b: 41–42. Holotype ♀ (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5202) in
Pristiphora
coniceps
Lindqvist, 1955b: 39–40. Holotype ♀ (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5207) in
Pristiphora
brunniapex
Lindqvist, 1960: 37–38. Holotype ♀ in
The most similar species are P. albitibia, P. confusa, P. opaca, P. pusilla, and P. sootryeni. The species is best distinguished through the structure of male penis valve (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. subopaca belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG3568) as P. aphantoneura, P. bifida, P. confusa, P. opaca, P. pusilla, and P. staudingeri (Fig.
Salix caprea L. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland and Sweden.
Nematus
brevis
Hartig, 1837: 205. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3209; here designated) in
Nematus
fumipennis
Thomson, 1871: 112. Primary homonym of Nematus fumipennis Stephens, 1835 [= Nematinus fuscipennis (Serville, 1823)]. Syntype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20852) in
Pristiphora fuscata Benson, 1943: 181. Replacement name for Nematus fumipennis Thomson, 1871.
Species limits in the rufipes group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the rufipes group are divided between five BIN clusters (BOLD:AAI2590, BOLD:AAU8834, BOLD:ABU9175, BOLD:ABV4437, and BOLD:ACW1774), four of which are found in Europe (BOLD:AAU8834 is so far known only from Canada) (Fig.
Thalictrum flavum L. (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Estonia, Germany, and Sweden.
Tenthredo
flavipes
Zetterstedt, 1838: 350–351, syn. n. Primary homonym of Tenthredo flavipes O.F. Müller, 1776 [= Hymenoptera non-Symphyta, 1758]. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20851) in
Nematus
dochmocerus
Thomson, 1871: 93. Lectotype ♀ (
Nematus congener W.F. Kirby, 1882: 394, syn. n. Replacement name for Tenthredo flavipes Zetterstedt, 1838.
Pristiphora
thomsoni
Lindqvist, 1953: 223–224, syn. n. Holotype ♀ (MZLU2015172) in
The small differences in the length of antennae and coloration of the legs among the primary types of flavipes Zetterstedt, dochmocerus Thomson, and thomsoni Lindqvist do not allow clear separation of these taxa. The legs are darkest in thomsoni (trochanters, trochantelli, and metafemur are more or less completely black), palest in flavipes Zetterstedt (trochanters, trochantelli, and metafemur are more or less completely pale), and dochmocerus Thomson differs from flavipes only by having a slightly darker metafemur (black in basal 1/3). The lancets of the types are very similar (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the rufipes group are divided between five BIN clusters (BOLD:AAI2590, BOLD:AAU8834, BOLD:ABU9175, BOLD:ABV4437, and BOLD:ACW1774), four of which are found in Europe (BOLD:AAU8834 is so far known only from Canada) (Fig.
Unknown. Based on the structure of the lancet (Fig.
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Norway and Sweden.
Pristiphora
rufipes
Serville, 1823: 75. Lectotype ♀ (designated by
Pristiphora
fusca
Serville, 1823: 75–76. Possible syntype(s) ♂ were not confidently identified in
Nematus
suessionensis
Serville, 1823: 68. Lectotype ♂ (designated by
Pristiphora
rufipes
Lepeletier, 1823: 60. Primary homonym of Pristiphora rufipes Serville, 1823 [= Pristiphora rufipes Serville, 1823]. Lectotype ♀ (designated by
Pristiphora
fusca
Lepeletier, 1823: 60. Primary homonym of Pristiphora fusca Serville, 1823 [= Pristiphora rufipes Serville, 1823]. Possible syntype(s) ♂ were not confidently identified in
Nematus
Suessionensis
[sic!] Lepeletier, 1823: 66. Primary homonym of Nematus suessionensis Serville, 1823 [= Pristiphora rufipes Serville, 1823]. Lectotype ♂ (designated by
Nematus
selandrioides
Costa, 1859: 21–22. Syntype(s) ♀ possibly in MZUN, not examined. Type locality: Sile, Italy. Synonymised with P. alnivora auct. by
Nematus
aquilegiae
Snellen van Vollenhoven, 1866: 202–205 (Sep. 14–17), pl. 9. Lectotype ♀ in
Species limits in the rufipes group are still unclear
Based on COI barcode sequences from larvae collected from Aquilegia sp. (DEI-GISHym20983 and DEI-GISHym21482), P. rufipes belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAI2590) as P. brevis and P. thalictri (Fig.
Aquilegia vulgaris L. (
West Palaearctic, (Nearctic). Specimens studied are from Canada, Estonia, Finland, and Germany.
Nematus
Thalictri [sic!] Kriechbaumer, 1884: 105–106. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3448; here designated) in
Pristiphora
Henschi [sic!] Konow, 1902: 162, 168–169. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3884; here designated) in
Diphadnus
thalictri
Takeuchi, 1922: 290–294. Note. Described as “Diphadnus ? thalictri”. Holotype ♀ in
Species limits in the rufipes group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the rufipes group are divided between five BIN clusters (BOLD:AAI2590, BOLD:AAU8834, BOLD:ABU9175, BOLD:ABV4437, and BOLD:ACW1774), four of which are found in Europe (BOLD:AAU8834 is so far known only from Canada) (Fig.
Thalictrum aquilegiifolium L. (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Austria, Germany, and United Kingdom.
Pristiphora
thalictrivora
Lindqvist, 1962: 110–111. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20905) in
Pristiphora
rufiventris
Lindqvist, 1974a: 118–119. Holotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym20909) in
Pristiphora
thalictricola
Lindqvist, 1974a: 117–118. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20850) in
Species limits in the rufipes group are still unclear.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of the rufipes group are divided between five BIN clusters (BOLD:AAI2590, BOLD:AAU8834, BOLD:ABU9175, BOLD:ABV4437, and BOLD:ACW1774), four of which are found in Europe (BOLD:AAU8834 is so far known only from Canada) (Fig.
Thalictrum flavum L. (
Ovipositing experiment 52/1987: Finland, South Häme, Janakkala (uniform grid reference 6760:3370). On 18–19.VI.1987 one captured female laid eggs on leaf margin of Thalictrum flavum. Larvae hatched on 22.VI.1987. There were four larval instars, larvae grew rapidly and on 2.VII.1987 prepupae were seen. No extra moult after feeding.
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Estonia, Finland, and Sweden.
Nematus
abbreviatus
Hartig, 1837: 205. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3181; here designated) in
Gymnonychus
californicus
Marlatt, 1896: 122–123. 11 possible ♀ syntypes (USNMENT00778445) in
Most easily confused with P. monogyniae, from which it differs by having pale pronotal angles (black in P. monogyniae), black clypeus (pale in P. monogyniae), and the valvula 3 with a distinct dorsoapical projection (absent in P. monogyniae) (Figs
Based on COI barcode sequences (only one specimen in BOLD), it forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:ACV9937). The nearest neighbour (BOLD:AAG3540, P. melanocarpa) is 8.43% different. Based on nuclear data (one specimen; NaK), the nearest neighbour is 4.2% different (unidentified specimen DEI-GISHym84983 belonging to the ruficornis group).
Pyrus communis L. (
West Palaearctic, (Nearctic). Specimens studied are from Germany and Greece.
Pristiphora
angulata
Lindqvist, 1974b: 21–22. Holotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym20805) in
Because of the rather distinct shape of valvula 3 (see the Key), it should be possible to distinguish the females relatively easily. Males are best recognised by examining penis valves (see the Key), which are most similar to P. bohemica Macek, 2012a, a species not treated here (see
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. angulata forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:ACB1782) (Fig.
Spiraea chamaedryfolia L. (
Ovipositing experiment no. 2/1975: Finland, South Häme, Koski, H. l. (Uniform grid reference 676:339). One captured female laid eggs on 25–26.V.1975 on Spiraea chamaedryfolia. The eggs are laid into pockets on outer surface of the calyces (green leaves at the base of flowers). Larvae eat flowers first, later also leaves. There are four or five instars, the development of larvae is rapid and on 9.VI.1975 prepupae were seen. No extra moult after feeding.
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Germany, Norway, and Sweden.
Nematus
biscalis
Förster, 1854b: 326–327. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3698; here designated) in
Nematus
conspersus
Zaddach in Brischke, 1883b: 186. Syntype(s) possibly destroyed (
Nematus
pruni
Brischke, 1883: pl. I, 2. Holotype (sex not stated, see
Nematus
lateralis
Brischke, 1885: 246. Primary homonym of Nematus lateralis Norton, 1867. Holotype ♀ possibly destroyed (
Nematus postumus Dalla Torre, 1894: 251. Replacement name for Nematus lateralis Brischke, 1885.
Females are perhaps most similar to P. maesta, from which P. biscalis differs by having black cercus (usually pale in P. maesta) and at least partly pale clypeus (black in P. maesta). Males are best recognised by examining penis valves (see the Key). A female specimen DEI-GISHym11094 (GenBank accession KC975746) from Brandenburg, Germany, is morphologically almost indistinguishable from P. biscalis, but might represent a different species based on rather divergent COI barcode sequence. Additional specimens are needed to evaluate if there are reliable morphological differences between these two forms and to check if nuclear sequences support the divergence found in COI.
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. biscalis forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:AAM9740) (Fig.
Prunus spinosa L. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Germany and Sweden.
Nematus
bufo
Brischke, 1883a: pl. I, 1f. Nomen protectum. See
Pristiphora
pallidula
Konow, 1902: 178–179. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3904, designated by
Pachynematus
crassicauda
Lindqvist, 1964: 129–130. Holotype ♀ in
Pristiphora
laricicola
Verzhutskii, 1966: 126–127, 21. Syntypes ♀♂ possibly in
Females are most similar to P. paralella. In P. bufo, valvula 3 is clearly not truncate (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. bufo belongs to its own BIN cluster (BOLD:AAU4835). Maximum distance within the BIN is 0.2%. The nearest neighbour to BOLD:AAU4835, diverging by minimum of 6.15%, is BOLD:ABV9415 (P. parva). Based on nuclear data (one specimen and NaK), the nearest neighbour is 1.4% different (P. siskiyouensis).
Larix species: L. decidua Mill. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, and Switzerland.
Pristiphora
cadma
Wong & Ross, 1960: 198. Holotype ♀ was not found in
Females of P. cadma could most likely be confused with P. bufo or P. conjugata. Completely or nearly completely pale mesepisternum (Fig.
Based on a single COI barcode sequence (TUZ615726), P. cadma forms its own cluster (no BIN number has been assigned yet) (Fig.
Betula papyrifera Marshall (based on label data of five reared specimens from Canada) and probably some other Betula species (B. papyrifera occurs naturally only in northern North America).
West Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Canada, Estonia and Sweden.
Nematus (Nematus ) Friesi [sic!] Dahlbom, 1835: 10. Not available. Nomen nudum.
Pristophora [sic!] cincta Newman, 1837: 259. Holotype (sex unknown) possibly lost. Type locality: Herefordshire, United Kingdom.
Nematus
quercus
Hartig, 1837: 188–189. Syntype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3403) in
Tenthredo
borealis
Zetterstedt, 1838: 353. Lectotype ♀ (MZLU2014479; here designated) in
Pristiphora
identidem
Norton, 1867a: 77. Lectotype ♀ in
Pristiphora
idiota
Norton, 1867a: 77. Lectotype ♂ in
Pristiphora
coloradensis
Marlatt, 1896: 113–114 (key), 121–122. Note. Synonymy with P. cincta questionable (
Pristiphora
hoodi
Marlatt, 1896: 113–114 (key), 119. Note. Synonymy with P. cincta questionable (
Pristiphora
seorsa
Konow, 1897a: 180. 3 ♀♀ syntypes in
Pristiphora
idiotiformis
Rohwer, 1910b: 199–200. Holotype ♀ (Cat. No. 12923; USNMENT00779081) in
Pristiphora cincta ab. nigriventris Hellén, 1943: 71. Not available. Infrasubspecific name.
Pristiphora cincta ab. maukeniensis Hellén, 1943: 71. Not available. Infrasubspecific name. Note. Published as “maukeniensis Conde”.
Pristiphora
nigrogroenblomi
Haris, 2002: 74–75, syn. n. Holotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym80334; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5100994) in
The most similar species is P. condei, which has a pale supraclypeal area (usually black in P. cincta) and darker metatibia (half or more is black in P. condei, usually less than half in P. cincta). The shorter postocellar area in P. cincta (1.0–1.5 times longer than diameter of lateral ocellus) can also distinguish it from at least females of P. condei (1.5–2.5 times longer). Because males of P. cincta frequently lack a red band on the abdomen, penis valves (which are very similar to species in the rufipes group) should be studied to distinguish them from many other species (see the Key). It is possible that more than one species is involved under P. cincta, but this requires additional research (names are possibly already available among current synonyms).
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. cincta belongs to its own BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG3565) (Fig.
Betula pubescens Ehrh. (
Ovipositing experiment no. 5/1971: Finland, North Karelia, Ilomantsi, Heinävaara. One captured female laid eggs on 31.V.1971 in pockets through margins of the leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus. Larvae hatched on 5.VI.1971; four larval instars were observed. The development was rapid, the larvae were fully grown on 14.VI.1971. No “extra” moult after feeding. Also leaves of Betula pubescens were offered, but the female did not lay any eggs on them.
Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Canada, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Norway, Mongolia, Russia (Irkutsk Oblast, Primorsky Krai), Slovakia, Sweden, and Ukraine.
Pristiphora
condei
Lindqvist, 1955b: 48–49. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20900) in
The most similar species is P. cincta, which nearly always has a black supraclypeal area (pale in P. condei) and paler metatibia (usually more than half is pale in P. cincta, half or less in P. condei). Longer postocellar area in P. condei (1.5–2.5 times longer than diameter of lateral ocellus) can also distinguish it from at least females of P. cincta (1.0–1.5 times longer).
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. condei forms its own cluster (no BIN number has been assigned yet) (Fig.
Sorbus aucuparia L. (
See
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Estonia, Finland, Russia (Primorsky Krai), and Ukraine.
Nematus gonymelas Stephens, 1829: 329. Not available. Nomen nudum.
Nematus
conjugatus
Dahlbom, 1835a: 21–22, 40. Lectotype ♂ (MZLU2014464; here designated) in
Nematus
gonymelas
Stephens, 1835: 34. Syntype(s) possibly in
Nematus (Nematus) conjugatus Dahlbom, 1835b: 8. Not available. Nomen nudum.
Nematus discipennis Herrich-Schäffer, 1840: 176. Note. Replacement name for “Pristoph. myosotidis Lep. Pz. 98. 13. Tenthr.”.
Nematus
discoidalis
Thomson, 1888: 1209–1210. Syntype ♀ in
Pristiphora
conjugata
var.
forsiusi
Enslin, 1916: 534. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3282; here designated) in
Pristiphora
conjugata
var.
ulbrichti
Enslin, 1916: 534. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3450; here designated) in
The most similar species in Europe are P. testacea, P. pallidiventris, and P. nigricans, which have a unicoloured (dark or pale) pterostigma (bicoloured in P. conjugata, but this is less clear in males). Lancets and penis valves can also be distinguished from other species (see the Key). Darker specimens of P. conjugata (e.g. females with black mesepisternum and dorsally black abdomen) feeding on Salix have been treated as a separate species, P. forsiusi Enslin (
Based on a COI barcode sequences, P. conjugata forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:ABV4426) (Fig.
Populus nigra L. (Pesarini and Turrisi 2001,
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Austria, Estonia, Finland, Germany, and Sweden.
Female holotype (DEI-GISHym80053), Figs
Male paratypes (DEI-GISHym80258, 80266), Figs
The species name is an arbitrary combination of letters, to be treated as a noun.
Black thorax, head, and mostly abdomen, dark pterostigma, smooth mesepisternum, claw without subapical tooth, and simple valvula 3 (Figs
Based on two identical COI barcode sequences, P. dedeara forms its own cluster (no BIN number has been assigned yet) (Fig.
Unknown.
West Palaearctic. Germany.
Holotype. Female. Germany, Brandenburg, Ruhlsdorf bei Strausberg, 52.57070°N 13.99780°E, 30.IV.2016, leg. A. Liston (
Nematus
faustus
Hartig, 1837: 189. Holotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3273) not found in
The combination of nearly completely red head and completely black hind legs enables quite easy identification of this species (see also the Key).
Based on COI barcode sequences (only one specimen in BOLD), P. fausta belongs to its own BIN cluster (BOLD:ABU7035). The nearest neighbour to BOLD:ABU7035, diverging by minimum of 5.45%, is BOLD:ABA3518 (P. parnasia Konow, 1902, a species not treated here). Based on nuclear data (one specimen and TPI), the nearest neighbour is 1.3% different (P. calliprina Liston & Jacobs, 2012, a species closely related to P. parnasia, that is not treated here).
Quercus robur L. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Germany, Greece, and Italy.
Nematus
geniculatus
Hartig, 1840: 26. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3290; here designated) in
Nematus
cheilon
Zaddach, 1876: 41. Syntypes possibly destroyed (
The most similar species is P. pseudogeniculata. Both, females and males of P. pseudogeniculata have shorter antenna (1.9–2.1 times as long as head width compared to 2.4–2.5 in P. geniculata) and a paler metatarsomere 1 (completely or nearly completely pale, compared to largely black in P. geniculata). Lancets are also different (see the Key and Figs
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. geniculata belongs to its own BIN cluster (BOLD:AAK9465) (Fig.
Sorbus aucuparia L. (
Palaearctic, (Nearctic). Specimens studied are from Austria, Estonia, Finland, and Germany.
Pristiphora
insularis
Rohwer, 1910a: 106. Holotype ♀ (USNMENT00779086) in
Amauronematus
amelanchieris
Takeuchi, 1922: 289–293. Holotype ♀ in
Pristiphora
kamtchatica
Malaise, 1931: 56–57. Lectotype ♀ in
Pristiphora
luteiventris
Koch, 1989: 145–148. Holotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym2821) in
Because of the shape of valvula 3, females might be confused most often with the P. leucopodia group. In addition to small differences in the valvula 3 (see the Key and Figs
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens are divided between two BIN clusters (BOLD:AAU3333 and BOLD:AAX8162), which are the closest neighbours of each other, with 3.79% difference (Fig.
Amelanchier asiatica (Siebold & Zucc.) Endl. ex Walp., Chaenomeles japonica (Thunb.) Lindl. ex Spach (
Ovipositing experiment no. 12/1977: Finland, South Häme, Hämeenlinna, Aulanko. On 6–7.VI.1977 one captured female laid eggs into teeth (leaf edges) of unopened leaves of Rosa majalis. Larvae hatched on 9–10.VI.1977, four larval instars were observed. Their development was rapid and on 22.VI.1977 prepupae were seen. No extra moult after feeding.
Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Spain, and Sweden.
Nematus
brevicornis
Thomson, 1863: 622–623. Primary homonym of Nematus brevicornis Förster, 1854b [= Euura brevicornis (Förster, 1854b)]. Syntype ♀ (MZLU2014457) in
Nematus
maestus
Zaddach, 1876: 85–86. Syntypes ♀ and ♂ possibly destroyed (
Nematus parvicornis W.F. Kirby, 1882: 118. Replacement name for Nematus brevicornis Thomson, 1863.
Pachynematus
insularis
Malaise, 1921: 7–8. Syntype(s) ♀ in
Females are perhaps most similar to P. biscalis, from which P. maesta differs by having pale cercus (black in P. biscalis) and black clypeus (at least partly pale in P. biscalis). Males are best recognised by examining penis valves.
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. maesta forms its own cluster (no BIN number has been assigned yet) (Fig.
Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. and M. domestica Borkh. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, France, Germany, and Sweden.
Tenthredo
bipunctata
Gmelin, 1790: 2670. Primary homonym of Tenthredo bipunctata O.F. Müller, 1776 [= Tenthredo (Tenthredella) livida Linné, 1758]. Type specimens probably lost (
Nematus
mollis
Hartig, 1837: 201. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3355; here designated) in
Tenthredo
lapponica
Zetterstedt, 1838: 350. Lectotype ♀ (MZLU2014469; here designated) in
Nematus
whitei
Cameron, 1878b: 35–36. Syntype(s) ♂ possibly in
Pachynematus
orarius
Kincaid, 1900: 348. Syntype ♀ (USNMENT00778196) in
Lygaeonematus mollis ab. albipes Lindqvist, 1943: 107. Not available. Infrasubspecific name.
Lygaeonematus mollis ab. rufonotata Lindqvist, 1943: 107. Not available. Infrasubspecific name.
Pachynematus
kontkaneni
Lindqvist, 1960a: 35–36. Holotype ♀ in
The most similar species belong to the carinata group. Externally, both females and males of P. mollis generally have a more depressed frontal field (area anterior to median ocellus) and it is often rather smooth compared to carinata group specimens, but the difference is rather small and difficult to quantify. Females of P. mollis can often be distinguished from carinata group specimens by the combination of darker coloration of the head and abdomen (black clypeus and valvifer 2, and usually black tergum 10), the paler metatarsus (usually mainly pale), and longer cerci. Lancet (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. mollis forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:AAF5097) (Fig.
Vaccinium myrtillus L. (
Ovipositing experiment no. 4/1986: Finland, South Häme, Janakkala, Kalpalinna. One captured female laid several eggs on 23.V.1986 in pockets on undersides of young leaves of Vaccinium myrtillus. Eggs were situated very close to the leaf margin at the base of teeth (leaf edges) of the plant. 5 larval instars were observed, the development of larvae was rapid and on 6.VI.1986 first cocoon was observed. No extra moult after feeding. Larva can be green or red. On both sides of the dark dorsal vessel, there are longitudinal white subcutaneous fat stripes on the thorax and abdominal segments 1–9.
West Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and Ukraine.
Nematus
Monogyniae [sic!] Hartig, 1840: 27. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3358; here designated) in
Nematus
pullus
Förster, 1854a: 330–331. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3391; here designated) in
Nematus
filicornis
Thomson, 1863: 625. Syntype(s) ♀ in
Nematus
hibernicus
Cameron, 1878a: 225. Syntype(s) possibly in
Nematus
nanus
Zaddach in Brischke, 1884: 137. 3 ♂♂ and 2 ♀♀ syntypes possibly destroyed (
Nematus
serotinus
Zaddach in Brischke, 1884: 137–138. Holotype ♀ possibly destroyed (
Nematus
catulus
Zaddach in Brischke, 1884: 142–143. Syntype(s) ♂ possibly destroyed (
Nematus
ludens
Costa, 1894: 72. 2 ♀ syntypes possibly in MZUN, not examined. Type locality: Emilia [part of Emilia-Romagna], Italy. Synonymised with Micronematus monogyniae by
Most easily mixed up with P. abbreviata, from which it differs by having black pronotal angles (pale in P. abbreviata), at least partly pale clypeus (black in P. abbreviata), and valvula 3 without distinct dorsoapical projection (present in P. abbreviata). Males are best recognised by examining penis valves (see the Key).
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of this species are divided between two BIN clusters (BOLD:AAX8166 and BOLD:ACG5295) (Fig.
Prunus spinosa L. (
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Germany, Greece, and Sweden.
Nematus
paralellus
Hartig, 1840: 25. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3375; here designated) in
Lygaeonematus
tenuicornis
Lindqvist, 1955a: 142–143, syn. n. Holotype ♀ (
Females are most similar to P. bufo. In P. paralella, valvula 3 is slightly truncate (clearly not truncate in P. bufo) in lateral view, and the anterior protibial spur is without velum (with velum in P. bufo). Males are best recognised by examining penis valves (see the Key).
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. paralella belongs to its own BIN cluster (BOLD:AAX8164) (Fig.
Picea sp. (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Germany, Poland, Russia (Primorsky Krai), and Sweden.
Pristiphora
pseudogeniculata
Lindqvist, 1969: 246. Holotype ♀ (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5215) in
The most similar species is P. geniculata. Both females and males of P. geniculata have longer antenna (2.4–2.5 times as long as head width compared to 1.9–2.1 in P. pseudogeniculata) and a darker metatarsomere 1 (largely black compared to completely or nearly completely pale in P. pseudogeniculata). The female of P. geniculata also has a different lancet (see the Key).
No data.
Prunus padus L. (ex ovo rearing experiments by VV).
Ovipositing experiment no. 3/1979: Finland, South Häme, Hämeenlinna, Katinen. One female was captured on 4.VI.1979 and leaves of Malus sp., Sorbus aucuparia and Prunus padus were offered her. On 4–5.VI.1979 she laid several eggs only in teeth of leaves of Prunus padus. Four larval instars were observed. Larvae feed gregariously on the leaf margin, like larvae of P. geniculata on Sorbus aucuparia. Prepupae were seen on 19.VI.1979. No extra moult after feeding.
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland.
Nematus
punctifrons
Thomson, 1871: 111. Holotype ♀ (MZLU2014459) in
Nematus
platyceros
Zaddach in Brischke, 1884: 135–136. Syntypes ♀♂ possibly destroyed (
Pristiphora
viridana
Konow, 1902: 164 (key), 176–177. Lectotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3896; designated by
Micronematus
camtschatcalis
Enslin, 1927: 376–377. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym30136) in
Nematus (Pristiphora) punctifrons ab. maculipleura Hellén, 1948a: 45. Not available. Infrasubspecific name.
Pristiphora
aspericeps
Lindqvist, 1960a: 37. Holotype ♀ (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5216) in
Pristiphora
flavipicta
Lindqvist, 1975: 14, syn. n. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym20895) in
Pristiphora
mongoloexigua
Haris, 2002: 76–77, syn. n. Holotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym80346; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5101081) in
Pristiphora
flavopleura
Haris, 2002: 81, syn. n. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym80355; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5101099) in
Pristiphora
mongolofausta
Haris, 2003: 116–118, syn. n. Holotype ♀ (DEI-GISHym80354; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5101090) in
Females of P. punctifrons can be distinguished from other species by having a very deep scopa of valvula 3 (Fig.
Based on COI barcode sequences, specimens of this species are divided between three BIN clusters (BOLD:AAU9246, BOLD:ACW2731, BOLD:ACB0668), which form a monophyletic group (Fig.
Rosa canina L. s. l. (
Ovipositing experiment no. 9/1976: Finland, South Häme, Hämeenlinna, Aulanko. On 14.VI.1976 one captured female laid 3 eggs into teeth of unopened leaves of Rosa majalis. Larvae hatched on 18.VI.1976, four larval instars were observed. Their development was rapid and on 29.VI.1976 prepupae were seen. No extra moult after feeding.
Palaearctic, Nearctic. Specimens studied are from Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Russia (Kamchatka Krai and Republic of Buryatia), Sweden, and USA.
Micronematus
tenuiserra
Lindqvist, 1959: 72. Holotype ♀ in
Females can be distinguished from other species by the combination of the structure of valvula 3 (long and narrow and practically without scopa; Figs
Based on COI barcode sequences (only one specimen in BOLD), P. tenuiserra forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:ADD2616) (Fig.
Unknown, but the structure of valvula 3 suggests that the species is probably a conifer-feeder.
West Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Germany, Poland, and Sweden.
Tenthredo
Betulae
[sic!] Retzius, 1783: 72–73, by indication to
Tenthredo
betulae
Christ, 1791: 453, by indication to
Pteronus
testaceus
Jurine, 1807: pl. 13 fig. 8. Syntype(s) probably lost (
Nematus (Nematus) betulinus
Dahlbom, 1835b: 8. Note. Replacement name for “(an. Tenthr. Betulae De Geer)”. Syntype(s) possibly in
Nematus betularius Hartig, 1837: 192–193. Holotype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym4688) in NFVG, examined. Type locality: Harz, Germany.
Nematus
betulae
Hartig, 1837: 219–220, by indication to
Nematus
melanurus
Hartig, 1840: 24. Syntype ♀ (GBIF-GISHym3347) in
Nematus
erythrogaster
Thomson, 1871: 103–104. Primary homonym of Nematus erythrogaster Norton, 1864. Syntype(s) ♀ in
Nematus crassiventris Cameron, 1878c: 267. Replacement name for Nematus erythrogaster Thomson, 1871.
Nematus hartigii W.F. Kirby, 1882: 127. Replacement name for Nematus betulae Hartig, 1837.
Nematus luteogaster W.F. Kirby, 1882: 132. Replacement name for Nematus erythrogaster Thomson, 1871.
Pristiphora
gaunitzi
Lindqvist, 1968b: 196, syn. n. Holotype ♀ (
The most similar are pale specimens (with completely yellow abdomen) of P. pallidiventris and P. conjugata. Pristiphora pallidiventris is best distinguished from P. testacea by having valvula 3 with long medial projection (short in P. testacea) and short postocellar area (1.0–1.5 times longer than diameter of lateral ocellus, about 2.0 times in P. testacea). The bicoloured pterostigma (Fig.
We treat gaunitzi Lindqvist as a rare colour form (abdomen dorsally black) of testacea. We have seen one additional female with this coloration, from Pallastunturi in Finnish Lapland, that was reared from Betula, the host plant of testacea. The penis valve of what
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. testacea forms its own BIN cluster (BOLD:AAX8158) (Fig.
Betula humilis Schrank, B. pendula Roth, and B. pubescens Ehrh. (
Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, and Sweden.
Nematus lanificus Zaddach in Brischke, 1883b: 192–193. 3 syntypes possibly destroyed (
Pristiphora mesatlantica Lacourt, 1976: 314. Holotype ♀ possibly in
Nematus breviusculus Eversmann, 1847: 17, syn. n. Syntype gynandromorph (DEI-GISHym30032) in
Nematus caudalis Eversmann, 1847: 16. Syntype ♂ (DEI-GISHym30028) in
Pachynematus (Pikonema) carpathiensis Haris, 2001: 80–81. Holotype ♂ (DEI-GISHym80338; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5100877) in
The lack of modern keys or revisions for the large nematine genus Pristiphora seriously hampers its study. High species diversity coupled to the small number of reliable morphological characters are probably the main reasons for this neglect. Here, we have revised the North-Western Palaearctic species, but three species groups (carinata, micronematica, and rufipes groups) still await more thorough revision. About 13 additional West Palaearctic species, not belonging to the three problematic groups, would have to be considered when identifying species outside of North-Western Europe: P. beaumonti Zirngiebl, 1957, P. bensoni Lindqvist, 1953, P. murielae Lacourt, 1995 (all three in the ruficornis group), P. bohemica Macek, 2012a, P. calliprina Liston & Jacobs, 2012, P. parnasia Konow, 1902 (the last two were keyed by
For animals, mitochondrial COI is widely used for species identification (http://www.boldsystems.org/), but our results show that about 48% of the species of Pristiphora (out of 60 where it was possible to give an assessment) cannot be reliably identified based on COI barcodes. This increases to 62% (out of 81) when the carinata, micronematica, and rufipes groups (unresolved taxonomy, but with indications of barcoding failure) are included. Therefore we caution against using COI barcodes to identify species in Pristiphora, even if the match is 100% (identical barcodes for different species are common). Still, barcodes can be used at least to identify species groups, which would need more thorough investigation based on morphology or nuclear genes. Problems in using COI barcodes for species identification are known in many other groups of sawflies, but appear to be most frequent within Nematinae (
Taken together, genetic results suggest that mitochondrial COI divergence within Pristiphora species usually remains within 3%, but could be as high as 5%. Divergences more than 5–6% probably indicate different species, although we cannot exclude that there are exceptions to this. Typical within species divergence for nuclear genes is less clear because of limited data, but seems to remain within 1%.
In summary, based on our results, the current number of West Palaearctic species of Pristiphora is reduced from 120 (
External characters used to identify Pristiphora species. 6 albitibia DEI-GISHym31514 7 testacea DEI-GISHym19770 8 pallida DEI-GISHym20845 9 bifida DEI-GISHym31512 10 groenblomi DEI-GISHym31602 11 retusa DEI-GISHym20965 12 abietina DEI-GISHym31225 13 malaisei DEI-GISHym19772 14 luteipes DEI-GISHym80038, flagellum 15 ruficornis DEI-GISHym31185, flagellum 16 armata DEI-GISHym11092 17 frigida
External characters used to identify Pristiphora species. 29 atripes holotype 30 malaisei DEI-GISHym10991 31 pseudogeniculata DEI-GISHym20832 32 pusilla DEI-GISHym80050 (arrows indicate trochanters and trochantelli) 33 friesei DEI-GISHym31524 (arrow indicates hair and the absence of velum on anterior protibial spur) 34 nigella DEI-GISHym31549 (arrow indicates the velum) 35 erichsonii DEI-GISHym20807 36 paralella 15-255 37 nigriceps DEI-GISHym31687 38 subbifida DEI-GISHym11332 (arrow indicates partly pale metapostnotum) 39 subopaca holotype, pterostigma (arrow) 40 opaca holotype 41 retusa DEI-GISHym31584 42 ruficornis DEI-GISHym31185 43 conjugata DEI-GISHym20960 44 albitibia DEI-GISHym31514, thorax in lateral view 45 luteipes DEI-GISHym80038 46 astragali holotype 47 cincta DEI-GISHym31501 48 condei DEI-GISHym20957 49 conjugata DEI-GISHym20960 50 testacea DEI-GISHym31237 51 cadma TUZ615726 52 biscalis DEI-GISHym80224 (arrows indicate a deep notch at the posterior margin of sternum 9) 53 nigriceps DEI-GISHym80059 (arrow indicates a notch at the posterior margin of sternum 9) 54 pallidiventris DEI-GISHym20971.
External characters used to identify Pristiphora species. 55 subopaca DEI-GISHym31560 56 leucopodia DEI-GISHym80057 (arrow indicates an indistinct apical projection of the tergum 8) 57 armata DEI-GISHym11092 (arrow indicates a distinct apical projection) 58 malaisei DEI-GISHym10991 (arrows indicate small eyes relative to head length above eyes) 59 testacea DEI-GISHym19770 (arrows indicate large eyes relative to head length above eyes) 60 saxesenii DEI-GISHym20844 (arrows indicate lateral constriction of the apex of the abdomen) 61 appendiculata DEI-GISHym31500 62 pseudodecipiens DEI-GISHym20999 63 decipiens DEI-GISHym21256 64 laricis DEI-GISHym31503 65 alpestris lectotype.
Valvula 3 of Pristiphora. 66–67 abbreviata DEI-GISHym31505 68–70 angulata DEI-GISHym31523 71–72 monogyniae DEI-GISHym11352 73–74 dasiphorae DEI-GISHym31598 75 malaisei DEI-GISHym 15461 (arrows indicate small scopa) 76–77 biscalis DEI-GISHym11088 78 maesta DEI-GISHym11381 79–81 friesei DEI-GISHym31524 82–83 depressa DEI-GISHym11043 84–85 nigriceps DEI-GISHym21257 86–87 insularis DEI-GISHym20966.
Valvula 3 of Pristiphora. 88 alpestris DEI-GISHym20881 89–90 pseudocoactula DEI-GISHym19952 91–92 micronematica group (DEI-GISHym20879) 93–94 carinata group (DEI-GISHym19835) 95–96 lativentris DEI-GISHym19838 97 carinata group (DEI-GISHym19966) 98–99 carinata DEI-GISHym20847 100 pseudogeniculata DEI-GISHym20832 101–102 exigua DEI-GISHym31527 103 retusa DEI-GISHym20965 104 cincta DEI-GISHym31723 105 appendiculata DEI-GISHym80025 (arrows indicate distinct scopa) 106 pallidiventris DEI-GISHym20964 107 punctifrons DEI-GISHym21254.
Valvula 3 of Pristiphora. 108–110 bufo DEI-GISHym17786 111, 115 nigella DEI-GISHym20972 112–114 paralella 15-255 116–117 decipiens DEI-GISHym21256 118, 122 gerula DEI-GISHym20843 119, 123 tenuiserra DEI-GISHym20846 120–121 saxesenii DEI-GISHym20844 124 erichsonii DEI-GISHym20807 125 pallida DEI-GISHym20845 126–127 glauca DEI-GISHym31525.
Penis valves of Pristiphora. 223 nigricans DEI-GISHym20869 224 pallidiventris DEI-GISHym20866 225 pallidiventris DEI-GISHym80143 226 pallidiventris DEI- GISHym20976 227 maesta PR.579VV (arrow indicates an angulate dark area) 228 angulata DEI-GISHym31030 229 geniculata PR.549VV 230 pseudogeniculata PR.577VV 231 punctifrons DEI-GISHym31669 (arrow indicates a round hump) 232 condei DEI-GISHym80223.
Penis valves of Pristiphora. 233 alpestris DEI-GISHym31711 234 pseudocoactula DEI-GISHym19968 235 alpestris, holotype of karvoneni 236 pseudocoactula DEI-GISHym80212 237 dissimilis holotype 238 albilabris DEI-GISHym80210 239 carinata syntype (GBIF-GISHym4689) 240 carinata group (DEI-GISHym80234) 241 carinata group (DEI-GISHym80220) 242 carinata group (DEI-GISHym80242).
Penis valves of Pristiphora. 243 rufipes group (BC
Penis valves of Pristiphora. 253 biscalis DEI-GISHym31533 (arrow indicates protruding ventral margin of paravalva) 254 insularis DEI-GISHym20941 255 conjugata DEI-GISHym31542, reared from Populus sp. 256 monogyniae DEI-GISHym31590 257 conjugata DEI-GISHym80024, reared from Salix fragilis 258 exigua holotype 259 conjugata DEI-GISHym31544, reared from Salix pentandra 260 retusa DEI-GISHym20791 261 testacea DEI-GISHym31631 262 appendiculata DEI-GISHym31555.
Penis valves of Pristiphora. 263 armata PR.465VV 264 melanocarpa PR.425VV 265 leucopus GBIF-GISHym3246, syntype of Nematus crassicornis Hartig 266 ruficornis PR.462VV 267 bifida DEI-GISHym80000 (arrow indicates a dorsal depression of the pseudoceps) 268 confusa DEI-GISHym31265 269 subopaca DEI-GISHym80030, left penis valve 270 opaca PR.459VV 271 pusilla DEI-GISHym80029, left penis valve with strong dorsal depression of the pseudoceps (arrow) 272 staudingeri PR.352VV.
Penis valves of Pristiphora. 273 albitibia DEI-GISHym20956 274 frigida
Penis valves of Pristiphora. 283 abietina PR.285VV (arrow indicates a thin non-serrate margin of valvispina) 284 compressa DEI-GISHym31607 285 decipiens DEI-GISHym31585 (arrow indicates angled middle part of valvispina) 286 gerula DEI-GISHym31601 (arrows indicate dorsal and ventral thinned and serrate margins of valvispina) 287 pseudodecipiens DEI-GISHym31586 288 saxesenii DEI-GISHym31547 289 robusta PR.621VV 290 erichsonii DEI-GISHym80353 291 glauca DEI-GISHym17724 292 wesmaeli DEI-GISHym19512.
Penis valves of Pristiphora. 293 amphibola DEI-GISHym80051 294 nigella PR.523VV 295 parva DEI-GISHym80061 296 paralella 15-269 297 dasiphorae DEI-GISHym20587 298 malaisei DEI-GISHym80112 (arrow indicates a notch) 299 fausta DEI-GISHym31714 300 mollis DEI-GISHym31040 301 tetrica DEI-GISHym20946 302 tenuiserra 15-300.
Penis valves of Pristiphora micronematica group. 303 DEI-GISHym80246 (arrow indicates a loose membranous region of pseudoceps) 304 sermola DEI-GISHym31580 305 micronematica DEI-GISHym31592 306 atripes DEI-GISHym80249 307 DEI-GISHym31599 308 reuteri DEI-GISHym80250 309 nordmani paratype (DEI-GISHym31677) 310 kontuniemii DEI-GISHym31720, reared ex ovo from Salix daphnoides.
Pristiphora dedeara Liston & Prous, sp. n. and P. cadma. 330 lancet of dedeara holotype (DEI-GISHym80053) 331 lancet of cadma DEI-GISHym80406 (Canada) 332–333 valvula 3 (332) and lancet (333) of cadma
This study was supported by the Swedish Taxonomy Initiative (contract numbers dha 153/2011, dha 2013-146, and dha 2016-25 4.3). Over several years while this project was in progress, many people have helped with their advice, and loans or gifts of material: Emmanuelle Artige, Karel Beneš, Stephan M. Blank, Henri Goulet, John Grearson, Michael Greeff, Christer Hansson, Erik Heibo, Mikk Heidemaa, Tomasz Huflejt, Ewald Jansen, Iiro Kakko, Manfred Kraus, Jean Lacourt, Pierre-Nicolas Libert, Ole Lønnve, Pekka Malinen, Marko Mutanen, Thierry Noblecourt, Jouko Nuorteva, Matti Nuorteva, Henri Savina, Olga Schmidt, Stefan Schmidt, Jean-Claude Streito, Andreas Taeger, Agnièle Touret-Alby, Hege Vårdal, and staff of the Swedish Malaise Trap Project (particularly Mattias Forshage, Kajsa Glemhorn, Dave Karlsson and Pelle Magnusson). Greg Pohl and David R. Smith provided photographs of male specimens of P. abbreviata and P. erichsonii. Dustin Kulanek helped with some of the lab work. Tommi Nyman kindly provided access to some of the sequences newly reported here and Marko Mutanen allowed us to use some of the unpublished barcode sequences. Reviews by Henri Goulet, David R. Smith, Villu Soon, and one anonymous reviewer helped to improve the mansuscript.